Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 May 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Cole

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Cole

  • Postcode verified

    BN14 7PR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongwell supportedpositiverichimprovedstrengthsvery well
Criticismshortcomingsrequires improvementfalling behindnot consistentlynot effectivelowerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Full report text

Mr John Gadd Headteacher Thomas A Becket Junior School Glebeside Avenue Worthing BN14 7PR

p.1

Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 2 May 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the monitoring inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Junior School

The monitoring inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and has taken place because the school has received two successive judgements of requires improvement at its previous section 5 inspections.

p.1

Junior School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. Leaders’ evaluations of teaching and learning and of pupils’ progress were reviewed. Leaders and I visited a range of classrooms where I spoke to teachers and pupils. I evaluated a wide range of work in pupils’ books. I met with a representative of the local authority and reviewed their evaluations of the school’s progress. I met representatives of the governing body.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, there have been significant changes in staff. Almost half of the 23 teachers have joined the school since the last inspection. Last year, the Ofsted

p.1

Context

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted school’s leadership and management were restructured. As a result, the school now has two assistant headteachers with responsibility for upper and lower key stage 2.

p.1

Main findings

Leaders have a clear and accurate view of where teaching and learning are consistently strong and where teachers need additional support. Since the last inspection, leaders have significantly increased their presence in the classrooms and their oversight of pupils’ progress. Consequently, leaders have been able to provide effective coaching and training opportunities to better support teachers, including those who are newly qualified. Teachers feel well supported. They now have good subject knowledge and feel more confident to teach, including the teaching of spelling, punctuation and grammar.

p.2

Main findings

Standards are improving. In July 2017, a greater proportion than that nationally of Year 6 pupils reached the expected standards in reading and mathematics. Although more Year 6 pupils reached expected standards in writing in July 2017 compared with 2016, standards in writing remained low.

p.2

Main findings

Current pupils are making more consistent progress in English and mathematics than at the time of the last inspection. Teachers use assessment information well to identify those pupils who are falling behind. These pupils feel well supported and make good progress. The most able pupils are also making better progress. They feel that the level of challenge is ‘just right’ in their lessons. Leaders’ actions to improve teachers’ knowledge regarding mathematics are having a positive impact. Pupils now get a rich range of problems to think about and solve and are becoming more adept at offering sound mathematical reasons for their answers.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders and teachers are working to improve pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar. Work in pupils’ books shows that this work is beginning to have a positive impact on standards in writing. Teachers have consistent expectations of pupils and therefore expectations of pupils’ written work in other subjects across the curriculum are as high as they are for their English work. Pupils develop a wide and rich vocabulary and this has a positive impact on both their creative writing and their ability to infer meaning in what they read.

p.2

Main findings

Governance has improved since the last inspection. Long-standing governors are able to reflect on both historic shortcomings and current strengths. The governing body has been strengthened by strategic recruitment of individuals with specific knowledge and skills. The local authority has provided effective training to ensure that governors, including those who are new, are clear about their roles and responsibilities. Governors now know the strengths and development points within the school very well. They make good use of external reports to hold leaders to account for the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress.

p.2

External support

The local authority provides extensive and effective support to the school. Leaders and governors value the time and resources that the local authority has provided. Last academic year, a seconded additional leader provided strong support for teachers that were not consistently effective. Consequently, teaching and pupils’ learning improved. The local authority has provided expertise in the assessment of writing. This work has ensured that teachers’ assessments of pupils’ work are accurate and that pupils’ spelling, punctuation and grammar are a whole-school focus. The headteacher has been well supported by a national leader of education. All leaders recognise that they are now much more focused on teaching and learning, have established clear ‘non-negotiables’ with staff and check rigorously as to what is happening in the classrooms. Local authority reviews of the effectiveness of the school are comprehensive. As a result, it can accurately identify the

p.3

External support

improvements leaders have made since the last inspection.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the director of children’s services for West Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion