Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Surrey County Council in Surrey
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Surrey County Council
- Inspection date verified
26 Mar 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Emeline Evans
- Name on report verified
SC068827
- URN verified
SC068827
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The registered person should only accept placements for children where they are satisfied that the home can respond effectively to the child’s assessed needs as recorded in the child’s relevant plans, and where they have fully considered the impact that the placement will have on the existing group of children. p.3
- Ensure supervision for staff allows them to reflect on their practice and explore safeguarding practice. p.3
- Ensure the registered person notifies Ofsted of the outcome following an incident relating to the protection, safeguarding or welfare of a child living in the home which the registered person considers to be serious. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 169
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 37, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: SC068827 1 SC068827 Registered provider: Surrey County Council Interim inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
The home is owned and run by a local authority. It provides care and accommodation for up to five young people who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Information about this children’s home
Enforcement action since last inspection: none
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At the interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness.
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Since the last inspection, good progress has been made in meeting the previous requirements and recommendations. There are various audits in place which demonstrate a good management awareness of the strengths and areas for development in the home. The manager has a child-centred approach to management, and is involving young people in developments and decision making. The manager continues to ensure that staff are fully involved in the running of the home, and in the decisions made. As a result, staff are positive about their work and feel that there have been improvements in the culture created.
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
In recent weeks, the home has experienced a change in its group dynamics. Two young people have left since the last inspection; one of these was a temporary move. The staff team recognised that the young person was potentially being exploited by individuals in the community. The staff monitored episodes of missing to understand any patterns, and communicated with all of the necessary professionals to implement a safety plan. The Inspection report children’s home: SC068827 2 decision was to move him as a temporary measure, with a view to transitioning him back. This was a good example of proactive working to ensure that the young people are kept safe. The other move was planned, with a transition back home. Although there have been no new admissions, the impact risk assessments in place are not reviewed when young people’s behaviours and vulnerabilities change. In addition, they do not take into account the staff’s skills and experience, and the impact that any new
p.1
and young people since the most recent full inspection
admissions may have on the current group of young people. However, the statement of purpose has been revised; the manager ensures that all potential admissions are now in line with the criteria outlined in the statement of purpose.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Young people currently in placement have progressed as a result of living in the home. Young people now either have jobs or are engaging in education. The staff continue to create educational opportunities for the young person who is in employment, as he refuses to engage in formal education. Young people have appropriate boundaries in place to enable them to progress. Staff positively intervene to enable young people to learn from behaviours. This has been successful in reducing behaviours such as going missing from the home.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Care planning documentation has been revised with the introduction of daily care programmes. This now enables cross-referencing of all the necessary information about young people, including individual risk assessments. The strategies are now much clearer and information is easier to locate. This enables the staff to support the young people more effectively. All of the records are now signed and dated and the managers have a better oversight of these. Since the last inspection, staff have been advised on how to follow the room-search policy and complete the necessary paperwork. There have not been any room searches.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The home provides a homely and safe environment. The manager recognised that it was taking too long for contractors to repair the fire system. Therefore, they have ordered spare parts to reduce this waiting time considerably. This has ensured that young people are not at risk while waiting for these repairs.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The workforce development plan has been amended to remove training that is no longer provided by the local authority. The manager has recognised the need for additional training within the staff team, and is using team meetings to develop the staff’s skills and ensure that staff are all aware of, and can support, young people’s specific vulnerabilities. Staff undertake a range of training courses to reflect on their practice.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Referrals have been made to the necessary professionals in the local authority when there have been allegations made. The manager has followed the necessary procedures to ensure the safety of the young people. However, Ofsted has not been notified of the outcomes of investigations.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Staff report that they are well supported by the manager and the deputy, and records indicate that supervisions are regular. However, the documentation regarding the supervisions is not detailed and does not evidence discussions about safeguarding or reflections on practice. Therefore, this does not identify if any additional support for the Inspection report children’s home: SC068827 3 member of staff is required.
p.2
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The whole staff team has developed strong links with external professionals and parents. One placing social worker who spoke with the inspector was very positive about the relationship she has with the staff, and how communication is effective in ensuring her young person is kept safe. The location risk assessment has been reviewed and consultation with the local police took place to share known information about concerns in the local area.
p.3
and young people since the most recent full inspection
The number of physical interventions increased prior to a young person transitioning on. Staff recognised the emotional impact the transition was having towards the end of the placement. Staff had regular discussions with the young person to try and find alternative strategies for regulating his emotions.
p.3
and young people since the most recent full inspection
Staff are confident in their roles and key workers are well informed about the needs and progress of their key children. The monitoring systems in place are used to good effect to identify shortfalls and take appropriate action. There is a commitment from the management and the staff team to further raise the standard of care provided for the young people who live in the home.
p.3
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
04/10/2017 Full Good 04/01/2017 Interim Improved effectiveness 01/06/2016 Full Requires improvement 09/11/2015 Interim Declined in effectiveness
p.3
Recommendations
The registered person should only accept placements for children where they are satisfied that the home can respond effectively to the child’s assessed needs as recorded in the child’s relevant plans, and where they have fully considered the impact that the placement will have on the existing group of children. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 56, paragraph 11.4) Ensure supervision for staff allows them to reflect on their practice and explore safeguarding practice. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 61, paragraph 13.2) Ensure the registered person notifies Ofsted of the outcome following an incident relating to the protection, safeguarding or welfare of a child living in the home which the registered person considers to be serious. (‘Guide to the children’s Inspection report children’s home: SC068827 4
p.3
Recommendations
homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 63, paragraph 14.10)
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.4
Information about this inspection
This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’.
p.4
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: Quadrant Court, 35 Guildford Road, Woking GU22 7QQ
p.4
Inspector
Emeline Evans, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC068827 5 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion