Summary
Susan Mann (lead), David Baber, Godfrey Bancroft
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Mar 2014
- Inspectors verified
David Baber, Godfrey Bancroft, Susan Mann
- Access to services verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of practice verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
CB8 0HY
- Name on report verified
Suffolk - Forest Heath
- URN verified
80783
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Access to servicesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Quality of practiceRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The group does not reach enough families from its priority families. p.1
- Although the number of families accessing services has increased significantly since April 2013, the numbers of teenage mothers, lone, workless and families living in the most deprived areas, fathers and families who speak English as an additional language, are not high enough. p.1
- The quality of sessions delivered across the group are too variable. p.1
- Staff do not always give enough support to improving target children’s communication and language skills. p.1
- Systems to track children’s progress and families who are supported and signposted to other services, are not thorough enough. p.1
- Consequently, the centres are unable to evaluate accurately the difference they are making to children and families. p.1
- Leaders’ arrangements for assessing the success of the group’s work and planning of improvements are not precise enough for development priorities to be addressed swiftly and appropriately. p.1
- The well established advisory board is currently reviewing its role and membership to better support and challenge the centre in going forward. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health4
“Parents really value the emotional support and practical help staff provide to them.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,200
- about usual (typical 2099)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 41
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Foley house, 52 Wellington Street, Newmarket, CB8 0HY
p.1
This inspection: Requires improvement 3
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement 3 The quality of practice and services Requires improvement 3 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This children's centre group requires improvement. It is not good because:
The group does not reach enough families from its priority families. Although the number of families accessing services has increased significantly since April 2013, the numbers of teenage mothers, lone, workless and families living in the most deprived areas, fathers and families who speak English as an additional language, are not high enough. The quality of sessions delivered across the group are too variable. Staff do not always give enough support to improving target children’s communication and language skills. Systems to track children’s progress and families who are supported and signposted to other services, are not thorough enough. Consequently, the centres are unable to evaluate accurately the difference they are making to children and families. Leaders’ arrangements for assessing the success of the group’s work and planning of improvements are not precise enough for development priorities to be addressed swiftly and appropriately.
p.1
This children's centre group requires improvement. It is not good because:
The well established advisory board is currently reviewing its role and membership to better support and challenge the centre in going forward.
p.1
This children’s centre group has the following strengths:
Parents value services and staff very highly. They say they always feel welcome and safe at the centres and have a say in what activities are put on for them. Most partnerships are strong. Staff work well with health and social care colleagues to give good individual support to those families most in need and make sure vulnerable children are well protected. Provision for children with additional needs and/or disabilities is good. The ‘Little Stars’ group provides excellent learning and development opportunities matched to children’s individual needs. Parents really value the emotional support and practical help staff provide to them. They greatly appreciate the accessibility and approachability of staff. As one user said, reflecting the views of many, ‘Staff are always willing to spare the time to listen to what you have to say and to offer help’.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspection of this children’s centre was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009. The centres that form part of this children’s centre group are Foley House Children’s Centre, Brandon Children’s Centre and The Lark Children’s Centre.
p.2
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The inspectors held meetings with local authority professionals ; health and education professionals; partner agencies; family support workers; an early years coordinator; representatives from the advisory board; and parents. They observed the centres’ work, and looked at a range of relevant documentation including the centres’ self-evaluation form, development plan, annual conversation report, a sample of case studies and safeguarding practice, policy and procedures.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The inspectors visited all three children’s centres. Visits to activities were undertaken. The local authority’s strategic lead and group coordinator attended all team meetings.
p.2
Inspection team
Lead inspector, Susan Smith Her Majesty’s Inspector Susan Mann Her Majesty’s Inspector David Baber Additional inspector Godfrey Bancroft Additional inspector
p.2
Information about the group
Suffolk – Forest Heath Centre Group has three centres: Foley House and The Larks which are phase two children’s centres and Brandon a phase three children’s centre. Foley House Children’s Centre is situated in Newmarket and shares premises with an adult learning provider called Realise Futures and the 12 + integrated team. It was previously inspected as a stand-alone centre in March 2013 and was judged as inadequate. The Lark Children’s Centre is situated at the Mildenhall Jubilee Centre and the Brandon Children’s Centre is located on a site with the library service, police, Brandon Pre-school and Forest Heath housing department. There is no linked day-care onsite for any of the children’s centres. The children’s centres each have their own small team of staff comprising full and part time family support practitioners and support and information officers.
p.3
Information about the group
The group is run by the local authority, and shares an advisory board. The group coordinator oversees all three centres. The group works with a range of partners to deliver services to meet its core purpose, including family support, adult learning and health services. In addition to activities that take place at the centres, services are also delivered directly in the community, where parents are able to access them more easily.
p.3
Information about the group
There are 3,976 children under five years of age living in the centre’s reach area. Generally the area is affluent but there are pockets of deprivation and some isolated communities with poor transport services. Around 13.8% of families are in receipt of out of work benefits and 12.3% are eligible for the childcare element of Working Tax Credit. Most families are of White British heritage with smaller percentages of families from a range of minority ethnic groups. Childrens’ skills when they start early years provision vary across the area but are typically at the level expected although communication, language and literacy skills are often weak.
p.3
Information about the group
The group has identified its main priority groups as vulnerable families, teenage mothers, lone parents and workless, fathers, families living in the most deprived areas and families who speak English as an additional language.
p.3
Information about the group
Schools and registered early years providers are subject to separate inspection arrangements .
p.3
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership, governance and management by: - making the best use of all available data in order to demonstrate the impact services have for identified priority children and families - sharpening the centre group’s development plan so that all key priorities are precise, have measurable success criteria and contain well-informed targets - ensuring that systems to monitor and track the work of the centre are fully embedded and effective - completing the review of the role of the advisory board and its membership.
p.3
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Increase the proportion of families most in need who use centre services by: -increasing the proportion of families registered, especially those living in the Brandon Children’s Centre catchment area -improve the quality of information gathered so leaders and staff can precisely measure the proportions of families accessing services, especially those from workless households and those living in the most economically deprived areas of the group’s catchment area.
p.3
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Improve opportunities for children to be well-prepared for the next stage of life by: -ensuring all sessions delivered in the centres are of good quality and prioritise the development of good communication and language skills -monitoring the value sessions add to children’s learning and development so that everyone can reach their full potential and more reach a good level of development by the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.3
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Not all families who need it currently have access to support from the group. The group has significantly increased the number of children and families they are working with since April 2013 but robust systems are not in place to accurately monitor attendance by those families most in need.
p.4
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Parents and families who come through the door and those who receive outreach and family support visits are positive about the work of the group. Many of these families have a long-standing relationship with the centre and some, become volunteers and progress into employment.
p.4
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Staff know the most vulnerable local families, including those most difficult to reach, through working closely together with health and social care colleagues. They share information, advice and planning to ensure these families receive sustained and regular support. This leads to productive and useful home visits and individual work that helps these families live safer and healthier lives.
p.4
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Positive relationships with key partners have helped to improve access to services, including the delivery of health programmes to mothers before and after the birth of their babies.
p.4
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
The proportion of children who take-up their two-year-old funded place in early years settings has improved in recent months as a result of the effective work of the Family Information Outreach Co- ordinator and centre staff. Now, most eligible children living in the group’s catchment area make use of their free early years sessions to help them gain a head start in their learning and development. The take-up of places in the Brandon Children’s Centre area is not quite as good as in The Lark or Foley House children’s centres areas.
p.4
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Families are highly satisfied with the quality of services at the centres. Parents from target groups say how much they appreciate the good support from all staff. Their support helps parents to engage in what the centres have on offer and in the community, meet new friends and break down any barriers due to feeling isolated or depressed.
p.4
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
The range of activities and services provided at the centre are an appropriate mix of those for target groups and those open to all. Services are increasingly becoming better matched to the needs of users as the group extends its understanding of its priority families.
p.4
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Provision for children with additional needs and/or disabilities is good. The ‘Little Stars’ group is delivered by skilled staff that ensure the session is wholly matched to children’s individual needs. Children and their parents thoroughly enjoy this group. Parents especially value the emotional support and practical help staff provide to them.
p.4
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
The quality of sessions is too variable. On some occasions, such as in ‘Funky Fun’ and ‘Going Global’, staff fail to prioritise the development of target children’s communication and language skills well enough in their planning or practice. On these occasions, staff do not provide enough examples of modelling good language and or sustained conversation with children to support this aspect of their learning and development. In other sessions, such as ‘Little Stars’, this aspect of staff’s practice is excellent.
p.4
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
The proportion of children reaching a good stage of development at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage is lower than levels found nationally and at county level. Children’s learning and development in the aspects of communication and language, and writing are poorer than other aspects. In Foley House area, there are less children reaching a good level of development than elsewhere in the group’s catchment area.
p.5
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Some parents benefit from courses and activities such as, ‘English for Speakers of Other Languages’ (ESOL), ‘Me Time’ and ‘Ready Steady Play ’ that help improve their parenting skills, health and their self-development.
p.5
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Adults are signposted to job vacancies and some courses, such as numeracy and literacy and there are examples of a few adults gaining qualifications that lead to employment and enhanced life chances. However, the centres do not yet receive information from adult learning providers in order to measure the success of the courses run or to modify services to be more appealing to a greater range of adults from target groups.
p.5
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Users receive good access to advice and support regarding issues such as physical and emotional health of the baby, weaning and breastfeeding support. The group offers a range of sessions such as baby massage, breastfeeding workshops and weaning groups. As a result, breastfeeding rates are improving: 49% of mothers maintain breastfeeding their babies, which is slightly below the national average. Activities provided by staff and volunteers, such as ‘Wiggle and Jiggle’ and ‘Walkers and Talkers’ promote the benefits of physical activities for young children and their parents successfully.
p.5
Requires improvement
Self-evaluation of the group’s effectiveness has recently been completed and as result staff are working hard to re-focus provision on the needs of the families, and better targeting provision using outreach and partnership work. For example, the group is working with midwives to get more families registered and engaging with the centre at the earliest opportunity.
p.5
Requires improvement
The development plan has been reviewed by the group coordinator and the whole staff team. It has identified relevant areas, such as increasing the numbers of families who use centre services. However, performance targets and success measures are not always precise and do not have timescales to show exactly what needs to be achieved.
p.5
Requires improvement
Leaders are aware that the impact of the centres’ work is not always clear. They continue to improve the systems in place to monitor and assess whether targets are being met and to more precisely measure the impact of services on improving children and families’ lives.
p.5
Requires improvement
Resources are used well and staff are increasingly developing creative solutions to tackle the challenges they face in reaching more families, particularly those who most need support, living in the area.
p.5
Requires improvement
Appropriate performance management and professional supervision arrangements are in place. Staff feel well supported and have access to good training opportunities to enable them to develop their skills and knowledge further which enhances their ability to meet the needs of the community in which they work. The advisory board members are aware of their governance role and responsibilities. They are keen to strengthen the role they play in providing support and challenge. The information provided by the group coordinator is increasingly enabling them to do this. An appropriate range of professionals who work in the local area are members of the advisory board, however, attendance at meetings is low with no representation from schools. The centre is quite rightly considering ways to increase the numbers who attend and reviewing the membership to ensure it reflects the community, including parents across the three centres.
p.5
Requires improvement
The centre evaluates each session it provides and staff respond to the points and requests parents make. That said, parents are not involved sufficiently in more formal decision making.
p.6
Requires improvement
Safeguarding policies and procedures are in place and well-implemented. However, the annual review of the policy has been over-looked. The centre has acted quickly to address this, and has already put systems in place to ensure that all policies are reviewed within the required timescale.
p.6
Requires improvement
The Common Assessment Framework procedures are implemented well, and referrals and case management are mostly completed effectively. Some case files seen lack enough detail about action planning with families and of how leaders monitor the impact of the interventions undertaken. Staff work closely with social care when children are subject to child protection and attend core group meetings where appropriate so action to keep children safe is taken promptly when needed.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and as a result inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.
p.7
Children’s Centre Group details
Unique reference number 80783 Local authority Suffolk Inspection number 443506 Managed by The local authority
p.8
five in the reach area
Centre leader Tanya Merton Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01638 565533 Email address Tanya.Merton@suffolk.gov.uk
p.8
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
21191 Foley House Children’s centre 20401 Brandon Children’s Centre 23203 The Lark Children’s Centre guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
(Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,
p.9
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion