Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Children's centre inspection

Kingston upon Thames – Surbiton & Tolworth children's centre group

Inspected 15 Jan 2014 · URN 80650

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Jan 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Jon Bowman, Sarah McDermott, Sue Smith

  • Access to services verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Quality of practice verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    KT5 8RS

  • Name on report verified

    Kingston upon Thames – Surbiton & Tolworth children's centre group

  • URN verified

    80650

Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Access to servicesGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • Quality of practiceGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type graded Good
GoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexcellentsuccessfullyeffectivelypositiveenthusiasticoutstandingstrong
Criticisminadequatenot yetnot alwaysrequires improvementconcernsgapsnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings208w+66
  • Leadership975w+11
  • What needs to improve744w+84

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
8
Words of findings
1,892
about usual (typical 1955)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 42
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 3
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%Leadership 40%What needs to improve 31%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Kingston upon Thames – Surbiton & Tolworth children's centre group

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Access to services by young children and families Good 2 The quality of practice and services Good 2 The effectiveness of leadership, governance and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for children and families

 Parents and carers highly value the services and groups on offer. Parents typically describe staff as ‘like an extended family’, and that when it is needed, ‘there is always someone to pick you up.’  The good range of universal and targeted services successfully attracts families and contributes well to their personal development.  A strong emphasis on multi-agency working provides excellent value for money.  There are effective and mutually beneficial working arrangements with other agencies, in particular health and the two adjacent schools. As a result, the needs of families are swiftly identified and met well.  Staff use the high quality, well-resourced and inviting outdoor play areas effectively to promote the benefits of outdoor play to children’s health, development and well-being.

p.1

It is not outstanding because:

 Managers’ data analysis and use of data do not fully inform staff and service users of the impact of the centres’ work.  Systems to track progress and measure how the group is making a difference to children and families’ lives are not yet well established across all aspects of the group’s work.  Some agencies are not providing information to enable the centre to engage with families at the earliest opportunity.

p.1

Information about this inspection

The inspection of this children’s centre group was carried out under Part 3A of the Childcare Act 2006 as amended by the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009. The centres that form part of this children’s centre group are

p.2

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and an Additional Inspector.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors held meetings with local authority managers, representatives from the advisory board, parents, centre staff, health visitors and midwives and representatives from a range of partner agencies.

p.2

Information about this inspection

The inspectors visited a range of services and activity sessions held at the two centres and spoke with the users of services.

p.2

Information about this inspection

They observed the centre’s work, and looked at a range of relevant documentation.

p.2

Inspection team

Sue Smith Her Majesty's Inspector, Lead Inspector Jon Bowman Her Majesty’s Inspector Sarah McDermott Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about the group

In September 2013, the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames realigned its children’s centres into four locality areas and management transferred to the local authority. Previous to this, the centres were managed by the headteacher of the local primary school and the head teacher of the maintained nursery school. In addition, the London Borough of Richmond and the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames are working in partnership to offer services, including children’s centres, within the two boroughs. Surbiton and Tolworth is a group of children’s centres in the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames. The group is made up of two centres: Surbiton, a phase two children’s centre, and Tolworth, a phase three centre. Both centres are run by the local authority. The group manager is based at Surbiton. Tolworth has its own centre manager who is responsible to the group manager. Health visitors are based at Surbiton. The community midwifery team work at each centre. The area family support team

p.3

Information about the group

are managed separately within the local authority. Surbiton Children’s Centre work very closely with Surbiton Children’s Centre Nursery; this is a local authority maintained setting. Tolworth Children’s Centre is on the same site and works very closely with Tolworth Infant and Nursery School.

p.3

Information about the group

The group has an advisory board which oversees both centres. The group offers a range of services to meet its core purpose. These include: post-natal appointments; play and learning; family support and adult and family learning opportunities.

p.3

Information about the group

There are 3154 children under five years of age living in the area the centres serve. It is a densely populated area with pockets of deprivation. There are around 2% of households with dependent children in receipt of workless benefits.

p.3

Information about the group

Around 32% of families living in the locality are from Black and Minority Ethnic communities. Around a third of the population in the area have English as an additional language. An increasing number of Eastern European families are using the centres. Children enter early years provision with level of skills, knowledge and ability typical for their age.

p.3

What does the centre/group need to do to improve further?

 The local authority should ensure: – up-to-date information about live births in the area is supplied to the group manager – information on families moving into social housing with children under five years is shared with the centre manager – the named social worker informs the centre manager immediately when children become in receipt of statutory social services.

p.3

What does the centre/group need to do to improve further?

 The centre manager should work with the local authority to: – determine the most important data that are needed to assist further the continued drive for improvement so that the impact of the group’s work can be better measured – expand the tracking systems in place across all aspects of the centres’ work with children and adults.

p.3

Inspection judgements

Access to services by young children and families Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 The large majority of children and their families in the area engage well with the centres, including those from vulnerable and target groups such as those subject to child protection plans. The number of children who are most vulnerable being supported by the centres is increasing. Many families achieve good outcomes through their long-term involvement with the centres.  Those families who experience problems are swiftly identified by health visitors and midwives. They share information routinely with children centre staff. This leads to the timely offer of help and support for children and families at the early onset of difficulties.  Access for parents and carers to courses that help them develop the skills and knowledge that they need to gain employment and support their children’s development is promoted well through crèche provision. This provides them with easy access to the good learning opportunities that are

p.4

Inspection judgements

available.  Good knowledge of the local community and feedback from families are used well to plan services and adapt the programme to better meet local needs. For example, the ‘Early Birds’ sessions have been developed to ensure that families with children who may have autism routinely access support.  Almost all families eligible for free funding for three- and four-year-old children take up the offer, while the vast majority of eligible two-year-olds take up entitlement to free early education.

p.4

Inspection judgements

The quality of practice and services Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Family support workers, centre and school staff provide good support for those on child protection plans, children in need and those receiving help through the common assessment framework. Staff provide effective oversight of the welfare and safety of children, including when they first experience difficulties. Support reflects the wide range of needs that are evident and includes practical help, advocacy and access to specialist services.  Adults receive good support that enhances their employability skills and builds their confidence and skills well. There are a good range of good quality learning opportunities that are closely matched to the needs of parents and carers, such as those for whom English is an additional language.  There are reasonable opportunities for adults to take on volunteer roles in each centre. This helps individuals develop their experience and skills well. However, there is not a cohesive approach

p.4

Inspection judgements

across centres to recruit, train and support volunteers in their role.  Evidence collected throughout the inspection indicates the positive impact of services for families engaged with the group’s services. However, systems have not been systematically introduced to effectively monitor all areas of the group’s work, including tracking children’s and adults’ progress over time to measure the longer term impact of the group’s work.  Local authority data show that breastfeeding initiation and continuation rates, immunisation levels and the proportion of children entering school at a healthy weight exceed those nationally.  Parents receive good support to help them improve their parenting skills through programmes which are tailored to meet individual needs. Parents gain increased confidence and develop effective strategies to help their children.  The children’s centre makes a good impact on children’s early years learning. Children learn to be

p.4

Inspection judgements

independent, grow in confidence and have a go at doing things for themselves. Targeted help with needy children is particular successful in teaching them how to get on with each other, eat healthily and help to look after their surroundings.  The resourcing of the outdoor play areas has been carefully considered and is successfully offering a safe and exciting environment for children to explore, use their imagination, communicate with each other, take risks and be outside in all weathers. As a result children and their parents have fun and parents feel confident in supporting their children’s development.

p.4

management

 Safeguarding arrangements are effective. Suitable recruitment and selection procedures of staff are in place. Good liaison between health and children’s centre staff enhances the vigilant approach to safeguarding children at centres. Inspectors observed safe practice at both centres.  The formal system of sharing information about the most vulnerable children between children’s social care services and the group is too infrequent. The tenacious centre managers ensure that they receive the information through informal means. As a result, families receive support from children’s centres when they need it.  There are good examples of parents’ views shaping service delivery and design. Frequent consultation with parents shows high levels of satisfaction with services and parents are enthusiastic advocates of the centres. The group has recently introduced a parents’ forum at each centre to give further opportunities for parents to express their views and become even more

p.5

management

involved in decision making.  Lines of accountability are clearly defined and understood. The local authority and senior management team have worked closely together during the transition to a children’s centre group. The advisory boards for the two centres have merged and there is growing representation from a range of partners and users.  Data are used reasonably well to inform judgements on the performance of centres. The quality of local authority data available to help the group to understand the needs of the area and their priority groups continues to improve. However, data on live births and when families with children under the age five move into social housing within the reach area are not yet available to the group.  Action plans focus well on the key areas for improvement. However, targets and success measures are not always sufficiently precise to inform managers and the advisory board whether

p.5

management

the centres are meeting the targets. More recent planning is of better quality and focuses well on the priorities for the locality such as improving the tracking of the progress of work with families.  The children centres’ tracking shows that they give children a good start as they move on to Nursery and Reception classes. Currently the centres only track a core group of children to a few nursery and infant schools, but they are working towards expanding this to a bigger sample. In particular, they are building up useful baseline data on two-year-olds who are eligible for free education so they can track their progress accurately as they grow up.  Effective partnerships ensure that best use is made of available resources. The enthusiastic and loyal staff team are highly positive about their work and work very hard, often going the extra mile, to maintain a very high quality service delivery despite going through a period of transition

p.5

management

and efficiency cuts. The local authority shows ongoing commitment to the existing children’s centres.  Users state that the premises are child- and family-friendly, inviting and welcoming. Some expressed the view that they find Tolworth friendlier than Surbiton. The centre manager is quite rightly monitoring the attendance at the popular ‘stay and play’ session at the Surbiton centre to ensure that the high attendance numbers do not impact on the safety of users. A good range of information is available and notices are displayed to further promote the safety and welfare of users.

p.5

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding Practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for children and their families and as a result inequalities are reducing rapidly and gaps are closing. Grade 2 Good Practice enables most children and their families to access good quality services that improve children’s wellbeing and achieve the stated outcomes for families. Grade 3 Requires improvement Performance is not as good as it might reasonably be expected to be in one or more key areas. Grade 4 Inadequate The needs of children and families in its area are not being met and/or the leaders and managers are not providing sufficient challenge to bring about improvement to the quality of services.

p.6

Children’s Centre details

Unique reference number 80650 Local authority The Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Inspection number 434489 Managed by The local authority

p.7

five in the reach area

Centre leader Teresa Wildash Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 02085476285 Email address teresa.wildash@rbk.kingston.gov.uk

p.7

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

 Surbiton Children’s Centre  Tolworth Children’s centre guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

(Ofsted) regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.8

This group consists of the following children’s centres:

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.8

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion