Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Peter Pan Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Allyson Watts and Ruth Edbrooke-Stainer Partnership
- Group reference verified
RP910458
- Inspection date verified
15 May 2018
- Inspectors verified
Tracy Bartholomew
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GU32 3EB
- Name on report verified
Peter Pan Pre-School
- URN verified
109793
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not maintain an accurate record of children's attendance as required, to fully promote children's welfare. p.1
- This is a breach of the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the associated Childcare Register. p.1
- Staff do not consistently help children to understand why certain rules are in place for the daily tasks and routines in which they are involved. p.1
- At times, some staff do not give children sufficient time to think and respond to questions, to develop their own ideas and solve problems. p.1
- Staff have a good relationship with the children and know them well. p.1
- They plan a good amount of activities to help support children's ongoing learning and development. p.1
- Staff observe and track children's learning and development well. p.1
- Staff focus on children's next steps in their development well to ensure that they are all making good ongoing progress. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development3
“Recruitment, supervision and mentoring procedures are now robust.” p.3Communication & language2
“Staff support children's communication, language, and investigative skills well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 697
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Peter Pan Pre-School Methodist Church Hall, Station Road, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU32 3EB
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 15 May 2018 29 November 2017
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Good 2
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Staff do not maintain an accurate record of children's attendance as required, to fully promote children's welfare. This is a breach of the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the associated Childcare Register. Staff do not consistently help children to understand why certain rules are in place for the daily tasks and routines in which they are involved. At times, some staff do not give children sufficient time to think and respond to questions, to develop their own ideas and solve problems.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff have a good relationship with the children and know them well. They plan a good amount of activities to help support children's ongoing learning and development. Outcomes for children are good. Staff observe and track children's learning and development well. Staff focus on children's next steps in their development well to ensure that they are all making good ongoing progress. Partnerships with parents are strong. For example, staff ensure parents receive verbal feedback about their children's day to support continuity.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure the daily record of attendance contains the names of the children being cared for on the premises and their actual hours of attendance. 15/06/2018
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
create more opportunities to help children understand why rules are in place create more opportunities to challenge children's thinking, and encourage them to solve problems and come up with their own ideas.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the activities and learning experiences available to children. The inspector observed interactions between children and staff and interacted with the children as they played. The inspector spoke to some parents and considered their views and opinions of the provision. The inspector asked staff questions about their work and observed practice with the manager. The inspector sampled documentation and undertook a joint observation with one of the managers.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The management team has made lots of improvements since the last inspection. However, it has failed to ensure that all legal requirements are met. For example, staff do not record the times that children leave the setting, to maintain an accurate record of children's attendance. This has minimal impact on children's welfare. Safeguarding is effective. Staff are aware of the signs, indicators and procedures to follow in the event of a child protection concern. Recruitment, supervision and mentoring procedures are now robust. All staff benefit from regular appraisals, staff meetings and suitable training to update their skills. For example, some staff have recently received training on the early years foundation stage, which has helped them to improve the quality of teaching.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
The manager reviews children's progress to ensure any gaps in children's learning are identified and supported well. Staff provide a good range of activities which supports children's interests and promote their learning. For example, children enjoy pretending to bake cakes from dough and decorate them artistically with various materials. Staff support children's communication, language, and investigative skills well. For example, during the inspection, children enjoyed exploring with ingredients to make a volcano. They talked with, and listened to, the staff about how they got the 'lava' to spill out of the science bottles. However, at times, staff do not allow children enough time to think and respond to their questions, so they can develop their ideas.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Weaknesses in leadership and management regarding accurate record-keeping have an impact on the quality of the provision for children's welfare. Staff support children's emotional development well through suitable praise. However, at times, not all staff help children to learn the consequences of their behaviour and why certain routines need to be followed. For example, not all children are taught why they should sit down on chairs and walk inside, which results in some children not doing this. Staff provide a range of healthy snacks, and encourage children's self-help and care skills well. For instance, children are encouraged to serve their own snacks and are encouraged to wipe their own noses. Children have daily opportunities for fresh air and exercise.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
All children are developing good skills needed for their next stages of learning. For instance, children become excited as they correctly recall numbers and shapes when they play and explore with dough and construction materials. Children have fun being physically active. For example, they enjoy climbing and exploring on the indoor climbing frame, and have fun as they dance and move their bodies energetically when singing with friends.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 109793 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 1119531 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 37 Name of registered person Allyson Watts and Ruth Edbrooke-Stainer Partnership
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 29 November 2017 Telephone number 07851013312
p.4
reference number
Peter Pan Pre-School registered in 2000. It is located in Petersfield, Hampshire. The pre- school is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The pre-school is open term time only, Monday to Thursday between 8am and 2.55pm. It is closed on Fridays. There are five members of staff who work directly with the children, including the manager who holds a relevant level 3 early years qualification.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion