Summary
Jennie Christopher (lead), Sarah Olliver
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Mar 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Jennie Christopher, Sarah Olliver
- Helped and protected verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GU10 3AP
- Name on report verified
More House School
- URN verified
SC013927
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Helped and protectedGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff form positive relationships with young people and support them to settle and thrive through their residential experience. p.2
- The well-being team, led by the designated safeguarding lead, is highly effective within the school. p.2
- Leaders and managers are ambitious and have extremely high aspirations for the young people across the school. p.5
- Young people and their parents are consistently positive about the residential provision. p.2
- Young people enjoy their residential experience and they are enthusiastic about their time at school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Demonstrate how residential staff are working towards a level 3 qualification within three months of starting employment. p.3
- Evidence the joint working across school departments in meeting young people’s needs. p.3
- Consider using the most current guidance, namely the social care common inspection framework, when evaluating the residential provisions. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,445
- about usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 1 More House School Moons Hill, Frensham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 3AP Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this residential special school
More House School is an independent Catholic foundation school occupying a large, self-contained site in a rural setting on the borders of Frensham Common, Surrey. It is open to boys of any faith, aged eight to 18. The school provides individualised learning programmes for boys who have specific learning difficulties and/or social communication/speech and language difficulties within the average range of ability. Day, weekly and full-boarding places are provided. Boarding facilities are split between the lower school in the main school building and the upper school in a separate accommodation block.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
good
How well children and young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of previous inspection: 20 March 2017
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: good Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 2
p.1
Key findings from this inspection
This residential special school is good because:
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
Young people and their parents are consistently positive about the residential provision. Staff form positive relationships with young people and support them to settle and thrive through their residential experience. The well-being team, led by the designated safeguarding lead, is highly effective within the school. The promotion and development of this team have led to improvements in the supportive environment for young people, in particular a reduction in sickness and providing them with new skills to manage exam stress and anxiety. The development of house families within the residential provision is generating a sense of belonging for young people. It underpins the notion of peer-to-peer support within the school. The accommodation has continued to be improved and redecorated over the last year. It is all now of a high standard and homely in its feel and appearance. Young people say that they have been involved in choosing colours and how the
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
communal areas have been designed and laid out. The leaders and managers within the school are ambitious and have high aspirations for young people. They are accessible, and young people, as well as staff, are confident in approaching them and sharing their thoughts and ideas.
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
The residential special school’s areas for development are:
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
Residential staff do not always feel as well informed as their colleagues who work during the day. There are no formally recorded joint meetings between the teams within the day and residential provisions, beyond daily handover. Staff who are new to the residential provision benefit from a thorough induction. However, there is no evidence of how they are working towards their level 3 (or equivalent) qualification within the first three months of employment. The most up–to-date guidance has not been used when evaluating the residential provision’s quality and effectiveness. Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 3
p.2
Recommendations
Demonstrate how residential staff are working towards a level 3 qualification within three months of starting employment. Evidence the joint working across school departments in meeting young people’s needs. Consider using the most current guidance, namely the social care common inspection framework, when evaluating the residential provisions. Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 4
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Young people enjoy their residential experience and they are enthusiastic about their time at school. Those who may struggle or require a greater level of encouragement to engage are afforded this time by the committed staff team. Joint working across the team and with parents and specialist teams, such as speech and language and occupational therapy, provides effective assistance to help young people settle in the residential provision.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Parents are consistently positive regarding their child’s experiences of staying at the school. They feel that they are able to access staff at any time and that their views are heard. They are welcome to visit the school at any time, and were seen during the inspection in both the residential area, and taking their children out for the evening.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Young people feel that they are listened to and that they are able to effect change. House meetings, student council and focus committees allow young people the opportunity to raise their views and share ideas. In addition, the recent implementation of ‘boarding families’ is embedding peer-to-peer support.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Young people are supported to understand how to lead healthy lifestyles. Displays in the dining room are interactive and demonstrate the nutritional aspect of certain foods, with a current focus on the amount of sugar in popular drinks. Some young people are engaged in ‘food explorers’ to try new types and textures of foods to help expand their diet. A wide range of physical activities are also on offer in the evening, alongside other stimulating and creative activities.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Young people’s emotional well-being has become key to the residential experience, and is a priority across the school. Joint working with the therapies team has become more embedded for residential staff. Targeted sessions have seen a reduction in student sickness and better management of exam stress.
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Young people learn skills for independence and adulthood through accessing the residential provision. This includes how to share and tolerate others, in addition to practical skills such as cooking, domestic chores and budgeting. There are plans to develop the sixth-form kitchen in order to promote independence further.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Young people say that they feel safe in the residential provision. They are confident in their surroundings and interactions with each other and staff. Those who struggle with identifying positive relationships and what being safe means are identified by staff, who offer help and guidance.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
The well-being team, led by the designated safeguarding lead, has an excellent Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 5 understanding of the vulnerabilities of those in the school. Its members identify who may be at risk and require extra support. Records of liaison with partner agencies are clear and demonstrate a sound level of challenge if they feel that a service is not fulfilling its responsibilities. The chronologies maintained of safeguarding concerns and actions are clear. The safeguarding lead has settled well into her role, and has grown in confidence and knowledge.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff responses to behaviour are consistent across the school and young people know what is expected of them. The recently computerised records of behavioural interventions are well maintained. Senior residential staff meet weekly to analyse behaviour and responses, identifying trends, and who is currently needing more bespoke support. Risk assessments are regularly updated and reflect changes in behaviour. Physical intervention by staff is rarely used, and the headteacher provides robust oversight, including ensuring that records accurately reflect incidents.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Young people rarely go missing from the school. If a young person’s whereabouts are unknown, the walkie-talkie system ensures a coordinated response in searching for them. Members of the senior team are aware of their roles in this instance.
p.5
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Young people are supported to keep safe and do not raise bullying as an ongoing concern. Issues within peer groups are quickly noted and staff interventions are sound. Those who continue to struggle benefit from a targeted, multidisciplinary response. E-safety workshops are regularly undertaken with young people. It is recognised that this is an ever-evolving area, and the school endeavours to keep abreast of new concerns as they arise. All computers and devices have a link for young people to report inappropriate content or bullying online.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Leaders and managers are ambitious and have extremely high aspirations for the young people across the school. They are keen and committed to their roles. They have a key understanding of young people’s progress and individual tracking is being updated and developed to make it easier to manage data and evaluate students’ progress.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff are positive in their roles and say that they are well supported by senior staff. They feel listened to and that they have the training they need to meet the needs of those they care for. Staff who are new to role undertake a thorough induction, and say that they have been made welcome in the school. However, there is currently no system to ensure that they are working towards a level 3 or equivalent qualification within three months of employment.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff comment that at times they feel that day staff have better guidance and support when managing young people’s behavioural needs. There is insufficient evidence of the involvement of residential staff, including seniors, in some joint planning meetings, which results in information being missed from plans. Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 6 There is sound evaluation in the monitoring of the residential provision against the national minimum standards. Minor shortfalls noted during the inspection may have been noted if the most current guidance, the social care common inspection framework, had been used.
p.5
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The ethos, as set out in the residential provision’s statement of principles, is adhered to and promoted. The physical environment is of a high standard, and young people feel that it is a homely place. Tolerance and difference are celebrated across the school. Young people, in general, are tolerant of each other’s difference. Young people’s views are sought and listened to.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the school knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.6
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 7
p.6
Residential special school details
Social care unique reference number: SC013927
p.7
Residential special school details
Headteacher/Teacher in charge: Jonathan Hetherington
p.7
Residential special school details
Type of school: Residential Special School
p.7
Residential special school details
Email address: headmasterspa@morehouseschool.co.uk Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 8
p.7
Inspectors
Jennie Christopher, social care inspector (lead) Sarah Olliver, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school – More House School 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.8
Inspectors
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspectors
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.9
Inspectors
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion