Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Mark's Church of England Primary School

Inspected 15 Mar 2018 · published 16 Apr 2018 · URN 131450

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    15 Mar 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Daniel Lambert

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RG22 4US

  • Name on report verified

    St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongambitioushighly effectiveeffectivelysuccessfulaccuratelystrengthsproud
Criticismweaknessesconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1023w+74
  • What needs to improve78w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,092
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Charles Applegate Headteacher St Mark’s Church of England Primary School Danebury Road Hatch Warren Basingstoke Hampshire RG22 4US

p.1

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 15 March 2018 with Debra Anderson, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in January 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since starting in September, you have wasted no time: developing staff, gaining the trust and respect of parents and carers, and galvanising a strong and ambitious leadership team. Your efforts to improve pupils’ attitudes to learning have been impressive and successful. Pupils across the school embody the new learning behaviours of creativity, curiosity, pride, responsibility, risk-taking, teamwork and resilience. Parents appreciate the great start you have made, one summarising the thoughts of many saying, ‘Mr Applegate has been a fantastic addition to the school.’

p.1

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

The governing body recently restructured to concentrate its efforts on the standards of teaching and learning in the school. Leaders at all levels are regularly invited to present information to governors who ask probing questions, holding leaders to account for their actions. Governors are well informed and evaluate accurately the strengths and weaknesses in the school. They, rightly, note that plans for the spending of pupil premium funding are not sharply focused enough on the needs of disadvantaged pupils in order to accelerate their progress.

p.1

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

In class, pupils are proud, happy and industrious. They take great care to present their work to the highest standard using, at your insistence, sharp pencils to carefully space their dates, titles and work. Pupils listen carefully to adults and show great respect for their peers. They enjoy the range of responsibilities they can take on. For example ‘rights, respect and responsibility’ ambassadors help to form class charters and encourage others to think about the consequences of their actions. Pupils told me that they always consider if their words are ‘true, useful, kind or helpful’ before they speak. Pupils’ positive attitudes contribute significantly to the joyful and harmonious ethos which is palpable throughout the school.

p.1

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

The curriculum is interesting and planned carefully to meet the needs of pupils. Pupils in Year 3 learned about the human body, plotting their own anatomical diagrams and explaining how different organs interact. Pupils in Year 6 attend a week-long residential trip and develop their team-building skills through raft- building, climbing and archery. Pupils record their ideas and findings in great detail, drawing on their strong English skills. Standards in English, science and foundation subjects are high. However, pupils’ reasoning skills in mathematics have weaknesses which you are taking steps to address.

p.2

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

At the time of the previous inspection, leaders were asked to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment in the resourced provision. The ‘Bridge’ resourced provision is now highly effective at supporting pupils who have complex social, emotional and mental health needs. The assistant headteacher has a strong vision for the centre and uses this to offer staff clear direction and effective professional development. For example, staff have received training to help them better identify pupils’ specific needs and adapt work to meet these. Staff in the provision are cohesive and supportive, and use their strong links with the main school to help pupils reintegrate back into mainstream education.

p.2

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

Systems for safeguarding pupils are well maintained and fit for purpose. Statutory checks are made, and reviewed by governors, before new staff commence employment. All staff receive regular update training to ensure that they are able to effectively identify pupils who need help. When concerns arise, leaders work with families and external agencies to get pupils the support they need.

p.2

Short inspection of St Mark’s Church of England Primary School

Pupils know how to keep themselves safe. All pupils learn about online safety and know to avoid unsolicited contact from strangers. Pupils say they all have an adult in school they can trust and talk to if they are worried. Parents value the regular safety updates in the school newsletter and the workshops in school that help them keep their children safe.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At the start of the inspection, we agreed to look at the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements; the progress of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, in mathematics; how effectively leaders evaluate and improve the school; and how well leaders support staff to improve their practice.  Pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, make strong progress in mathematics because teachers assess their needs and understanding accurately. When pupils find work too hard, teachers notice this quickly and, working with the skilled team of learning support assistants, offer helpful support to get pupils back on track. In mathematics, all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, use their secure calculation skills to solve increasingly complex problems. Leaders, rightly, recognise that pupils need to develop their reasoning skills to improve their mathematics further.  Since starting in September, you have worked with your senior team to evaluate

p.2

Inspection findings

every aspect of the school. You have liaised closely with staff and the local authority to create meaningful plans for improvement. The governing body monitors these plans closely, gathering useful, first-hand evidence to satisfy governors that the school is moving in the right direction. Leaders and governors are well placed to secure further improvement in the school.  In September, you embarked on a challenging and ambitious programme of staff development. You, rightly, noted that in order to maximise progress teachers had to set work at the right level for the pupils. Teachers and support staff received useful training in assessment which helps them to set, evaluate and adapt tasks that are closely aligned to pupils’ starting points. As a result, the quality of teaching has improved throughout the school. Middle leaders receive valuable support to improve their skills and understanding. They have shadowed

p.3

Inspection findings

senior colleagues, worked with successful leaders in other schools and received training from the local authority to improve their practice. The school continues to improve apace.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 pupils are routinely taught to reason in mathematics  plans for additional pupil premium funding are refined so that pupils’ barriers are effectively identified and addressed.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Winchester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

We met with you, senior and middle leaders, and three governors, including the chair. We observed learning in 14 classes, all jointly with senior leaders. Together we looked at pupils’ work. I analysed a range of the school’s documentation including information about pupils’ achievement, the school improvement plan, and safeguarding checks, policies and procedures. We discussed your evaluation of the school’s effectiveness. I considered 103 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and spoke to parents at the beginning of the day. I scrutinised the results of Ofsted’s pupils’ survey and gathered the views of other pupils throughout the day.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion