Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

East Bierley Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 27 Mar 2018 · published 1 May 2018 · URN 107719

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Mar 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Randall

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BD4 6PH

  • Name on report verified

    East Bierley Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 26% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivelyimprovedconsistentlyhappyflourishproudeffective
Criticismweakerconcernsgapsnot alwaysfalling behindbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1357w+53
  • What needs to improve93w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,437
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Lysa Upham Headteacher East Bierley Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School South View Road East Bierley Bradford West Yorkshire BD4 6PH

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 27 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2013.

p.1

Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since your appointment as headteacher in January 2016, there have been considerable changes in leadership and staffing and an increase in pupil numbers. You lead the school with ambition, commitment and determination. Your clear vision of ‘an inclusive school where pupils are happy, flourish and can be the best they can be’ is shared by all staff and governors. This, combined with your strong drive for improvement, has ensured that the school has improved quickly, following a dip in its performance since the previous inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The school is proud of its Christian ethos and has strong links with the local church. Pupils understand the school’s core values of ‘friendship, forgiveness, trust, courage and respect’. Pupils say that that they feel happy in school and enjoy their learning. They attend regularly. Pupils behave well and want to make progress. Parents are overwhelmingly supportive of the school and recognise the difference you have made since your appointment. As one parent told me: ‘This is a lovely school. The headteacher has made such a difference since she joined.’

p.1

Primary School

You have an accurate understanding of what the school does well, and where the school needs to improve. Senior leaders are effective, and they support teachers well in classrooms. You have increased the rigour of your checks to ensure that the quality of teaching is consistently strong. You have acted decisively to make sure that any weaker teaching is quickly addressed. All members of staff who completed Ofsted’s online questionnaire say that they are proud to work in the school and that the school has improved since the last inspection.

p.1

Primary School

At the time of the last inspection, the school was asked to raise pupils’ attainment in mathematics. In 2017, at the end of key stage 2, pupils’ attainment in mathematics was average at the expected standard and above average at the higher standard. In 2017, at the end of key stage 1, pupils’ attainment in mathematics was below national averages. You have quite rightly identified that middle-ability pupils in key stage 1 could make better progress, and have begun work to address this.

p.2

Primary School

Inspectors also asked the school to raise attainment in writing. You and your team were disappointed with attainment in writing at the end of key stage 2 in 2017, and have taken action. Pupils are now making better progress in writing. However, you agree that more work is required to ensure that pupils’ handwriting and presentation are of a consistently high standard. Since your appointment as headteacher, you have taken action to drive improvements in mathematics and writing. You are working determinedly on the right aspects for improvement.

p.2

Primary School

There have been significant changes to the governing body since the last inspection, including the appointment of a new chair of the governing body. Governors have quickly gained an accurate view of what is working well and what could be better still, and are fully committed to the success of the school. Through regular visits, they assure themselves that pupils are well cared for, safe and now achieving well. They offer a healthy balance of challenge and support to you and your team.

p.2

Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. You have ensured that staff and governors receive appropriate training in child protection, and you and your team ensure that you carry out appropriate checks on the suitability of all staff who work with pupils. Staff know that safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility. You have made sure that all staff know the school’s systems and procedures well. They are in no doubt about what action the school expects them to take should they have any concerns.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils say that they feel safe in school. Pupils say that there is rarely any bullying, but if it does happen, they are confident that teachers and leaders will tackle it quickly. Pupils know who to go to if they have any concerns, and are confident that staff will deal effectively with any problems. Pupils enthusiastically told me about your ‘School Ambassadors’, and say that ‘these are pupils who are always available to listen and try to help us’. Pupils understand how to keep safe on the internet. Every parent who completed Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, agreed that the school keeps pupils safe.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At the start of my visit, we agreed a number of key lines of enquiry for the inspection. My first key line of enquiry was to explore how effectively leaders are improving progress in reading of the most able pupils at the end of key stage 2. This was because, in 2017, the most able pupils made weaker progress than other pupils.  Pupils, including the most able pupils, read accurately and fluently. You have changed the way reading comprehension is taught across the school. Guided reading sessions take place each day. Pupils read challenging texts, and use these to answer a range of questions which develop their reading skills well. Inference is promoted well, and the development of pupils’ vocabulary features highly in lessons. For example, in one lesson we visited, pupils confidently defined the meaning of the words ‘sumptuous’ and ‘elaborately’.  Throughout the school, pupils are enthusiastic about reading. You have

p.2

Inspection findings

successfully developed a love of reading. Pupils enthusiastically told me about ‘Drop everything and read’ time, when all pupils and adults in school spend time reading. Pupils also told me about the reading areas in each classroom, and they appreciate the variety of books on offer to them. Pupils, including the most able, are making good progress in reading.  My second key line of enquiry, and a key area for improvement in the school’s development plan, was the progress that pupils make in writing across key stage 2. Careful tracking of pupils’ progress has successfully identified any gaps in learning, and this has supported teachers in planning work which is well matched to pupils’ needs. Staff training and working with other schools have also been effective in increasing the accuracy of teachers’ assessment.  A school-wide focus on grammar and spelling is already having a positive impact on pupils’ writing. Teachers enable pupils to develop their understanding of

p.3

Inspection findings

grammatical features, and routinely encourage them to use these in their writing. You have recently introduced a new approach to spelling, which is paying dividends. Pupils are also given opportunities to apply their skills by writing at length in a range of other subjects, including history and science. You agreed that, in some classes, pupils’ handwriting and presentation could be further improved.  I also explored how effectively leaders are addressing the weaker progress of middle-ability pupils in mathematics at the end of key stage 1. This is because, in 2017, middle-ability pupils made weaker progress in mathematics than in reading and writing. Teachers ensure that appropriate apparatus and practical materials help pupils understand mathematical concepts effectively. Recent whole-school training, led by the mathematics leader, has resulted in teachers providing more opportunities for pupils to apply their skills through reasoning. However, our

p.3

Inspection findings

visits to classrooms, and work in pupils’ books, showed that, on occasions, teachers in key stage 1 do not always move pupils on soon enough and give them opportunities to apply their skills through reasoning.  My final focus was the effectiveness of the teaching of phonics in key stage 1. The teaching of phonics is good. You have developed tighter tracking, with more precise targets for pupils’ progress. You quickly identify those pupils who are falling behind, working with teachers to plan how to address gaps in pupils’ learning.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 teachers more regularly check the progress that pupils are making in mathematics, and move them onto more challenging reasoning problems sooner, especially in key stage 1  pupils’ presentation and handwriting are of a consistently high standard in all classes.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Leeds (CofE), the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kirklees. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you, your two assistant headteachers, the mathematics subject leader, five parents, seven members of the governing body, including the chair, and a representative from the local authority. I talked with small groups of pupils informally in lessons and during lunchtime. Along with you, I visited all classes. I looked at current English and mathematics books. I also listened to some pupils read in classes.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I examined a range of documentation, including documents relating to attendance and safeguarding. I took account of the minutes of the governing body meetings, the school’s evaluation of how well it is doing and the school’s improvement plan. I reviewed the school’s website. As part of the inspection, I considered the 48 responses from parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I also considered 18 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion