Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Children's centre inspection

Kent – Canterbury Coastal Group

Inspected 11 Sept 2014 · URN 80802

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Sept 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Davies, Denise Blackwell, Janet Stacey, Sue Pepper

  • Access to services verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of practice verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CT5 4LT

  • Name on report verified

    Kent – Canterbury Coastal Group

  • URN verified

    80802

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Access to servicesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of practiceGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 15% of reports of this type graded Good
GoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyconsistentlysecurehigh qualitysafeenthusiasticenjoy
Criticisminadequateat riskgapsnot alwaysrequires improvementconcernsyet tolow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings308w−10
  • Leadership949w+39
  • What needs to improve122w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,358
shorter than usual (typical 1955)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 42
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 3
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 10%Leadership 32%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 54%

Full report text

Joy Lane Children’s Centre, Whitstable, Kent, CT5 4LT

p.1

Inspection dates

Previous inspection date 9–11 September 2014 Not previously inspected

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Not applicable Access to services by young children and families Good 2 The quality of practice and services Good 2 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

This group of centres is good.  Families’ views are absolutely central to planning at every level in the group. Leaders and managers listen very closely to families and act on their views. They make sure that the group maintains the good quality services that are needed and valued most in the area.  Personalised guidance and support reduce inequalities by helping families to take part fully in the centres’ activities. This brings significant improvements in the health, personal development and safety of families, particularly those in priority groups.  Enthusiastic staff and partners in health services publicise the children’s centres well, so that the large majority of families are registered and take up the services they need.  Working in partnership with other organisations such as the Herne Bay ‘One Stop Shop’, staff support families at risk of domestic abuse to make changes for the better in their lives.

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

 Children enjoy their play and learning in the crèches or stay-and-play activities; those attending regularly are well prepared with the skills they need for starting school.  Links with adult training providers are well established so that there are good opportunities for parents to take up courses. Many parents gain useful work-place experience through volunteering.

p.1

It is not outstanding because:

 Some children in some locations are not doing as well as other children in their age group by the time they start school. The take-up of funded education for two-year-olds is low in some areas.  The group is working with partners to make sure that figures held for the numbers of lone-parent families and children living in workless households are accurate. However, plans to support these families are vague and the group does not always know whether it is doing enough to help.

p.1

What does the group need to do to improve further?

 Work with the local authority and partners to close the achievement gaps for children at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage, particularly for children in the areas around Bysing Wood and St Mary’s where children’s achievement is lowest, by: using data to target specific support to individuals and groups in readiness for transition to school ensuring the uptake of funded early education provision by all eligible children.

p.2

What does the group need to do to improve further?

 Work with the local authority and partners to make sure that all those involved in service delivery are counting the numbers of lone-parent families and children living in workless households in the same way so that they agree on baselines and the centres plan accurate, specific targets for improvement in outcomes.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspection of this children’s centre was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009.

p.2

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and two additional inspectors.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors held meetings with managers of the group of centres, staff and representatives of partner organisations in children’s education, health, social care and adult learning. Inspectors met and held telephone conversations with the chair and members of the advisory board, volunteers and parents. Inspectors observed the work of the centres and talked with staff, parents and children. They looked at a variety of documentation.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspection covered the following centres: Bysing Wood and St Mary’s in Faversham; Joy Lane in Whitstable; and The Poppy in Herne Bay. The inspectors visited outreach provision at Briary and Swalecliffe centres and partnership provision at ABC Nursery, Briary Nursery Pre- school and The Avenue.

p.2

Inspection team

Christine Davies, Lead Inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Denise Blackwell Her Majesty’s Inspector Sue Pepper Additional inspector Janet Stacey Additional inspector

p.2

Information about the group

The group serves the Kent towns of Faversham, Whitstable and Herne Bay and the surrounding coastal communities in the Canterbury District. The group of four main centres and two outreach centres was formed in July 2014 following a review of children’s centre services by Kent County Council. The group is managed directly by the local authority. The early help group manager is supported by a team of full- and part-time receptionists, administrators, early help family practitioners and early help workers who work across the area. Governance is provided through a district advisory board. Local parents’ forums link to the advisory board through three local steering groups. The children’s centre group is implementing plans for the steering groups to be amalgamated into one.

p.3

Information about the group

Bysing Wood, Joy Lane and The Poppy children’s centres were inspected as individual centres before becoming a group. All were judged good. No registered childcare is provided by the centres although The Poppy centre shares premises part of the week with the private childcare provision Avenue Nursery School Ltd. Registered childcare settings are found adjacent to all other main centres and outreach venues in the group and all are provided independently. Bysing Wood, Joy Lane and St Mary’s (at St Mary of Charity C of E (Aided) Primary School) children’s centres are each located on the same site as a primary school of the same name. Each registered childcare provision and primary school is subject to its own inspection. The inspection reports can be found at www.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.3

Information about the group

The main sites opened as individual children’s centres in 2008. Working together now as a group, the centres provide family support services, midwifery and child health-check clinics and family learning provision. In partnership with other organisations, the centres provide the support for parents to access employment, benefits and debt advice, adult learning and specialist children’s services.

p.3

Information about the group

The areas served are mainly urban and suburban with rural coastal areas adjoining. The very large majority of the population is White British. There are no predominant minority ethnic or language groups. Polish and Nepalese speaking families are among the fastest growing groups. The area is a traditional home for Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities, with changing numbers visiting throughout the year. The Canterbury coastal area is relatively affluent although there are a number of pockets of deprivation. Social housing estates such as Lucerne Drive and Long Rock and parts of Heron Ward, with high numbers of families in temporary accommodation, are within the 20% most deprived communities in the country. Children enter Early Years Foundation Stage provision with skills and experience that are mostly in line with the expectations for their age, except in Bysing Wood and St Mary’s areas where they are often

p.3

Information about the group

The group identifies the following priority and target groups: teenage parents; children in need or subject to child protection or care plans; families living in rural isolation or in areas of deprivation; children and adults with disabilities; lone parents; and workless households.

p.3

Inspection judgements

Access to services by young children and families Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Families make good use of the smoothly joined up midwifery and health visiting services throughout the group. Ante-natal appointments, parenting classes and child health checks are all provided on local children’s centre sites and take up is good. Health partners introduce expectant and new families to children’s centre services so that the large majority of families, including most in the centres’ target groups, are registered with the children’s centres.  Staff use their observations effectively to find out about individual children’s needs and offer families services that they require. Assessments of children who regularly attend the crèche lead to early referral to specialist services, particularly for children with speech problems or developmental need. Health visitors quickly refer families for support when needs are discovered in child health and development checks.  Health visitors and midwives running clinics at the centres are very enthusiastic about the

p.4

Inspection judgements

expertise available through children’s centre services to help parents solve housing, employment, debt and benefit problems. Parents build up trust with a wide range of experts. This is very helpful to parents with low-level anxiety and depression who are prioritised for help by health partners because of the complex challenges they face.  Within this good picture, the centres further target and invite some of the most vulnerable families to specialist activities. Most teenage parents attend ‘YAPs’ and ‘YAPs Plus’ for their age groups. Almost all children with disabilities are registered in the group and access specialist groups like ‘Chat and Giggle’. They take part take part regularly enough to make a difference to their lives and their satisfaction is high.  The group has identified a mismatch between countywide data and its own local information on the numbers of lone-parent families and children living in workless

p.4

Inspection judgements

households and targeting is not precise. Once registered and circumstances known, families in these groups are encouraged to take up tailored services for their needs. Local data shows that their participation is good.  The centre increased the uptake of funded early education by eligible two-year-olds in the 2013–14 year so that 70% are now taking up their entitlement across the whole area. This could increase in some areas where take up is low and be more specifically targeted but the centre does not currently have access to the names of eligible families to follow up non- participants. The very large majority, 95%, of three- and four-year-olds take up funded early education and the large majority are in high quality provision.

p.4

Inspection judgements

The quality of practice and services Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Families quickly gain a sense of emotional well-being through a mixture of good quality groups that are open to all or by invitation only. These include healthy walks, ‘Topic and talk’, breastfeeding support, Baby massage and ‘Your Time’ sessions. Fathers are well served with specialist ‘Soccer Tots’ and ‘Men behaving dadly’ groups.  Staff and health partners target families for good, sustained support that is evident in case records seen. The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) is used frequently to ensure a coordinated approach and the full involvement of families in decisions. A new Kent early help assessment framework was initiated in September 2014 but it is too soon to see the impact.  Services to help families at risk of domestic abuse are sensitive to needs and extensive. ‘Freedom Programme’ courses in each of the main children’s centres and partner organisations in the multi-agency ‘One Stop Shop’ in Herne Bay support families to make

p.4

Inspection judgements

safe choices in relationships and housing. The centres promptly make referrals to children’s services for children in need of help and protection.  The group is successful in helping to meet health targets so that obesity among five year olds is very low at 4%. Sustained breastfeeding rates are well below the national average in Bysing Wood and The Poppy area, where families are often living in temporary accommodation. However, breastfeeding rates for some priority groups who have specialist support, including teenage parents, are good. Tailored accident prevention courses are helping to reduce hospital admissions from burns and traffic accidents.  Children enjoy their learning in the well thought-out family environments in the centres and ‘beach learning’ expeditions from Bysing Wood. ‘Little Talkers’ sessions promote communication and language skills well, including for some children waiting for speech and

p.5

Inspection judgements

language therapy. Parents enthusiastically fill in ‘all about me’ records of their children’s development. Evaluations of targeted family learning programmes show that all parents gain confidence in their understanding of their child’s development and behaviour.  The large majority of children across the area, 68%, are working within age-related expectations when they start school. This rises to more than 80% of tracked children who have attended activities in the centres. Good partnerships are in place with most schools to improve children’s achievement and transition to school. However, transition planning is not sharply focused on children’s skills in the Bysing Wood and St Mary’s areas where only a minority of children reach a good level of development.  Parents make great strides in their personal development through attending the centre regularly. The large majority of the parents in priority groups whose progress is followed up

p.5

Inspection judgements

by the centre complete their courses when they take up Kent adult education programmes and go on to further training or work. Parents grow in confidence in making their voices heard in evaluation of services for them and through the parents’ forum. The rate of volunteering is high, with more than 50 gaining valuable work skills as they help out across the group.

p.5

management

 Leaders and managers have maintained the best of partnerships in their formation of the group. Parents had a highly influential role in defending the services that they most need in the locations that are most helpful to them. The process of change was carefully managed to maintain services so that, as one parent said to inspectors: ‘We don’t like all the changes, but to be honest I still get all the help I need.’  The expertise of centre staff is recognised widely by parents and does a lot to secure their increasing take-up of services and their interest in helping out as volunteers. The Early Help Group Manager and District Early Help Manager have nurtured the skills of staff exceptionally well throughout the changes and put workable supervision arrangements in place so that high quality work has continued. Parental satisfaction is high.  Governance arrangements have been strengthened across the Canterbury District Advisory

p.5

management

Board with secure representation in place. Local steering groups provide are clear and well- understood link between the strategic leaders and local views, including those of vociferous parents. The steering groups are transforming into one unit although it is too soon to see if the new arrangements will provide increased challenge and consistency across the area.  Early help safeguarding policies and procedures are in place and are implemented. Safe recruitment procedures are carried out for all paid staff and volunteers. Protocols with partners are in place. Centre staff carry out good risk assessments and model safe behaviour so that parents keep their children safe. Early help workers and early help family practitioners contribute strongly to work alongside other agencies where common assessments have been undertaken or where child protection plans are in place. Those children in need of additional social care support are equally well supported.

p.5

management

 The E-Qualities (Equalities Commission) Award for diversity achieved by Joy Lane and Swalecliffe centres as a cluster has outstanding impact on promoting inclusion across the group. Staff use creative skills to make a warm environment in which all families, including Gypsy, Roma and Traveller families, feel a sense of belonging. This gives parents the confidence to speak out and begin to lead groups like the healthy walks themselves.  The local authority is providing data which is increasingly accurate and useful to the group leaders within a clear performance framework. Better quality data helps the group to sharpen priorities according to the needs of the area. The detailed analysis of children’s achievements in the Early Years Foundation Stage is yet to be used to focus support to children who need it most.  The centre’s self-evaluation accurately captures the extent of the work of the group as this

p.6

management

becomes standardised across the group area. It reflects the strengths of the group and those areas that require further development. There is more to do to ensure that the work with some key target groups, particularly lone parents and families in workless households, is measured and evaluated consistently by all partners so that the impact of work with them is understood.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and, as a result, inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.

p.7

Group details

Unique reference number 80802 Local authority Kent County Council Inspection number 451707 Managed by The local authority

p.8

under five in the reach area

Group manager Emma Fairbairns Telephone number 01227 263 998 Email address emma.fairbairns@kent.gov.uk

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

 20534 Bysing Wood Children’s Centre  21632 Joy Lane Children’s Centre  22868 St Mary’s Children’s Centre  23239 The Poppy Children’s Centre guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. This template is available at www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/130186. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk No. 130186

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion