Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Children's centre inspection

Worcestershire - Bromsgrove Group

Inspected 12 Jun 2014 · URN 80772

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jun 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Christine Field, Karen Cooper, Maureen Deary, Nina Bee

  • Access to services verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of practice verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B60 3FG

  • Name on report verified

    Worcestershire - Bromsgrove Group

  • URN verified

    80772

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Access to servicesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of practiceGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type graded Good
GoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongpositivepositivelyeffectivesuccessfullyrobustvery welloutstanding
Criticisminadequatenot yetrequires improvementconcernslimitedyet togapsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1858w+48
  • What needs to improve109w+54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,919
about usual (typical 1955)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 42
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 3
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

c/o Sunny Fields Children's Centre, Charford First School, Littleton Avenue, Charford, Bromsgrove, B60 3FG

p.1

Inspection dates

Previous inspection date 10–12 June 2014 Not previously inspected as a group

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Not applicable Access to services by young children and families Good 2 The quality of practice and services Good 2 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

This group of centres is good.  Nearly three quarters of young children from the reach area, including a high proportion of particularly vulnerable families living in the most disadvantaged communities, access the group’s services.  Family support work is well targeted at those who most need early help, and the strong network between professionals results in good quality, well-integrated and timely services being provided.  Children benefit from the group’s good quality practice and well-planned services such as ‘Sing and Move’ and ‘Talking Tots’ which helps build confident communication skills and prepare well for school.  A high number of parents gain from programmes such as ‘Family Links’ which enhance their parenting skills.  Partnership work, especially with health professionals, is well developed and reflected positively in children’s and families’ good health outcomes.  Those responsible for leadership and governance know the group well as a result of their close

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

monitoring of its performance. Together they are ensuring that families receive ‘business as usual’ services during the final two months of the current contract.

p.1

It is not outstanding because:

 Only a minority of workless families are using the group, and the services available to enhance their employability are too narrow.  Systems to track the impact of centre services on vulnerable children’s learning and development in the short and longer term are not fully effective.  Some case files are rather disorganised and do not reflect the good quality of family support.

p.1

What does the centre group need to do to improve further?

 Establish a strategy to increase the number of workless families who take up appropriate opportunities that enhance their skills, employability and economic well-being, and track the progress they make in achieving personal goals.

p.2

What does the centre group need to do to improve further?

 Set up a rigorous monitoring system to measure the impact of the group’s services on improving the learning and development of target children who attend centre activities and keep a check on how well they achieve relative to their peers by the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.2

What does the centre group need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen case files by ensuring that all are of the best quality and show clearly that any actions flagged for improvement are followed up.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspection of this children’s centre was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009.

p.2

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out by four Additional inspectors.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors held meetings with the group’s managers, staff, local authority officers, social care, health, speech and language, housing and education professionals, partner agencies, outreach workers, early years practitioners, volunteers and representatives from the advisory board.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors visited all five children’s centres in the group to observe a range of activities and also attended sessions held in clinics, libraries and at outreach venues located at Belbroughton and The Ark, Alvechurch.

p.2

Information about this inspection

They observed the centre’s work, and looked at a wide range of relevant documentation.

p.2

Inspection team

Christine Field, Lead inspector Additional inspector Nina Bee Additional inspector Karen Cooper Additional inspector Maureen Deary Additional inspector

p.2

Information about the centre group

Worcestershire - Bromsgrove Group consists of five centres, four of which (Tulip Tree, Sunny Fields, Conkers and Pear Tree) have a base from which services are directly delivered. The remaining centre (Cottonwood) covers a more rural area, has an office based at a local library and runs outreach services to the surrounding community. The reach area spans 217 square kilometres and this leads to children and families using whichever centre service suits them best rather than the one to which they are linked due to where they live.

p.3

Information about the centre group

The group has been managed by Action for Children since April 2013. The centres have separate local advisory board meetings to gather parents and partner views. There were many changes last year to the staffing and structure, the implementation of some of which is still on-going. The group is now moving forward into the transition of services to the local authority’s 0-19 Early Help model of delivery, and the contract will be managed by Redditch Borough Council, commencing from 1 August, 2014.

p.3

Information about the centre group

Sunny Fields opened in 2006 and serves the most disadvantaged community within the group. Pear Tree opened in 2008. A high number of families with children under five years of age living in its reach area experience social and economic disadvantage. Tulip Tree opened in 2010 and serves a mixed area in terms of social and economic disadvantage. These three centres are each based two miles from each other and between them cover the most deprived areas in the Bromsgrove locality.

p.3

Information about the centre group

Conkers opened in 2010. It is six miles north of Tulip Tree and serves a largely affluent area with small pockets of deprivation. Cottonwood opened in July 2010. Action for Children decided to base the staff in Wythall library when they took up the contract as this building is located in an area of highest disadvantage.

p.3

Information about the centre group

The group offers a range of services for families and children under five years, including family support, adult learning and health services. These are run from the centres and a number of community venues including clinics, libraries and schools. Outreach work within families’ homes is a key feature of the group’s work.

p.3

Information about the centre group

There are 4,822 children under five years of age living in the group’s reach area. Most children are from White British backgrounds, although the number of minority ethnic families across the district is increasing each year. At nine per cent the level of childhood poverty is below the county and national averages. Children’s skills, knowledge and ability on entry to early education vary but generally are at the levels expected for their age.

p.3

Information about the centre group

Target groups include: children living in the most disadvantaged communities; vulnerable children; children living in workless homes; children from minority ethnic backgrounds; lone parents; fathers, pregnant teenagers and teenage parents and breastfeeding mothers.

p.3

Access to services by young children and families Good

 The group has worked very effectively over the last six months to extend its reach so that the large majority of children under five years of age are registered. Three quarters of children, including virtually all those living in priority families, use the group’s services.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 The group has successfully met most of the challenging access targets set by the local authority. Work is on-going to engage more workless families with young children in activities, by amongst other things raising the profile about what is on offer.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Needs assessments are robust and this leads to services being delivered at a variety of locations that attract good numbers of users, particularly in the more rural communities. Cottonwood serves a relatively affluent community with pockets of disadvantage and staff are working successfully to engage with families who most need early help.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Very well-forged links with health professionals mean that expectant mothers, new parents and those having their next baby are known to the group, with a high proportion in early contact. High numbers of breastfeeding mothers are seen by the group. Parents identify the ante-natal pathway as being very positive and appreciate being able to attend clinics held at the centres.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 The group works with partners to scope services that are of particular relevance to some families and meet identified issues. For example, a parenting group was set up and attended by one father and six mothers from the small but significant Muslim community.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Most eligible two, three and four year-olds are taking up their free education place; robust support is given to the very few settings that have less than a ‘good’ Ofsted grading for their effectiveness. All registered childminders who provide for two year olds are assessed as good or better at what they do.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Strong partnerships actively support the right balance, quality and relevance of the group’s services. The good quality of care, guidance and support provided for children and families helps build resilience, strengthens relationships, reduces inequalities and promotes their positive well-being. Case files are very detailed, but some fall below the quality of the best and this detracts from the otherwise good quality family support work.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Family support work is well targeted at those who most need early help, and the strong network between professionals results in well-integrated and timely services being provided. Quite a few families were willing to share their personal stories, milestones and successes with inspectors and it is clear that the centre’s interventions prove critical to assisting those who face very challenging circumstances, including domestic abuse.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 A high number of parents benefit from programmes such as ‘Family Links’ which enhance their parenting skills. Activities such as ‘Little Foodies’, the fussy eating workshop, swim-fit and first aid training help families to understand how to keep their children healthy and safe.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Group activities such as ‘Sing and Move’ and ‘Talking Tots’ usefully draw on the early years guidance to promote prime areas of learning and especially communication and language. Although a useful start has been made in developing ‘Learning Journeys’, they are not yet being used consistently to show the progress target children are making or to share this with parents.  Outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage were in line with the national average in 2013. Strong links with early years partners support children’s readiness for school, with sessions such as ‘Sing and grow’ helping them to cope positively with transition. However, there is currently only limited follow up to see what impact the group’s work has on children’s overall achievement once they transfer to other settings.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 The volunteering programme results in some adults enhancing their work place experience and skills and providing additional resources to help families improve their life choices.

p.5

The quality of practice and services Good

 Adult education courses are available through partners, but the centre is not yet proactive enough in ensuring that the large majority of workless families participate in order to enhance their skills and education, or in tailor-making activities to better meet local needs and add to the services available.

p.5

The quality of practice and services Good

 Working with its health partners, the group encourages healthy lifestyles, and their effective collaboration is clearly reflected in the low levels of childhood obesity and the high proportion of mothers who sustain breastfeeding at six-to-eight weeks.

p.5

The quality of practice and services Good

 Parents’ representatives ‘champion’ the view of other users at their regular meetings with managers, whilst others sit on the local advisory boards and contribute to decision-making. The centres have established themselves as focal points in their communities and families are highly satisfied with the services they receive.

p.5

Good

 Strong leadership and management ensure that the group’s performance has improved over time; this is reflected in the increasing registration figures and improving health outcomes. Expectations are high and leaders and staff remain totally focussed on doing the very best they can for families despite the contract coming to an end. Leaders realise that they have yet to fully meet the needs of workless families.

p.5

Good

 Regular meetings led by the local authority keep a close check on how well the group is doing and provide lots of challenge to ensure a rapid pace to positive change. Well-focused action planning and clear management procedures mean that the group has good capacity to achieve still greater success. Report cards are a positive feature of the group’s evaluation that show the impact services are having.

p.5

Good

 There is good representation of partners and parents on the Local Advisory Boards (LABs). The LABs are effective in their performance monitoring and challenge roles. A new group has recently come together that includes all heads of services; this meets to discuss strategic matters and ensure continuity in service delivery as the group moves forward under the management of a new provider.

p.5

Good

 Supervision is undertaken regularly, is supportive and links well to professional development training. Performance management is viewed positively by staff who identify that targets give focus to their work, and reviews provide opportunities to reward success or support development.

p.5

Good

 Safeguarding policy, practice and procedures are effective in protecting children and families. Very occasionally, parents forget about mobile phone use and are challenged by staff. There are well understood referral routes for families in need of support, and new early help procedures are being implemented well. The investment in ‘Framework I’ means that family support workers as well as all other agencies involved in the care and protection of children and families record their evaluations so that there is an integrated approach and timely information sharing.

p.5

Good

 The framework also enables staff to escalate cases speedily or step down from child protection to children in need status as appropriate. All looked after children, those subject to a child protection plan or in need, are known to the group. Close links with the safeguarding and social care teams contribute very well to reducing risks to children.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and, as a result, inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.

p.7

Centre Group details

Unique reference number 80772 Local authority Worcestershire Inspection number 442840 Managed by Action for children on behalf of the local authority

p.8

five in the reach area

Centre leader Susan Connor Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected as a group Telephone number 01564 823139 Email address sue.connor@actionforchildren.org.uk

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

 20593 Tulip Tree  21016 Cottonwood  21340 Conkers  22341 Pear Tree  23002 Sunny Fields guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. This template is available at www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/130186. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk No. 130186

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion