Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Brimpton C.E. Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
13 Mar 2018
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
RG7 4TL
- Name on report verified
Brimpton Church of England Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance10
“Staff are a happy and collegiate team under your leadership.” p.1Communication & language4
“They know what to do and who to talk to if they have concerns.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,195
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Carolyn Purchase Headteacher Brimpton Church of England Primary School Brimpton Lane Brimpton Reading Berkshire RG7 4TL
p.1
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 13 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You have ensured that the school has continued to improve. Staff are a happy and collegiate team under your leadership. Parents and carers who spoke to me expressed very positive views about all aspects of the school. They were particularly vocal about improved levels of communication and how welcoming staff are. Parents told me of their disappointment about your impending retirement, but were glad that the governing body had been successful in finding a suitable replacement. You explained to me how work to ensure a smooth transition in leadership is already under way.
p.1
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
Classroom visits showed Brimpton to be a happy place. Because of the size of the school I was able to visit most classes more than once, as well as observing small- group teaching. Pupils were confident to tell me about their work. Children in Reception were very keen to share their work on 3D shapes. I was able to see their progress later in the day when they visited me to name and describe the shapes they had found on their foray into the village after lunch.
p.1
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
Older pupils were also hard at work across the school. Their engagement in learning was strong, although I did witness some disengagement when pupils found that activities were not challenging enough. Pupils’ attitudes to school are very positive. They told me that they enjoy coming to school, because teachers plan exciting things to do most of the time. They particularly enjoy learning in the outside environment. Much of their learning is connected to real life. Writing a detailed set of instructions for cooking outdoors as part of their preparation for a canoeing and camping expedition is a good example of this. Pupils told me of their excitement about the prospect of singing in a local theatre with pupils from other schools later in the week. They were also positive about the wide range of clubs they can attend during and after school.
p.1
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
At the time of the last inspection, inspectors acknowledged the many strengths of the school. These included leaders’ work with external agencies, the inclusive ethos of the school and the good behaviour of pupils. Inspectors also identified the need for teachers to use up-to-date assessment information to set work at the right level for pupils, particularly for the few who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. They also recognised that leaders needed to look more closely at the progress that different groups of pupils made over time. You and your staff have addressed these matters successfully. Provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is strong. Parents are particularly positive about this aspect of the school, telling me that their children are making good progress because of the focused support they receive. You track the progress of pupils well. This means that staff
p.2
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
are aware of pupils who are in danger of falling behind. This includes the few pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds and those with SEN and/or disabilities.
p.2
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
Since the last inspection, you have continued the important process of self- evaluation. You were able to explain the school’s many strengths, as well as the priorities for development. You recognise the need to increase the proportion of pupils across the school achieving more highly. You agreed with me that development planning should be reviewed and further refined, so that it more accurately reflects your self-evaluation and fully addresses the main priorities for improvement.
p.2
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
Arrangements to safeguard pupils are effective. Policies, procedures and day-to-day routines are sound. Importantly, the culture to safeguard pupils is strong. Staff have a clear understanding of their responsibilities to protect children. Their training is up to date. They know what to do and who to talk to if they have concerns.
p.2
Short inspection of Brimpton Church of England Primary School
All parents who spoke to me or completed Ofsted’s online survey expressed an opinion that their children feel safe in school. Pupils told me that they feel safe in school. They talked knowledgeably about staying safe online. They also know what to do in the event of a fire or other kind of emergency.
p.2
Inspection findings
The curriculum is a strength of the school, including in the early years. It meets the needs of pupils well. Teachers appreciate the freedom they have to innovate and change subject content when appropriate. Pupils are very positive about how teachers make learning interesting. Their work in books and displays throughout the school shows an appropriate breadth and balance of subjects. A recent focus on developing writing across curriculum subjects is having a positive impact on the progress pupils make in this key subject. Pupils’ personal development is well served by the curriculum. Because of this, they thrive in school and become rounded individuals by the time they leave Brimpton. Pupils talk enthusiastically about their trips out of the school into the local community or further afield. Residential visits to places such as the Brecon Beacons or Snowdon are commonplace. Pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds do well at the school. Leaders and staff
p.2
Inspection findings
have a clear understanding of their individual needs and provide appropriate additional support when required. Small numbers of disadvantaged pupils make it difficult to compare their academic outcomes with other pupils. However, it is clear that leaders and governors monitor the progress of this key group well. As a result, most pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds make good progress as they move through the school. School leaders and governors realise that the proportion of pupils who achieve a greater depth of learning in English and mathematics needs to be higher. Teachers are also aware that they need to develop their strategies to ensure that most-able pupils are more consistently challenged at an appropriate level. This now needs to be given a higher priority in improvement planning. Self-evaluation of the school’s strengths and areas to develop is sound. However, the school’s development plan does not focus clearly enough on the main
p.3
Inspection findings
priorities to improve. Linking self-evaluation and improvement planning in a more concise way will enable leaders and staff to have greater clarity about the main areas they wish to develop, as well as the specific actions required to achieve success.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
school development planning is further refined, so that it better reflects leaders’ self-evaluation and focuses more acutely on the key areas that need improving a greater proportion of pupils achieves more highly in reading, writing and mathematics across the school.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Oxford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for West Berkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I visited classrooms, assessing the progress pupils were making and talking to them about their learning. I observed pupils’ behaviour in classrooms, at breaktime and as they moved around the school. I met with the headteacher, the chair and vice-chair of governors accompanied by four other governors, a group of teachers, non-teaching support staff, and also with a group of pupils. I talked to parents at the start of the school day and took into account 15 replies to Ofsted’s online parent questionnaire and accompanying text messages. I talked to a representative of the Diocese of Oxford on the telephone and received a written briefing from a representative of the local authority. A wide range of documentation was scrutinised, including safeguarding records, pupils’ progress information, the school’s self-evaluation and development planning, policies, and minutes of governing body meetings.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion