Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Saint Joseph's Catholic Primary School, the Borough

Inspected 27 Mar 2018 · published 2 May 2018 · URN 100834

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Mar 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jason Hughes

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SE1 1NJ

  • Name on report verified

    Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+59Positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghigh expectationsrapid progressmake good progressambitiousgood progressaccuratepositive
Criticismconcernsfalls behindgapslowerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings866w+59
  • What needs to improve84w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
940
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Sue Barber Headteacher Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough Little Dorrit Court Redcross Way London SE1 1NJ

p.1

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

Following my visit to the school on 27 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in December 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

The school has a strong ethos, based upon its Christian values. Pupils and families are supported well by the school because staff appreciate the diverse nature and needs of the local community.

p.1

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

With the majority of pupils at the school speaking English as an additional language, the school gives particular emphasis to the development of speaking, reading and writing. You recognise that early literacy support is needed to bridge gaps in pupils’ learning. The high profile given to literacy development across the school is also seen through a variety of subjects. For example, in science, pupils have written poems to share their knowledge, allowing them to practise and improve their non- fiction writing skills.

p.1

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

Your school self-evaluation is thorough and an appropriate development plan has been put in place. Leaders are tasked with implementing school developments and regularly meet their targets. This accurate self-evaluation and planning have had a positive effect on the areas identified for improvement at the previous inspection. For example, the school’s approach to teaching science has been transformed and pupils are now more able to gain knowledge by taking part in exciting and thought- provoking experiments. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose, with the safety and well-being of pupils having the highest priority. Pupils, including those educated off-site, are monitored closely to ensure their well-being and safety.

p.2

Short inspection of Saint Joseph’s Catholic Primary School, The Borough

The governing body regularly audits safeguarding records to ensure that all statutory safeguarding duties are completed. Governors and leaders are trained in both safeguarding and safer recruitment. They ensure that appropriate staffing checks are made and that all safeguarding training is up to date. All staff react quickly to any concerns and inform pupils on how to stay safe.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At our initial meeting, we agreed that the inspection would focus on two key lines of enquiry. The first of these was to look at the school’s work to improve pupils’ outcomes in reading. This was because, although broadly average, pupils’ progress and attainment were lower in reading than in writing and mathematics. Leaders had also identified reading as an area for improvement.  Your arrangements for tracking pupils’ progress have contributed to improvements in reading. You have developed the roles of middle leaders so that they are confident in holding their teams to account for the quality of their work. They set high expectations and make sure that teachers’ information on the progress pupils make is consistent and accurate. Staff meet regularly to discuss individual pupils’ progress. Where necessary, additional support is provided for any pupil who falls behind. For example, after-school phonics lessons are used to

p.2

Inspection findings

help pupils catch up with early reading skills.  Specific strategies adopted by the school include the introduction of daily supported reading, with all staff committed to the project. Teachers are also using rich texts so that pupils deepen their understanding and link their reading and writing. The school has communicated to parents and carers the need for a strong start in reading to ensure long-term progress in all subjects. The parents who spoke with me recognised the benefits of the school’s emphasis on regular reading at home.  Inspection evidence demonstrated that pupils are making rapid progress in phonics and most are now making the expected progress in reading. As you acknowledge, there is still work to do to improve the progress of some lower- attaining pupils.  The second line of enquiry chosen was pupils’ outcomes in mathematics in key stage 1. Pupils generally make good progress from low starting points so that, by

p.2

Inspection findings

the end of key stage 2, their attainment is close to the national average standards. However, a lower proportion than found nationally reached the greater-depth standard at key stage 2.  Middle leaders closely monitor teachers’ work and quickly identify areas that need to be developed. Leaders provide support and training and check that improvements are made swiftly. These actions have led to more consistent approaches and better-quality mathematics teaching. For example, teachers are using a mathematics resource to make teaching more challenging, adding a competitive element which pupils clearly enjoy.  Teachers routinely promote pupils’ basic numeracy skills. Younger pupils show a clear understanding of how to work out fractions, for example. Pupils are keen to learn from their mistakes. Teachers apply this resilience and commitment to enable pupils to improve their mathematics skills.  Pupils in key stage 1 are ambitious to do well in mathematics and are making

p.2

Inspection findings

good progress, as shown by their work in classrooms and in their books. They are establishing good foundations for work in key stage 2.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 pupils’ progress in reading continues to improve so that it is as good as in mathematics and writing  more pupils are challenged to reach the greater-depth standard in mathematics at key stage 1.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of governors, the director of education for the Archdiocese of Southwark, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Southwark. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I met with senior leaders, a group of middle leaders, a representative from the local authority and governors of the school. Members of the senior leadership team joined me in observing lessons. I heard pupils from Year 2 and Year 6 reading and scrutinised a range of school documents, including policies and safeguarding records, the school’s website, governors’ minutes and a range of pupils’ workbooks. I also had conversations with parents in the playground and pupils around the school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion