Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 294
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 25, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Summary of complaint
On 17 November 2017 we received information that raised concerns about the provider's ability to safeguard children. At an unannounced inspection, we looked at the concerns to see whether the provider was meeting the early years foundation stage requirements relating to; medicine, first aid, training, support and skills, general information and records matters and information for parents and carers. We found that the provider had failed to implement an effective policy and procedure for administering medicines. She had failed to take into account guidance and information provided by qualified professionals involved in children's care. All staff have completed training in paediatric first aid. However, the provider had failed to ensure staff receive appropriate training where the administration of medicine requires medical or technical knowledge. The provider had also failed to maintain accurate records or to ensure information shared with parents is correct. Following our
p.1
Summary of complaint
inspection, we sent the provider a notice to improve that required her to: implement an effective policy and procedures for administering medicines, taking into account any guidance and information provided by qualified professionals involved in children's care. Ensure staff receive appropriate training where the administration of medicine requires medical or technical knowledge; maintain accurate records and ensure information shared with parents is correct so that they can make an informed decision about their children's safety and well-being. The provider remains registered with Ofsted. Complaint
p.1
Publication of complaints
We publish details of complaints made against childminders, home childcarers and childcare providers where we or the provider have taken action in order to meet legal requirements. We publish details of complaints for five years commencing on the date we complete our investigation.
p.1
Publication of complaints
For further information on how we deal with complaints about providers, please view the Early years compliance handbook which can be found here at www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-provider-non-compliance- action-by-ofsted
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion