Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Kingston upon Thames

Inspected 10 Apr 2018 · published 3 May 2018 · URN EY494869

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Apr 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Katarina Hustava

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY494869

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−12Mixedmore positive than 83% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectivelyenjoyskilfullysecure knowledgerobustsafeeffective
Criticismweaknessesbreachesineffectivepoorfailedweaknot robustconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings576w+45
  • Leadership266w−60
  • What needs to improve157w−53

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
986
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 7
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 38%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 10 April 2018 Not applicable

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder and her assistant have a limited knowledge of safeguarding procedures, including the reporting procedures in line with the Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) and the 'Prevent' duty guidance, to protect children's welfare.  The childminder has not informed Ofsted that she has employed assistants, to enable relevant checks to be carried out on people working with children. She does not use a robust procedure to carry out her own checks when she employs assistants. This compromises children's safety.  The childminder does not follow appropriate hygiene routines when she provides bedding for children, to minimise the risk of the spread of infection.  The childminder does not reflect on her practice well enough to identify all areas for development, to improve the overall quality of care for children.  Occasionally, the childminder does not provide enough opportunities for children to

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder carries out regular observations and assessments of children's learning, and plans suitable activities to help children make good progress.  The childminder and her assistant skilfully use children's home languages during conversations, to help children build on their good communication and language skills.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 develop a secure knowledge of the Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) procedures and the 'Prevent' duty guidance, to ensure that in the event of concerns about a child's welfare appropriate actions are taken to protect children from harm 29/05/2018

p.2

Due Date

 ensure a robust recruitment and vetting procedure is followed, to check the suitability of all people looking after children 29/05/2018

p.2

Due Date

 improve hygiene procedures to ensure that the storage of bedding minimises the risk of cross-infection 10/05/2018

p.2

Due Date

 improve knowledge and understanding of changes that must be notified to Ofsted, with specific regard to the recruitment of assistants. 10/05/2018

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 use self-evaluation effectively to identify and address all weaknesses and breaches in requirements, to promote children's welfare  provide greater opportunities for children to express their own ideas during play.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector had a tour of the areas of the premises used for childminding.  The inspector spoke to the childminder and her assistant, and interacted with children at appropriate times during inspection.  The inspector looked at children's assessment records, the childminder's qualification, planning documentation and evidence relating to the suitability of household members and assistants.  The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector and the childminder evaluated the effectiveness of an activity together.  The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken to and provided in writing on the day of inspection.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder and her assistant have a poor understanding of their safeguarding responsibilities, which compromises children's safety. They are unaware of the procedures to follow in line with the LSCB should they have a concern about a child. In addition, they are unaware of the 'Prevent' duty guidance and of how to protect children from extreme behaviours and views to keep them safe. However, they know how to recognise the signs and symptoms of abuse. The childminder has failed to inform Ofsted about employing assistants, so Ofsted does not have the necessary information to carry out checks to determine their suitability. Furthermore, she does not use robust procedures to check the suitability of any adults she employs. As a result, children are cared for by unchecked adults, which compromises their safety and welfare. Nevertheless, she took some basic steps, such as viewing their Disclosure and Barring

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Service (DBS) check gained from their previous employment. In addition, the childminder closely supervises her assistants' practice. The childminder has not established an effective way to evaluate her practice to ensure she complies with requirements to provide good- quality care for children. Nevertheless, she carries out regular risk assessments of her home to keep children protected from potential hazards. The childminder seeks ideas to develop her skills, including through research. She provides resources and constructive feedback to her assistants regarding their teaching to support continuous improvement in children's learning. The childminder works in close partnership with parents. Together, they share information about children's learning at the setting and home effectively, to help provide continuity in children's development.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

The childminder plans for children well to capture their attention and helps them build on their skills. For example, when she teaches children about different seasons, she ensures that they gain a range of other skills, such as small- and large-muscle movements. The childminder reads a range of books with children and encourages them to name objects, both in their home languages and English. Children happily choose from a range of resources to support their learning and initiate their own play. For example, they pretend to cook and make a cup of tea. The childminder and her assistant enable children to solve simple problems, for instance, as they complete puzzles together. The childminder teaches children to count in sequence to help them build on their early mathematical skills.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The childminder does not ensure the suitability of her assistants well enough. This, and the childminder and her assistants' weak knowledge of safeguarding, compromises children's welfare. In addition, the childminder does not minimise the risk of cross- infection. She stores used mats and sheets on top of each other daily. The childminder monitors children's sleep appropriately. She follows children's individual care needs and teaches children to be active and fit. For example, she ensures that children have access to outdoor play throughout the day and enjoy healthy and nutritious food. The childminder has effective procedures to help children settle in quickly in her care. She models positive behaviour well and teaches children to respect and value each other's differences from an early age. She praises children for their achievements to help them build on their confidence.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

All children, including those who learn English as an additional language, make good progress in their learning and development. Children develop good physical skills and learn to roll, throw, catch and kick the balls. They enjoy a daily exploration of the outdoor environment and master their physical skills on a range of safe apparatus. Children cooperate well with one another and behave well. They develop good levels of independence. For instance, young children learn to manage their personal hygiene routines well. They are happy and motivated to learn and explore. Children learn a range of skills that prepares them for the next stage in their learning, such as nursery or school when the time comes.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY494869 Local authority Kingston upon Thames Inspection number 1043514 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 0 - 2 Total number of places 5 Number of children on roll 6

p.5

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection Not applicable

p.5

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2016. She lives in the London Borough of Kingston upon Thames, Surrey. The childminder works each weekday from 7am to 7pm all year round, except for family holidays and bank holidays. She employs two assistants. The childminder holds a relevant childcare qualification at level 3.

p.5

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.5

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion