Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Walmer Bridge Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Jayne Parkinson and Kenneth Ernest Parkinson Partnership
- Group reference verified
RP523934
- Inspection date verified
25 Apr 2018
- Inspectors verified
Daphne Carr
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PR4 5GE
- Name on report verified
Walmer Bridge Day Nursery
- URN verified
EY102250
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The manager fails to identify when children are at risk of harm. p.1
- Furthermore, the manager fails to act on signs of concern and does not follow the nursery's policy and procedures to ensure children's safety and welfare. p.3
- The weaknesses in safeguarding practice compromise children's well-being. p.3
- She has insufficient knowledge of what constitutes a concern and of the procedures to follow to protect children's safety and welfare. p.1
- Despite attending recent child protection training, she is unable to identify when a child may be at risk of harm. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action p.2
- ensure that the designated lead person for safeguarding has a secure knowledge of all safeguarding matters, that enables them to identify, understand and act appropriately to any signs of possible abuse and neglect that indicate a child may be at risk of harm 21/05/2018 p.2
- ensure that the designated lead person for safeguarding reports all safeguarding matters in a timely manner to the relevant local statutory children's services as required. 21/05/2018 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“Partnerships with parents are positive.” p.1Progress & outcomes3
“Children make good progress.” p.1Wellbeing & mental health2
“The weaknesses in safeguarding practice compromise children's well-being.” p.3Communication & language2
“Children talk to staff about healthy lifestyles.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 783
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Walmer Bridge Day Nursery 74 Liverpool Old Road, Walmer Bridge, Preston, Lancashire, PR4 5GE
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 25 April 2018 1 June 2017
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Requires Improvement
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Children's well-being is significantly compromised. The manager fails to identify when children are at risk of harm. She has insufficient knowledge of what constitutes a concern and of the procedures to follow to protect children's safety and welfare. The manager, who is the designated lead person for safeguarding, does not report all safeguarding matters to the relevant agencies as required. She does not seek advice on how to act on safeguarding issues, which places children's safety and welfare at further risk.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The well-qualified staff team use their knowledge skilfully to help children to develop the skills that they need for future learning. They plan a variety of interesting activities and experiences that children enjoy. The manager and staff work closely together to assess and monitor the progress that all children make effectively. They identify where children need extra support in their learning and use timely interventions well. Children make good progress. Partnerships with parents are positive. Parents comment that staff are warm, friendly and welcoming. They state that their children make firm friendships and that their speaking skills are developing well. Children talk to staff about healthy lifestyles. They know that eating fresh vegetables helps them to build their muscles and state, 'I will be big and strong to lift houses up'.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the designated lead person for safeguarding has a secure knowledge of all safeguarding matters, that enables them to identify, understand and act appropriately to any signs of possible abuse and neglect that indicate a child may be at risk of harm 21/05/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the designated lead person for safeguarding reports all safeguarding matters in a timely manner to the relevant local statutory children's services as required. 21/05/2018
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector took a tour of the nursery with the nursery manager, including the outdoor environment. The inspector spoke with staff and children during the inspection. She observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outside, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector held a meeting with the nursery manager. She discussed self-evaluation processes, looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. The inspector completed an evaluation of an activity with the nursery manager. The inspector spoke to some parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The manager has a weak understanding of safeguarding matters. Despite attending recent child protection training, she is unable to identify when a child may be at risk of harm. Furthermore, the manager fails to act on signs of concern and does not follow the nursery's policy and procedures to ensure children's safety and welfare. She does not inform the relevant professionals in line with the local safeguarding children board procedures to seek their advice. This puts children's safety and welfare at significant risk. That said, the manager follows appropriate recruitment and vetting procedures, and checks the ongoing suitability of all staff. She ensures that staff are provided with regular supervisory meetings and supports them to continually develop their skills. Staff work well with other settings that children attend. They exchange information regularly and use this to complement children's learning that
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
takes place elsewhere. The manager considers the views of parents and children in her self-evaluation process.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Staff use what they know about children well to help to promote learning. For example, older children join in group activities and demonstrate good listening skills. They practise counting and recognise numerals successfully. Younger children enjoy imaginary play outside. For instance, they pretend to speak on toy telephones and show a good understanding of how things work. Babies join in singing songs with staff and demonstrate good early speaking skills. Staff use information gained from recent training in how children prefer to learn effectively. For example, they now provide more activities and experiences that support children to solve simple problems. This helps children to develop good thinking skills. All children are motivated and keen to learn.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The manager does not promote children's safety and welfare adequately. The weaknesses in safeguarding practice compromise children's well-being. Despite this, children show that they are happy and settled. They behave well and form close bonds with staff. Children go on outings into the community, such as to the local park. This helps them to learn about the wider world. Children have daily opportunities to be physically active and exercise. For instance, they enjoy running in the outside play space.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
All children make good progress from when they start. This includes children who speak English as an additional language, funded children and children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Additional funding is used well. For example, extra resources are purchased that staff use to support older children to develop greater confidence in communicating with their peers. Younger children listen to stories and join in with their favourite phrases. Babies delight in sensory experiences, such as when they feel bubbles land on their skin. Children are prepared well for their future learning and the eventual move to school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY102250 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 1100534 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 10 Total number of places 59 Number of children on roll 105 Name of registered person Jayne Parkinson and Kenneth Ernest Parkinson Partnership
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 1 June 2017 Telephone number 01772 611 222
p.4
reference number
Walmer Bridge Day Nursery registered in 2001. The nursery employs 11 members of childcare staff. Of these, 10 hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 and above. This includes the manager and one member of staff who hold early years professional status or qualified teacher status. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday, all year round. Sessions are from 7.30am until 6pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion