Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Luddenden CofE School
Summary
Philip Riozzi (lead), Mary Lanovy-Taylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Apr 2018
- Inspectors verified
Mary Lanovy-Taylor, Philip Riozzi
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
HX2 6PB
- Name on report verified
Luddenden CofE School
- URN verified
107541
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The headteacher ensures that pupils who are identified as being at risk of harm, or who are being harmed, get the help they need. p.4
- Pupils are reluctant to report this unacceptable behaviour to their teachers. p.5
- The governing body underestimated the significance of the weak progress evident in the Year 6 test outcomes. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- An external review of the use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- The progress of pupils in reading and writing during their time in key stage 2 has declined considerably since the last inspection. p.3
- The proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard in early reading by the end of Year 1 has also declined. p.3
- Staffing difficulties have contributed to this decline. p.3
- However, leaders and governors have not managed to prevent the negative impact on pupils’ achievement. p.3
- Most leaders are inexperienced and/or underdeveloped in their roles. p.3
- They have made minimal contribution to improvement. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment53
“The headteacher has addressed the weakest, inadequate teaching.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 3,129
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Luddenden CofE School Dene View, Luddendenfoot, Halifax, West Yorkshire HX2 6PB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders and governors did not manage to prevent a decline in the progress of pupils in reading and writing in key stage 2. The proportions of Year 1 pupils meeting the expected standard in phonics have diminished. The headteacher is carrying too much of the workload because other leaders are inexperienced. Governors have misjudged the consequences of this. In the last two years, too many pupils by the end of Year 6, especially disadvantaged pupils, have not been prepared well enough for learning in secondary school. The curriculum is broad and balanced. However, teachers’ expectations of what pupils should learn in a range of subjects are too low, including for the most able pupils. Pupils currently in key stages 1 and 2 do not make enough progress, especially in science, in geography and in history. The work teachers plan in a range of subjects is often too hard or too easy for pupils. Too many of the least able pupils are not
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
catching up quickly enough in learning to read and write. The behaviour of a small, but significant, minority of older boys has a disproportionately negative effect on other pupils. Adults do not always deal with incidents of bullying effectively enough. Pupils’ use of homophobic and other offensive language goes undetected by adults. Pupils’ understanding about gender and cultural diversity is limited.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ progress in mathematics over time has been generally good, including for the most able pupils. The headteacher has managed to begin to arrest the decline in pupils’ progress. Most pupils display positive behaviour and attitudes to learning. The headteacher has opened the school’s doors to all pupils, regardless of their needs. She ensures that pupils with the most challenging of problems get the help they need. Leadership and provision in the early years are effective. Children get off to a good start. Most are well prepared for learning in Year 1.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – reviewing the leadership structure and responsibilities to ensure that all essential leadership functions can be effectively managed – continuing to train and coach leaders at all levels so that they contribute effectively to improvements in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment and in pupils’ outcomes – carrying out more regular and routine checks on the quality of teaching and its impact on learning. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that the progress of pupils is consistently good in a wide range of subjects by: – raising teachers’ expectations of what pupils of differing abilities ought to be able to accomplish in each subject – making sure that teachers, when planning learning, take better account of what pupils already know, understand and can do – making sure that the questions teachers ask help pupils to think more deeply
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– making sure that teachers check during lessons that pupils’ work is not too easy or too hard, and that teachers adapt tasks to better match pupils’ needs when necessary – matching reading books better to pupils’ developing phonic knowledge and making sure that the least able readers have reading books well matched to their needs – sharpening the effectiveness of the teaching of phonics in key stage 1 – giving pupils more problems to solve in mathematics and more opportunities to apply mathematics in subjects such as science and geography. Improve pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare by: – more effectively addressing the behaviour of the small minority of pupils who do not conduct themselves well – making sure that adults are more vigilant in detecting bullying and discriminatory and offensive language – increasing pupils’ confidence to report all incidents of bullying and discriminatory and
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
offensive language they observe and/or hear – teaching pupils more effectively about gender and cultural diversity and the consequences to individuals of disrespectful attitudes and behaviours.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The progress of pupils in reading and writing during their time in key stage 2 has declined considerably since the last inspection. The proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard in early reading by the end of Year 1 has also declined. Staffing difficulties have contributed to this decline. However, leaders and governors have not managed to prevent the negative impact on pupils’ achievement. Most leaders are inexperienced and/or underdeveloped in their roles. They have made minimal contribution to improvement. The headteacher is carrying too much of the burden of responsibility. Because of this, vital quality assurance tasks have not been sufficiently rigorous. For example, the checks on the quality of teaching have not been regular enough to secure consistency in the quality of teaching. Leaders’ use of the pupil premium funding has been variable in its impact. There remains too much difference between the achievement of disadvantaged pupils and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
others. Leaders have not evaluated carefully enough the impact of spending on each chosen initiative. The curriculum is broad and balanced in most year groups. Leaders have reviewed the curriculum to secure fuller coverage of the statutory content. However, subject leaders have not evaluated how well teachers teach each subject and how well pupils achieve, for example in science and the humanities. This has resulted in limited pupils’ progress. Leaders have ensured that the curriculum includes content that supports pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. However, nobody has checked that this is having the desired effect. Pupils have a limited knowledge of a range of cultures represented in modern Britain. Older pupils have very little age-appropriate knowledge about gender diversity. Leaders have not managed to secure consistently good behaviour. While most pupils behave well and develop positive attitudes to school, the behaviour of a small, but
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
significant, minority of older boys undermines the extent to which some pupils feel safe. The headteacher has addressed the weakest, inadequate teaching. She has identified the right improvement priorities and taken appropriate action to address weaknesses. This has resulted in some recent improvements. For example, the quality of the teaching of reading and writing in key stage 2 is improving, following staff training and the provision of new resources. However, the limited leadership capacity hampers the rate of progress, which is not rapid enough. The headteacher ensures that teachers regularly review the progress of pupils through testing and other assessments. As a result, leaders know which pupils are falling behind or who ought to be achieving better standards. However, teachers do not make effective use of what this assessment tells them. The local authority recognises the weaknesses in outcomes since the last inspection. It
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
has given the school higher priority for support. The school effectiveness officer has recently provided appropriate challenge and continues to monitor progress.
p.3
Governance of the school
The governing body underestimated the significance of the weak progress evident in the Year 6 test outcomes. Governors have not realised the limited capacity in the leadership team to bring about sustained improvement. Governors take their responsibilities seriously. They have the relevant experience to equip them for governance. They meet regularly and make visits to school to assess progress. Nevertheless, the governing body has an over-optimistic view of improvements. The governing body has investigated potential school improvement partnerships and consulted with parents and carers on the possibility of joining a multi-academy trust. It has erroneously emphasised more what the school can do for others than what others can do to support and challenge their own school to improve.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders ensure that adults are properly vetted before taking up employment. Minor omissions from the record of these checks were corrected during the inspection. Adults understand their safeguarding and child protection responsibilities. They report their concerns to leaders, who keep a proper record so that they can monitor pupils’ safety. The headteacher ensures that pupils who are identified as being at risk of harm, or who are being harmed, get the help they need. However, occasionally the bullying of a small number of pupils by their peers has not been addressed well enough. The energetic headteacher is driven by a strong sense of moral purpose. She has welcomed into the school a number of vulnerable pupils who have complex needs. Despite being overburdened, she ensures that these pupils receive the help, nurturing and care they need.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, in a wide range of subjects, hamper the progress of groups of pupils. Pupils in both key stage 1 and key stage 2 could be reaching higher standards, given the opportunity. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils of different abilities ought to be able to achieve are too low. Too many of the tasks teachers ask pupils to complete do not make enough demands on pupils to deepen their learning. Variability in the quality of teaching is evident in the way some teachers ask questions. Some ask questions that cause pupils to think deeply, while others accept one-word answers or do not help pupils who are struggling to articulate an answer. Teachers do not consistently plan work that helps pupils to make the best progress. Work is often either too easy or too hard. Furthermore, teachers do not consistently check well enough in lessons that the work is just right for pupils, so do not adapt
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
tasks to better match needs. Pockets of strength in teaching exist in some subjects and in some classes. For example, in some classes, teachers help the most able pupils to maintain above-average standards in their writing. However, on the other hand, teachers do not consistently give these pupils opportunities to practise and apply their skills well enough in other subjects. Most teachers help pupils to develop fluency in their number skills. However, they do not then give pupils enough opportunity to apply this understanding to solving mathematical problems, either in mathematics lessons or in other subjects. Teachers generally make ill-considered use of worksheets that do not challenge pupils enough, especially the most able pupils. This is especially so in science, geography and history. Teachers in key stage 1 would benefit from additional training in the teaching of phonics to sharpen their knowledge and skills. In addition, teachers do not properly
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
match reading books to pupils’ developing phonics skills. Teachers have received training in how to teach reading in key stage 2. Because leaders have not checked whether teachers are using the agreed methods effectively, the quality of teaching is variable. One consequence is that the least able readers in key stage 2 are not catching up quickly enough. The books these pupils are asked to read are sometimes too difficult. Leaders have made sure that pupils have a wide variety of quality books from which to choose. Teachers read appealing books to pupils. They have successfully begun to get more pupils interested in reading. This has been less successful in Year 5 and in Year 6, where too many pupils have little interest in reading.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. The large majority of pupils demonstrate positive attitudes to learning. Many pupils take pride in their work. They enjoy positive relationships with adults and with each other. Many pupils greeted inspectors politely and with a smile. Pupils say ‘please’ and ‘thank you’, hold doors open for others and remember to tidy up after themselves. However, pupils reported the regular use of swearing and homophobic language by some that goes unnoticed by adults. Pupils are reluctant to report this unacceptable behaviour to their teachers. While some pupils are satisfied that adults deal with incidents of bullying, others are not. Some pupils reported bullying that went unchecked. A few say that they are reluctant to stand up for victims of bullying for fear of reprisal. A small but significant minority of parents expressed concerns about bullying.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Pupils’ limited understanding about a range of cultures and about gender diversity has resulted in some pupils not understanding the importance of respect for diverse groups. However, pupils demonstrated some knowledge about major world faiths. This is a positive feature of the religious education curriculum. Many pupils show open- minded attitudes to different lifestyles. Pupils learn about how to stay safe in a variety of ways. For example, they know about road, rail and water safety. They learn about healthy eating and about how to keep fit. Older pupils learn about substance and alcohol misuse. However, leaders have not planned these aspects of the curriculum systematically to build pupils’ knowledge progressively over time. This means that some important knowledge is not well enough embedded. For example, not all pupils understand enough about how to stay safe online. Adults provide well for the emotional and mental health of the most vulnerable pupils.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Most pupils conduct themselves well in class and in other areas of the school and grounds. However, a small, but significant, proportion of older boys do not behave well. Pupils reported to inspectors that fighting is common. A small number of older boys dominate certain spaces in the playground that other pupils are inclined to avoid. Play is sometimes not constructive. For example, some boys play boisterously and misuse equipment. Teachers manage the behaviour of the vast majority of pupils well through a system of rewards and sanctions. However, teachers mostly have to resort to managing behaviour rather than successfully teaching in a way that enthuses pupils to learn and to be absorbed in their activities. Most pupils follow adults’ instructions, get on with their work and complete their learning tasks. However, because too much teaching is uninspiring, a small minority of
p.6
Behaviour
pupils disrupt the learning of others. This sometimes goes unnoticed by teachers. Attendance over time has been above average. Persistent absence rates have been low. Absence has risen a little this year, although leaders have managed to sustain at least average attendance.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Too few pupils in the last two years have reached the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined, by the time they left Year 6. Some pupils that met the expected standard in mathematics have not done so in reading and in writing. Teachers have not prepared pupils sufficiently well for secondary school. The Year 6 projections for 2018 are more positive, although some pupils have much to learn and only a short time to catch up. The testing period is imminent. There are signs of improvement in pupils’ progress in reading and writing in a number of year groups across the school. This is less evident in Years 5 and 6, where pupils have experienced earlier much weaker teaching. Variability in the quality of teaching continues to result in inconsistent progress for groups of pupils. The least able pupils, for example in writing in key stage 1, are not catching up quickly, neither are the least able readers in key stage 2.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Over time, the most able pupils have achieved as well as pupils with high prior attainment nationally by the end of Year 6. The large majority of the most able pupils continue to demonstrate above-average attainment, but not in all subjects. This is because teachers do not consistently make strong enough demands on these pupils in science, geography and history, for example. Disadvantaged pupils, over time, have not made as much progress as other pupils nationally. School assessment information suggests that in most year groups disadvantaged pupils are making as much progress as their peers. However, there remains too much difference between the attainment of disadvantaged pupils and others in the school. The special educational needs coordinator makes sure that pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities are identified. The majority make good progress, primarily because of effective one-to-one and small-group support from
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
teaching assistants. However, teachers do not always adapt learning tasks in the classroom well enough to meet the needs of these pupils. A higher proportion of girls currently in the school are on track to reach age- appropriate standards than boys. A small minority of boys currently in the school show negative attitudes to learning, while many girls exhibit especially positive attitudes.
p.7
Early years provision Good
The majority of children enter the school with skills, knowledge and understanding that are generally below those which are typical for their age. A minority are broadly typical on entry. By the time they leave Reception, most children have made good progress, reaching a good level of development, and are ready for learning in Year 1. Children who are eligible for free school meals generally develop as well as other children. A few children each year exceed the early learning goals in some areas of learning, including in reading and in mathematics. No children last year exceeded the writing goals. However, a few have made strong progress and are likely to do so this year. The teaching of basic numeracy and literacy skills in Reception is very effective. The Reception teacher, who is the early years leader, keeps a careful track of children’s developing knowledge and skills and gives them just the right level of challenge to help
p.7
Early years provision Good
them make quick progress in reading, writing and counting. Children’s phonic knowledge develops quickly and they develop conceptual understanding in mathematics. In both the Reception and the Nursery classes, adults plan for all areas of the children’s development. In the Nursery class, particularly well-planned activities and resources engage and challenge children purposefully. When Reception and Nursery children access the same activities and resources independently, sometimes play does not challenge the Reception children well enough. Adults interact with children’s play and exploration effectively to help them solve problems and make choices. They regularly question children to help them think about what they are learning. They correctly model language to build children’s vocabulary. Occasionally, the questions one or two adults ask are less effective at promoting talk and thinking. Adults successfully teach children to behave well. Children learn good manners. They
p.7
Early years provision Good
follow instructions quickly. They tidy up after themselves. The adults are caring and nurturing. They teach children how to look after themselves, for example handwashing. They check that the children are playing safely and that the inside and outside environments are free of hazards. The early years leader, who took up post at the beginning of the current school year, has identified the right improvement priorities. She has successfully increased parents’ involvement in children’s learning and assessment.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Website www.luddenden-ce.calderdale.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Email address admin@luddenden-ce.calderdale.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 16–17 July 2014
p.9
Information about this school
Luddenden CofE School is a smaller than average-sized primary school. Very few pupils speak English as an additional language. The vast majority are of White British heritage. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is below the national average. This varies, as a larger than average proportion of pupils leave and enter the school each year and mid year. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged and receive support from the pupil premium is above the national average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for attainment and progress in English and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed parts of lessons in all classes at least once. Some of these observations took place with school leaders. Inspectors looked at a sample of pupils’ workbooks and talked with pupils about their learning. Inspectors chatted with many pupils informally at breaktimes and at lunchtime. They held formal interviews with groups of pupils to find out what it is like to be a pupil at the school. They observed pupils as they played and socialised. The lead inspector met with a group of five governors. Inspectors held telephone discussions with a representative of the local authority and a representative of the diocese. Meetings were held with the headteacher and most of the teachers and middle leaders. Inspectors questioned several adults about their safeguarding duties. Documents were scrutinised, including the school improvement plan, leaders’ monitoring notes, governing board minutes and notes of the local authority
p.10
Information about this inspection
representative’s visits to the school. Inspectors examined safeguarding and child protection records. Inspectors considered 26 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and 11 written responses from parents. One of the inspectors talked with parents at the beginning of the school day. The responses of 16 members of staff to the online staff survey were considered. There were no responses to the online pupil survey.
p.10
Inspection team
Philip Riozzi, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Mary Lanovy-Taylor Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion