Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Setting

Inspected 6 Dec 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    6 Dec 2007

  • Name on report verified

    Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 6% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedexcellenteffectiveeffectivelymake good progressstrengthsstrength
Criticisminadequateinsufficientweaknessnot alwaysseriousweaknesseslowinsufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings958w−42
  • Leadership783w+2

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Inspection number 317807 Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection

p.1

Adult Learning Inspectorate Inspection Report 9 January 2007 Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007

p.1

Contents

Background information ......................................................................................................... 3 Description of the provider...................................................................................................... 4 Grades ....................................................................................................................................... 4 About the reinspection............................................................................................................. 6 Areas of Learning..................................................................................................................... 7 Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 3 of 9

p.2

Overall effectiveness

The grades given for areas of learning and leadership and management will be used to arrive at a judgement about the overall effectiveness of the provider.

p.3

Overall effectiveness

An outstanding provider should typically have leadership and management and at least half the areas of learning judged to be a grade 1. All area of learning grades will be graded 1 or 2.

p.3

Overall effectiveness

A good provider should have leadership and management and at least half of the area of learning grades judged to be a grade 2 or better. A good training provider should not have any grade 4s, and few grade 3s in the areas of learning.

p.3

Overall effectiveness

A satisfactory provider should have adequate or better grades in leadership and management and at least two thirds of the area of learning grades. An adequate provider might have a range of grades across areas of learning, some of which might be graded 4.

p.3

Overall effectiveness

Provision will normally be deemed to be inadequate where more than one third of the area of learning grades and/or leadership and management is judged to be inadequate.

p.3

Overall effectiveness

Inspectors use a four-point scale to summarise their judgements about the quality of provision in occupational/curriculum areas and Jobcentre Plus programmes, as well as to summarise their judgements about the quality of learning sessions. The same scale is used to describe the quality of leadership and management, which includes equality of opportunity and quality assurance. The descriptors for the four grades are:

p.3

Overall effectiveness

 Grade 1 – Outstanding  Grade 2 – Good  Grade 3 – Satisfactory  Grade 4 – Inadequate Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 4 of 9

p.3

Description of the provider

1. The Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme centre is based in the public library of the Staffordshire town, within the West Midlands region of the UfI. It is one of a network of 28 learndirect centres throughout the United Kingdom operated by Exchange Group. The centre provides training in skills for life and information and communications technology (ICT). At the time of the reinspection there were 13 learners on ICT courses. Exchange Group also runs a variety of other publicly- and privately-funded training programmes.

p.4

Description of the provider

2. All ICT learners attend the centre for their training. They aim to achieve a qualification or other personal learning goals. The centre promotes its provision through word of mouth, direct marketing, and through referrals from the library and Jobcentre Plus.

p.4

Description of the provider

3. Newcastle-under-Lyme is in north Staffordshire close to Stoke on Trent. The area comprises densely populated urban areas and a large rural area. The borough has some areas of serious deprivation. Keele University is nearby and there is a large student population. Approximately 3.5% of the local population are from minority ethnic groups and 25% are qualified to levels 4 or 5.

p.4

Grades

grade1= outstanding, grade 2= good, grade 3= satisfactory, grade 4= inadequate

p.4

Leadership and management 3

Contributory grades: Equality of opportunity 3 Quality improvement 3

p.4

Information and communications technology 4

Contributory areas: Number of learners Contributory grade learndirect 12 4

p.4

Preparation for life and work 2

Contributory areas: Number of learners Contributory grade learndirect 16 2

p.4

Information and communications technology 3

Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 5 of 9

p.5

Information and communications technology 3

Contributory areas: Number of learners Contributory grade learndirect 13 3 Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 6 of 9

p.5

About the reinspection

4. The reinspection covered the provision of information and communication technology (ICT). No other aspects of learndirect provision were inspected or graded. At the previous inspection ICT was inadequate. At reinspection the provision in this area was satisfactory. At the previous inspection the overall effectiveness of the provision was satisfactory. Following the reinspection this remains unchanged.

p.6

About the reinspection

Number of inspectors 2 Number of inspection days 4 Number of learners interviewed 7 Number of staff interviewed 8 Number of employers interviewed 0 Number of locations/sites/learning centres visited 1 Number of visits to the provider 1 Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 7 of 9

p.6

Information and communications technology 3

Number of learners Contributory grade learndirect 13 3

p.7

Information and communications technology 3

5. Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme centre offers ICT training at levels 1 and 2. From the start of the contract with the UfI on 1 August 2006, up to 31 October 2007, a total of 324 learners enrolled on ICT courses. Of those learners who have completed their programme since 1 August 2007, 32 achieved a qualification and 45 were working towards other personal learning goals.

p.7

Information and communications technology 3

The following strengths and weaknesses were identified during this reinspection:

p.7

Information and communications technology 3

 Good use of targets for each learning session  Effective initial assessment and guidance  Good use of management information to monitor progress

p.7

Information and communications technology 3

 Insufficient proactive support and feedback for learners  Insufficient emphasis on teaching and learning in self-assessment

p.7

rate (%)

ICT 2006/07 275 248 47 6 2007/08* 49 44 77 4

p.7

rate (%)

Note: 2007/08* data is ‘part year’ only and is representative of the first 3 months of the UfI Sheffield contract year

p.7

rate (%)

6. Success rates for learners on ICT courses have improved over a period of six months and were 77% in the three-month period from August 2007. This is substantially higher than the success rates at the time of the previous inspection, which were 39%. However, since August 2007, the completion of personal learning goals has counted as success. Learners make good progress towards their qualification or personal learning goals, helped by the introduction of a system of targets for each session they spend in the centre. The targets are agreed between the learner and a tutor. Progress is reviewed against the targets at the end of the session. This strength was identified through self-assessment. Withdrawal rates have also improved and are low. 7. Learners enjoy their programmes and substantially improve their confidence in their ability to learn ICT skills, often from a low starting point. They acquire a satisfactory level

p.7

rate (%)

of ICT skills during their training, contributing to their economic and social wellbeing. However, they are not always confident in their use of skills they have learnt earlier. Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 8 of 9

p.7

The quality of provision

8. Initial assessment and guidance are effective. All ICT learners complete initial assessments in numeracy and literacy as well as in ICT. These are used to identify any additional support needs before undertaking the relevant ICT programme. The necessary support is given by qualified staff. Learners are then well equipped to cope with the demands of their programme.

p.8

The quality of provision

9. The learning centre is well located in the centre of town and is easily accessible. It has an adequate standard of accommodation, although workstations have little space. Computers are of sufficient specification. They are reliable and provide good connectivity to learndirect systems. Opening times are limited to those of the library within which the centre is located, which restricts access for learners in full time employment.

p.8

The quality of provision

10. Learners are very satisfied with the quality of the learndirect learning materials used to support their programme. A comprehensive set of additional materials are available and used by learners, some drawn from other sources and some devised by the provider’s staff.

p.8

The quality of provision

11. Tutors are not always sufficiently proactive in offering support to learners or checking that they are learning. Many learners adopt a trial and error approach to passing assignments by answering the multiple choice questions repeatedly until they get the answer right. This weakness was not identified through self-assessment. Tutors provide clear explanations when learners ask for help. The satisfaction of learners with their support, measured in a recent survey, has fallen. There is insufficient awareness or use of the feedback for learners from their tutor that is available on the learndirect system. Little use is made of verbal feedback given during sessions. Learners rely mainly on the brief feedback to be found on the target sheet, reviewed at the end of each session. It does not adequately reinforce or consolidate the learning or help learners to improve their performance.

p.8

The quality of provision

12. Since the previous inspection staff have acquired qualifications in ICT. They are now adequately qualified in ICT and many have themselves completed the learndirect programmes they provide.

p.8

The quality of provision

13. Health and safety is covered at induction and is reinforced by posters and notices around the centre. Learners are reminded by staff of the need for correct posture and frequent breaks during their work and they understand all the aspects of health and safety as it applies to the centre. Reinspection report: Exchange Group Newcastle-under-Lyme Centre Reinspection, 6 December 2007 9 of 9

p.8

The quality of provision

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.9

Leadership and management

14. The progress of ICT learners is monitored effectively. The system in use for monitoring progress of skills for life learners at the time of the previous inspection has been extended to include ICT. A comprehensive range of management information is used very effectively to manage training. Exchange Group has designed and developed its own computer management information systems, matched to the needs of the learning centre and its head office.

p.9

Leadership and management

15. The communications between Exchange Group managers and centre staff were excellent at the previous inspection and have improved further. There are more frequent meetings between senior managers in London and the staff in Newcastle-under-Lyme. Quality monitoring has increased.

p.9

Leadership and management

16. Teaching and learning is insufficiently addressed in self-assessment. Self-assessment in ICT is based on too narrow a range of evidence, predominantly the success rates. The most recent full self-assessment report was produced in August 2007, based on the views of managers and staff, and the feedback of learners. ICT was judged to be unsatisfactory. The main weakness identified in the self-assessment was the continuing low success rates. An update before the reinspection indicated a rise of the self-assessment grade by two grades as a result of the improved success rates in the previous three months.

p.9

Leadership and management

17. The promotion of learners’ understanding of equality of opportunity has been improved since the previous inspection. Learners’ understanding of equality of opportunity is satisfactory. They are well aware of how they should expect to be treated and what to do if they believe they have been unfairly treated. Less emphasis is placed on learners’ responsibility towards other people.

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion