Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Wales High School

Inspected 2 May 2018 · published 30 May 2018 · URN 136331

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    2 May 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Shaw

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S26 5QQ

  • Name on report verified

    Wales High School

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsvery effectivestrongeffectiveimprovingimprovedconsistentlystrengths
Criticismweaknessespersistent absenceinconsistencynot strongbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1424w+67
  • What needs to improve95w+81

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,509
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Guiseppe Di’Iasio Headteacher Wales High School Storth Lane Kiveton Park Sheffield South Yorkshire S26 5QQ

p.1

Short inspection of Wales High School

Following my visit to the school on 2 May 2018 with Ofsted Inspectors Tudor Griffiths and Gordon Watts, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in April 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Wales High School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Together with governors, you are resolutely committed to the school’s further improvement. You are not complacent about any of the school’s successes and strengths. Equally, you have a very accurate and honest understanding of where you need to do more work to further improve the school. Crucially, you have already started to take the necessary steps to address these areas.

p.1

Short inspection of Wales High School

Following the last inspection, you took decisive action to improve the consistency in middle leadership. A significant number of middle leaders are now nationally recognised as leaders in their subject areas, and they provide support to other schools. Recent changes to how you monitor pupils’ progress have enabled middle leaders to take more responsibility for the quality of teaching in their subject areas. As a result, while there is still work to do, there is growing consistency in the quality of teaching, so that pupils’ achievement is now in line with national averages over time.

p.1

Short inspection of Wales High School

You also addressed weaknesses in the quality of school improvement plans. Your thorough and honest self-evaluation accurately identifies the areas in school which require continued focus. This clarity of understanding has enabled you to implement an improvement plan which provides leaders and governors with the means to monitor and evaluate progress against each of the identified actions. As a consequence, governors are able to hold you to account for how well pupils are doing.

p.1

Short inspection of Wales High School

You have rightly identified the progress of disadvantaged pupils and of boys as the main areas of focus. However, you have already taken steps to address these priorities. You have appointed additional staff, for instance, to lead the development of boys’ progress, and you have detailed plans for how best to use the pupil premium funding. You know that there is more work to be done, including improving the attendance of disadvantaged pupils, but these actions are leading to improving outcomes for these groups of pupils.

p.2

Short inspection of Wales High School

You also acknowledge that standards dipped in English for pupils who left Year 11 in 2017. You acted quickly to gain a full understanding of why and how this happened, and you put a number of actions into place to bring standards up again. As a result, there are clear signs of strong improvement in English.

p.2

Short inspection of Wales High School

In the sixth form, you have taken action to further improve outcomes in 2018. Although achievement in 2017 was in line with national averages, you acknowledge that this was not as strong as in the previous two years. You have a clear understanding of why this is the case. You have taken action, and there is evidence of very effective teaching in the sixth form as a result.

p.2

Short inspection of Wales High School

You and other leaders have worked with persistence and diligence to maintain and improve levels of attendance and persistent absence, which are better than the national averages. Similarly, over several years you have maintained a rate of fixed- term exclusion, which is below the national average. Pupils told us that behaviour around school and in lessons is good most of the time and, indeed, inspectors saw high standards of pupil conduct throughout the inspection. You acknowledge that the school faces some challenging behaviour from a few pupils  a view shared by a small proportion of parents, carers and staff  and that this remains a priority for you.

p.2

Short inspection of Wales High School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. The procedures around the recruitment and vetting of staff are appropriate. Leaders have made sure that all adults in the school are up to date with the necessary safeguarding training.

p.2

Short inspection of Wales High School

Those responsible for child protection arrangements, including the plans for children looked after by the local authority, ensure that records are thorough, with all actions taken in a timely manner and accurately logged. There are strong links with external agencies, including the local authority children’s services and health services.

p.2

Short inspection of Wales High School

Leaders maintain appropriate communication with the relevant staff at the alternative education provision used by the school, including daily attendance checks and fortnightly progress reviews. You have acted decisively in responding to the needs of your pupils, such as training 18 staff as mental health first aiders. You have also enabled the development of the ‘Be-U-Tiful LGBTQ support and awareness group’. As a consequence of this and other work, pupils told us that the school is a tolerant place, and that they feel safe there. They told us that bullying is rare, but that if it happens, the school deals with it.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Following a searching examination of standards in English after the dip in 2017, expectations of pupils are high and there is some very effective teaching. In Year 11, for example, pupils’ understanding of the skills required to gain high marks in the unseen poetry examination were systematically and thoroughly developed. As a result, pupils have clarity about what they need to do to achieve top marks.  A similar quality of teaching and high expectations was evident in Year 7 mathematics. Pupils’ understanding of ratios was skilfully established by the effective use of questions. Pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, were challenged to explain their reasoning to the rest of the class. This enabled pupils to grasp the mathematical principles sitting behind the tasks set by the teachers.  While there is strong evidence of high aspirations and pupils knowing what they need to do to improve, there is some inconsistency. This is within and between

p.3

Inspection findings

subjects in the extent to which teachers articulate next steps to pupils, such as Year 9 English and Year 9 science. Additionally, on occasions, such as in Year 8 mathematics and key stage 4 history, expectations of what pupils are capable of achieving are not as high as they could be. Leaders recognise this variability.  Outcomes for boys are improving and the gap with girls is closing, although leaders are not complacent about the job still to be done here. There is some effective work taking place to improve boys’ literacy in Year 7, so that they can better access the curriculum as they move through the school. The parent and sons reading group which takes place after school is encouraging boys to read. As one of them said: ‘I decided to put my phone down and read a book instead.’  Outcomes for disadvantaged pupils are improving, as seen in a range of subjects and years, including English, mathematics, science, religious education, history

p.3

Inspection findings

and geography, as well as in pupils’ work and in the school’s own progress information. This is due to the clarity of leaders’ plans for the use of additional funding for disadvantaged pupils, and in the rigour of the implementation of the plans. You acknowledge that the progress of disadvantaged pupils will continue to be a priority.  Although attendance rates in recent years have been comparable with national averages, as have been persistent absence rates, you have taken effective action to maintain and improve on this positive picture. You have focused especially on disadvantaged pupils because their attendance as a group is not as good as other pupils in the school. As a result of your actions, the attendance of disadvantaged pupils is improving. You recognise that although there are often complex circumstances around the attendance of some pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, there is more work to be done to bring their

p.3

Inspection findings

attendance in line with the rest of the school.  In the sixth form, there is some very effective teaching in a range of subjects. In a Year 12 religious education lesson, for example, the teacher’s skilful use of questions deepened and stretched students’ knowledge and understanding about the word of God. High expectations of what students can achieve were evident in a Year 12 physics lesson about momentum, a Year 12 geology lesson about trilobites and a Year 13 English lesson on ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’. Students told inspectors, though, that sometimes the work can be less challenging than they would like.

p.4

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 pupils’ progress is further improved by the consistent communication of next steps and of consistently high expectations  students’ progress in the sixth form is further improved by consistently high expectations  the focus on the progress and attendance of disadvantaged pupils, and the progress of boys, continues to be a priority.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During this one-day inspection, I met with you and other senior leaders. I also met with members of the governing body. An inspector met with a group of subject leaders. Members of the inspection team met with groups of pupils from key stages 3, 4 and 5 and also spoke informally with them around the school. Inspectors met with the leaders responsible for safeguarding, the sixth form, teaching and learning, pupil premium funding, and attendance and behaviour. We conducted joint visits to lessons with you, the leader of the sixth form and the senior leader responsible for teaching and learning. During these visits to lessons, inspectors looked at pupils’ books and spoke with pupils about what they were learning and their progress. Inspectors also visited lessons without senior leaders. Inspectors looked in detail at pupils’ books and folders, both with and without senior leaders present. An inspector listened to pupils reading. I took into account results from Ofsted’s online

p.4

Information about the inspection

questionnaires: Parent View (211 responses), including the 209 free-text responses; the staff survey (74 responses); and the pupil survey (149 responses). We looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, school improvement plans, safeguarding records, behaviour and attendance records, including bullying logs, pupil assessment and progress information, and other documents available on the school website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion