Summary
Joy Considine (lead), Kevin Burrell, Simon Francis
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 May 2018
- Inspectors verified
Joy Considine, Kevin Burrell, Simon Francis
- Postcode verified
OX11 7LB
- Name on report verified
Manor School
- URN verified
139755
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The designated safeguarding leader has completed the required training and she ensures that all staff know exactly what to do should they have a concern that a child may be at risk from harm. p.4
- This is largely because there are inconsistencies in the way in which adults deal with poor behaviour. p.5
- Where teaching is weaker, pupils have poor attitudes and do not engage in learning. p.6
- They know that the quality of teaching is not yet consistently strong across the school, and they support the leadership in their efforts to improve outcomes for pupils. p.4
- Several leaders are new to their roles and have not yet gained an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in their subjects. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, including in the early years, p.2
- Improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare by: – improving pupils’ attendance, especially for boys, disadvantaged pupils and those pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities – ensuring that all pupils are taught about how to maintain a healthy and safe p.2
- Since joining the school in September 2017, the headteacher and deputy headteacher have quickly gained an overview of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. p.3
- They have taken action to bring about improvements. p.3
- These are still at a very early stage of development and have not yet had time to bring about all the changes needed. p.3
- Since the previous inspection, there has been significant turbulence in staffing at all levels. p.3
- Several teachers and leaders have left the school and some staff have been on long-term sickness absence. p.3
- There have been changes to leadership roles, including for English and for SEN. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,515
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Manor School Lydalls Close, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 7LB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school has undergone a significant period of instability in recent years, and this had a negative impact on pupils’ academic as well as their personal and social development. Despite current leaders’ efforts to improve the quality of teaching, it is too variable across the school. The significant turnover of staff in some classes has had a detrimental impact on pupils’ learning and behaviour. Pupils do not make consistently good progress in reading, writing and mathematics across the school. It is stronger in key stage 1 than in key stage 2. Where teaching is weaker, pupils do not behave well. The attendance of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities and disadvantaged pupils is below the national average. Several leaders are new to their roles and have not yet gained an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in their subjects. They do not all check that the actions that they
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
have put into place are effective. Teachers do not all make enough use of assessment information to plan work for the range of pupils in their class. As a result, some groups of pupils, including the most able and those who have SEN, do not progress as well as they should. Children in the early years do not make rapid enough progress. This is because learning tasks provided for them are not challenging enough. The curriculum is too narrow and does not provide pupils with enough opportunities to learn subjects other than English and mathematics to any depth. The school has the following strengths The proportion of Year 1 pupils meeting the expected standard in phonics was above average in 2018. This helps pupils to get off to a good start in reading at key stage 1. The proportion of girls who reached the expected standard in reading and writing was above average at the end of Year 6 in 2017. The headteacher and her leadership team have
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
high expectations. They have taken action to improve the quality of teaching in order to raise pupils’ standards. Where teaching is stronger, pupils enjoy learning and make good progress. A large majority of parents say that their children enjoy school and are happy and safe.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of leadership and management, including in the early years, by ensuring that: – leaders carry out an incisive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of their area of responsibility so that they can create plans with specific actions to bring about improvement – subject leaders sharply evaluate the impact of their actions on pupils’ progress to identify what is most effective – leaders develop the curriculum so that pupils study a wide range of subjects in depth – governors provide a high-quality professional challenge to leaders by asking probing questions to gain a greater understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses – leaders improve communications with parents so that they are well informed about the school’s work, and ensure that statutory requirements for maintaining the website are met. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, including in the early years,
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
by ensuring that: – teachers consistently use assessment information to plan work that is matched to the learning needs of all pupils, including those who are most able as well as those who have SEN and/or disabilities – teachers have secure subject knowledge so that they can deepen pupils’ understanding – the school’s marking and feedback policy is applied more consistently so that pupils know what they need to do to improve their work – teachers move pupils on to harder work when they have demonstrated that they can achieve the learning tasks set – teachers provide pupils with more opportunities to use their English and mathematical skills when learning in other subjects. Improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare by: – improving pupils’ attendance, especially for boys, disadvantaged pupils and those pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities – ensuring that all pupils are taught about how to maintain a healthy and safe
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
lifestyle, including how they may stay safe from external dangers related to modern technology – implementing the school’s behaviour and rewards system consistently so that pupils are clearer about what is acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Since joining the school in September 2017, the headteacher and deputy headteacher have quickly gained an overview of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They have taken action to bring about improvements. These are still at a very early stage of development and have not yet had time to bring about all the changes needed. Since the previous inspection, there has been significant turbulence in staffing at all levels. Several teachers and leaders have left the school and some staff have been on long-term sickness absence. There have been changes to leadership roles, including for English and for SEN. There had been a decline in the quality of teaching, pupils’ learning and achievement, and in pupils’ behaviour, since the previous inspection. The headteacher and her deputy headteacher are ambitious and they have high expectations. Together with the leadership team and governors, they are taking rapid action to reverse this decline.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
School leaders have taken decisive action to bring about improvements to the quality of education. They have introduced a new system to address pupils’ behaviour, and this is already bringing about improvements. They have observed the quality of teaching and provided helpful guidance to strengthen teachers’ skills. They have acted rapidly to address and manage previously weak teaching. However, they are not complacent and know that more needs to be done to improve outcomes for all pupils. Some middle leaders do not carry out an incisive evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses in their subjects, and so they do not all know precisely what needs to be improved. As a result, some of the actions that they put into place are not always effective. Subject leaders do not always evaluate the impact of the actions that they have put into place to identify what works well, and where further work is needed.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The headteacher introduced a robust programme to check the quality of teaching. She has introduced a formal system to appraise the work of teachers. She has ensured that all teachers are now accountable for pupils’ progress. This has brought about some improvement but there are still inconsistencies across the school. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is stronger in key stage 1 than it is in key stage 2. Leaders have reviewed the way in which the pupil premium funding is used. They have identified the barriers that some pupils have to learning and are helping them to overcome these. Teachers are now aware of the needs of their disadvantaged pupils and their progress is showing early signs of improvement. However, the gap between the outcomes of disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally remains too large, and is slow to diminish. Although the school provides opportunities for pupils to learn subjects other than
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
English and mathematics, the activities provided are often too simple and do not allow pupils to deepen their knowledge and understanding. The way in which the curriculum is planned does not ensure that learning builds from one year to the next, and so does not develop knowledge and skills effectively. Pupils have a clear understanding of right and wrong, and they are largely supportive of each other. They speak enthusiastically about Forest School, where they learn a variety of social and practical skills that help to prepare them well for life in modern Britain. School assemblies add to their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Parents who responded to the online survey and posted comments on free text expressed mixed views about the school. While a number were positive and praised the actions taken by the new leadership team, a significant number expressed concerns about lack of communication. They do not feel well informed about what is going on in
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
school or their child’s progress. Many were concerned about the disruption over the past two years. They felt that some leaders were not responsive to their concerns.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors are committed to the school and are ambitious to bring about necessary improvements. They know that the quality of teaching is not yet consistently strong across the school, and they support the leadership in their efforts to improve outcomes for pupils. They visit school regularly and so they see for themselves how the school runs on a day-to-day basis. They say that they are now provided with detailed information from the headteacher, so they have a clearer understanding of the school’s performance than they did in the past. This allows them to provide a greater level of challenge to school leaders. However, they do not yet probe or question information at a deeper level, and this limits their ability to make a strategic contribution to school improvement planning. Governors review statutory policies regularly and ensure that arrangements for safeguarding pupils are effective. However, they have not ensured that the school
p.4
Governance of the school
meets responsibilities for maintaining a website containing statutory information. New governors have brought valuable skills to the governing body and are well placed to move the school forward. Following discussion and research, they are planning to join a multi-academy trust to provide an effective support network for the school.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. School leaders have ensured that systems for keeping pupils safe are robust. Careful checks are made to ensure that all staff are suitable to work with pupils and that they receive appropriate training when they join the school. All visitors to the school are carefully checked and they are required to comply with the school’s safeguarding policy. The designated safeguarding leader has completed the required training and she ensures that all staff know exactly what to do should they have a concern that a child may be at risk from harm. Leaders work in close cooperation with other professionals to ensure that vulnerable pupils and their families receive the right support in a timely way. Pupils say that they feel safe in school. They know that there are a small number of pupils who find it difficult to manage their behaviour, but they show understanding
p.4
Safeguarding
towards these pupils. Pupils say that most adults help if a situation gets out of hand, and they are confident that their concerns will be taken seriously. Through the curriculum and assemblies, pupils are taught to stay safe from external dangers, including those relating to modern technology. However, pupils struggled to articulate clearly how to keep themselves safe from harm when using modern devices.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is too variable across the school. While there are pockets of good teaching, too much remains that requires improvement. Teachers do not all use assessment information to plan work that meets the learning needs of the different groups of pupils in their class. There is too little challenge for the most able pupils, because teachers do not have high enough expectations for what these pupils can do. Frequently, pupils of all abilities have very similar work to do. Some teachers do not have secure subject knowledge and so they do not explain clearly enough to pupils what they are to learn. They are unable to probe pupils’ understanding and develop their learning to greater depth. Pupils themselves say that work is often too easy and that they do not have enough work to do. In some classes, teachers use questions effectively to explore how well pupils
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
understand and so they adjust the lesson accordingly. However, this is not uniform across the school and there are too many times when teachers’ questions are limited in scope and do not give pupils the opportunities to show how much they know. Work in pupils’ books is not always presented to a good enough standard. The work provided for them is often repetitive, and this slows pupils’ progress. Although teachers have an overview of how well pupils are doing, they do not all follow the school’s policy to provide clear guidance about how they may improve their work. The teaching of reading has been more successful than in writing. The leadership team introduced a new programme to teach phonics, and this is leading to pupils in key stage 1 developing a greater confidence in reading. In some classes, teachers do not always explain clearly or show pupils what it is they are to learn. They do not all consider the specific knowledge, skills and understanding
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
that pupils need to acquire. Where teaching is more successful, lessons are well planned and have clear outcomes in mind. Teachers show enthusiasm and present their lessons in a way that captures pupils’ interest and imagination. In these lessons, pupils make good progress.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. This is largely because there are inconsistencies in the way in which adults deal with poor behaviour. Pupils speak of the confidence that they have in some adults but say that, should they have a problem, a successful solution depends on who they speak to. Although the school has put in place initiatives to improve pupils’ attendance, it remains below average. Boys, disadvantaged pupils and those pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities have lower rates of attendance than other pupils. Most pupils are friendly, courteous and polite. They get on well together and they enjoy talking to visitors about their school. Lunchtimes are very well organised and the school meets the needs of those pupils who have food allergies very well. They have been thoughtful in making special arrangements that help these pupils to feel included.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Some older pupils have been appointed to posts of responsibility, such as house captains and prefects. They speak proudly of their roles and they take their responsibilities seriously. Pupils do not show a deep understanding of healthy lifestyles or the importance of eating the right food and taking regular exercise in order to stay healthy. Although they attended an assembly about staying safe online, few could articulate the reasons why they need to take care when using modern technology.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Where teaching is weaker, pupils have poor attitudes and do not engage in learning. They show signs of boredom and fidget and chat among themselves. Pupils do not all take enough pride in their work, and this is reflected in the quality of presentation seen in their books. It is often untidy and poorly presented. Most pupils like the new behaviour system, although some report that rewards are often given for little effort. A significant minority of parents who responded to the online survey, or wrote comments using the free-text service, did not feel that the school manages pupils’ behaviour well. They reported that rewards are often given for little effort and that those pupils who behaved well often felt missed out. The headteacher has introduced tracking systems to monitor pupils’ behaviour. This shows that the number of reported incidents has reduced considerably since
p.6
Behaviour
September. There are very few reported incidents of bullying. Pupils say that they have a good understanding of bullying but that it rarely occurs. The number of pupils who are temporarily excluded from school has reduced during this academic year.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Require improvement
Pupils’ learning is inconsistent across the school. It varies widely between classes, year- groups and subjects. Consequently, pupils do not achieve as well as they should, particularly in writing and mathematics. Their learning in other subjects is not strong, because the activities they carry out are often superficial and do not deepen their understanding. The work in pupils’ books reflects the turbulence in staffing over recent years, particularly for the older pupils. The quality of learning has been inconsistent, so that they have not built up their skills and understanding systematically as they move from one year-group to the next. Pupils get off to a good start in writing at key stage 1. They write neatly and fluently and express their ideas and thoughts with confidence. Their spelling is mainly accurate and they use punctuation to write with meaning and expression. However, this good start is not maintained across key stage 2, where their progress in writing slows. Their
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Require improvement
work is mostly untidy, showing poor handwriting, spelling and punctuation. Although the overall picture in attainment and progress in 2017 looked to be close to the national average, this was largely inflated by the attainment of girls. The proportion of girls who reached the expected standard in reading and writing was above average. However, the proportion of boys who reached the expected standard was below average. The attainment and progress for disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities was well below average in each of reading, writing and mathematics. Current performance information and work in pupils’ books show that girls remain ahead of boys, particularly in writing. This is largely due to the poor behaviour and attitude of some boys in class. Boys take less care with their work and so consequently make unnecessary errors. The new leader for SEN has introduced changes to the way in which pupils who have
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Require improvement
SEN and/or disabilities are provided for. She is supporting teachers to identify the specific needs of these pupils. She has liaised with staff to provide more precise interventions to help these pupils to catch up with their classmates. Information recorded shows that they are now making more progress than they did in previous years in all subjects. The most able pupils do not reach the higher levels of which they are capable. This is because they are not provided with work that is at a sufficiently high enough level. This is particularly the case in mathematics, where they do not have enough opportunities to apply their numeracy skills to solve complex written problems. While pupils competently carry out calculations, there are too few occasions when they have to explain and give reasons for their answers, and this prevents them from applying their skills at a deeper level. Pupils at key stage 1 progress more rapidly than they do at key stage 2. In these
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Require improvement
classes, teachers provide them with some challenging activities that extend their learning, allowing them to understand in greater depth. In the 2017 assessments, the percentage of pupils reaching a greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics was broadly in line with pupils nationally. The proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in phonics has increased year- on-year and is above the national average. This provides pupils with a good start in reading. Pupils across the school enjoy reading. Pupils in Year 6 say that they like books that are exciting and have a moral to them. In Year 2, pupils read with good understanding and respond confidently to questions by referring to what they have read.
p.7
Early years provision Require improvement
The early years provision requires improvement because there are too many inconsistencies in the provision and outcomes for children across the three classes. The proportion of children reaching a good level of development has improved year-on- year and was broadly average in 2017. However, few children reached a greater depth, which shows that the most able children do not progress as rapidly as they should. Girls do much better than boys and disadvantaged children do not do as well as other children. In some classes, adults have a secure understanding of the learning needs of young children. They plan activities that support children’s learning well, allowing them to make good progress. However, there are times when children spend too long without adult intervention and so valuable learning opportunities are lost. Although adults observe children and note what they achieve, this information is not
p.7
Early years provision Require improvement
routinely used to plan work that builds systematically on what they know and can do. Consequently, they do not make progress rapidly enough across all areas of learning. Some areas of the early years are cluttered and untidy and, consequently, children are unclear about the choice of activities available to them. The outdoor provision is underdeveloped and does not support effective learning. Adults have established warm relationships with children. As a result, children are confident and they feel safe in school. They know that adults will help them. Children are well behaved and get on very well together. They share and take turns and work and play very well together. The early years leader has gained a secure understanding of the provision and has plans to improve the learning environment and the quality of teaching. She has a clear understanding of the quality of teaching and works alongside other staff to help to
p.8
Early years provision Require improvement
develop their skills. This is already leading to some improvement, but the leader knows that more needs to be done to develop the roles of support staff and to ensure that a higher proportion of boys reach a good level of development.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address office.2597@manor-didcot.oxon.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 22 March 2016
p.9
Information about this school
The school does not comply with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish. The website is currently under reconstruction. The school is much larger than most primary schools. Pupils are taught in mixed-age classes in some year groups. There is provision for children in the early years in three Reception classes. There has been significant turbulence in staffing at all levels since the previous inspection. The headteacher and deputy headteacher joined the school in September 2017. Several staff have left or joined the school in the past two years. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is similar to that found in most primary schools The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is similar to the national average. Most pupils are White British and very few speak English as an additional language. The school meets the government’s floor standards, which set out the minimum
p.9
Information about this school
expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress at the end of key stage 2.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The inspectors observed pupils working in all classes. Most of these observations were carried out jointly with members of the senior leadership team. They spoke to pupils about their learning and they looked at work in their books. Inspectors listened to some pupils read, and talked with them about their reading. Inspectors held meetings with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders and teachers who are new to the profession. They met with representatives from the governing body, including the chair of governors. Inspectors met with small groups of pupils and spoke to them informally in the playground and at lunchtimes. They observed pupils’ behaviour in class and as they moved around the school. Among the documents scrutinised were school development plans, information relating to pupils’ behaviour and safety and the school’s own observations of teaching and learning. Inspectors also reviewed minutes of meetings of the governing body.
p.11
Information about this inspection
Inspectors met informally with parents during the inspection and they took into account the 81 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View, including many free-text comments. They considered 27 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey.
p.11
Inspection team
Joy Considine, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Simon Francis Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion