Summary
Penny Fisher (lead), Cliff Rose, Joan Cawdron, Lesley Talbot-Strettle
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 Jun 2014
- Inspectors verified
Cliff Rose, Joan Cawdron, Lesley Talbot-Strettle, Penny Fisher
- Access to services verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Quality of practice verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
ST16 3NQ
- Name on report verified
Staffordshire - Stafford
- URN verified
80624
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Access to servicesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- Quality of practiceRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Only the majority of families are registered with the children’s centres. p.1
- Not enough families, including priority families, are attending some of the children’s centre sessions. p.1
- Data provided by the local authority are not all up-to-date. p.1
- Systems are not assisting managers, and management advisory board members to easily monitor the group’s performance and quickly drive improvement. p.1
- Not all services are tracking children’s and adults’ progress effectively, which means that the centres cannot clearly show that they are having a positive impact on families’ lives across all services. p.1
- Appropriate priorities for the centres are in place, but precise local authority targets are not clearly set out within one overall development plan for the district. p.1
- Not enough parents are contributing to the design and delivery of the group’s services. p.1
- The centres’ efforts to set up parent forums and encourage parent representatives to attend p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,215
- about usual (typical 2099)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 41
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
C/O Stafford Children's Centre, Faraday Road, Staffordshire, ST16 3NQ
p.1
Inspection dates
Previous inspection date 10–12 June 2014 Not previously inspected
p.1
This inspection: Requires improvement 3
Previous inspection: Not applicable Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement 3 The quality of practice and services Requires improvement 3 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This group of centres requires improvement: It is not good because:
Only the majority of families are registered with the children’s centres. Not enough families, including priority families, are attending some of the children’s centre sessions. Data provided by the local authority are not all up-to-date. Systems are not assisting managers, and management advisory board members to easily monitor the group’s performance and quickly drive improvement. Not all services are tracking children’s and adults’ progress effectively, which means that the centres cannot clearly show that they are having a positive impact on families’ lives across all services. Appropriate priorities for the centres are in place, but precise local authority targets are not clearly set out within one overall development plan for the district. Not enough parents are contributing to the design and delivery of the group’s services. The centres’ efforts to set up parent forums and encourage parent representatives to attend
p.1
This group of centres requires improvement: It is not good because:
locality partnership and management advisory boards have not been fully effective.
p.1
It has the following strengths:
The group is now receiving data regarding new births in the local area. Most eligible families with two-year-olds are taking up the offer of a free place in early years settings that provide good or outstanding early education. Support for early years settings that are not yet good is well-targeted. Good quality family support work is effective, improving parenting skills and ensuring parents and children develop positive support networks. Support for young parents is having a positive impact on their families’ lives. Despite significant reductions in resources, management and staff remain positive and committed to improving the lives of families, across the district they serve.
p.1
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Ensure a large majority of families, including those from the most deprived parts of the district, are accessing services by: - working with partners to further increase the delivery and take-up of services in the targeted communities that need them most - using the recently available new birth data effectively to target those families most in need of services - using and presenting data effectively to clearly demonstrate the engagement of priority groups and capture the full extent of the centres’ work.
p.2
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Improve systems to measure the impact of the group by: - tracking progress and outcomes for individual children and adult learners - collating the information that is gathered so that the group has a sharper overview of the impact of all services delivered.
p.2
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Improve governance by: - ensuring the management advisory board has the data and information needed to provide effective challenge and drive improvement - ensuring the voice of the families using the centres is informing service development and delivery.
p.2
What does the group need to do to improve further?
Bring together the priorities and performance measures that have been set for the district into a comprehensive development plan that includes precise targets for improvement.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The inspection of this children’s centre group was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009.
p.2
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and two Additional Inspectors.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The inspectors held meetings with strategic leads for commissioning and targeted services and district leads for commissioning and targeted services and the business manager. Inspectors also met with health and education professionals, commissioned providers, family support workers, parents and grandparents, volunteers and the chair and members of the management advisory board for the district.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The inspectors visited Stafford, Castlechurch, Silkmore, Manor Hill, Wildwood, Barlaston and Hixon children’s centres, as well as the Signpost Centre in Highfields and the Holmcroft Community centre.
p.2
Information about this inspection
The inspection covered the following centres: Stafford, Castlechurch, Manor Hill and Silkmore Children’s Centres.
p.2
Information about this inspection
They observed the centres’ work, and looked at a range of relevant documentation.
p.2
Inspection team
Penny Fisher, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Cliff Rose Her Majesty’s Inspector Lesley Talbot-Strettle Additional Inspector Joan Cawdron Additional Inspector
p.3
Information about the group
The Stafford Group comprises four children’s centre clusters in Staffordshire. The group was established in April 2013 and serves the Stafford, Stone, Barlaston, Hixon and Gnosall areas. Group leadership and management are provided by Staffordshire County Council and governance by the management advisory board for the Stafford district and four cluster locality partnership boards. The daily management of the group is overseen by the local authority district lead for targeted services and local authority district children’s commissioner.
p.4
Information about the group
Stafford, Castlechurch and Silkmore Children’s Centres are all situated in Stafford itself, with Manor Hill children’s centre situated in Stone. Stafford is a full-time centre and is the main hub centre in the district; other centres are open part-time. Linked satellite centres include Hixon, Barlastone and Wildwood. Early childhood services and activities are delivered through the children’s centres and other community venues. The KEVI centre (Gnosall), previously a satellite of Castlechurch children’s centre has closed as a new academy is being developed on the previous school site.
p.4
Information about the group
The group provides a full range of services, including health, adult learning, early education and family support. Services are delivered by the local authority ‘Families First’ targeted and specialist services, commissioned services and partnerships with agencies, community groups and independent providers.
p.4
Information about the group
The four main children’s centres in the Stafford Group are on school sites. These include Castlechurch Primary School, Manor Hill First School, Silkmore Community Primary School and John Wheeldon Primary School. There is linked early years provision at Sandytots, which is based in the Stafford Children’s Centre, The Launch Pad at the Silkmore Community Primary School site and Hixon Pre-school Playgroup, which is at the Hixon Children’s Centre. Separate inspection reports for all of these schools and early years providers can be found at www.ofsted.gov.uk.
p.4
Information about the group
There are approximately 6,600 children under five years of age in the district. The very large majority are White British. The economic position of families across the district is very mixed. The centres serve a relatively affluent area overall, with pockets of deprivation in the Stafford, Silkmore and Castlechurch Children’s Centres’ areas. About 900 children aged under five live in some of the 30% most deprived wards in the country. The number of workless families is low in comparison to West Midlands, England and Staffordshire averages. Children’s level of skill and knowledge when they enter early years provision vary across the district.
p.4
Information about the group
The centres’ key target group is those families living in the areas of high deprivation within the district. Other target groups also include families affected by domestic violence, families affected by obesity, young parents and children with special educational needs and their parents.
p.4
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Only the majority of families in the district are registered with the children’s centres, although most engage with universal services for children under the age of five. The centres are finding resourceful new ways of engaging with families, such as increased use of parent-led ‘Stay and play’ groups. Health clinics held in some centres are well- attended, including by expectant parents, and promote other children’s centre services.
p.5
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Various local authority data systems do not ensure that all available information is brought together to clearly show the extent of the centres’ work with priority families. For example, separate data systems are in place for level three family support work and children’s centre services, despite being one integrated service for the district. In the current format, data is not effective in demonstrating good engagement for those families from the more deprived areas of the district.
p.5
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Since April 2013, parents have been paying a small charge to attend commissioned services such as ‘Play and learning’ sessions. This has led to an overall reduction in the number of families engaging with the group’s services, but some sessions are popular and show an increase in attendances over the last year. An increasing number of families are taking up the offer of a ‘pass card’, which ensures that cost is not a barrier for those families that need services the most.
p.5
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
The take up of funded places for vulnerable two-year-olds is high; most children have access to good or outstanding early education provision in the district. The availability of discretionary places ensures that those that do not meet the criteria, but have an identified additional need for support, are able to access appropriate provision. Partners work well together to identify and support children with special educational needs and disabilities in accessing appropriate services.
p.5
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
To overcome barriers to access for some priority families more services are being delivered in venues that are established hubs of their communities. This is ensuring sustained engagement with some priority families, such as pregnant teenagers and young parents who might not otherwise take up services.
p.5
Access to services by young children and families Requires improvement
Multi-agency panels, attended by an appropriate range of partners are ensuring that families have access to services, including specialist support through Child and Adult Mental Health services that are appropriately matched to their needs.
p.5
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Commissioned ‘Play and learning’ sessions are well planned and include a good range of activities, with highly effective modelling of good practice by practitioners. Families that attend participate fully but sometimes numbers attending, including families from less affluent parts of the district, are low. Although an above average proportion of children in the district achieve well in the Early Years Foundation Stage, the gap between children from poorer backgrounds and their better-off peers remains too wide.
p.5
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Family support work is effective and well-recorded. Services are able to demonstrate the impact of their work, such as improving parents’ knowledge and understanding of parenting skills. Parents report that they are managing children’s behaviour more positively and have an increased understanding of the importance of their interactions with their children following staff support. Good support networks for both parents and children are well developed. Assessments, including the Common Assessment Framework and other early help assessment tools, are identifying family needs effectively. Good partnerships are in place to support families affected by domestic violence. Parents report that they have noted significant improvements in their lives following engagement with the centres’ services, such as, reducing levels of isolation and depression.
p.5
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Young parents are provided with good quality holistic support. Tenacious work to maintain contact with these parents is undertaken and there are some individual examples of good outcomes and a reduction in in-equality, which include young parents accessing education, employment and training opportunities.
p.6
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Children attending commissioned ‘Play and learning’ sessions make good progress, which is recorded and shared with parents. However, the centres have only recently introduced longer term tracking and this is being piloted with one primary school in the district. This means that the centres are currently not able to demonstrate whether services have made a positive difference to children’s readiness for school and achievements.
p.6
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Families have access to a wide range of learning opportunities in a variety of settings to improve their social, personal and employability skills. Most learners, who attend courses, achieve their main learning outcomes and improve their life chances. However, the recorded numbers attending are low and tracking is insufficiently robust to accurately reflect the impact of the services on skills and progression.
p.6
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
There are a growing number of volunteers working across services, which means that the children’s centres are able to offer more activities and services. For example, volunteers play a pivotal role in the running of a parent-led twins’ group, the young parents’ group and the toy library. Volunteers are vetted, well-supported and access a range of training, which supports their pathway into employment.
p.6
The quality of practice and services Requires improvement
Health outcomes are generally better than found across Staffordshire as a whole and some are improving. The number of teenage parents has fallen and there has been a reduction in obesity rates in young children in the district. Activities such as the healthy walks, ‘cook and eat’ sessions and a community café at the Silkmore centre contribute to healthy lifestyles. However, support for mothers to sustain breastfeeding is patchy across the area and rates are comparatively low in some parts of the district.
p.6
Requires improvement
Governance arrangements are clearly defined and understood. However, the lack of easily accessible data is not helping members of the management advisory board or locality partnership boards to provide sufficient challenge to the centres and drive the required improvement, especially the engagement of priority families. The sharing of new birth data is a welcome recent development, demonstrating good capacity for further improvement. Leaders and managers demonstrate a good knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of the centres and appropriate priorities have been agreed based on accurate analysis of needs and local knowledge. Actions and targets for improvement are contained within various plans. However, there is not an overarching, clear development plan, containing precise performance measures for the Stafford Group. This means that the group cannot easily identify the progress being made.
p.6
Requires improvement
The commissioning framework is clear. Relevant services have been carefully commissioned based on the needs of the area. Quarterly monitoring is routinely taking place and commissioned providers are regularly evaluating services. Commissioning arrangements are frequently reviewed to ensure effectiveness, but these discussions are not always well documented.
p.7
Requires improvement
Safeguarding policies and procedures are sound. Supervision is undertaken regularly and staff feel well supported. The commissioning process ensures that the safeguarding policies and procedures of organisations providing commissioned services are robust. Close working relations with the local family support teams and the co-located safeguarding support unit ensure a collaborative approach to protecting the district’s most vulnerable children, including looked after children, children in need and those subject to a child protection plan.
p.7
Requires improvement
The district lead has been in post since April 2013 and has learned an impressive amount about the role and the district over that time, successfully developing good working partnerships. For example the district lead is chairing the local ‘Start Well’ health group in order to ensure that community health services are delivered in a coherent and consistent way across the district.
p.7
Requires improvement
Parents are asked for their views and regularly evaluate services they have attended. However, despite efforts to encourage regular parent’s forums and to attend locality partnership board meetings that are held in the four cluster areas, only small numbers of parents are currently taking up these opportunities. There is currently no parent representative on the management advisory board.
p.7
Requires improvement
Centres are attractive and welcoming but some sessions are not engaging enough priority families. Following significant funding reductions the centres have worked hard to make best use of resources. This is evident in the delivery of increasingly well-targeted services within the community and the on-going work, in conjunction with partners, to meet both the apparent and hidden needs of the district.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and, as a result, inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.
p.8
Group details
Unique reference number 80624 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 450690 Managed by The local authority
p.9
under five in the reach area
Centre leader Julie Walker Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01785 854704 Email address julie.walker@staffordshire.gov.uk
p.9
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
22899: Stafford Children’s Centre 20586: Castlechurch Children’s Centre 21911: Manor Hill Children’s Centre 22723: Silkmore Children’s Centre guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,
p.10
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. This template is available at www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/130186. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
This group consists of the following children’s centres:
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk No. 130186
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion