Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Kensington and Chelsea
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Mar 2018
- Inspectors verified
Nataliia Moroz
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
159441
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She has failed to address previous breaches of requirements. p.4
- The childminder does not have a suitable knowledge of how to recognise the signs that a child may be at risk of harm or exposed to extreme views. p.4
- Weaknesses are not identified or addressed to improve practice. p.1
- Due to the weaknesses in safeguarding, children’s safety and welfare are not assured. p.4
- The weaknesses in the childminder’s understanding of the early years foundation stage impacts negatively on outcomes for children. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action p.2
- ensure that the childminder understands the safeguarding policy and procedures, with particular regard to how to identify and respond to children that may have been exposed to extreme views and how to recognise allegations and appropriately respond to them 30/03/2018 p.2
- ensure the safeguarding policy and procedures are in line with the guidance from the relevant Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB), and include all relevant guidance about the action to be taken in the event of any child protection concerns 30/03/2018 p.2
- implement effective risk assessments to ensure any potential hazards are identified and eliminated, particularly in relation to the contents of unlocked low kitchen cupboards and large glass vase in the living room 30/03/2018 p.2
- ensure that appropriate hygiene levels are maintained, especially in relation to the management of children’s body fluids and the cleanliness of high chairs 30/03/2018 p.2
- keep and maintain a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance 30/03/2018 p.2
- ensure that the first-aid box is maintained according to requirements and has appropriate contents for use with children 30/03/2018 p.2
- improve knowledge of the early years foundation stage, and gain a good understanding of how to plan and provide challenging activities that cover all areas of learning to meet each child’s learning needs so they make good progress 16/04/2018 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Health & safety9
“Risk assessment is weak.” p.1Teaching & assessment8
“Risk assessment is weak.” p.1Safeguarding7
“Safeguarding is ineffective.” p.4Communication & language3
“The childminder does help children gain some basic communication and language skills.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,059
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 15 March 2018 6 July 2016
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Requires Improvement
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder does not meet requirements for the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register. Children’s safety is compromised. The childminder does not have a clear understanding of all child protection procedures. Risk assessment is weak. The childminder has not identified and acted promptly to eliminate all risks and potential hazards, jeopardising children’s safety. The childminder does not follow appropriate hygiene routines. The first-aid box does not have appropriate content for use with children. The childminder does not record hours of attendance for children who attend. The childminder does not provide a variety of challenging and interesting activities that cover all areas of learning to help children make rapid progress. She does not identify each child’s learning needs and stage of development accurately or precisely to ensure children make as much progress as they should.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder does not assess or monitor children’s progress. She has not improved her knowledge about required assessment when a child is aged between two and three years. Self-evaluation is poor. Weaknesses are not identified or addressed to improve practice.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are settled and build positive relationships with the childminder.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the childminder understands the safeguarding policy and procedures, with particular regard to how to identify and respond to children that may have been exposed to extreme views and how to recognise allegations and appropriately respond to them 30/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure the safeguarding policy and procedures are in line with the guidance from the relevant Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB), and include all relevant guidance about the action to be taken in the event of any child protection concerns 30/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
implement effective risk assessments to ensure any potential hazards are identified and eliminated, particularly in relation to the contents of unlocked low kitchen cupboards and large glass vase in the living room 30/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure that appropriate hygiene levels are maintained, especially in relation to the management of children’s body fluids and the cleanliness of high chairs 30/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
keep and maintain a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance 30/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the first-aid box is maintained according to requirements and has appropriate contents for use with children 30/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve knowledge of the early years foundation stage, and gain a good understanding of how to plan and provide challenging activities that cover all areas of learning to meet each child’s learning needs so they make good progress 16/04/2018
p.2
Due Date
implement effective assessment procedures, including the precise identification of children’s starting points in order to monitor children’s ongoing progress accurately 16/04/2018
p.2
Due Date
improve knowledge about compulsory progress checks that required to be completed on all children aged between two and three years. 16/04/2018
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector spoke with the childminder, some children and parents during the inspection. The inspector sampled a range of documents available, including those relating to the premises and safeguarding. The inspector observed activities and daily routines indoors only.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder does not have a suitable knowledge of how to recognise the signs that a child may be at risk of harm or exposed to extreme views. She does not know the correct procedure to follow if an allegation is made against her. This puts children at risk. The safeguarding policy is not in line with Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures and latest guidance and does not include all the information required. The childminder does not have an understanding of her statutory responsibilities and does not identify the aspects of the provision that need to be improved. She has failed to address previous breaches of requirements. Furthermore, she does not recognise how current breaches of the requirements have a negative impact on children’s safety and welfare. For example, the childminder does not understand the importance of maintaining an accurate daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder does not have sufficient knowledge and understanding of the learning and development requirements of the early years foundation stage, including how to plan activities across all seven areas of learning. The assessment arrangements are weak. The childminder does not identify each child’s individual learning needs. She does not assess children’s stage of development to plan for their next steps accordingly. This means that the childminder is not able to identify areas any gaps in children’s learning. She does not provide challenging enough activities to help all children make as much progress as they could. In addition, the childminder still has not improved her knowledge about the required progress check when a child is aged between two and three years. This was raised as an action at a previous inspection. The childminder interacts with children in a positive way. Children have some toys and resources freely available to them so that they
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
can chose what to play with. For example, children enjoy playing with the toy cars.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Due to the weaknesses in safeguarding, children’s safety and welfare are not assured. The childminder has not implemented effective risk assessments to ensure all hazards to children are identified and eliminated. For example, during the inspection an inspector observed unlocked low kitchen cupboards containing chemicals and a large glass vase in the living room. Both were easily accessible to young children that are crawling or learning to walk. The first-aid box is not maintained according to the requirement and does not have appropriate contents for use with children. In addition, the childminder does not always follow appropriate hygiene procedures to eliminate cross-contamination. For example, she does not clean children’s high chairs between meal times. Children form secure attachments with the childminder. They behave well and learn to respect others. The childminder meets children’s individual dietary requirements.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
The weaknesses in the childminder’s understanding of the early years foundation stage impacts negatively on outcomes for children. This means that children do not make the progress they should and are not well prepared for the next stage in their education. They do not have the opportunity to take part in well-planned and resourced activities. The childminder does help children gain some basic communication and language skills. For example, she asks children some questions and comments on children’s actions to help to extend their vocabulary. Children with English as an additional language receive adequate support as the childminder uses some native words from their language throughout the day.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 159441 Local authority Kensington & Chelsea Inspection number 1115976 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 2 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3
p.6
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2001. She lives in Ladbroke Grove, in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The childminder works Monday to Friday from approximately 8am to 6pm, all year round, except for bank holidays and family holidays.
p.6
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.7
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion