Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Children's centre inspection

Charnwood Children’s Centre Programme in Leicestershire

Inspected 6 Mar 2014 · URN 80234

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Mar 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Alan Comerford-Dunbar, Ann Taylor, Joanne Smith, Karen Cooper, Maxine Mayer

  • Access to services verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of practice verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LE11 2NF

  • Name on report verified

    Charnwood Children’s Centre Programme in Leicestershire

  • URN verified

    80234

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Access to servicesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of practiceGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type graded Good
GoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentstrongoutstandingvery wellmake good progresspositivehighly effectiveeffective
Criticisminconsistenciesinadequateyet toweaknessesfalling behindconcernlownot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2025w+54
  • What needs to improve91w−43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,083
about usual (typical 1955)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 42
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 3
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Charnwood Children’s Centre Programme in Leicestershire

p.1

Shelthorpe Children’s Centre, Woodthorpe Road, Loughborough, LE11 2NF

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Access to services by young children and families Good 2 The quality of practice and services Good 2 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

This is a good centre.  Very strong partnerships between the group, Charnwood Borough Council, Leicestershire County Council and health agencies result in Charnwood families having access to a good range of services and activities in the heart of their communities. Recent years have seen a rapid increase in families’ registering with the group and their use of what it has to offer because of this community focus.  Services and activities are good quality. They are thoughtfully planned so that families receive highly appropriate support and guidance from them.  Children and adults using group services make good progress in their personal development. Children who are vulnerable to falling behind their peers are well supported to attend good quality play and learning activities with their parents to help them prepare for school. An excellent example of adult progress is the outstanding development and progression of volunteers in the area, some of whom

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

have moved into employment or higher education.  The safety of families is a primary concern of the group. All of its buildings are well-maintained, safe and secure. Staff are attentive to and understand well procedures to protect the welfare of children and vulnerable adults in the area served by the group.

p.1

It is not outstanding because:

 Outcomes for families in the Charnwood area as a whole are improving year on year, however, there are pockets, most notably in the Cobden area, where they are not improving rapidly enough.  The measure of engagement of families whose circumstances may make them vulnerable is too narrow and focuses only on the most intensive work packages of guidance and support they receive. It does not count vulnerable families’ use of other group services and activities, consequently engagement appears low.  It is known that there are inconsistencies in how supervision records and case records are reviewed and kept and new processes are being introduced. Their effectiveness is yet to be seen. As a result, some issues, such as a small number of families experiencing a delay between a case being allocated to a family outreach worker and them being contacted, are not identified quickly enough.

p.1

Information about this inspection

The inspection of this children’s centre was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009. The centres that form part of this children’s centre group are Anstey Sure Start Children’s Centre, Cobden Sure Start Children’s Centre, Loughborough West Sure Start Children’s Centre, Mountsorrel Sure Start Children’s Centre, Shelthorpe Sure Start Children’s Centre, Shepshed Sure Start Children’s Centre and Thurmaston Sure Start Children’s Centre.

p.2

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and three Additional Inspectors.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors held meetings with parents, staff and representatives of the local authority, the locality partnership group, partners and commissioned service providers.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors visited all of the children’s centres in the group, Anstey United Reformed Church, Baxtergate and The Moira Centre.

p.2

Information about this inspection

They observed the centre’s work, and looked at a range of relevant documentation.

p.2

Inspection team

Joanne Smith Her Majesty’s Inspector Maxine Mayer Her Majesty’s Inspector Karen Cooper Additional inspector Alan Comerford-Dunbar Additional inspector Ann Taylor Additional inspector

p.2

Information about the group

Charnwood Children’s Centre group operates from seven main sites across Loughborough. The group is managed by the local authority. Private day care providers run nurseries on five sites. Beacon Nursery EY460601 at Shelthorpre Sure Start Children’s Centre; Cobden Pre-school EY396750 at Cobden Sure Start Children’s Centre; Superstars Activity Club EY439357 at Mountsorrel Sure Start Children’s Centre; Tiddlywinks EY335541 at Thurmaston Sure Start Children’s Centre and The Oak Treehouse EY360642 at Shepshed Sure Start Children's Centre. These are subject to separate inspections and their reports can be found on the Ofsted website www.ofsted.gov.uk.

p.3

Information about the group

Charnwood Children’s Centre group has operated the seven centres in the area under one manager since it opened in 2007. The centre serves an area that is approximately 20 miles from north to south. It serves a varied range of communities, including the densely populated town centre with a large student population, and smaller rural communities.

p.3

Information about the group

The group is an integral part of the locality partnership group, which is a multiagency commissioning partnership for children and young people aged 0-19 years. With partners the group delivers parenting advice and support, parent and child activity groups, adult learning, volunteering opportunities and health appointments alongside one to one work for families.

p.3

Information about the group

There are around 9120 children aged under five years living in the area served by Charnwood Children’s Centre group and the large majority are from a White British background. The area served by the group is in the top 30% of the most deprived areas in the country. Across the area the levels of deprivation vary with Shelthorpe, Cobden, Loughborough West, Mountsorrel and Thurmaston being the most deprived. Worklessness is in line with the county average across the area, however, it is significantly higher in the Cobden area. The number of families dependent on workless benefits is higher than county averages and in Cobden, Loughborough West and Shelthorpe it is significantly higher than county average figures. Around 1350 children under 0-4 years live in households dependent on workless benefits.

p.3

Information about the group

Children enter school Early Years Foundation Stage provision with skills and knowledge in line with or below those expected for their age, this varies across the area served by the group.

p.3

What does the group need to do to improve further?

 Improve and refine the information collected and used by the group to monitor the engagement of target and vulnerable families so that the group has an even clearer overview on which to base their work.  Continue to focus the group's work on reducing health and achievement inequalities in areas where outcomes have remained low or been slow to improve.  Evaluate the changes made to how case files and staff supervision are recorded to ensure they are having the desired impact on timeliness of contact and quality of recording.

p.3

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Registration and engagement is improving rapidly across the whole of the reach area, including in areas where it has been very low. Work to continue the positive trend continues in earnest in areas such as Mountsorrel and Thurmaston where registration remains stubbornly lower than in other areas. Family outreach workers target these rural areas to promote group services, and activities are delivered in community venues, such as church halls, which are familiar to families.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Much improved partnerships with the midwifery service are instrumental in the registration and engagement of families. The group now receives a ‘notification of new parent’ form when women are pregnant, which is used to good effect to risk assess families for any early help they may need. As a result, target and vulnerable families are very well identified and support is offered as soon as possible, for example through attendance at ‘Cherub’ groups. The group, however, does not capture the engagement of these families well enough.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Leaders and managers use the information they have about families in the reach area extremely well to provide timely and appropriate service delivery. A good example of this level of scrutiny is the group identifying that too many women suffering domestic abuse were waiting too long for a place on an appropriate programme. The locality partnership group reviewed local resources and identified funding to provide more programmes, leading to reduced waiting times. Women using the domestic abuse programmes experience very positive life changes.

p.4

Access to services by young children and families Good

 Most parents of 2-, 3- and 4-year-old children who are eligible for funded early education take up the opportunity for their child to attend a childcare provider. The local authority works hard to encourage parents to choose settings that are good or better. Where parents of 2-year-olds choose a local setting that does not meet these standards the setting is well supported to improve their practice. Children make good progress in their development and are learning skills that prepare them well for life at school.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Partnership working is highly effective in developing new skills for parents and improving their employability and work readiness. Good and strong arrangements are in place to ensure families benefit from programmes of adult learning, work related benefit calculations and personal skills development in order to improve their economic well-being. Rates of achievement and progression to further learning and/or employment are high and local worklessness is significantly reducing.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Parenting programmes are well designed and outcomes for families on these programmes are highly positive. The very large majority of parents complete their programmes and their personal skill development is carefully monitored, measured and evaluated. Parents gain significant increases in confidence and demonstrate good parenting skills and see improvements in their children’s behaviour.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 The group has an outstanding and innovative programme for volunteering delivered through excellent partnership working. The group has an extensive network of volunteers who support many different activities within the children’s groups. In particular the well thought through and planned ‘Moving on Up’ programme provides invaluable salaried work experience for existing volunteers seeking employment. Progression rates of volunteers entering employment or further education are excellent. Volunteers are an essential resource in the group’s plans to sustain the good levels of activities offered to families in the future.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Services and activities are very carefully planned for highly relevant delivery across the Charnwood area. In Loughborough West, for example, strong emphasis is given to increasing children’s skills and knowledge as children in this area do not do as well as their peers in other areas at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage. Likewise, Cobden is known to have a transient population with a changing ethnic make-up and health outcomes are not improving rapidly enough for families in this area so healthy lifestyles are promoted strongly in an attempt to make a change to this.

p.4

The quality of practice and services Good

 Family outreach workers provide families with very good personalised support and guidance. They use a visually effective progress measurement tool sensitively with families to help them see the progress they make when they are receiving support. Group activities are delivered by partners who plan them very well, in line with the group’s requirements. Session leaders are highly skilled at presenting simple and inexpensive play activity ideas and help parents to value children’s play as a learning experience. They explain what is happening in easy to understand terms and parents use the ideas they are given in their homes.

p.5

Good

 Leaders and managers have robust and rigorous processes in place to monitor the quality and effectiveness of the services they commission from external partners and providers. Quarterly reports from providers are scrutinised to make sure the group’s targets for engagement and impact are being met. Quality of delivery is regularly checked by providers and by the group. Underperformance is tackled effectively and contracts changed or terminated when necessary.

p.5

Good

 The group has an accurate view of its strengths and weaknesses resulting from a performance management cycle that is clear and effective. The group’s annual review is conducted by senior officers from the local authority and an honest appraisal of the group’s progress against previous targets is produced alongside priorities for the coming year. These are highly visible in the group’s development plan, which then feeds into the service commissioning cycle.

p.5

Good

 The locality partnership group is a successful and effective part of the governance and management of the group. Parents and partners are an integral part of this well-informed group. Their excellent knowledge of the Charnwood area is used well to influence the group’s service delivery. Decisions on funding and commissioning services are made after thorough scrutiny of need and of contracts so that the group is getting the best possible value from them.

p.5

Good

 Attention to health, safety and welfare in all buildings that make up the group is very strong. Staff are highly attentive to safeguarding practices. Buildings are safe and welcoming and staff make excellent use of wall space to inform, educate and reinforce key messages for staff, visitors and group users.

p.5

Good

 The group is a key member of the locality hub, which assesses the needs of the most vulnerable children and young people in Charnwood and agrees who might best meet their needs. When children are subject to child protection, the local team around the child and family processes or child in need plans staff work closely with other key agencies, such as social work teams, to help families to achieve their targets.

p.5

Good

 Staff use the relatively new computer based case file record system with varying levels of success. Supervision has not always picked up in a small number of cases when contact with a family after allocation has been delayed. A local authority audit identified similar inconsistencies and as a result new processes and standards are being introduced. Their impact on files is yet to be seen.

p.5

Good

 The staff team is well qualified and skilled. Family outreach workers each have a specialism. They are supported very well to extend and improve their specialist knowledge and share this with colleagues so that all have a broad knowledge base to draw on in their work.

p.5

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and as a result inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.

p.7

Children’s Centre Group details

Unique reference number 80234 Local authority Leicestershire Inspection number 430100 Managed by The local authority

p.8

five in the reach area

Centre leader Rachel Sharman Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected as a group Telephone number 0116 305 5241 Email address rachel.sharman@leics.gov.uk

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

 20097 Anstey Sure Start Children’s Centre  20772 Cobden Sure Start Children’s Centre  21864 Loughborough West Sure Start Children’s Centre  22067 Mountsorrel Sure Start Children’s Centre  22683 Shelthorpe Sure Start Children’s Centre  22687 Shepshed Sure Start Children’s Centre  23312 Thurmaston Sure Start Children’s Centre guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

(Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion