Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Hounslow Town Primary School

Inspected 22 Feb 2018 · published 21 Mar 2018 · URN 102491

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Noeman Anwar (lead), Gill Bal, Jeff Cole, Ross Macdonald

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Feb 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Gill Bal, Jeff Cole, Noeman Anwar, Ross Macdonald

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    TW3 1SR

  • Name on report verified

    Hounslow Town Primary School

  • URN verified

    102491

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongmake good progressconsistentlyeffectivelyinspirationalsecurestrengthsrespectful
Criticismrequires improvementweakvariableinconsistentweaknessesnot strongconcernslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings660w−7
  • Leadership129w−6
  • Safeguarding118w+51
  • What needs to improve2075w+36

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,907
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 18%

Full report text

Hounslow Town Primary School Pears Road, Hounslow TW3 1SR

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders and managers have not maintained the school’s good overall effectiveness since the previous inspection. The school has also suffered from high rates of staff turnover over the past few years.  The quality of teaching, learning and assessment, over time in key stage 2, has been inconsistent. As a result, pupils in Years 5 and 6 have not made good progress from their starting points.  The school’s new reading curriculum is in its infancy in key stage 2. As a result, pupils do not effectively develop their comprehension skills.  Governors have not held senior leaders to account as robustly as they could.  Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is weak in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of key stage 2.  Pupils’ progress in mathematics in key stage 2 is variable and not as strong as it could be in Years 5 and 6 because of the lack of challenge in mathematics teaching.  Leaders have not, until recently, had an

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

accurate understanding of pupils’ progress information. Consequently, evaluation of the impact of the use of pupil premium funding on the progress disadvantaged pupils make has been limited.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The recently appointed headteacher has tackled past vulnerabilities head on. She has galvanised a leadership team into action to make the necessary changes for improvement.  In early years, children make good progress because of strong teaching, learning and assessment.  Pupils’ progress in key stage 1, and in most subjects in lower key stage 2, is strong because of consistently secure teaching.  Pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities receive strong care and guidance in the Rainbow resource base.  In 2017, the proportion of Year 1 pupils meeting the expected standard in the phonics skills check was above the national average.  Pupils behave well and are kept safe at the school. They are polite and welcoming to visitors.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: – teaching is strengthened, particularly in Years 5 and 6, so that pupils make good progress in reading and mathematics – the proportion of disadvantaged pupils achieving at least the national expectations in reading, writing and mathematics, at the end of key stage 2, is at least similar to that of other pupils nationally – the reading curriculum is enhanced to enable pupils to better develop their comprehension skills in key stage 2 – performance management is used effectively to promote the best practice in teaching and learning – leaders and governors rigorously evaluate the impact of the use of the pupil premium funding on the progress of disadvantaged pupils across the school.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by: – sharing and building on the good practice found in the school – providing pupils in Years 5 and 6 with more challenging work in reading and

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

mathematics to enable them to achieve as well as they should – ensuring that pupils in key stage 2 better develop their comprehension skills through reading texts that are matched to their abilities.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 In the past, weak leadership and management and changes in staff have resulted in pupils not receiving a good standard of education, particularly in key stage 2.  Leaders have not been rigorous in sustaining good teaching across the school over the past few years. The quality of teaching is variable, particularly for pupils in Years 5 and 6. Leaders have not ensured that pupils in Years 5 and 6 receive consistently strong teaching to make the progress they should. As a result, the progress these pupils make is not as strong as that of pupils in the rest of the school.  Over the past few years, teachers’ assessments of pupils’ attainment and progress have lacked sufficient accuracy. As a result, leaders inaccurately evaluated the school’s strengths, and did not robustly ensure strong outcomes for pupils.  Leaders’ evaluation of the impact of actions on how to spend the pupil premium funding to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils has been inconsistent. Until

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

recently, leaders did not have accurate information about disadvantaged pupils’ progress. Consequently, the achievement of disadvantaged pupils is variable across the school and is particularly low in Years 5 and 6.  The design of the reading curriculum in key stage 2 does not ensure that pupils have opportunities to develop their comprehension skills well. Leaders recognise the need to change how reading is taught in key stage 2, and have taken action to do this. However, the implementation of this change is at too early a stage to discern any notable impact.  The recent appointment of an inspirational headteacher has already led to several improvements. She has empowered enthusiastic senior and middle leaders to begin to hold other staff to account as part of a ‘no excuses’ culture. Senior leaders have an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, and demonstrate strong aspiration for the school to succeed.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Additional funding for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is used well. Leaders ensure that pupils in the Rainbow resource base receive strong care and guidance. Pupils who have complex SEN and/or disabilities receive specialist care linked to their needs and are included well in the wider school.  The primary school physical education and sport premium is used well to enable pupils to benefit from the expertise of specialist sports coaches. Pupils receive many opportunities to develop their skills in physical education, which they value.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well. Pupils benefit from learning about a wide range of religions. Assemblies bring the community together and encourage pupils to think deeply about the school’s values, which are linked to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This helps pupils to become respectful British citizens.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The curriculum is broad and gives pupils opportunities to develop their understanding of a range of themes and subjects. For example, pupils take part in trips and workshops, often linked to their history and geography topics.  Pupils’ attendance remains strong for all groups of pupils because leaders monitor this robustly.  Parents and carers agree that their children are safe and well cared for at the school. The majority of parents would recommend the school to others.

p.3

Governance of the school

 In the past, the governing body did not hold senior leaders robustly to account. The school was going through a transitionary phase of its assessment procedures due to the new national curriculum. The school’s assessment information was not precise enough to allow governors to pinpoint where there were weaknesses, particularly around the progress of disadvantaged pupils.  Governors now have a better understanding of the school and ask some pertinent questions to challenge leaders. For example, governors have questioned leaders about the difference the interventions for specific groups of pupils have made. Consequently, governors are now mostly accurate in their understanding of the differences that new initiatives make.  Governors carry out safeguarding training and demonstrate a strong understanding of potential risks to pupils in the local area.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Staff are well trained in all aspects of safeguarding, including the ‘Prevent’ duty. They demonstrate a good understanding of the school’s policies and referral systems.  Leaders make strong use of external agencies and are tenacious in following up concerns with the local authority. Leaders have a strong understanding of potential risks to pupils in the community, and ensure that any concerns are followed up. For example, leaders make staff and parents aware of specific social media and gaming sites.  Leaders have ensured that the potential risks associated with the extensive building work around the site are managed well. The site is secure and adults remain vigilant during playtimes.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inconsistent. As a result, pupils’ progress is variable, particularly in Years 5 and 6.  In key stage 2, the teaching of reading is not effective because teachers are at the early stages of implementing a new approach to teaching reading. Too often, pupils read books and texts that are not challenging enough. When teachers choose challenging books, they do not guide pupils with tasks or questioning to deepen their thinking. For example, in Year 5, pupils enjoyed reading ‘The Secret Garden’, but did not have the necessary skills to use information from the text to aid their understanding of the meaning of what they read.  When work is not demanding for pupils, they lose interest and this slows their learning. In some classes, particularly in Years 5 and 6, pupils who need the next level of challenge wait too long before they are moved on to the next task. Sometimes, pupils

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

choose work that is too easy for them and teachers do not check that tasks are challenging and matched to pupils’ abilities.  In mathematics, pupils demonstrate a secure understanding of how to calculate. They use a range of calculation strategies and demonstrate a strong understanding of applying their learning to more complex tasks. For example, in Year 6, pupils solved problems involving percentages, using a ‘bubble’ method. However, in Years 5 and 6, pupils, particularly the most able, told inspectors that they found the work too easy. This limits the progress they can make.  The teaching of writing is secure. Pupils typically develop fluent writing skills. In key stage 1, pupils make use of strong phonics skills to write increasingly long pieces. In Year 2, pupils used conjunctions and formal English with confidence when they wrote about pirates. Teachers encourage pupils to develop their writing well in subjects such

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

as history and religious education. Pupils’ writing in their independent writing books is often of a high quality. However, there are inconsistencies in the quality and frequency of writing between some classes, particularly where there have been changes to teaching staff.  Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are supported well, particularly in the resource base. They receive strong support from adults, who set clear boundaries and interesting tasks to develop their social skills. Strong questioning and reinforcement of new language by adults enabled these pupils to progress well in their speaking and listening skills. For example, pupils who have complex needs in the Rainbow section were challenged to share their decisions on the correct use of bowls and spoons to give to ‘the three bears’. These pupils study the same topics as their peers, thus including them as fully in the mainstream curriculum as appropriate.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teachers ensure that pupils benefit from learning a range of subjects, and cross- curricular learning in topic lessons is strong. For example, in Year 1, pupils learned about space in the ‘busy learning area’ to enhance their writing and creative artwork.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are respectful of differences, and benefit from many opportunities in personal, social and health (PSH) education to learn about themes such as tolerance. Pupils enjoy religious education lessons, showing a strong respect for different faiths. A pupil shared with inspectors that everyone, irrespective of their backgrounds, should be ‘treated fairly and be kind’.  Adults provide good support to pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities and encourage them to take a full part in activities with their peers. For example, with strong adult support, pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities integrated seamlessly with their peers during a history lesson in Year 4. Such practice helps these pupils develop their self- esteem.  Pupils told inspectors that bullying was very rare and ‘everybody gets on with each other’. Inspectors agree. Pupils have a good understanding of online safety, including

p.5

Personal development and welfare

the potential risks of sharing information on online gaming sites.  Pupils benefit from a wide range of extra-curricular activities, including dance and sports. They speak highly of tuition, which enables them to learn musical instruments.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils behave well in class, even when the work set by teachers is not challenging. Pupils are well mannered and have positive attitudes to their learning. They move around the school in an orderly manner.  During playtimes, pupils manage the limits of the playground well. Despite much of their playground area being restricted due to building work, they play sensibly with their friends.  Pupils’ attendance remains at least in line with the national average for most groups, including disadvantaged pupils. Pupils settle quickly and take part in their lessons with little disruption.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics across classes and year groups is variable. In particular, the progress of pupils in Years 5 and 6 from their starting points is weak in reading and mathematics.  The most able pupils across the school, including those who are disadvantaged, have not been challenged sufficiently in key stage 2 to achieve greater depth in their learning.  In 2017, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected age-related standard in reading at the end of key stage 2 was below average. The proportion of pupils achieving the higher standards in reading was below the national average.  The achievement of disadvantaged pupils remains low. In 2017, at the end of key stage 2, disadvantaged pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics was well below that of other pupils nationally. Only a small proportion of pupils met the higher standards at the end of Year 6.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The proportion of pupils attaining the expected standard in the national phonics screening check at the end of Year 1, in 2017, was above the national average.  Pupils in key stage 1 make strong progress. The proportion of key stage 1 pupils who met the expected standard or attained higher standards in reading and writing in 2017 was similar to the national average. Pupils meeting the expected and higher standards in mathematics was above the national average.

p.6

Early years provision Good

 Children make good progress in early years due to strong leadership and consistently good teaching. Children behave well and work collaboratively with their peers.  Leaders demonstrate a robust understanding of individual children’s needs. Children’s progress is assessed regularly and leaders have systematic systems in place, which enable them to capture children’s learning across all areas of the early years curriculum.  Children in the Nursery and Reception classes benefit from a vibrant learning environment. Children have set routines and are encouraged to develop their confidence. For example, through skilful questioning, an adult encouraged a child to compare the size of a tower he had made with other objects in the classroom. This helped the child to think about comparing objects and to change his original tower to make it ‘equal’.  Reading is promoted well and children have a strong grasp of early phonics skills.

p.7

Early years provision Good

Children have a good understanding of a wide range of books. Teachers encourage children to rehearse stories and rhymes out aloud. For example, children engaged well while re-telling the story of ‘The Gruffalo’. This helped develop children’s awareness of new vocabulary, sentence structure and punctuation.  There are many opportunities for children to be creative. For example, children created a ‘starry night’ painting, using watercolours linked to their theme of space. Children also used sticks from the local area to create a ‘stick man’ structure related to their work around a book.  The additional funding for children who have SEN and/or disabilities is used effectively. Leaders identify children who have additional needs and work closely with external specialists to provide good support. Children who have SEN are included well in lessons and progress well.  Leaders recognise that in the past, children’s understanding of the world was not as

p.7

Early years provision Good

strong as in other areas of learning. Children now benefit from exciting activities to learn about the wider world. For example, they role play confidently in the restaurant area and celebrate a wide range of cultural events, including Chinese New Year.  Teachers effectively encourage children to apply their phonics knowledge to their writing. For example, children wrote descriptive words about ‘The Gruffalo’. They used their phonics sound prompts well to help them write. However, on occasions, the most able children are not appropriately challenged to extend their writing further.  The effective use of the early years outdoor area was an area for improvement identified at the time of the previous inspection. In the past, children’s opportunities to learn outside were limited. Leaders have addressed this well overall. Children now use the outdoor space regularly for activities to promote their personal development and

p.7

Early years provision Good

creativity. However, the effectiveness of adults’ interactions with children outside varies. As a result, in some areas of learning, children do not make as much progress as they should when they learn outside.  Parents have positive views about the level of care provided and the progress their children make. Parents share children’s achievements at home with teachers, through ‘wow’ slips. The school has encouraged fathers to take a more active role through a ‘dad’s day’, where they designed and made structures with their children.  In 2015, the proportion of children who left the Reception classes with a good overall level of development was significantly below the national average. In 2016 and 2017, this figure rose and is now close to the national average. Disadvantaged children attain well above the national average. Children’s progress in communication and language, reading and writing is strong and their attainment in these areas is similar to the

p.7

Early years provision Good

national average. This means that children are well prepared for the Year 1 curriculum.

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Email address office@hounslowtown.hounslow.sch.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 5 February 2014

p.9

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 6.  Hounslow Town Primary School is much larger than the average primary school. The school has expanded considerably since the previous inspection. A newly built school is planned to become operational by September 2018, and the school is expected to reach full capacity by 2022.  The headteacher joined the school in September 2017.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is broadly in line with the national average.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above the national average.  Pupils come from a wide range of ethnic backgrounds. The largest groups come from Asian or Asian British and Indian British backgrounds.  The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is similar to the national

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in all year groups. Many observations were undertaken jointly with senior leaders.  Inspectors met with governors, including the chair of the governing body, and a senior school improvement adviser from the local authority.  Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders to evaluate the impact of their work.  Inspectors heard pupils read and talked with pupils informally throughout the inspection.  Inspectors scrutinised books in all classrooms, across a range of subjects.  A range of documentation was considered, including the school’s self-evaluation, assessment information, and records relating to attendance, safeguarding and behaviour.  Inspectors considered 63 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View. They also took into account the 42 staff responses and 35 pupil responses to the online surveys.

p.11

Inspection team

Noeman Anwar, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Ross Macdonald Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion