Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Burraton Community Primary School

Inspected 22 Mar 2018 · published 30 Apr 2018 · URN 111972

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

Mark Lees (lead), Janet Ross

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    22 Mar 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Ross, Mark Lees

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PL12 4LT

  • Name on report verified

    Burraton Community Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivegood progressstrongmake good progresswell ledstrengthsrobust
Criticismconcernsweaknessesweaknot consistentlystrugglebelownot precisely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings951w+52
  • What needs to improve77w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,020
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Lisa Tamblyn Headteacher Burraton Community Primary School Fairmead Road Saltash Cornwall PL12 4LT

p.1

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 22 March 2018 with Mark Lees, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the previous inspection. You have been pivotal in continuing to drive school improvement to ensure better outcomes for pupils. Your evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the school is accurate and you have constructed comprehensive plans to promote further improvement.

p.1

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

Leaders are aspirational for pupils to experience the best possible education. Robust and comprehensive management systems have ensured that teaching has continued to improve over time. Procedures to improve the quality of teaching are personalised and effective. For example, leaders’ rigorous monitoring processes identify areas for improvement for each teacher and link to a comprehensive programme of professional development. Across the school and over time, teaching is good and pupils in upper key stage 2 in particular are making rapid and sustained progress.

p.1

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

Your clear focus on behaviour and personal development has resulted in pupils who behave well and have a good attitude to learning. Pupils say that they enjoy school. They participate enthusiastically in lessons. Increasingly, pupils develop an understanding that learning is sometimes a struggle but that they can overcome difficulties if they keep trying. This means that pupils challenge themselves to achieve as much as possible. A Year 6 pupil summarised the comments of a range of pupils when he said, ‘It’s a fun place with interesting learning and opportunities to do well.’ Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

Leaders have created a culture where safeguarding is central to all of the school’s activities. Effective training ensures that staff and governors have a good understanding of the potential risks that pupils may face. Processes are well- established to record and monitor any safeguarding concerns and also to analyse any patterns or trends over time. The school undertakes stringent checks when recruiting staff and governors.

p.2

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

Staff manage playgrounds well. This enables pupils to feel safe. Pupils are confident that if they have any concerns, an adult will help them. E-safety is a high priority for the school. Consequently, teachers ensure that pupils know how to use the internet safely.

p.2

Short inspection of Burraton Community Primary School

Teachers and leaders deal well with the rare occurrences of bullying. Pupils understand what bullying is and they know what to do should it happen. The majority of parents who responded to the online questionnaire, Parent View, were positive about the school’s approach, although a minority disagreed.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The first line of enquiry explored how the early years provision is meeting children’s needs, particularly for boys. In 2017, children made good progress from their starting points. However, the proportion who achieved a good level of development was just below the national average. Boys did not achieve as well as girls in most of the areas of learning.  Leaders plan carefully for children’s transition to school and early years assessments identify children’s starting points. Teachers have identified that language and communication is a barrier to learning for a significant minority of the children entering the school. However, assessments do not identify precisely for each child which aspects of language and communication are weak. As a result, teaching does not consistently meet children’s needs well enough. This limits the progress some children make.  Children learn well: both boys and girls are able to sustain concentration on

p.2

Inspection findings

learning tasks. Teachers ensure that learning is intriguing for the children. For example, when ‘mysterious footprints’ had ‘arrived’ in the classroom, the children had to find out who had left them by measuring and comparing sizes with people in the school. Teachers’ strong knowledge of phonics ensures they effectively help children, including the youngest, to develop good phonic skills. Children successfully blend and segment words which helps them with both their reading and their writing.  Second, we focused on how effectively school leaders and governors are ensuring that teaching is meeting the needs of the most able pupils. This is because in 2017, although the proportion of pupils meeting the expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics combined was just above the national average, the proportion achieving the higher standards in reading, writing and mathematics combined was below the national average. Leaders identified the need to develop

p.2

Inspection findings

greater challenge for the most able pupils, which they have communicated effectively to staff. As a consequence, staff now work more effectively to cater for the needs of the most able pupils. They provide these pupils with appropriate challenge. This has resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of current pupils working at the higher standards.  We also looked at how effectively the additional resource base (ARB) provision is in ensuring that pupils with complex needs make good progress from their starting points. The ARB is well led by a knowledgeable and experienced leader who has created a safe, secure and supportive learning environment for the pupils. Staff are well trained and manage pupils who have challenging emotional and behavioural needs highly effectively. Teaching within the ARB is creative and responsive to the interests of the pupils. Regular assessment of pupils’ progress

p.3

Inspection findings

involves the pupils themselves in setting targets and results in pupils understanding their next steps well. As a result of an individualised curriculum that supports the pupils to become increasingly independent, the pupils who access the provision are making good progress.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 assessment in the early years, particularly around speaking and listening, is more precise so that staff identify children’s barriers to learning promptly and provide activities that rapidly develop children’s achievement in language and communication.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cornwall. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, we visited classes with either you or your deputy headteacher. We looked at the work in pupils’ books during lessons, as well as looking separately at samples of work with your leaders. We talked with pupils during our visits to the classrooms as well as in separate discussion groups and on the playground.

p.3

Information about the inspection

We met with you and your leadership team during the inspection and spoke with your administrator. I also met with three governors, including the chair of the governing body. I took account of 95 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and we spoke with parents informally at the start of the school day. I also considered 41 responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire and 240 responses to Ofsted’s online pupil questionnaire.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I reviewed the school’s website and information about the school’s academic performance. I considered a range of documents, including your summary of the school’s effectiveness, the school’s improvement plan and external reports. I also looked at documents related to safeguarding.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion