Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Inspected 21 Mar 2018 · published 23 Apr 2018 · URN 126098

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Mar 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Metcalf

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RH11 8JE

  • Name on report verified

    Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongoutstandingeffectivepositiveimprovingsupportivesecurestrong relationships
Criticismconcernsinconsistentgapsvariablebelownot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1298w+77
  • What needs to improve83w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,370
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Rev Chrissie Millwood Headteacher Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley Buckswood Drive Gossops Green Crawley West Sussex RH11 8JE

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Following my visit to the school on 21 March 2018 with Christopher Lee and Peter Rodin, Ofsted Inspectors, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since your appointment as headteacher two years ago, you have swiftly and accurately identified which aspects of the school need development. You have worked tirelessly with senior leaders, middle leaders, staff, pupils and parents to bring about improvements, especially in the quality of teaching and, more recently, in giving a greater focus to pupils’ learning.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

You provide strong leadership with a clear sense of purpose and direction. Your analysis has helped you to identify issues relating to pupils’ progress and to take effective action to bring about improvement. For example, the prompt action you took to improve standards in mathematics by working with an outstanding provider is beginning to have a benefit. Throughout the school, there is a strong drive to raise the expectations and aspirations of both staff and pupils.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Your strong commitment to every pupil succeeding, irrespective of their background or ability, is shared by governors, leaders and staff. You believe passionately that the school makes a difference to pupils’ future chances in life and use this to guide your principles and decisions. You have created an environment that fosters the care and nurture of the whole school community, driven successfully by the school’s Christian values.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Pupils’ progress and attainment continue to be close to national averages. However, the progress of disadvantaged pupils is below that of their peers, although improving because the school is better focused on their needs. The school is working hard on removing other gaps through earlier intervention, positive action and ongoing training. Relative underperformance by boys is being addressed through training and improving boys’ performance in language and literacy.

p.1

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

You have worked hard to develop teaching across the school and your involvement in the Teacher Effectiveness Enhancement Programme is having a positive impact on improving classroom practice. This is supported through a comprehensive induction programme and an appraisal programme which matches professional development to the needs of staff and the school. Opportunities to regularly share good practice as well as peer observations are also having a positive impact.

p.2

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Inspectors identified particularly strong learning and progress in English, Spanish, French, art, dance, drama, technology and psychology. In these lessons, learning walks confirmed teachers’ secure subject knowledge, strong relationships with pupils and supportive interactions. Learning and progress in humanities were less secure but leaders are well aware of the problems and have plans in place to address them. Pupils rated their teachers very highly, especially in the sixth form.

p.2

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

Your curriculum is appropriately adapted to the needs, abilities and interests of all pupils. The curriculum ensures that all pupils can leave the school with recognisable qualifications which enable them to progress on to higher education, employment or training. The sixth-form curriculum provides an appropriate range of A levels and vocational courses which are responsive to pupils’ aptitudes and future needs. This is evident from the high numbers of pupils staying on in the sixth form.

p.2

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

The school has effective procedures for safeguarding and risk assessment. These meet statutory requirements and include high-quality checks on adults and a carefully planned approach to managing the safety of pupils. The safeguarding policy is very comprehensive and the single central record is fully compliant. The extensive staff training programme has ensured that all staff are conversant with child protection requirements. There are clear reporting procedures if staff have any concerns and regular safeguarding updates as well as frequent reminders to staff, pupils and parents. Senior staff and governors have received safer recruitment training and apply this to the recruitment and selection of all new staff.

p.2

Short inspection of Holy Trinity CofE Secondary School, Crawley

The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is strong. Pupils told us that they feel safe and secure in the school. They are aware of different forms of bullying and say that all forms of bullying are actively challenged and dealt with effectively. Pupils spoke positively about the advice and support provided about online safety and the opportunities to talk about their worries, concerns and challenges. They were well informed about homophobic and racist bullying as well as knife crime. The very large majority of parents who completed the online questionnaire, Parent View, agreed that their children were safe and well looked after.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At the start of the inspection, three specific lines of enquiry were agreed with you and the senior staff. The first line of enquiry considered outcomes for disadvantaged pupils and what the school was doing to secure improvements. In the 2017 examinations there was a significant gap between the progress of disadvantaged pupils and their peers. However, the gap between these pupils and their peers is now narrowing and much closer to national averages as a result of better data, focused intervention and a greater awareness by teachers.  In particular, professional development had been focused on different groups and teachers are better aware of their disadvantaged pupils in class. In most classes, these pupils had been carefully seated to partner them with good role models and maximise their accessibility. The school has also worked hard to improve these pupils’ attendance by making use of the school’s reward system. As a

p.3

Inspection findings

result, their attendance is improving significantly.  In addition, the English department has worked hard to develop disadvantaged pupils’ reading skills through the accelerated reader programme. The programme has seen a considerable improvement in reading scores, especially in Years 7 and 8. Pupils have also been involved in the ‘Widening Participation’ course offered by the University of Sussex, which aims to provide young people with the insight to make informed choices about their future.  The second line of enquiry concerned the consistency of teaching and learning in the core subjects as well as in humanities. English lessons observed contributed significantly towards pupils’ progress as a result of strong lesson planning and challenging work. However, in mathematics, science and humanities, lesson observations and work scrutinies suggested that learning and progress were much more variable, with noticeable improvements in mathematics and science.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Recent support from an outstanding school had contributed well to these improvements in mathematics. The schemes of work are well written and lesson planning more challenging and focused. In science, improvements were evident in books and through pupil assessments, which had seen a rapid improvement in performance across all three sciences. In the humanities, lessons observed were more inconsistent and this was confirmed by the work scrutiny.  The third area of focus was the leadership and governance of the school, especially with regard to key stage 3 and the sixth form. Leaders had already identified the issues raised in this inspection and were addressing these with commitment and determination. Governors are knowledgeable, supportive, perceptive and share the same aspirations as school leaders. They regularly review the school’s strengths and areas for improvement.  Leaders have worked hard to develop the curriculum in key stage 3 and ensure

p.3

Inspection findings

that schemes of work are challenging and developmental. The quality of teaching seen in key stage 3 was similar to that in the other phases. Leadership in the sixth form is particularly effective. The school acknowledges that value-added data in the sixth form needs improvement, but lesson observations, work scrutinies, school data and student interviews confirm much better achievement now.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 outcomes for pupils who are disadvantaged improve to match those of their peers with similar starting points  teaching and learning are more consistent across the school, especially in humanities.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Chichester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for West Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

Inspectors undertook a series of accompanied learning walks, visiting 31 lessons, and looked at pupils’ work as well as speaking with pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. They looked at a wide range of school documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, development plans, assessment information and documents relating to safeguarding. The lead inspector spoke with governors, met with a group of middle leaders and had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority. The inspection took account of 73 responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire, 351 responses to Ofsted’s online pupil survey and 72 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, as well as the accompanying written responses.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion