Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Children's centre inspection

Newstead and Rural Families Children’s Centre

Inspected 22 May 2014 · URN 80669

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 May 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Deborah Sanders, Maureen Deary, Qaisra Shahraz

  • Access to services verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of practice verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NG16 6BW

  • Name on report verified

    Newstead and Rural Families Children’s Centre

  • URN verified

    80669

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Access to servicesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of practiceGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 100% of reports of this type graded Good
GoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveexcellentpositiveimprovedrobustvery highimproving
Criticisminadequateat riskrequires improvementconcernsharmgapsnot successfulnot engaging

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1957w+74
  • What needs to improve94w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,018
about usual (typical 1955)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 42
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 3
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Newstead and Rural Families Children’s Centre

p.1

The Tin Hat Centre, Chapel Road, Selston, Nottinghamshire, NG16 6BW

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Access to services by young children and families Good 2 The quality of practice and services Good 2 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

This children’s centre group is good.  Registration and participation rates have significantly improved due to a range of successful approaches, including strong partnership with a wide range of professionals, and better collation and use of data.  Families benefit from a wide range of effective universal and targeted services. This includes also packages of tailored support in homes for those families experiencing personal difficulties.  Families’ outcomes are improving. Children benefit from activities preparing them for school. Adults gain in confidence, make new friends, and are gaining good opportunities to extend their learning, improve employability and parenting skills.  The centre is led and managed well. Outcomes have improved due to robust monitoring of services, and effective support and challenge provided by the local authority and advisory board.  The effective use of resources, and a variety of venues across the locality, has enabled families to

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

access appropriate services and improve their well-being.  There is strong involvement of parents in the centre’s decision making through formal consultations, and active representation on the advisory board. A well-managed and excellent volunteer programme resulted in paid and unpaid employment for several adults.  Staff and managers are driven to reduce inequalities, working with those families that need specialist support and celebrating diversity.

p.1

It is not outstanding because:

 A small minority of families living in remote rural communities remains difficult to engage, and are not benefiting from the good services offered by the centre.  Although the majority of children are making good progress in their development, the gap is not closing quickly enough between the lowest 20% in the Early Years Foundation Stage, and the rest.

p.1

Information about this inspection

The inspection of this children’s centre group was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009. The centres that form part of this children’s centre group are Newstead Children’s Centre and Rural Families Children’s Centre.

p.2

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors held meetings with: local authority managers; representatives from the advisory board; parents; volunteers; a community midwife; childminders; a headteacher; an early years teacher; Jobcentre Plus managers; leaders of parenting and freedom district programmes; as well as centre staff and a number of other partners.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors visited a range of sessions and activities held at each of the two centres as well as in other venues. These included Acacia Community Centre, Hucknall Children’s Centre, Selston Community Centre and Newstead Welfare Centre.

p.2

Information about this inspection

Activities observed included: ‘Messy Play’, ‘Messy Explorers’, ‘Baby Massage,’ ‘Sewing’, ‘Crèche’, ‘Kirkby Woodhouse Toddler Group’ and a ‘Childminder’s Group’.

p.2

Information about this inspection

Inspectors looked at the group’s self-evaluation documents, activity plans, case files, safeguarding procedures and a wide range of other relevant documentation.

p.2

Inspection team

Qaisra Shahraz, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Deborah Sanders Additional Inspector Maureen Deary Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about the group

Newstead and Rural Families Children’s Centre is a group of two centres in the Ashfield district in western Nottinghamshire. It serves the wards of Newstead, Kirkby Woodhouse, Kirkby Annesley, Selston, Jacksdale, and Underwood which cover a large, and mainly rural, geographical area. There are nine other children’s centres in the district. Commissioned by the local authority, the centre is managed by Nottinghamshire Children and Families Partnership (NCFP). A district manager, with the support of a coordinator is responsible for the group. The two centres share a local advisory group (LAG) comprising key partners and parents.

p.3

Information about the group

The centre works in partnership with a wide range of organisations to meet its core purpose by providing a range of universal and targeted services, including play and learning activities, family support services, adult education and health promotion activities. There is no on-site childcare provision.

p.3

Information about the group

There are 1077 children under five years of age living in the area. Around 16% of families living in the locality are from minority ethnic backgrounds, the main groups being mixed British, Eastern European and African/Caribbean. About 22% of families are workless and dependent on benefits. There are pockets of deprivation, for example, in Newstead village and Jacksdale ward. In Hucknall and Kirkby wards families live in the 30% lowest of deprivation. The centre’s main target groups are children from isolated families, low-income families and those with disabilities.

p.3

Information about the group

Children’s skills, knowledge and abilities on entry to early years provision are at or below those typical for their age. The priorities for the group are tackling rural isolation, workless households, supporting sufferers of domestic abuse and children with additional needs or disabilities. Housing is mainly owner occupied, as well social housing and private rented.

p.3

What does the group need to do to improve further?

 Increase the number of families engaging with the centre from the identified target groups, particularly those experiencing isolation by living in remote rural communities by:  exploring innovative ways to reach more families  marketing and promoting the centre’s services across the reach areas  planning more outreach activities.

p.3

What does the group need to do to improve further?

 Demonstrate that outcomes are improving for children by:  working with the local authority, and with partners in schools and local nurseries, to identify actions that will narrow the gap between the lowest 20% in the Early Years Foundation Stage, and the rest.

p.3

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Currently, over 83% of children under five years of age and expectant parents are registered with the centre, and the majority are involved with the centre’s services. However, managers recognise that, while they have increased the number of families engaging with the centre from some target groups, the centre has not been successful in engaging a small minority of families living in remote rural communities.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Strong partnerships, underpinned by good communication with local schools and health and social care professionals, have a very positive impact on children’s learning and families’ welfare, and on reducing inequalities. Good use of live birth data and effective sharing of information with the midwifery team, for example, have resulted in increased registrations.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 A large majority of families benefit from a wide range of good-quality, universal and targeted services, which considerably improve their outcomes and personal circumstances. These are based on a thorough assessment of the needs of individual families and of children who have additional needs.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Opportunities for parents who are eligible to receive funding for their two-year-old children to attend early education have increased, and the majority of those children take up free places. Similarly, the vast majority of children aged three and four take up their free entitlement to early education.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Through the effective use of a variety of community venues, including other local children’s centres, the centre has successfully increased its outreach services. Home visits are an integral part of its outreach work.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 The centre places strong emphasis on providing services for the development of users’ social, emotional, and personal skills. Proactive family support workers have good knowledge of the varied and difficult issues facing many families. They target support and advice effectively to meet the needs of individual families, particularly those suffering from postnatal depression, isolation or domestic violence, resulting in a reduction of inequalities for families.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Satisfaction rates are very high. Parents, including those experiencing personal difficulties as a result of being new arrivals in the country, speak highly of how the centre has improved their lives. One grateful Eastern European woman spoke highly about the invaluable support she received from staff, which enabled her family to integrate well into life in Britain: ‘They are fantastic people, and helped me a lot. They were there for me at the most difficult time in my life.’

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Families regard the children’s centre, known locally as The Tin Hat Centre, as a valued hub of their community. They speak very warmly of the welcoming, helpful and sensitive staff who provide a high level of support, advice, and guidance.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 The centre is improving children’s life chances through specialist sessions, such as ‘Hometalk’, which have a clear focus on children’s speech and language development. Children enjoy and benefit from well-planned activities, such as ‘Musical Tales’, and ‘Messy Explorers’. The proportion of children living in the area who achieved a good level of development by the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage has shown improvement over time. In partnership with local nurseries, the centre is working hard to improve children’s preparation for and success at school. However, the gap in attainment between the lowest achieving 20% and the rest still remains wide.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 The large majority of parents have engaged in parenting courses and some form of adult learning. This includes short taster courses such as ‘First Aid’, ‘Sewing’, ‘Beauty’, and ‘Vintage Interiors’. The ‘Dad’s Baby Massage’ sessions demonstrate well the centre’s commitment to inclusivity and its involvement with fathers. Parents also have opportunities to gain accreditation in English and mathematics through effective partnerships with Access Training. They can also practise for job interviews, and write curriculum vitae in ‘Work Clubs’ at Acacia Centre to improve their employability skills. Some families who have difficulty in accessing the centre’s services are supported by a free taxi service and a crèche place for their child.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Health outcomes are good. Improving childhood obesity levels, which are significantly below the national rates, very high immunisation rates, and sustained breastfeeding reflect the centre’s effective targeted work and support. Messages about healthy lifestyles and the importance of physical exercise, for example, are promoted well through health-themed events, ‘Little Eaters’, and swimming sessions for families held at Annesley Primary School.

p.5

The quality of practice and services Good

 A key strength of the centre is its high level of engagement of parents who successfully influence the centre’s decision making by becoming very active and confident members on the local advisory group. An excellent and well-managed volunteer programme at the centre has enabled several parents to benefit from volunteering opportunities. This has helped to build their confidence and progress into training and eventual employment.

p.5

The quality of practice and services Good

 Disabled children and their parents are supported well through clear signposting to specialist support groups. The outreach work in several toddler groups meet the needs of families living in remote rural areas of Ashfield and Selston.

p.5

Good

 Managers are supported well and challenged to continually improve by the local authority and the advisory board. The local authority works closely with Nottinghamshire Children and Families Partnership (NCFP) who manage the group, to set ambitious targets for the centre. Robust analysis of data and information available to the centre, including through new systems of recording data show that services are having a positive impact on families and are consistently used in action planning.

p.5

Good

 The strong, highly qualified, and experienced leadership and staff team are extremely effective and efficient. Leaders ensure that good use is made of the diverse skills of the staff by allocating them specialist lead roles, including for community development and inclusion. All staff benefit from a wide-ranging programme of appropriate professional development opportunities. The effective use of high-quality children’s resources, accommodation and staff demonstrates good value for money and resulting in good outcomes for families.

p.5

Good

 The quality-assurance arrangements are robust and demonstrate well the centre’s clear focus on maintaining and monitoring of high quality services. The group’s quality monitoring cycle includes quarterly performance reviews, quality improvement visits, locality meetings, session observations, supervision, and monitoring of development plans.

p.5

Good

 The practice of gaining families’ views more formally, such as through consultations, representation on the advisory board, and the use of parents as volunteers, are now well embedded and key strengths of the centre. As a result, self-evaluation processes are effective, and centre leaders accurately identify strengths and areas for improvement.

p.5

Good

 Safeguarding, including e-safety, is a high priority within the centre, and its policies, procedures, and displays reflect this strong focus. The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) is used very effectively by family support staff to assess need and coordinate support for families, including those at risk of harm, children subject to child protection plans, and children in care.

p.5

Good

 Inclusivity and a strong commitment to reducing barriers for families underpin all the centre’s activities. Similarly, the centre celebrates diversity through its displays of positive images of children from around the world and its choices of toys and bilingual books. Some parents new to the country benefit from the bilingual skills of two volunteers. The centre website with access to links to 28 languages, help the centre to increase online registrations, improve communication, and engage with its diverse minority ethnic local communities.

p.5

Good

 Family case files are maintained to a high standard by staff. They are securely audited by managers to ensure that children and families are appropriately protected. The records clearly show positive improvements in mental health, economic stability and the safety of families.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and as a result inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.

p.7

Children’s Centre Group details

Unique reference number 80669 Local authority Nottinghamshire Inspection number 442836 Managed by The local authority

p.8

five in the reach area

Group manager Rosemary Phillipson Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01623 673860 Email address Rosemary.phillipson@nottshc.nhs.uk

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

 URN 22584 – Rural Families Children’s Centre  URN 22130 – Newstead Children’s Centre guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

(Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion