Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School
Summary
Liz Bowes (lead), Clare Beswick, Clementina Aina, Graham Marshall
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Apr 2018
- Inspectors verified
Clare Beswick, Clementina Aina, Graham Marshall, Liz Bowes
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
RG2 7RB
- Name on report verified
Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School
- URN verified
136512
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- An external review of the use of pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of the school’s work may be improved. p.2
- Pupils do not always make the progress of which they are capable. p.3
- This is because of inconsistency in the quality of teaching and assessment. p.3
- Subject leaders, although enthusiastic, do not consistently perform their roles well enough. p.3
- For example, they do not check regularly that teachers’ assessments of pupils’ progress are in line with the progress shown in individual pupils’ books. p.3
- This means that senior leaders sometimes have inaccurate information about pupils’ progress. p.3
- Management of the pupil premium funding is variable. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,600
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Whitley Park Primary and Nursery School Brixham Road, Reading, Berkshire RG2 7RB
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The quality of teaching is not consistently good. Often, staff do not have high enough expectations about what pupils can achieve. The progress pupils make across the school is variable. Outcomes by the end of key stages 1 and 2 are below the national average. Not all teachers are accurate in assessing pupils’ starting points. Some staff do not correctly record the amount of progress pupils make. This means that leaders do not always have the right information about pupils’ performance. Teachers do not consistently match work to the needs of pupils. This includes pupils who are most able and those who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. The attendance of some pupils is low. Skills in writing are not well enough developed. This is because pupils do not get enough chances to write longer pieces of work. Subject leaders do not always effectively monitor pupils’ progress in their areas of
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
responsibility. Additional funding for disadvantaged pupils is not spent well enough to ensure that disadvantaged pupils do as well as they could. The new governing body does not regularly check some policies or the website. Governors do not receive accurate performance information from the school. This means that they do not hold leaders effectively to account. Governors have not checked whether leaders have produced a pupil premium report for this academic year.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school is a very caring and inclusive community. Leaders rightly pride themselves on ensuring that pupils are well supported and ready to learn. All staff, including members of the therapeutic team, work hard to support pupils’ personal development. Children make a good start to their learning in early years. They make strong progress in both the Nursery and Reception classes. Pupils behave well and have good attitudes to their learning. The headteacher and other senior leaders have identified the areas that need to improve. They have already taken effective action to improve the teaching of mathematics. Communication with parents and carers has strengthened.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that pupils make good progress from their starting points by: – raising teachers’ expectations so that they match work to the ability levels of pupils – providing more opportunities, through extended written work, for pupils to apply the skills they have learned – ensuring that teachers assess pupils’ starting points and progress accurately so that senior leaders have the right information about how pupils are doing. Improve leadership and management by: – maximising the use of pupil premium funding to ensure that all disadvantaged pupils make good progress and that the attainment gap between them and their peers narrows – improving the provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities by ensuring that leaders check more thoroughly that the work provided matches pupils’ needs – ensuring that subject leaders monitor effectively pupils’ progress in their areas of
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
responsibility to secure higher outcomes – improving the attendance of some pupils – making sure that the governing body monitors the website and policies, receives accurate school performance information, and holds leaders effectively to account, for example by ensuring that they produce an annual pupil premium report.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the use of pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of the school’s work may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Since the last inspection, improvements in the quality of education have been too variable. Pupils do not always make the progress of which they are capable. This is because of inconsistency in the quality of teaching and assessment. Subject leaders, although enthusiastic, do not consistently perform their roles well enough. For example, they do not check regularly that teachers’ assessments of pupils’ progress are in line with the progress shown in individual pupils’ books. This means that senior leaders sometimes have inaccurate information about pupils’ progress. Management of the pupil premium funding is variable. Some disadvantaged pupils do not make enough progress from their starting points. Leaders have not yet produced a pupil premium report for this academic year. There is no indication of the spending plans for this year. Most parents who responded to the questionnaire, Parent View, would recommend the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
school to another parent. Many praised the teachers, saying how kind and supportive they were. A typical comment was, ‘Teachers are easy to talk to and are friendly and caring. They understand my child very well.’ Senior leaders are passionate about ensuring the welfare of vulnerable pupils. This approach underpins the ethos of this inclusive school. Until recently, leaders spent a disproportionate proportion of their time in attending multi-agency meetings. They acknowledge that this has had an impact on some aspects of the school’s management. They have now appointed a specialist welfare officer to support pupils and their families, including when attending multi-agency meetings. This has freed up the time of senior leaders. They show a strong determination to improve the school and have accurately identified the areas that need attention. They have already improved phonics teaching and mathematics across much of the school.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Senior leadership has developed a ‘transformation team’ of middle leaders. Their role is to ensure that the curriculum is interesting and relevant to pupils. The exceptional science and engineering laboratory provides pupils with valuable ‘hands-on’ experiences. For example, during the inspection, pupils were investigating what happens to potatoes when left out in the light, and pupils in Year 5 were excited about the imminent hatching of some chicks. Pupils enjoy learning key words and sentences in Spanish. The school provides a wide range of trips. Visitors to school often include inspirational people who have accomplished challenging tasks. Recently, pupils listened to a climber who had successfully ascended Everest. There is a growing number of extra-curricular activities. Workshops called ‘enabling enterprise’ help pupils to understand the characteristics that will help them to do well when they start work.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
These include having a positive attitude and persevering. The physical education and sport premium is used well to promote different sports. Participation rates have improved for all pupils. When asked, pupils said that they enjoyed the many activities that the school provides. Leaders have established a programme of events to ensure greater parental involvement. This is having a positive impact. Parents said that they valued the school’s videos on subjects such as, ‘how to read with your child’.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governance has been through a period of upheaval. New governors have only recently been appointed. Currently, they do not have a deep enough understanding of how the school is performing. They do not receive accurate information from the school regarding the attainment and progress of different groups of pupils. Minutes of meetings show that governors do not always hold leaders sufficiently to account. The monitoring of pupil premium funding is not rigorous enough. The school’s website has not been frequently checked. Some key policies have not been updated. However, this was urgently addressed during the inspection, and put right. Since taking up their new role, governors have conducted a skills audit. This shows that governors have valuable expertise in business, safeguarding and finance. They are currently looking to recruit a governor with experience of education. Governors are determined to improve the quality of education provided by the school.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Pupils say that they feel safe at the school. They know whom to go to if they ever have any concerns. There are stringent checks on making sure that staff are suitable to work with children. The school runs an extensive range of safeguarding training. Procedures are followed carefully and records of concerns are well maintained. The majority of parents who responded to Parent View say that the school keeps their children safe. The school has effective links with external agencies and so is able to access specialist support when needed.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching and learning is not consistently good throughout the school. Assessment procedures are too variable. Mathematics is tracked on two different systems, which staff find confusing. Some teachers are inaccurate in assessing pupils’ starting points and the progress that pupils make. This means that teachers do not routinely use assessment to plan lessons that meet pupils’ different abilities. A few parents expressed some concerns about the support provided to pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Inspectors found that leaders spent a considerable amount of time working on pupils’ individual education plans. However, they did not spend enough time on checking these plans to ensure that the work provided matched the specific needs of each pupil. Teachers do not give pupils enough opportunities to write extended pieces of work. This means that pupils do not get enough chances to refine their skills.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The teaching of phonics is improving. Staff have been well trained, and phonics sessions build upon pupils’ existing abilities. Pupils’ reading skills are well developed, for example through the numerous activities provided by the school librarian. Teaching assistants make a significant contribution to pupils’ learning. For example, they support those pupils who find it challenging to manage their own behaviour. Displays in most classrooms enable pupils to refer to useful material to help them in their learning. For example, pupils in Year 4 were seen carefully checking their answers about the properties of three-dimensional shapes.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Parents praise the support provided by the staff, including the skilled therapeutic team. They say that staff help to improve their children’s self-confidence and emotional well- being. A typical comment by a parent was, ‘The school are very supportive of both the children and parents – they are always available to talk to when you have a problem.’ Pupils say how much they value the support that is available to them. All know whom to contact if they have any concerns. One pupil expressed the views of many when they said, ‘The staff care about us and want to do everything they can to help us do well.’ Staff promote pupils’ safety well. Pupils are taught how to stay safe when using the roads and railways. Pupils learn useful information to help them stay safe when online. They know about the importance of not revealing personal information about
p.5
Personal development and welfare
themselves. Most pupils who spoke to inspectors said that bullying at the school is rare. They felt that if they ever had a problem, it would be sorted out quickly by staff.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Around the school, pupils conduct themselves well. For example, during the inspection, pupils did not run along the school’s long corridors. At the end of play- and lunchtime, pupils went sensibly to their classrooms. In lessons, pupils generally behave well. They listen carefully to the teacher and readily engage in the activities that have been set. However, when tasks are not well suited to pupils’ needs, a few can lose focus. Some parents who spoke to inspectors expressed concerns over the behaviour of pupils. They also had concerns about the use of the school’s behaviour monitoring system. School records and discussions with pupils indicate that behaviour is usually good. Most pupils said that they felt the school’s use of the behaviour monitoring system was fair. The school has worked hard to improve the attendance of pupils. It is now broadly similar to the national average. However, the attendance for some pupils is still low.
p.5
Behaviour
School leaders are working on further improving this area. They have recently put in place a number of strategies that are beginning to have an impact.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Leaders recognise that pupils’ progress is often inconsistent across the school. Their self-evaluation, that outcomes require improvement, is accurate. Because the pupil premium funding is not used well enough, disadvantaged pupils make variable progress. For example, disadvantaged pupils did not do as well as their peers last year. In 2017, by the end of Year 6, fewer than half of them reached the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined. Work in current pupils’ books shows that progress is still variable. Most-able pupils often do not make enough progress. Last year, with the exception of mathematics in key stage 1, the percentage of pupils reaching the higher standard was below the national average in all subjects at the end of key stages 1 and 2. Work in current pupils’ books shows that teachers do not stretch most-able pupils enough with challenging work. Pupils typically enter key stage 1 with below-average starting points. They make
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
variable progress and leave Year 2 with below-average results. Last year, pupils’ attainment in reading and writing was very low. Leaders have worked hard to address this issue, and progress in many classes is improving. Evidence seen in pupils’ books indicates that greater proportions are on track to meet the expected standard, particularly in reading and writing, than last year. Pupils make variable progress in key stage 2. In 2017, the percentage of pupils reaching the expected standard was below the national average. Work in pupils’ books shows that progress remains variable. Leaders agree that the percentage of pupils in the current Year 6 who are on track to meet the expected standard in writing is low. In most year groups, progress in mathematics is improving; however, it is still inconsistent in Year 6. Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities make the same variable progress as their peers. This is because staff do not consistently ensure that they provide work that
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
helps these pupils make strong progress. Pupils’ phonics skills are improving. Previously, the percentage of pupils reaching the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics check was below the national average. Work in current pupils’ books indicates that pupils are making stronger progress in this subject. Pupils do well in developing their scientific skills. They have many opportunities to think scientifically and make predictions. Pupils develop good geographical skills. For example, in Year 5, they knew about the different ways in which mountains form.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Children’s skills and abilities are often below those typical for their age when they enter the Nursery and Reception classes, particularly in communication, English and mathematics. Children make good progress from their starting points across early years. The proportion gaining a good level of development is improving each year. However, it is still a little below the national average. Teaching is effective. Staff are adept in making an accurate assessment of children’s progress. They carefully help children who need to catch up. They adjust the curriculum to ensure that children have the right type of work that matches their needs. For example, staff help children with communication difficulties to develop their speech from words into sentences. Staff have a good understanding of each child’s different social and emotional needs. Relationships are warm and caring, and this helps children to feel happy and safe.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Parents report that they are pleased with the support given to their children. Leadership is strong. Members of the large staff team work well together, communicating with each other often to ensure that children in all classes get the same effective support. The indoor and outdoor areas are attractive and well organised. Children have many activities that stimulate their interests, such as making ‘cakes’ in the outdoor mud kitchen.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address admin@whitleypark.reading.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 3−4 June 2015
p.8
Information about this school
The school does not meet requirements on the publication of specified information about the pupil premium, SEN and/or disabilities, and aspects related to governance, on its website. Whitley Park is much larger than the average-sized primary school. Provision in early years consists of a part-time Nursery and full-time Reception. Nearly half of the pupils are supported through pupil premium funding. This is well above the national average. A quarter of the pupils have SEN and/or disabilities. This is above average. Many members of the governing body are new. There is currently an acting chair. The school has a large therapeutic team. It consists of a child welfare officer who deals with issues related to child protection and children’s welfare, a mental health worker, and specialist play and music therapists. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum
p.8
Information about this school
expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning throughout the school, with most observations being carried out jointly with senior leaders. In addition, inspectors scrutinised pupils’ books, and listened to pupils read. Meeting were held with pupils, the governing body, the headteacher and other senior leaders. There was also a meeting with a representative of the local authority. Inspectors looked at a range of information provided by the school, including information on pupils’ progress and attainment, behaviour and attendance records, procedures for safeguarding, and the school’s own evaluation of its work. They considered reports to the governing body, minutes of governing body meetings and the school’s plans for further improvement. Inspectors considered the 81 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View. They also held informal discussions with parents at the end of the school day.
p.10
Inspection team
Liz Bowes, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Clare Beswick Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion