Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Husthwaite Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Mar 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Kate Rowley
- Postcode verified
YO61 4QA
- Name on report verified
Husthwaite Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They should then ensure that this information is shared with governors, so that governors can direct their questions more accurately to check the effectiveness of leaders’ actions for improvement. p.4
- I am copying this letter to the co-chairs of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of York, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. p.4
- This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,527
- about usual (typical 1481)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Miss Fiona Bennett Interim Headteacher Husthwaite Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Low Street Husthwaite York North Yorkshire YO61 4QA
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 27 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2013.
p.1
Primary School
Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I have identified some priorities for improvement which I advise the school to address. In light of these priorities, the school’s next inspection will be a full section 5 inspection. There is
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
Since your secondment to the school in January 2018, you have brought an ambitious, focused vision for the school, and for the federation as whole. You know what needs to be done to improve the school, and have identified many of these actions on the revised school improvement plan. However, it is early days, and it is too soon for all of these actions to have been set in motion, or to check their effectiveness. Governors, parents, carers, staff and pupils have confidence in your leadership and are committed to working together to make the school the best it can be.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
Since the last inspection, many changes have taken place in leadership and staffing. Each class is taught by a different teacher this year. Some stability has been retained by teaching assistants. You are working closely with the governors and partners in the local authority and the diocese to establish the priorities for improvement and to celebrate the strengths of the school. You are honest and accurate in your view that aspects of teaching and learning need support and improvement, such as those for younger children and in phonics and writing.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
Governors are passionate in their role and wholly committed to improvement. They embrace opportunities for further development, such as the process of a pupil premium review and the local authority-led governor training and forums. They said that they have much better clarity of their roles, and a clear, shared vision with you. They have honest and focused discussions and are comfortable in supporting school leaders and challenging them too where necessary. Governors said that they would like more assessment detail about the progress and attainment of all pupils and of groups of pupils across the school and checkpoints along the way on the improvement plan. I agree that this information would support them in strengthening their work further.
p.1
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
At the last inspection, school leaders were asked to raise achievement in mathematics by making greater use of problem solving and practical mathematical opportunities to challenge pupils’ learning. Leaders’ successful work to address this can be seen in the stronger outcomes at the end of key stage 2 and pupils’ current work in Year 2 to Year 6. Teachers’ and teaching assistants’ attention to giving pupils opportunities to develop fluency in their number work and then apply these skills to reasoning and problem solving activities are apparent in pupils’ work and in discussions with them about their learning. Pupils confidently share their thoughts with each other in class and test out their ideas. For example, during my visit, groups of pupils were involved in estimating weights of products and checking their answers, and weighing ingredients accurately to make cakes. The misconceptions of a group converting grams to kilograms were quickly spotted and addressed by the
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
teacher, ensuring that pupils developed a clear understanding and made progress in the session. Older pupils were seen making choices in tasks that gradually increased in difficulty, guided carefully and positively by their teacher if the task proved too easy or too challenging. The lead teacher for mathematics knows that clearer assessment systems and a focus on challenging pupils who are working at higher standards are the next steps for improvement.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
Leaders were also asked to make better use of tracking information to identify pupils’ next steps in learning at the last inspection. This is something you know needs to be better addressed.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
As the interim headteacher and designated safeguarding leader for the school, you have made sure that you have quickly got to grips with the current systems for safeguarding in the school. You have made some changes to strengthen arrangements, such as the way in which pupils exit the building safely at the end of the school day. The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Staff are aware of procedures for identifying and reporting concerns. There are clear logs of staff training, which are up to date, and systems for effective information sharing. Case files show effective work with external agencies where it is needed.
p.2
no change to the school’s current overall effectiveness grade of good as a
Pupils are taught different ways to keep each other safe. They said that they feel safe at school and would tell an adult if they did not. They explained how the Playground Squad keeps everyone happy and safe at playtimes by organising activities. They were able to give me very clear instructions about what to do if there was a fire alarm.
p.2
Inspection findings
There has been fluctuation in phonics results over time, lower results in writing and recent lower outcomes for children at the end of early years. I was interested to see how well phonics teaching develops pupils’ skills in reading and writing. You are right in your view that current pupils are not making strong enough progress in phonics. Adults do not use clear enough routines in phonics to engage pupils, give them confidence in making responses, or to develop effective phonics skills. Adults do not model saying sounds and applying them into writing and spelling, so pupils are unsure of the task and lose concentration, and then their behaviour slips. Writing outcomes are lower than those in reading and mathematics and lower than those seen nationally at the end of early years and key stage 1. Pupils’ current work and the school’s priorities for improvement show that this is still a focus area for improvement. The lead teacher for English has identified strengths
p.3
Inspection findings
and weaknesses in writing across the school. She has directed teachers’ attention to supporting pupils in editing and improving their work. Some of the successes of this direction can be seen in key stage 2 pupils’ work, which demonstrates that pupils are becoming more confident about improving their own work and that of their peers. However, this direction and expectation are not consistent. Misconceptions and mistakes, such as those in spelling and punctuation, are often not identified and addressed. Pupils in all year groups are not clear about what is expected of them in the content or the presentation of their work. Work is often not well presented, and handwriting and inaccurate letter formation are not addressed. You have identified that the Nursery, Reception and Year 1 children need clearer direction in their learning. I agree that this needs to be a priority for improvement. The starting points of children’s learning across the curriculum are
p.3
Inspection findings
not clear, so work is often not well matched to their individual needs. For example, some pupils with skills that are higher than typical for their age in aspects of learning are not challenged to test out and deepen their understanding. Although regular observations take place, we agreed that these could be used more effectively to identify the next steps a child needs to take. Expectations of what children can achieve and how they behave are not always high enough. The majority of parents said that their children are happy and safe at school. They are mindful of the many changes that have taken place, particularly for some classes, but most have confidence that you will address their concerns and bring about improvement. Pupils enjoy opportunities to work and play with other pupils of different ages. They particularly value assemblies and collective worship, as they said that this is when they all join together, it is a ‘fun time’ and they celebrate successes, such
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
they improve the quality of teaching, provision and behaviour management for the younger pupils teaching in phonics is improved, so that it is systematic, with sounds and spellings well modelled by adults, enabling pupils to make more rapid progress in reading and writing expectations across school are raised of the quality and presentation of the work that pupils of all abilities produce teachers are supported in making accurate assessments of pupils’ learning, particularly in reading, writing and mathematics effective systems are in place to regularly check the attainment and progress of all pupils and groups of pupils in all year groups from their starting points. They should then ensure that this information is shared with governors, so that governors can direct their questions more accurately to check the effectiveness of leaders’ actions for improvement.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the co-chairs of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of York, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I looked at specific aspects of the school’s work, including leadership, the quality of teaching and learning throughout the school, and safeguarding arrangements.
p.4
Information about the inspection
You and I worked closely together throughout the inspection, observing teaching and learning, looking at pupils’ work and discussing the school’s strengths and priorities for improvement. We discussed recent changes in staffing and the school’s self-evaluation. I reviewed school documentation, including that relating to safeguarding. I had discussions with the school business manager and the lead teachers for English and mathematics. I looked at pupils’ work in English with the lead teacher. I met with representatives from the governing body, including the co- chairs, and with the local authority school improvement partner. I heard pupils read and spoke to a group of pupils about the school. I considered the views of parents, speaking to them before school and noting the 15 responses to Ofsted’s questionnaire, Parent View. Staff views in the Ofsted online questionnaire were also considered.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion