Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Little Hadham Primary School

Inspected 13 Mar 2018 · published 19 Apr 2018 · URN 117126

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Good

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Mar 2018

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SG11 2DX

  • Name on report verified

    Little Hadham Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveexceptionaleffectivelovesafehigh-qualityclearconfident
Criticismnot sufficientlyconcernstoo fewbelownot yetnot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1247w+54
  • What needs to improve72w+39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,306
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 56, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Elizabeth Stockley Headteacher Little Hadham Primary School Stortford Road Little Hadham Hertfordshire SG11 2DX

p.1

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 13 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the previous inspection. The many parents and carers who expressed their views through the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, are very positive about the school. All would recommend Little Hadham Primary School to other families. A further 47 parents sent additional comments. Almost all praise your leadership and its impact on the quality of provision, the progress that their children are making and the care that they receive. Parents say that you are totally dedicated to making the school the best it can be. Many are amazed at the large number of extra-curricular activities available to their children considering the small size of the school. This is thanks to the dedication of all staff.

p.1

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

 the school nurtures a love for learning  despite its smaller size, the school always puts on a full and varied programme  the leadership is clear and decisive; communication from the school is exceptional  the early years unit is a fantastic environment: welcoming, friendly, safe  the teachers care deeply about the work they are doing.

p.1

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

The findings from this inspection support these positive views. A very small number of parents are worried about the change of headteacher as you are retiring in July 2018. The experienced deputy headteacher is highly capable. She is aware of the school’s key priorities and is providing the stability and continuity that the school needs. This inspection found that governors are well organised. They are doing everything they can to ensure seamless transition to new leadership. Governors are keeping parents well informed.

p.1

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

The pupils I met love their school. Pupils said that staff listen to them and take pupils’ views into account. They feel that their teachers are helping them a lot. The Year 6 pupils are confident. They said that they are well prepared to move to a larger secondary school. Pupils clearly explained to me that ‘if behaviour is not good, and this is rare, staff deal with the issues quickly’. Pupils said that teachers make the lessons interesting. They particularly enjoy the exciting science experiments, the learning of French as it is ‘different’ and the many clubs and educational visits. Children get off to a flying start in the early years unit. The visit to Colchester Zoo, which took place on the day of this inspection, was well organised. The children were very excited to tell me how they would get to the zoo and what they were expecting to see there. The children’s work that I looked at and staff’s assessment of children’s progress provide a clear picture of the wide

p.2

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

range of experiences that children undertake and learn from.

p.2

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

Pupils explained how they are challenged in their work. They understand the school’s ‘root-stem-flower-pollen’ strategy that encourages them to select work pitched at different levels. Where teaching is effective this works well. However, in some subjects, work does not build well on pupils’ potential and some activities are not sufficiently demanding. At the previous inspection, the inspector recommended that pupils be given more opportunities to write across the curriculum and to improve spelling, punctuation and grammar. Staff now encourage pupils, particularly boys, to write in a range of different styles and genres. However, you acknowledge that further work is required and improving writing remains a key priority of the school’s development plan. Staff are applying the school’s assessment policy diligently.

p.2

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

With the support of senior leaders and governors you evaluate the school’s strengths and areas for further improvement well. During our joint observations, you explained how you are improving the quality of teaching and learning to make it even better. Many staff completed a questionnaire as part of this inspection and all are proud to work at the school. Subject leaders make the most of local networks to share good practice and learn from others.

p.2

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

As the designated safeguarding lead you ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. The single central record is kept up to date and all necessary checks are made when appointing staff. The school’s office manager is well organised and meticulous.

p.2

Short inspection of Little Hadham Primary School

Pupils are taught how to keep safe. They clearly explained how to manage risks, such as when using the internet and social networking sites. You record and follow up any concerns that you may have about individual pupils. You liaise effectively with families and external agencies to ensure that pupils get the help that they need.

p.2

Inspection findings

 I chose to follow up several key lines of enquiry to ascertain that the school remained at least good. We jointly looked at pupils’ progress in writing. We also checked the quality of provision in the early years and the achievement of pupils who are in receipt of additional funding.  You have introduced several initiatives to improve pupils’ outcomes in writing. This is because you recognised that, in the recent past, pupils’ rate of progress has not been rapid enough. In 2017, pupils’ progress in writing at key stages 1 and 2 was below average. Too few pupils achieved the highest standards.  The strategies, such as ERIC (explain-retrieve-interpret-choice), are beginning to pay off and current pupils are doing much better. Boys, in particular, are now more aware of the importance of writing. Teachers are carefully selecting topics to stimulate their interest, including in the early years. The ‘Big Write’ and ‘Wow’ books I looked at

p.3

Inspection findings

contained some examples of high-quality work. One of your successes includes the effective contribution of parents to their children’s writing activities.  Despite these improvements, accelerating progress in writing remains a key priority. In some subjects, handwriting is not as good as it could be. When I reviewed the effectiveness of teaching and learning, I found that staff’s expectations are not yet consistently high. This leads to the most able pupils not producing work of sufficient depth.  Parents are positive about the provision and care in the early years unit. The area is welcoming, safe and well resourced, indoors and outdoors. Children enter the unit with a range of pre-school experiences. In 2017, the proportion of children achieving good levels of development (61%) was below average. A challenging target of 80% has been set for this year and the early years leader, who is also a member of the

p.3

Inspection findings

senior leadership team, is tackling the areas that require some consolidation. Renewed impetus is rightly placed on developing children’s literacy and communication skills. Parents commented positively on the ‘busy fingers’ initiative that develops children’s fine motor skills.  The number of pupils who receive additional funding to support their welfare and learning is small. Pupils are well supported so that they can access all class activities and are given equal chance to succeed. The teaching assistants provide effective support in class and they know these pupils well. You are aware of the need to check whether the use of additional funding is making a difference so that pupils who are disadvantaged achieve as well as others in the school and nationally.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the quality of pupils’ writing, including their handwriting, is high across subjects, not just in English  the most able pupils achieve consistently well across areas of the curriculum. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher, the early years and subject leaders, governors and pupils. We jointly observed pupils’ learning in a series of short visits to classes. I looked at pupils’ work across subjects. I had a telephone discussion with the school’s improvement partner and, at the end of the day, I met some parents. I scrutinised the school documentation, including policies, the school’s self-evaluation, the school’s development plan, safeguarding records and information about pupils’ achievement and behaviour. I considered the views expressed in 69 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, together with 47 additional comments from parents and 14 questionnaires returned by school staff. I also looked at the school’s own parent surveys.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion