Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Alpha Care Agency Limited

Inspected 21 Mar 2018 · published 27 Apr 2018 · URN 58538

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andy Fitt (lead), Tricia Collis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    21 Mar 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Andy Fitt, Tricia Collis

  • Name on report verified

    Alpha Care Agency Limited

  • URN verified

    58538

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivecaringimprovedenjoypositivelysafeconfident
Criticismweaknessestoo fewlimitednot alwaysnot successfullynot effectiverequires improvementconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings874w+56
  • Leadership65w−17
  • Safeguarding160w+47
  • What needs to improve1165w+22

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,183
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 30%Leadership 2%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 40%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Alpha Care Agency Limited Independent learning provider

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement Adult learning programmes Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings

This is a provider that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Leaders, managers and board members do not know enough about the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.  Assessors do not help students to improve their understanding of health and social care enough in lessons.  Students, many of whom speak English as a second language, do not improve their English sufficiently to enable them to be more effective in their jobs.  Assessors do not teach lessons that interest students well enough, or that broaden their thinking about key health and social care issues sufficiently.  Leaders and managers do not identify successfully, or improve quickly, weaknesses in teaching, learning and assessment.  Too few assessors provide students with clear and constructive feedback that shows them how to improve their practical skills and theoretical knowledge of care settings.  Current governance arrangements do not provide the necessary support and challenge for leaders. They do not concentrate adequately on

p.1

Summary of key findings

improving teaching, learning and assessment.

p.1

Summary of key findings

The provider has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Leaders, managers and staff make sure that students benefit from a safe and caring environment where everyone is valued.  Students, many of whom have not been in education for a considerable time, gain in confidence and engage in learning well. They enjoy their learning and want to succeed in their jobs.  Employers value the improved practical skills and theoretical knowledge in caring for others that students gain as a result of their research.  Almost all students achieve their qualifications. As a result of their studies, students become more effective in the workplace.

p.1

Information about the provider

 Alpha Care Agency, trading as Alpha Gateway College (AGC), is an independent learning provider, based in Waltham Forest. AGC delivers qualifications for adult students in east, north and south London, all of whom are already in employment. Almost all these students study level 3 diploma courses in health and social care and are in receipt of advanced learner loans.  AGC also acts as a subcontractor, delivering apprenticeships and working with employers and learners across London, Essex, Cheltenham, Coventry, Liverpool and Nottingham, although this was out of scope of the inspection. AGC has very recently started apprenticeship delivery as a prime contractor. Apprenticeship provision was not inspected and graded as part of this inspection.

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Leaders should: – introduce reliable and effective quality improvement and assurance arrangements that will provide managers with a clear and accurate understanding of the quality of teaching and learning – introduce training for assessors to quickly improve weaknesses in teaching, learning and assessment – support assessors to improve their teaching and feedback so that lessons test and improve students’ subject knowledge – support assessors to provide students with constructive feedback on how to improve spelling, grammar, punctuation and mathematical skills – support assessors to set and monitor clear, achievable targets for all students – develop ways of tracking and testing students’ understanding of British values and radicalisation and extremism.  Leaders should consider establishing an independent board of governors to support the college and challenge it more effectively, and to scrutinise the quality of teaching,

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders, managers and board members do not have a detailed enough knowledge of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment on level 3 health and social care programmes. They do not make sure that effective teaching helps students to increase their understanding of the care skills required in the workplace.  Performance management processes do not lead to improvements in teaching, learning and assessment. During staff appraisals, managers do not refer adequately to strengths and weaknesses identified during lesson observations. The targets they set for staff in appraisals do not concentrate on improving teaching, learning and assessment. They do not take into account weaknesses identified in appraisal discussions. As a result, managers have little impact, through performance management, on tackling weaknesses or promoting good practice in teaching, learning and assessment.  Staff do not have clear actions for improvement resulting from observations of teaching

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

and learning. Where managers set targets, these are not always measurable or time- constrained. Managers do not revisit targets during subsequent observations to make sure that staff have made progress. Consequently, not enough staff know how to improve their classroom practice.  Leaders and managers have not developed a strategy to make sure that students learn quickly how to improve their English and mathematics skills. Assessors correct spelling, punctuation and grammar in assignments, but do not explain errors in English or mathematics, or teach students how to correct mistakes themselves. As a result, students do not learn how to avoid making the same mistakes again.  Leaders and managers lead well by example to create a culture of respect and tolerance. Students enjoy their learning and form strong and positive relationships with staff. Staff support students effectively and build their confidence well to help improve their learning.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

However, students do not have enough opportunities to explore and discuss British values with assessors. Accordingly, their understanding of this subject is too limited.  Leaders, managers and board members are passionate about the success of their students and the improvements that gaining a qualification can make to their lives. Staff support students effectively to complete their units. Students work hard in their own time to complete their level 3 qualification.  Staff work closely with employers to offer qualifications that meet their needs. They have identified students around London who benefit from health and social care qualifications, and support them well to make sure that almost all achieve their qualifications. Assessors work closely with most employers to choose optional units that will benefit both the employer and the employee.  Employers speak positively about the skills that students learn as a result of researching

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

and studying. They identify areas such as improved knowledge of how to care for people and a greater understanding of how to perform their day-to-day jobs. Students become more confident in dealing with clients and external staff. They become more assertive and put their learning to effective use.  Employers praise the effective communication they have with staff at AGC. Managers at the college inform them quickly about the progress that students are making in achieving their qualification. They contact them quickly to raise any concerns. Employers talk positively about how staff tailor optional units well to students’ current work needs.

p.3

The governance of the provider

 Current governance arrangements require improvement. Board members do not provide the necessary support and challenge for the effective quality assurance of the provision. Too many board members work in the company and so cannot provide independent, impartial challenge and scrutiny of the management of the provision. Board members do not meet frequently enough. They do not concentrate sufficiently on improving teaching, learning and assessment.

p.4

Safeguarding

 Managers have improved safeguarding measures over the past year. They conduct thorough recruitment checks for new staff. All staff undergo effective safeguarding training during induction. The college safeguarding officer has higher-level and frequent training.  Students are safe at learning centres, and feel safe. They learn about safeguarding at induction and as a central part of their health and social care course. They discuss the ‘Prevent’ duty with their assessors. However, managers do not track the development of students’ knowledge of the ‘Prevent’ duty in enough detail to be sure that they understand fully how to keep themselves safe from the dangers of radicalisation and extremism.  Students learn about e-safety at induction. They understand how to keep themselves safe when online. Although website filtering systems are in place in classrooms at AGC’s base, leaders and managers have been slow to put in place systems to inform them if students

p.4

Safeguarding

are trying to access inappropriate material when on site.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Too few assessors develop students’ subject knowledge in one-to-one or group lessons. Although students complete assignments for their qualification, they do not develop a broader understanding of health and social care, or relate it quickly to the client groups they work with.  Staff do not use their knowledge and skills effectively enough to plan lessons to engage students fully. They do not challenge most-able students sufficiently to extend their thinking and reflect on improving their workplace practice. Assessors do not set sufficiently individualised personal targets for students. Almost all targets discussed at reviews relate to unit completion rather than the development of wider skills and behaviours. Students do not learn enough about the wider aspects of health and social care in taught lessons.  Too few assessors check learning effectively enough in lessons to make sure that students fully understand concepts that they are discussing. They do not link learning and

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

understanding effectively enough to the workplace. As a result, students do not have sufficient opportunities to extend their learning in lessons.  Assessors, in their feedback on students’ work, do not give enough information about what they have done well and how they can improve their work and subject knowledge. They concentrate too much on how students can meet unit criteria, rather than on how they can improve their understanding of the subject. Assessors do not use errors in students’ work to direct further learning and to improve gaps in the students’ skills.  Although assessors have attended training on British values and the ‘Prevent’ duty, they do not yet have the confidence to explore these topics in enough depth with students. Consequently, students’ learning about how these topics affect their daily lives is often superficial.  Staff do not use assessment processes successfully enough to identify students with a

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

learning disability or difficulty at the start of their courses. As a result, these students do not always receive the support they need to help them complete their qualification rapidly.  Well-motivated students, many of whom work shift patterns, appreciate the flexible help that assessors give them. Assessors support students fully between lessons if they are not able to attend. They explain to them in detail how to complete their assignments. This helps students to understand well the requirements of the qualification. Most students submit high-quality final drafts of work.  Assessors’ detailed and effective oral feedback from workplace observations allows students to reflect fully on their practical work. Assessors help students to identify areas where they could improve or change their practice. This helps them to be more effective in caring for their clients.  Students develop a good understanding of the importance of equality, and how to work

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

effectively in a diverse society. They discuss these topics effectively with assessors, and learn how to relate them to their workplace. For example, a student could confidently explain how she communicates with a client who has limited hearing.

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

 Staff and students from widely varying backgrounds and cultures work admirably together. Staff understand well students’ backgrounds and reasons for studying. They work hard to create a highly respectful and welcoming environment where students feel safe and everyone is valued.  Students, very few of whom have benefited from recent educational opportunities, are grateful for the courses that AGC provides. Students attend frequently and present their work well. They are punctual and courteous. They produce work of a good standard.  During their studies, students quickly become more confident and self-assured. They develop an enthusiasm for learning and can apply their new knowledge to their job role in the care sector. They often gain extra responsibilities and promotions as a result of achieving their qualification. Students, and their families, are proud of what they have achieved.  Staff celebrate students’ successes very effectively through public events within the

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

community. They invite high-profile guests to present awards to recognise the success of their students. Students and their families value their qualifications.  Assessors provide good careers advice for students throughout their programmes. They have high aspirations for their students. They challenge students effectively to set ambitious goals for themselves. An effective partnership with a local community organisation supports effectively students who wish to progress to higher education.  Students do not learn enough about topics to do with personal welfare, including British values and how to keep themselves safe from the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. Assessors do not include effective discussion and learning about these ideas in their lessons. Most assessors do not test students’ understanding effectively enough. Consequently, managers cannot be sure that students are improving their learning in

p.5

Outcomes for learners Good

 The proportion of students who successfully achieve their qualifications rose substantially in 2016/17 and is very high. Almost all students who start their health and social care course now stay at AGC to finish their programme. All students who complete their course pass their level 3 health and social care qualification.  Students enjoy their learning. Many have been away from education for long periods of time and they speak positively about how their assignments and studies have helped them improve their skills and gain confidence. For example, a student spoke about how her improved knowledge of policies and procedures in health and social care had helped her become more insightful when caring for her clients.  Students produce detailed and well-researched work. The standard of their written assignments is high. Highly motivated students spend a great deal of their own time preparing work and investigating topics in depth. This enables them to meet the

p.6

Outcomes for learners Good

requirements of the qualification. As a result of their studies, they learn how to be more effective in their work roles.  Leaders analyse the differences in the performances of different groups of students well. They identified a need to improve achievement rates for male students in 2016/17 and responded quickly by employing more male assessors. However, it is too early to judge the impact of these actions.  Leaders know where their students progress to after completing their courses. However, they do not record and analyse what courses they move on to or those that receive promotion or positions of greater responsibility as a result of their learning. Consequently, they are not able to analyse fully the impact of their courses.

p.6

Provider details

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.7

Provider details

Approximate number of all learners over the previous full contract year Principal/CEO Audrey Soyam

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Main course or learning programme level Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 or above Total number of learners (excluding apprenticeships) 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

– – – – – 61 – – Number of apprentices by apprenticeship level and age Intermediate Advanced Higher

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 2 – – 11 – – Number of traineeships 16–19 19+ Total – – – Number of learners aged 14 to –

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Number of learners for which the provider receives high- needs funding –

p.7

Provider information at the time of the inspection

At the time of inspection, the provider contracts with the following main subcontractors: –

p.7

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the managing director as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider.

p.8

Inspection team

Andy Fitt, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Tricia Collis Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion