Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Woodham Burn Community Primary School

Inspected 25 Apr 2018 · published 23 May 2018 · URN 109302

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Karine Hendley (lead), Deborah Ashcroft

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Apr 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Deborah Ashcroft, Karine Hendley

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DL5 4EX

  • Name on report verified

    Woodham Burn Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    109302

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyimprovedhigh expectationsrapid progressstrongmake good progressgood progress
Criticismrequires improvementinconsistenciesvariableinconsistentconcernsnot consistentlybelowlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings752w−31
  • Leadership136w−9
  • Safeguarding179w+77
  • What needs to improve2117w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
3,114
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 55%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Woodham Burn Community Primary School Humphrey Close, Newton Aycliffe, County Durham DL5 4EX

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders have not acted swiftly enough to address weaknesses in teaching, learning and assessment. As a result, the quality of teaching across the school is inconsistent.  Leaders’ checks on the quality of teaching and learning focus on compliance with school policy, rather than improving pupils’ learning. As a result, leaders’ plans lack the precision needed to drive school improvement rapidly.  In 2017, pupils’ outcomes at the end of each key stage were below the national average in reading, writing and mathematics. Writing outcomes at key stage 2 have been in the bottom 20% of schools for two years.  Governors’ evaluation of the school’s performance is overly generous. This prevents governors from holding school leaders to account effectively.  Governors are not accurately evaluating the impact of pupil premium funding and its use in order to remove the barriers to learning for disadvantaged pupils.  Too often, pupils receive work that does not

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

challenge them in their learning.  Middle leaders have not started to monitor the quality of learning in their subjects. Therefore, they are unsure whether their work is having a positive impact.  The proportion of pupils regularly absent from school is above the national average. Leaders are beginning to take actions to reduce this but acknowledge that there is still more to do.  Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is variable. Generally, pupils behave well in lessons and around school. When this is not the case, it is because the quality of teaching is not engaging or motivating them.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Teaching of phonics is good. Pupils in the early years and in key stage 1 acquire secure phonetic skills, which supports their early reading development.  Leaders place a strong emphasis on nurturing pupils. Secure relationships exist in the school and pupils say that they feel safe.  Pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities have their needs identified and met. Consequently, the majority make good progress.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – ensuring that the quality of teaching, learning and assessment are consistently good or better – raising aspirations for pupils’ achievement and attendance – developing the skills of middle leaders so that they can contribute to school improvement effectively – ensuring that improvement planning and monitoring are precisely linked to gains in pupils’ achievement and attendance – developing secure leadership of the early years to ensure that teaching is matched to children’s needs – ensuring that pupil premium funding is spent effectively.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the consistency of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by: – ensuring that all teaching staff share the same high expectations of what pupils can, and will, achieve – ensuring that pupils of all abilities receive an appropriate level of challenge in all lessons, particularly in English and mathematics – ensuring that pupils in all classes receive opportunities to develop their mathematical skills in reasoning and problem solving – ensuring that staff, particularly in the early years, develop more effective strategies for improving children’s language and communication skills.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of the school’s use of pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders have faced significant staffing turbulence due to the departure and long-term absence of a number of key members of staff, many of whom held leadership positions. This led to a period of reduced leadership capacity, during which the headteacher and deputy headteacher tried to carry an increased number of responsibilities themselves. The headteacher and governors have taken action to mitigate against this more recently by appointing a pastoral manager, school business manager and assistant headteacher. It is too early to measure the impact of these appointments and some areas of subject leadership remain under-developed.  The speed with which leaders have tackled the inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across the school has been too slow. This has led to a decline in the effectiveness of teaching since the last inspection. As a result, pupils in some year groups complete work which is not sufficiently demanding. This slows some

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

pupils’ progress and means that they do not reach the standards that they are capable of. Because of this downward trend, outcomes for pupils in English and mathematics are considerably lower than the national averages.  Recent changes in staffing have impeded the effectiveness of middle leaders. English and mathematics subject leaders are new to their role and have had too little opportunity, training or guidance to improve the consistency of the quality of teaching and learning in their subjects. Consequently, any checks that they have completed on the quality of teaching and learning have lacked precision and improvements have been too slow.  The majority of staff feel well supported by leaders. However, there are a minority of staff who expressed their concerns about the consistency and effectiveness of leaders in managing behaviour. A number of parents also raised concerns about pupils’ behaviour. Inspection findings confirmed inconsistencies in leaders’ management of

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

some behaviour incidents.  Leaders have used pupil premium funding effectively for disadvantaged pupils in key stage 1. Targeted interventions have improved pupils’ attendance and achievement successfully. However, this is less positive in key stage 2, where staff absence has prevented the planned interventions from taking place.  Leaders have revised the school’s wider curriculum. There is now a stronger focus on developing pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding in a range of subjects. Teachers are using a variety of valuable first-hand experiences to extend, engage and inspire pupils in their learning. However, this is not consistent across all year groups and leaders have not yet checked the impact of this new approach on improving the quality of teaching and learning.  Leaders place particular emphasis on supporting pupils’ moral and social development. To this end, they have introduced a focus day each month where pupils learn the

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

necessary skills to deal with issues, such as those involving friendship, which may have arisen in class. However, pupils’ cultural development is less effective. Pupils receive fewer opportunities to study, in depth, the major world religions and cultures which are represented in Britain today.  Leaders use funding for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities effectively. The special educational needs coordinator has a secure understanding of pupils’ needs and liaises with outside agencies to ensure that appropriate support for pupils is in place. As a result, the majority of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are now making good progress from their starting points.  Primary physical education (PE) and sports funding is used well. Pupils benefit from opportunities to participate in a range of different sports through extra-curricular clubs and PE lessons delivered by specialist coaches. Staff value working alongside these

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

experts and say that it has strengthened their own teaching of PE. Teachers incorporate physical activity in a variety of lessons to encourage pupils to adopt healthy lifestyles.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors are overly generous in their evaluations of the school’s effectiveness. Because of this, they do not challenge leaders with sufficient rigour to effect improvements. This is reflected in their acceptance of pupils’ low achievement and high absence rates.  Governors do not evaluate the effectiveness of the school’s use of pupil premium funding accurately. Governors are of the view that the allocation of funding for initiatives represents effective spending. However, several of the initiatives are yet to be put in place.  There is much potential to strengthen the impact of the local governing body. Members show high levels of commitment and regularly give their time in support of the school. They receive a wealth of information about the school’s performance and are therefore in a position to provide a greater level of challenge.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Safeguarding procedures are fit for purpose. Leaders are rigorous in their approach to keeping all pupils, and especially the vulnerable pupils, safe from harm. The designated safeguarding officers ensure that all staff are fully aware of their responsibilities through regular training and monthly briefings. The pastoral manager has built strong relationships with families and external agencies, so that the most vulnerable pupils receive support when they need it. She provides effective and timely challenge to professionals from other services to ensure that pupils are kept safe.  Leaders ensure that all staff and visitors to the school are carefully selected and do not pose a risk to pupils.  Pupils say that they feel safe in school. Leaders place suitable emphasis on supporting the personal development and welfare of pupils. As a result, pupils are well informed

p.4

Safeguarding

about how to keep themselves safe. They speak confidently about how to stay safe online and have trusted adults both in and out of school who they feel comfortable to approach with any concerns.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is variable. Although leaders have tackled the underperformance of some individual teachers, teaching in a number of year groups and in some subjects remains less than good. Teachers are not consistently adept in assessing pupils’ starting points and using this information to build pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding rapidly. As a result, pupils’ progress slows.  Teachers do not have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. Consequently, some activities are not adequately challenging to move pupils’ learning on as quickly as it could in order for pupils to make strong progress. When this is the case, pupils lose their focus and their behaviour becomes passive or restless. At times, pupils’ behaviour disturbs the learning of others.  Pupils struggle to discuss their learning in any depth. They have not acquired the necessary skills to reflect on, and take charge of, their own learning. Furthermore,

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

pupils often miss opportunities to improve their learning and address misconceptions because teachers do not consistently direct them to do so.  The teaching of reading requires improvement. Teachers have not developed the required subject knowledge to enable them to teach comprehension skills effectively. A number of different strategies are being trialled but are not embedded. As a result, pupils’ reading comprehension skills are underdeveloped.  In mathematics, pupils often spend too much time repeating work on calculations, even though they have demonstrated accuracy in this skill. Pupils’ opportunities to develop their reasoning and problem-solving skills are limited, and this hinders their progress.  The teaching of the wider curriculum shows strength in some subjects and year groups. Where teaching is effective, pupils have regular opportunities to develop subject- specific knowledge, skills and vocabulary. For example, pupils carrying out practical

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

investigations in science learn how to predict, explore and draw conclusions from their findings. Similarly, pupils are also given opportunities to apply and consolidate their English and mathematical skills in a range of other subjects. While this is heartening, this stronger practice in the teaching of the wider curriculum subjects is inconsistent across the school.  Following extensive staff training in the teaching of phonics, younger pupils now receive high-quality phonics provision. Teachers ensure that activities in phonics sessions are well matched to pupils’ needs and provide a suitable level of challenge. As a result, pupils approach phonics lessons with much enthusiasm and make good progress in their learning.  The majority of teaching assistants are skilled in questioning pupils and in directing learning. They provide an appropriate level of support to ensure that pupils’ ability to work independently is promoted effectively. As a result, they make a positive

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

contribution to the progress of targeted pupils.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Leaders and staff are focused on meeting pupils’ welfare needs. The appointment of a pastoral manager has been crucial in building relationships with parents successfully. This improved communication has enabled the school to better understand the needs of pupils and, in turn, put strategies in place to support them. As a result, the nurture and support provided for vulnerable pupils and their families is a strength of the school.  Pupils show a secure understanding of how to keep themselves safe and healthy. Many pupils start their day with healthy eating choices at the school’s breakfast club. They benefit from lessons about online safety and from regular opportunities to exercise throughout the school day.  Pupils, staff and parents on the whole agree that bullying is rare. However, pupils identify inconsistencies in the effectiveness with which members of staff deal with

p.6

Personal development and welfare

reported incidents.  Where teachers’ expectations are high, pupils take great pride in their work. This is reflected in the care that they take in presenting their work neatly, across a range of subjects.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  Pupils’ rates of absence are higher than the national average and a high number of pupils miss school regularly. Leaders have recently taken action to tackle this and have been successful in improving attendance for those pupils with the lowest rates of attendance. Leaders acknowledge that improvements are very recent and are yet to be sustained over time.  Incidents of pupils using derogatory and discriminatory language are rare. However, when they do occur, records show that leaders’ responses lack the stringency required to ensure that pupils fully understand the gravity of their actions. As a result, pupils repeat their unacceptable behaviour.  In some lessons, pupils become less focused on their learning and occasionally disrupt the learning of others. This happens when planned activities do not challenge or motivate pupils sufficiently.  Throughout the inspection, the behaviour of pupils as they moved around school and at

p.6

Behaviour

playtimes was purposeful and orderly. Pupils are polite and welcoming of visitors and of pupils who are new to the school.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment have led to slow progress for pupils in some year groups and in some subjects. The resultant decline in outcomes for pupils across the school since the last inspection means that many pupils are not fully equipped for the next stage of their education.  In 2017, the attainment of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of each key stage was below the national average. Pupils’ attainment in reading at the end of key stage 1 was in the lowest 10% of schools.  In the same year, pupils’ progress at the end of key stage 2 was below average in reading and mathematics. In writing, pupils’ progress was significantly below average and in the lowest 10% of schools.  In some year groups, the quality of learning over time is stronger and pupils make rapid progress in developing their writing skills, particularly in their effective use of ambitious

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

vocabulary. Although this is encouraging, due to the remaining variability in the quality of teaching of writing, pupils make significantly slower progress than other pupils nationally while in key stage 2. Hence, their attainment in writing is below that of pupils nationally.  The progress of disadvantaged pupils, like other pupils in the school, is variable. Consequently, by the end of Year 6, the differences between disadvantaged pupils’ attainment compared with other pupils nationally are wide and are not diminishing.  The majority of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are now making good progress from their starting points. This is the result of targeted interventions and additional support. Improvements are strongest in key stage 1.  The effective teaching of phonics in the early years and key stage 1 has led to an increase in the proportion of pupils who attained the expected standard in the Year 1

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

phonics screening check. In 2017, this resulted in all pupils reaching the expected standard.

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Leadership of the early years is only recently established. The early years leader was appointed in 2017, at the same time as the school extended its provision to include a Nursery. With the support of local authority officers, the leader has strengthened the provision by ensuring that all children have access to improved areas of learning both inside and outdoors. However, leaders are not checking carefully on the impact of the changes made. This means that they are unclear about the priorities for improvement.  Teaching in the early years is variable. Although language development is clearly a priority for many children, activities designed to promote children’s speaking and extend their vocabulary across all areas of learning are inconsistent. Adults’ questioning skills are also variable. As a result, for some children progress is slowed.  Historically, many children start in the early years with skills that are below those

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

typical for their age. The proportion of children who achieve a good level of development has declined over the last three years and is below the national average. Inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment mean that children do not catch up quickly enough.  Support provided by the local authority has been effective in ensuring that adults’ assessments of children’s development are becoming increasingly accurate. However, adults are not making use of this assessment information to plan activities which are well matched to children’s needs and which provide sufficient challenge. Consequently, this improved accuracy in assessment information is yet to make a difference to the progress children make.  Effective relationships exist between the early years staff and parents. Parents enjoy being able to contribute to their child’s learning through attending ‘stay and play’ sessions and through sharing ‘wow moments’ with the school to celebrate things which

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

have happened at home.  Adults in the early years place heavy emphasis on developing children’s personal and social skills. The early years provides a safe and supportive learning environment for children. Children are warmly welcomed into their classes and are encouraged to play collaboratively. They benefit from the clear routines and high expectations of their behaviour, which most adults provide. As a result, many children are confident in their learning and show impressive periods of concentration.  Children have a wealth of opportunity to develop their early reading skills. As well as receiving effective phonics teaching, they also show great enthusiasm in reading books to their friends and in listening to stories read to them. Children find the reading opportunities available to them enticing. For example, they love looking at books in the den because they can use torchlight to see the pages.

p.8

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Leaders have enhanced outdoor provision in response to the children’s interests. During the inspection, examples of adults planning outdoor activities which led to children’s rapid progress were evidenced. For instance, children showed great enthusiasm in using sticks and other natural materials to compare length. Not only was this successful in extending their understanding of measures, it also stimulated a high level of mathematical talk.

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Website www.woodhamburnprimary.durham.sch.uk

p.9

School details

Email address woodhamburn@durhamlearning.net

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 22  23 May 2014

p.9

Information about this school

 Woodham Burn Community Primary School is an average-sized primary school. The school has a Nursery, which admits children from the age of two years.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is above the national average.  The vast majority of pupils are of White British heritage.  The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is above the national average.  The school currently meets the government’s floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics for pupils in Year 6.  The school runs a breakfast club and after-school childcare for its pupils.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in a range of lessons on both days of the inspection. Many of these observations were carried out jointly with the headteacher.  Inspectors examined pupils’ work and observed their behaviour in lessons, around school and at playtimes and lunchtimes. Inspectors talked to pupils about their learning, both formally and informally, and listened to them read.  Meetings were held with governors, senior and middle leaders, a group of staff members and a local authority partner.  A range of documentation was viewed, including the school’s self-evaluation, the school’s improvement plans, minutes from governing body meetings, monitoring records of the quality of teaching and learning, curriculum plans, information relating to safeguarding and information about pupils’ progress, attainment, behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors talked to a number of parents at the start of the school day. They also took

p.10

Information about this inspection

account of the 48 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the 33 free-text responses.  The 35 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire were also taken into account.

p.10

Inspection team

Karine Hendley, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Deborah Ashcroft Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion