Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder EY258787

Inspected 12 Mar 2018 · URN EY258787

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Karen Laycock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Mar 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Karen Laycock

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY258787

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−77Very criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressfeel safeeffectivelydelay
Criticismfailsinadequatepoornot effectiveat riskweaknessesfailnot met

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings594w−92
  • Leadership142w−83
  • What needs to improve176w−5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
896
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 36%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 12 March 2018 14 August 2014

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 Safeguarding concerns regarding the childminder's practice were raised with the relevant agencies during the inspection. The childminder does not manage children's behaviour appropriately and compromises their safety and well-being.  The childminder is not clear about the procedure to follow in the event of an allegation being made against her.  The childminder has a poor attitude towards supporting children's emotional well-being, confidence and self-esteem. She is abrupt at times and shows little interest in what children have to say. Babies do not receive warm and nurturing interactions.  The childminder does not provide appropriate furniture that is suitable for children, particularly the youngest. She does not make the best use of the space available.  The childminder fails to minimise the risk of cross-infection. For example, children play on the floor and are then taken straight to the table to eat their sandwiches. Children

p.1

This provision is inadequate

do not learn about good hygiene practice.  Teaching is inadequate. The childminder does not provide sufficient opportunities for children to learn new skills, explore, interact with and learn from each other, and make the best possible progress in their development. Older children are not sufficiently challenged.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure children are protected from harm at all times 29/03/2018  ensure that allegations are reported to the relevant authorities without delay 29/03/2018

p.2

Due Date

 make sure that all children are provided with an environment that promotes their emotional well-being and helps to build their confidence and self-esteem and ensures they feel safe 29/03/2018

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that behaviour management strategies are appropriate and support children's emotional well-being 29/03/2018

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that the space is used effectively and that furniture is appropriate for the purposes of childminding 29/03/2018

p.2

Due Date

 implement suitable hygiene procedures to minimise the risk of cross-infection. 29/03/2018

p.2

Due Date

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve teaching and interactions to ensure that children receive challenging, stimulating and enjoyable experiences that take full account of each child's individual needs, interests and their age and stage of development to promote good progress in their learning and development. 30/04/2018

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector spoke with the childminder and children at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and took account of their views.  The inspector looked at children's assessment records and a range of other documentation, including accident records, and she discussed the childminder's self- evaluation document with the childminder.  The inspector checked evidence of the suitability of the childminder and adults living on the premises and the childminder's qualifications. The inspector held discussions with the childminder and children at appropriate times during the inspection.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder's understanding of her responsibilities with regard to responding to allegations made against her are not reflective of the Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures. She does, however, have a suitable understanding of the signs that may indicate a child is at risk of abuse outside the setting. She uses inappropriate behaviour management strategies and fails to foster children's self- esteem. The childminder does not ensure that there is sufficient play space when organising activities or appropriate furniture for the children who attend. For example, during a planned art activity, a baby is placed in a high chair, which they slip down in. The childminder talks to parents and shares some useful information with them about their children’s day. The childminder's monitoring and evaluation of her practice is poor. She is unaware of the weaknesses in her provision.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The childminder does not ensure that babies are provided with opportunities to interact with others. They are often positioned away from the other children in a highchair during activities. The childminder makes some assessments of children’s progress but planned activities do not take sufficient account of children’s individual learning needs. Planned craft activities are overly adult-directed and focused on a predetermined end product. Babies and children try to explore the resources but are constantly reminded of the task the childminder wants them to achieve. The childminder does not promote children's communication skills. For example, a child says they have been on holiday. The childminder misses the opportunity to encourage the child to talk about their experiences, saying, 'That wasn't recently, you have finished your picture, you can go and play now'. Children's imaginative play is not promoted or valued. Children get together and engage in

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

pretend play. A child excitedly explains that they are swimming in the lake. The childminder stops them and tells them to get up from the floor. Children are not provided with sufficient space to engage in their play. During small-world construction play children are allocated an unreasonably small space and told to use that area.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The childminder does not always handle children appropriately. Behaviour strategies are inappropriate and fail to develop children's confidence and self-esteem. For example, the childminder glares at children in a very stern manner if they do not respond to her instructions quickly enough. The childminder fails to implement good hygiene routines and help children to learn how to stay healthy. Babies sit for long periods without any interaction from the childminder while the childminder prepares lunch. During breakfast, the childminder did not speak to a baby for the entire time the child was being fed. This does not support children's emotional well-being.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children do not make the progress of which they are capable because their individual learning needs are not met. Babies are not encouraged to explore and investigate. Children develop some basic skills. For example, they learn to put on their own coats. However, they are overly compliant and are restricted in their play. Children try to interact with each other but the childminder fails to acknowledge or support their attempts to play together. They are not encouraged to become enthusiastic and motivated learners, which is important to support their future learning.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY258787 Local authority Wirral Inspection number 1104068 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 5 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 5

p.6

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 14 August 2014

p.6

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2003. She works with a co-childminder and minds from her co-childminder's house. The childminder operates Monday to Friday, from 7.30am to 6pm, all year round, except for bank holidays and family holidays.

p.6

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.7

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion