Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Children's centre inspection

Honiton and Axe Valley Children’s Centres

Inspected 30 Jul 2014 · URN 80023

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jane Neech (lead), David Baber, Jonathan Palk

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Jul 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    David Baber, Jane Neech, Jonathan Palk

  • Access to services verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Quality of practice verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    EX12 2AN

  • Name on report verified

    Honiton and Axe Valley Children’s Centres

  • URN verified

    80023

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Access to servicesRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • Quality of practiceRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
GoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveoutstandingpositiveimprovedpreciserigorousfeel safe
Criticismrequires improvementinadequaterisk of harmnot yetconcernsyet togapsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings263w−12
  • Leadership840w+17
  • What needs to improve165w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,246
shorter than usual (typical 2099)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 41
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 10%Leadership 33%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 50%

Full report text

Honiton and Axe Valley Children’s Centres

p.1

Devon – Locality 1 East Devon, Trevelyan Building, St Clares Close, Seaton, Devon, EX12 2AN

p.1

Inspection dates

Previous inspection date 29−30 July 2014 11−12 June 2013

p.1

This inspection: Requires improvement 3

Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement 3 The quality of practice and services Requires improvement 3 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

This group of centres requires improvement.  Both centres in the group are not yet reaching enough children who live in areas of least advantage.  The focus on children’s early learning and development, in planning and delivering activities is not yet effective in reducing inequalities. There is not enough emphasis placed on early reading and preparing children for starting school. Not enough has been done to develop the staff team’s knowledge and understanding of promoting early learning opportunities for children.  The group does not have a clear strategy to help adults to improve their learning or gain qualifications that will help them to find work.  Leaders and members of the advisory board are not ensuring that the best use is made of available resources.

p.1

It has the following strengths:

 Registration figures have risen. This is due to the centre manager providing strong leadership in meeting the centres’ objectives and implementing a new staffing structure. As a result, the large majority, 71%, of families regularly access services, helping them to make positive changes to their parenting skills.  Most eligible two-year-olds and almost all three- and four-year-old children access funded early education in pre-school settings.  Leaders, members of the advisory board, and the local authority are now making better use of information to check, review and plan activities and services. Their improved understanding of the performance of the group is supporting improvements in services.

p.1

What does the group need to do to improve further?

 Provide a wider range of activities that promotes early learning and development, both in the centres and in the local community.  Increase attendance rates for all families by: – taking more activities out to the least advantaged areas – promoting early reading and book sharing – planning activities to meet children’s needs more closely – helping parents to contribute to their children’s learning and development in preparation for school.  Promote and provide a wider range of adult learning courses by: – giving advice and guidance about options for further study – tracking the take up and success of adult courses – considering closely how well adult learning is providing parents with employability skills, including the use of computer skills – being clear about intended outcomes courses and duration – providing a wider range of work-related training programmes.  Set up a training programme to improve staff’s understanding of early learning and

p.2

What does the group need to do to improve further?

development, planning next steps for children, early reading and school readiness.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspection of this children’s centre was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009.

p.2

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and one Additional Inspector.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors held meetings with senior leaders and managers from the local authority, the centre leader and programme manager, the commissioned provider, partner agencies and parents. They also met with the outreach and family support team leaders, early years’ workers, volunteers and members of the advisory board.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors visited the group’s two sites and sessions held in community venues.

p.2

Information about this inspection

They observed the centre’s work, and looked at a range of relevant documentation.

p.2

Inspection team

Jane Neech, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Jonathan Palk Her Majesty’s Inspector David Baber Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about the group

Devon – Locality 1 East Devon group consists of two children’s centres, Axe Valley and Honiton children’s centres. The group serves the coastal town of Seaton, urban areas of Honiton and Axminster and rural areas in Devon. The towns and villages cover an approximate geographical area of 152 square miles. The group is run by The Children’s Society on behalf of the local authority. The Children’s Society has been responsible for running the group since 2012. There are 1,827 children living in the area. The senior leadership team for the centres consists of a centre leader and a programme manager. Since the first inspection, there is one advisory board for the group.

p.3

Information about the group

The area is not identified as being deprived overall. However, there are pockets of deprivation among the areas that are considered to be more affluent. The number of families who are not working is increasing. Public transport facilities are sporadic and families in outlying villages are at risk of social isolation.

p.3

Information about the group

Most of the population is White British, with very small numbers of families from Black and minority ethnic groups. There are very few families who speak English as an additional language.

p.3

Information about the group

Most children in the area start early years education with skills that are broadly in line with what is typical for their age. The group meets the core purpose by offering a range of services which include health services, family play sessions, parenting programmes, adult learning and family support. Services are offered from the main children’s centre buildings in Seaton and Honiton, venues in Axminster and community venues within villages.

p.3

Inspection judgements

Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement  Since the inspection the number of families who know about the centre has risen. The large majority, including those expecting children and those most in need, engage with services now and access the centre. This is because the centre is better at promoting its services through strong partnership working.  Staff have reviewed the community the centres serve to identify where there are areas of least advantage. The centre, along with partners from health and other organisations, has pinpointed specific locations to deliver activities closer to families most in need. However, these are not yet operating fully.  A key recommendation from the previous inspection was to improve the access to services by young children and families. Since the inspection more families in Axminster are attending services. The centre has put services in place, such as antenatal classes and specific groups for families. Staff now

p.3

Inspection judgements

know the families they work with in this area well and are successfully maintaining contact with them.  Most children take up their free place at nursery from the age of three years. Most two-year-old children use their funded nursery place to attend one of the early years settings in the local area. Centre staff work individually with parents to encourage and support them to use their child’s two- year-old funded place.  More families are sustaining regular contact and involvement with the services across the centre group. The previous inspection recommended a review of the delivery of family support work so that families can access a timely response according to their needs. The new family support and outreach team leaders have quickly established good relationships with families in the community. This means that where specialist support is needed families are signposted to the appropriate service.

p.3

Inspection judgements

 A current barrier to the centres’ work with families most in need is the lack of continuity in the partnership working with social service colleagues. Frequent changes in social service staff mean that families are less likely to sustain regular contact with professionals, other than the children’s centre staff. Families report, that in times of crisis, their main and regular contact is only with the centre staff who give continuous support and help.

p.3

Inspection judgements

The quality of practice and services Requires improvement  Leaders now check more carefully the impact of services for priority groups. The centre has a clearer understanding of how its work is making a difference where it matters.  Families receive relevant care, guidance and support at times of crisis. Those who are in need of help, for example those suffering from domestic violence, are well supported because the group is now an established member of a multi-agency team. Early help work with families helps maintain children’s safety and welfare.  Families benefit from an adequate balance of services open to everyone and those aimed at specific groups. However, the range of quality activities that promote early learning and development is too variable. Some interesting activities are offered to families in an attempt to reduce health and educational inequalities. Summer holiday activities are appreciated by parents. Family Fun in the

p.4

Inspection judgements

Park helps to address social isolation and increase enjoyment of the outdoors.  However, activities are not planned well enough to highlight what children are going to learn and how their progress will be measured. Activities often taper off without making it clear to parents how the experiences have benefited children’s early learning.  Activities such as Bounce and Rhyme at the Axminster library introduce families and their children to opportunities for early learning, for example by rhyme making and responding to songs. The sessions, however, do not provide enough guidance to parents on how they can help their child enjoy reading and foster a love of books.  The recording of the checks on children’s progress are too variable. Observations lack a focus on the next steps in children’s learning and development. Centre workers do not link observations well enough to planning further activities to help those children who need to make the most progress.

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Although the very large majority of adults complete the courses they enrol on, overall there are insufficient opportunities for adult learning. Some courses do not meet the needs of the adults attending. The systems to track the progress of adults and check the impact of these arrangements are insufficiently established. The centre cannot evidence the proportion of adults who complete courses, or what they progress to, as a result of the courses they have attended.  Case files record the details of work done with individual families by staff in the community. These files show the work that is planned or completed. For example, the reason why contact is paused, the actions planned with the family, or the improvements made. This makes it clear how well each family is doing and how successful the centre is at reducing inequalities for individual families.

p.4

management

 Effective leadership and management have re-focused the children’s centre team on its core purpose. Critical self-evaluation has resulted in a more precise focus on groups identified as a priority. The centres are beginning to use resources to reduce inequalities, such as prioritising services in Axminster.  Since the previous inspection the advisory board has stepped up to the mark by using performance information to evaluate progress against the areas for improvement. A parent has recently joined the advisory board and acts as a conduit for sharing information with parents.  Much of the drive to improve has come from the centre leader and programme manager. They have introduced staff training at team meetings on safeguarding policies and procedures. This has been welcomed by staff and contributes to promoting the welfare of young children. However, leaders and managers have yet to deliver training related to children’s early learning and development.

p.4

management

 The centre leader has introduced rigorous procedures for supervising staff. Procedures for setting targets for staff, professional supervision and induction of new staff, are comprehensive.  Safeguarding is embedded. Procedures for recruitment of staff, including volunteers, place a high emphasis on keeping children safe. Parents spoken to say they feel safe and enjoy the activities. Children who are looked after, subject to child protection plans, and those deemed to be ‘children in need’ are well supported. As a result, the centre has been effective in helping to reduce the risk of harm for these children and their families.  Service level agreements and protocols with key partners are generally well established. Information is received from most key partners for leaders to monitor the impact on services on reducing inequalities for children and families. Partnering with providers to provide a range of work-related

p.4

management

programmes is underdeveloped.  The challenge for improvement from the local authority is strong. The action plans contain precise targets to measure how well the centre is improving the lives of families, particularly those in most need.  Leaders from The Children’s’ Society have an overview of the centres’ strategy for improvement. Centre polices are delivered by The Children’s’ Society. Some polices, however, such as those relating to complaints procedures, are not easily accessible to parents.  Links between the centres and the local community are now strong. There is an acknowledgement that there is a new openness between them and the will to work together and share good practice.

p.5

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and, as a result, inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.

p.6

Group details

Unique reference number 80023 Local authority Devon County Council Inspection number 446096 Managed by The Children’s’ Society on behalf of the local authority

p.7

five in the reach area

Centre leader Vikki Raymond Date of previous inspection June 2013 Telephone number 01297 20542 Email address AxeValleyCC@childrenssociety.org.uk

p.7

group consists of the following children’s centres:

 Axe valley Children’s Centre (20148)  Honiton and District Children’s Centre (21548) guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

group consists of the following children’s centres:

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.8

group consists of the following children’s centres:

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. This template is available at www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/130186. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.8

group consists of the following children’s centres:

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk No. 130186

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion