Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Taliesin Education Ltd
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Mar 2018
- Inspectors verified
Nathan Kemp
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
PL14 4DA
- Name on report verified
T Plus Centres (Taliesin Education)
- URN verified
135405
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is poor and fails to meet the needs of pupils. p.4
- Outcomes for pupils are inadequate because pupils’ progress from their starting points is consistently weak in reading, writing and mathematics. p.6
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate p.1
- Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate p.1
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development8
“Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,492
- about usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
T Plus Centres (Taliesin Education) Loveny House, Miller Business Park, Liskeard, Cornwall PL14 4DA
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
There is a lack of leadership and management across the school. As a result, the school does not have the direction needed and standards are low. Leaders do not have an accurate overview of the school’s curriculum. Schemes of work are not up to date and fail to meet the needs of pupils. The curriculum limits pupils’ development; some subjects, for example religious education, are not always taught. Leaders’ assessments of pupils’ progress are inaccurate. The newly introduced process for tracking pupils’ progress is much needed but requires more precision. Pupils’ rate of attendance is very low. Some pupils rarely attend school. They do not make progress and are vulnerable to risk. There is a lack of organisation across the school. Roles and responsibilities are blurred and accountability is underdeveloped. The actions of the local authority and the head of centre are propping up the school. They have prevented the school from deteriorating
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
even further. Teaching does not meet the needs of pupils. Learning activities are often poorly planned and this inhibits pupils’ progress.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders’ actions ensure that pupils are safe. For example, they maintain daily contact with social services. They acknowledge, however, that record-keeping must dramatically improve. The head of centre has acted to halt a steep decline in standards. He has formed a governing body and established a new level of middle management. However, it is too soon to see the impact of this work.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school must take action to meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 and associated requirements. The details are listed in the report.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders and those responsible for governance urgently establish processes for systematically checking the school’s effectiveness against the independent school standards – the current over-reliance on the local authority decreases over time, through establishing an effective leadership and management model which brings stability and direction – roles and responsibilities are well defined and systems and processes are clear, followed and well understood – the logging and record-keeping of concerns about pupils’ well-being are streamlined and easily monitored by leaders – leaders and those responsible for governance hold school leaders stringently to account and develop the skills required to check the accuracy of the school’s self- evaluation – governors and middle leaders receive high-quality professional development in order to support them in their roles
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– the curriculum offer is rich and varied and develops pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills across all subjects, particularly reading, writing and mathematics – schemes of work are revised for each area of the curriculum and reflect the school’s ethos – the personal, social and health education (PSHE) curriculum is designed to meet the needs of pupils and reflects the risks that make them vulnerable – a thorough programme of monitoring is implemented, which checks the impact that teaching, learning and assessment has on increasing pupils’ progress – leaders develop systems to check the accuracy and robustness of the school’s assessment information – poor teaching is tackled swiftly and effectively – rates of attendance rise for all pupils. Rapidly improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that pupils make good progress by ensuring that: – teachers have the highest expectations of what pupils can achieve
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– teachers plan learning opportunities to meet the various needs of each pupil, with learning rather than activity at the heart of each lesson – teachers assess accurately what pupils know, understand and can do – staff receive high-quality training to enable them to develop their teaching skills teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are significantly raised and pupils’ dependency on adults decreases, particularly in writing.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
Leaders’ and managers’ failure to monitor the independent school standards has resulted in many of the standards not being met. The head of centre, who is also the current interim headteacher, was not aware of these standards. Leadership and management have been ineffective in halting the decline in the school’s performance. The local authority and the head of centre are currently propping up the school. There is a lack of leadership capacity across the school which has resulted in the downward trajectory of the school’s effectiveness in recent years. The school has operated without strategic direction and standards have fallen. Leaders are not clear about the roles and responsibilities of staff across the school. For example, they are unsure who is taking responsibility for specific areas of school improvement. This results in confusion among staff and leads to systems and processes that are convoluted. Straightforward activities, such as policy renewal, have slipped
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
through the net. Leadership is ineffective in raising standards. Leaders are not monitoring closely enough the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Although leaders have identified areas for improvement, these have not been acted on. As a result, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment has not improved and fails to meet the needs of pupils. The curriculum offer is narrow and does not develop pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills sufficiently. Pupils have limited opportunities to develop core skills such as reading, writing and mathematics. Social visits such as trips to the cinema, bowling and gym take precedent over ensuring that pupils develop the key skills required to succeed in the wider world. The school’s PSHE curriculum is ineffective. The school serves pupils who have mixed experiences of schooling, with many excluded from previous settings. Some pupils are vulnerable to risks such as alcohol and substance abuse, criminality and anti-social
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
behaviour, yet the school’s PSHE curriculum does not address these issues. The outdoor education programme provides some PHSE but this is not enough to meet pupils’ needs. The school’s use of extra funding for specific groups of pupils is not monitored. There is no awareness of how disadvantaged pupils are supported through additional funding. The impact of extra funding for pupils who have an education, health and care (EHC) plan is not evaluated. This results in pockets of varying practice, rather than a school-wide strategy and makes it difficult for leaders to plan improvements in outcomes for these groups of pupils. There is a lack of middle leadership across the school. The head of centre has introduced some new roles to the school but these are not yet effective. Middle leaders require training so they know what is expected of them in these roles. They have attempted to create action plans to make improvements but these are vague, lack rigour and are too
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
focused on buying resources instead of improving the quality of teaching. The head of centre has attempted to improve assessment systems across the school. However, current assessments are inaccurate and do not enable leaders to effectively track pupils’ progress. As a result, the school’s view of the progress made by pupils is unfounded. In recent months, the head of centre has provided much-needed leadership, particularly in improving safeguarding practices and the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. However, he has had to rely on local authority support and the support of his deputy leader for safeguarding to make improvements in these areas. The head of centre has worked under extremely challenging circumstances to improve the school’s performance. He has led the school, without knowledge of the independent school standards, with integrity. He acknowledges the need for more support, hence his
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
actions to add layers of leadership which were lacking. Without his intervention, the school would be less effective than it is. Leaders provide counselling and supervision opportunities to support staff who work closely with pupils with wide and varied levels of need. Staff appreciate leaders’ investment in their well-being.
p.4
Governance
Until recently, governance of any kind has been absent in the organisation of school leadership. As a result, there has been a void of accountability and a lack of strategic direction in recent years. The head of centre recognises this and has successfully recruited two new governors to provide accountability and oversight of all facets of the school’s performance. The newly formed governing body is, at this stage, ineffective. Although this added level of leadership is much needed, it is too soon to see its impact. Governors have undertaken the first strand of governor training. They are not yet equipped to carry out their roles effectively.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Despite poor organisation, it is clear that pupils are kept safe. The designated leader for safeguarding has been absent for some time. The deputy designated leader has shouldered responsibility for safeguarding during this absence. She is passionate about keeping pupils safe and can demonstrate how she maintains daily contact with social services in order to communicate arising concerns. The school’s systems for record-keeping lack organisation. However, the culture of safeguarding is effective. Staff are well trained to ensure they pass on concerns about pupils. Care plans are detailed and kept up to date. Recruitment checks on new staff are thorough. Although logs of concerns are not recorded in a systematic way, leaders can demonstrate how they are passed on, and followed up with external agencies.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is poor and fails to meet the needs of pupils. Staff do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve. Inaccurate assessment of pupils’ work means that staff are unable to design learning opportunities that challenge pupils or address misconceptions accurately. Teaching does not build on the knowledge and understanding that pupils already have. Pupils’ workbooks show that activities are often too easy, and so do not challenge them to make good progress. Staff do not consistently promote pupils’ independence, particularly in writing. Many pupils join the school working below expectations for their age. Teaching does not help pupils to develop their own writing because pupils rely too heavily on staff support. The quality of teaching varies widely across subjects and so pupils’ progress in writing is inconsistent. In some subjects, such as humanities, staff have higher expectations of pupils. However,
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate
in many other subjects expectations are too low and sequences of learning are disjointed. Leaders recognise that staff require more training to help them plan learning effectively. Poor-quality schemes of work lead to poorly planned learning activities. Activities are poorly designed and do not take into account what pupils already know, understand and can do.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is inadequate. Pupils do not have sufficient understanding of the particular risks they face because the PSHE curriculum is not tailored to their specific needs. As a result, even though pupils feel safe, they have limited knowledge of how to deal with a range of situations that they might encounter in the future. Pupils are ill-equipped to make healthy choices about their lifestyles. Many pupils do not understand how or why they should stay healthy physically. Staff support pupils’ emotional well-being effectively. However, staff are less successful in helping pupils to understand how to be successful learners. This hinders pupils’ progress because they do not develop self-confidence or resilience. For example, pupils have numerous trips out, for example bowling or to the cinema, but there is little evidence of how these activities will benefit them.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is inadequate. Although a minority of pupils attend well, many pupils’ rate of attendance is consistently low. Attendance for these pupils shows little sign of improvement. Some pupils are not attending at all, and so they are not making progress. The school serves pupils with a range of behavioural challenges. Staff manage behaviour calmly and pupils’ behaviour is generally calm around school. However, teachers’ expectations of pupils’ behaviour are often not followed through into action and so when poor behaviour happens it is not dealt with effectively. As a result, teachers’ academic expectations of pupils are lowered further. School leaders are introducing a new approach to supporting pupils with significant emotional needs, with the aim of improving this aspect of their work.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Inadequate
Outcomes for pupils are inadequate because pupils’ progress from their starting points is consistently weak in reading, writing and mathematics. The school provides education for 13 pupils. All pupils have an EHC plan and are funded by Cornwall or Bristol local authorities. Although leaders review these plans annually with a range of external agencies present, evaluations of pupils’ academic progress are based on the school’s inaccurate assessment information. The school’s policy for supporting pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is out of date and the school’s statutory special educational needs information report is not in place. Pupils’ progress in reading is slow because teachers do not provide sufficient opportunities for pupils to read. Teachers’ weak assessment of pupils’ reading skills leads to pupils’ misconceptions being unchallenged. As a result, pupils do not improve their
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Inadequate
skills at a sufficient rate. Pupils’ writing is poor and shows little improvement because staff often scribe for pupils, especially in literacy lessons, and this limits pupils’ writing development. Pupils do not develop their mathematical understanding sufficiently across the school, and particularly in key stages 2 and 3. Teaching fails to build on their prior knowledge. Consequently, pupils make poor progress in mathematics. Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is not being supported effectively because this group receives no additional support in school. Leaders do not know what funding is in place to help these pupils and there is no expenditure plan or evaluation. Funding that has been ring-fenced to support these pupils is not being applied. Pupils receive timely careers advice. Through close work with a careers advisor, all upcoming school leavers have already secured a destination for September 2018. This
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Inadequate
work prepares pupils well for the next stage of their development. Pupils make strong progress in the outdoor education element of the school curriculum. Progress is specific and closely monitored. Statements of progress are precise and allow adults to make reasonable adjustments to activities in order to improve pupils’ progress.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
School details
Type of school Other independent special school
p.7
School details
Email address alice.morris@tpluscentres.co.uk
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 11 March 2015
p.7
Information about this school
The T Plus Centres has spaces for 14 boys aged between seven and 16. There are currently 13 pupils on the school’s roll. Most pupils arrive having been excluded from other settings. Due to their disjointed school experience, many are working below academic expectations for their age. All pupils have an EHC plan. Two local authorities, Cornwall and Bristol, fund these. Some pupils are living in care; as a result, the school maintains regular contact with social services with regard to their attendance and any concerns that may arise. At the time of the inspection, the proprietor, who is also the principal, was unable to come into school. The head of centre is acting as principal in her absence.
p.7
Information about this inspection
The lead inspector observed pupils’ learning in both the school and at an alternative provider. Discussions took place with the head of centre. The lead inspector spoke with a representative from Cornwall local authority, a member of the newly formed governing body and the proprietor. The lead inspector scrutinised a number of documents including school improvement plans and leaders’ monitoring records of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. The lead inspector scrutinised records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding and met with the deputy designated safeguarding leader. The lead inspector considered schemes of work, written risk assessments and annual reviews of EHC plans. The lead inspector, together with the head of centre, looked at pupils’ work in books to establish the current quality of pupils’ work and their progress over time. The lead inspector considered one response to the online survey, Parent View, and also
p.8
Information about this inspection
considered 16 responses to the staff survey.
p.8
Inspection team
Nathan Kemp, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
Part 1. Quality of education provided
2(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if– – 2(1)(a) the proprietor ensures that a written policy on the curriculum, supported by appropriate plans and schemes of work, which provides for the matters specified in sub- paragraph (2) is drawn up and implemented effectively; and – 2(1)(b) the written policy, plans and schemes of work– – 2(1)(b)(i) take into account the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils, including those pupils with an EHC plan; and – 2(2)(d) personal, social, health and economic education which– – 2(2)(d)(i) reflects the school’s aim and ethos. 3 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that the teaching at the school– – 3(a) enables pupils to acquire new knowledge and make good progress according to their ability so that they increase their understanding and develop their skills in the subjects taught – 3(b) fosters in pupils self-motivation, the application of intellectual, physical and creative
p.9
Part 1. Quality of education provided
effort, interest in their work and the ability to think and learn for themselves – 3(c) involves well planned lessons and effective teaching methods, activities and management of class time – 3(d) shows a good understanding of the aptitudes, needs and prior attainments of the pupils, and ensures that these are taken into account in the planning of lessons – 3(e) demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of the subject matter being taught – 3(f) utilises effectively classroom resources of a good quality, quantity and range – 3(g) demonstrates that a framework is in place to assess pupils’ work regularly and thoroughly and use information from that assessment to plan teaching so that pupils can progress. 4 The standard in this paragraph is met where the proprietor ensures that a framework for pupil performance to be evaluated, by reference to the school’s own aims as provided to parents or national norms, or to both, is in place.
p.9
Part 2. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils
5 The standard about the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils at the school is met if the proprietor – 5(b) ensures that principles are actively promoted which– – 5(b)(v) further tolerance and harmony between different cultural traditions by enabling pupils to acquire an appreciation of and respect for their own and other cultures.
p.9
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
24(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that suitable accommodation is provided in order to cater for the medical and therapy needs of pupils, including– – 24(1)(a) accommodation for the medical examination and treatment of pupils – 24(1)(b) accommodation for the short term care of sick and injured pupils, which includes a washing facility and is near to a toilet facility; and 24(2) The accommodation provided under sub-paragraphs (1)(a) and (b) may be used for other purposes (apart from teaching) provided it is always readily available to be used for the purposes set out in sub-paragraphs (1)(a) and (b).
p.10
Part 6. Provision of information
32(1) The standard about the provision of information by the school is met if the proprietor ensures that– – 32(1)(a) the information specified in sub-paragraph (2) is provided to parents of pupils and parents of prospective pupils and, on request, to the Chief Inspector , the Secretary of State or an independent inspectorate; – 32(1)(b) the information specified in sub-paragraph (3) is made available to parents of pupils and parents of prospective pupils and, on request, to the Chief Inspector, the Secretary of State or an independent inspectorate; – 32(1)(c) particulars of the arrangements for meeting the standard contained in paragraph 7 are published on the school’s internet website or, where no such website exists, are provided to parents on request. 32(2) The information specified in this sub-paragraph is – 32(2)(c) where there is a governing body, the name and address for correspondence of
p.10
Part 6. Provision of information
its Chair. 32(3) The information specified in this sub-paragraph is– – 32(3)(b) particulars of educational and welfare provision for pupils with EHC plans and pupils for whom English is an additional language – 32(3)(e) particulars of the school’s academic performance during the preceding school year, including the results of any public examinations – 32(3)(f) details of the complaints procedure referred to in paragraph 33, and the number of complaints registered under the formal procedure during the preceding school year.
p.10
Part 7. Manner in which complaints are handled
33 The standard about the manner in which complaints are handled is met if the proprietor ensures that a complaints procedure is drawn up and effectively implemented which deals with the handling of complaints from parents of pupils and which – – 33(h) allows for a parent to attend and be accompanied at a panel hearing if they wish – 33(i) provides for the panel to make findings and recommendations and stipulates that a copy of those findings and recommendations is– – 33(i)(i) provided to the complainant and, where relevant, the person complained about.
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school– – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion