Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2012 framework)

Priory Primary

Inspected 3 Jul 2012 · URN 103831

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    3 Jul 2012

  • Inspectors verified

    Edgar Hastings, Helen Morrison, Sally Hall

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Behaviour and safety verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Inadequate

  • Quality of teaching verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Priory Primary School

  • URN verified

    103831

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Behaviour and safetyInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Quality of teachingInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−47Criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodSatisfactory

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressenjoyeffectivelyeffectivehighly effectiveexceptionallysecure
Criticisminadequatepoorineffectiveconcernsnot alwaysinsufficientweakweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1897w−68
  • Leadership771w−23
  • What needs to improve348w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
3,001
about usual (typical 3042)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
6
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 19%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

Age group 3–11 Inspection date(s) 2–3 July 2012 Inspection number 376974 Priory Primary School Inspection report

p.1

Unique reference number 103831 Local authority Dudley Inspection number 376974 Inspection dates 2–3 July 2012 Lead inspector Helen Morrison

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005. The registered childcare provision, managed by the governing body, was inspected under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006.

p.1

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 559 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Rhoda Pearson Headteacher Liz Riley Date of previous school inspection 17 June 2009 School address Limes Road Priory Estate Dudley DY1 4AQ Telephone number 01384 816845 Fax number 01384 816846 Email address info@priory.dudley.sch.uk

p.1

Registered childcare provision EY334020 Priory Daycare Number of children on roll in the registered childcare provision Date of last inspection of registered childcare provision 17 June 2009 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not

p.1

exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.2

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.2

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out with two days’ notice. Inspectors visited 28 lessons taught by 19 teachers, spending over 13 hours directly observing pupils’ learning in class. They heard pupils read and looked at their work in books and on display. Meetings were held with pupils, staff, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. Inspectors took account of the responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) in planning the inspection. They observed the school’s work and looked at: curriculum planning; data on pupils’ achievement, including their current progress; evidence relating to the care and protection of pupils; plans for improvement and records of the school’s monitoring of its performance. They also analysed 89 inspection questionnaires that were returned by parents and carers, together with 150 from pupils and 47 from staff.

p.3

Information about the school

Priory is larger than the average sized primary school. Most pupils are from White British backgrounds. A relatively small number of pupils are from minority ethnic groups but very few are learning English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is higher than in most primary schools as is the proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs.

p.3

Information about the school

Since the last inspection there have been several changes of staff. The current headteacher, formerly the deputy headteacher, was appointed in April 2011. Since January 2012, the school’s leadership has received substantial support from a National Leader of Education, her National Support School and an associate headteacher. The current headteacher was absent during the inspection.

p.3

Information about the school

The school does not meet the current government floor standard, which sets the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.

p.3

Information about the school

Priory Daycare is the registered childcare available on the school site. It is managed by the school’s governing body. The governing body also manages the school’s breakfast and after school care.

p.3

Information about the school

There is a children’s centre, managed by the governing body, on the school site. This was inspected separately at the same time as the school. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.3

Key findings

 In accordance with section 13(3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement.

p.4

Key findings

 This is not a satisfactory school because pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2 make too little progress in reading, writing and mathematics, and leaders have been ineffective in improving the quality of teaching. Learning is often interrupted by pupils’ poor behaviour.

p.4

Key findings

 Pupils’ achievement is inadequate. Although children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make satisfactory progress, pupils in Years 1 to 6 make inadequate progress. Attainment at the end of Year 6 has declined sharply this year and is well below average.

p.4

Key findings

 Teaching is inadequate because not enough is expected of pupils. They have too few opportunities to use their reading, writing and mathematics skills in other subjects and lessons are often dull and repetitive. Marking does not help pupils to improve their work. Support staff spend too much time checking behaviour rather than helping pupils learn. Provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is inadequate because there are insufficient opportunities for pupils to be creative or learn about different cultures.

p.4

Key findings

 Behaviour and safety are inadequate. The majority of pupils usually behave satisfactorily, but at playtimes they often become boisterous because there is too little play equipment to occupy them. On occasions some staff do not follow the correct procedures for reporting poor behaviour, so pupils have not all received the support they need. Attendance figures are below average. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.4

Key findings

 Leadership and management are inadequate. Senior leaders are not skilled in monitoring pupils’ progress and do not manage teachers’ performance well enough to eradicate inadequate teaching. The governing body is ineffective in challenging the work of senior leaders and staff. The school is heavily dependent on external support. Good provision for childcare is made in Priory Daycare.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching and accelerate the progress made by all pupils in order to raise attainment in all year groups by:  ensuring that there is a systematic approach to teaching skills in reading, writing and mathematics, and by providing regular opportunities for pupils to use and apply these skills across the curriculum  raising teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do and ensuring that lesson activities are engaging and well-matched to the needs of pupils  ensuring that marking tells pupils what they need to do to improve and that pupils are given sufficient opportunities to respond to the advice given  using support staff effectively to help pupils learn.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ behaviour and safety by:  ensuring that information about pupils’ disabilities and special educational needs is reviewed and shared appropriately so that their needs are planned for and met  improving attendance  ensuring that actions taken to improve the conduct of pupils who frequently misbehave are sufficiently rigorous to significantly reduce instances of poor behaviour  providing a range of play equipment and constructive activities at breaks and lunchtimes  promoting pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development by giving them more opportunities to enjoy, explore and learn about different cultures and the arts.

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management in order to secure rapid improvement by:  putting into place, with immediate effect, suitable arrangements to ensure that all staff use the correct procedures to prioritise and record cases where safeguarding concerns are identified  sharpening the monitoring and evaluation skills of all leaders and managers  ensuring that the governing body holds leaders to account Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.5

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 regularly and rigorously monitoring the quality of teaching and using this information to hold teachers to account for the progress and attainment of pupils  analysing and prioritising what needs to improve and ensuring prompt and effective action is taken to bring about improvement.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Overall, all groups of pupils, including disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, are making insufficient progress and are underachieving. Children start in the Nursery class with skills that are well below age-related expectations. They make satisfactory progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage. In the Reception class children use their knowledge of the sounds that letters make (phonics) to write individual words, but they are not always encouraged to make sentences of their own, nor are they consistently expected to form letters correctly. When working in small groups with an adult children often make good progress, although some activities do not extend children’s learning as well as they should.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Standards have been low in Key Stage 1 for the last five years and work in pupils’ books indicates they have not improved. Attainment has fallen in Key Stage 2 this year to well below average in reading, writing and mathematics. Spelling and handwriting are weak across the school. Most parents and carers believe that their children make good progress but inspection evidence does not support this view. For example, the school’s analysis of its own assessment data reveals that less than a third of pupils make the expected progress in mathematics, and just two-thirds make expected progress in English as they move through Key Stage 2. New initiatives introduced by the National Leader of Education, such as the use of ‘learning ladders’, are helping teachers to have a better understanding of how much more pupils can achieve.

p.6

Achievement of pupils

Progress in reading is inconsistent. Most pupils in Years 1 and 2 use their knowledge of the sounds of individual letters to work out words accurately, although some are less confident in identifying words with irregular spelling. More able pupils in Year 6 read satisfactorily though they say they do not enjoy reading. Some older pupils find it difficult to tackle unfamiliar words because they do not have enough knowledge of how to blend the sounds that letters make.

p.6

Quality of teaching

Teaching is inadequate. Too much teaching, particularly of reading, writing and mathematics, is uninspiring and teachers’ expectations are too low. In some lessons teachers talk for too long and pupils are not involved enough in exciting and engaging tasks. As a result, pupils underachieve and do not reach the levels of which Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.6

Quality of teaching

they are capable. Although most parents and carers say their children are taught well, inspection evidence does not support this view.

p.7

Quality of teaching

In some lessons, support is too focused on managing behaviour and teaching assistants do not help pupils enough. As a result, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs are not supported sufficiently and do not always make as much progress as they should.

p.7

Quality of teaching

In too many lessons the pace of learning is slow and pupils spend too much time practising what they already know. For example, in one Year 4 lesson pupils spent time highlighting rhyming words in a poem, which they could do with ease. Some pupils told inspectors that work is often too easy. The curriculum is not planned to build progressively on what pupils already know, understand and can do. There are missed opportunities for pupils to practise their reading, writing and mathematical skills within the different subjects they are learning. Teachers’ marking does not give clear enough guidance about what pupils need to do to improve.

p.7

Quality of teaching

In most lessons pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is not promoted effectively. However, in the best lessons, teachers have high expectations of all pupils and provide opportunities for them to listen to each other and to work in groups and pairs. Teachers plan exciting activities which are matched carefully to pupils’ needs and capture their interest and imagination. For example, in a Year 1 literacy lesson, skilful modelling of what was expected ensured that pupils were enthused. They wrote expressively about their feelings on arriving in a strange country by accurately using connectives to extend their sentences.

p.7

Quality of teaching

In the registered daycare, skilled staff ensure that children are fully engaged in a range of activities which involves them in making plans for themes to explore, such as going on a journey. As a result provision is consistently good.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Most pupils are polite and courteous to visitors. However pupils, staff, parents and carers raised concerns about the amount of misbehaviour around the school and in lessons. Play areas are not used well and there is insufficient play equipment to occupy pupils in Years 1 to 6. Pupils and staff say that disputes often escalate and are not effectively dealt with. Some pupils felt that poor behaviour was rewarded with time in the ‘rainbow room’ which they perceive to be a treat. More than half of the pupils said behaviour was not good in lessons. This view is supported by observations during the inspection where learning was often disrupted because poor behaviour was not adequately managed. The school’s behaviour records show that behaviour seen during the inspection is typical of that found every day.

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Attendance is below average and too many pupils are late for school each day. Actions taken to improve attendance and punctuality are not effective. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.7

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils have a satisfactory understanding about how to be safe and look after themselves, particularly with regard to road safety and when using the internet. They have a satisfactory understanding of different types of bullying, such as persistent name-calling which relates to gender, race, disability or special educational needs, and cyber-bullying. Around three-quarters of pupils say that any instances of bullying are dealt with well and, despite concerns about behaviour, they feel safe in school.

p.8

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The quality of pastoral care for pupils and families whose circumstances may make them vulnerable is inadequate because staff do not always pass on information or follow correct procedures. As a result the needs of pupils with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties are not met. This includes a small group of pupils who are sent home every day. The reasons for this are not adequately recorded by the school.

p.8

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils who attend the breakfast and after school clubs enjoy stimulating activities and their needs are well met.

p.8

Leadership and management

Declining levels of attainment, significant underachievement by pupils and weak teaching have stemmed from inadequate leadership and management, including ineffective performance management. Monitoring of lessons is not used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of teaching. Professional development is not targeted to meet individual staff needs and, as a result, the quality of teaching has deteriorated. Teachers are not held accountable for the progress their pupils make and the governing body is too reliant on information provided by the headteacher to hold the senior leaders sufficiently to account.

p.8

Leadership and management

Current self-evaluation evidence, devised with support from the National Leader of Education and associate headteacher, is accurate and realistic. Similarly the Raising Attainment Plan recognises the wide range of weaknesses that need to be addressed. However, the school is overly reliant on substantial external support because the headteacher and senior leaders lack the skills to support school improvement. As a result, the school’s capacity to improve is inadequate.

p.8

Leadership and management

The curriculum is inadequate because it does not meet the needs of all pupils, particularly in Key Stages 1 and 2; there is not enough focus on pupils using their reading, writing and mathematics skills in all subjects. Additionally, the curriculum does not promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well enough. Pupils lack opportunities to learn about different cultures and there are few opportunities for them to enjoy the arts. The school’s promotion of equal opportunities is inadequate because too few pupils are achieving well enough.

p.8

Leadership and management

Although the single central record of checks made on those working with children meets requirements, safeguarding arrangements are inadequate because some staff do not always follow the correct procedures for reporting concerns about individual pupils. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.8

Leadership and management

Leaders of Priory Daycare have a good understanding of the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. There are strong links with other professionals who work in the children’s centre, which ensures there is good support for children and their families. Inspection grades: 1 is outstanding, 2 is good, 3 is satisfactory, and 4 is inadequate Please turn to the glossary for a description of the grades and inspection terms

p.9

childcare provision

Priory Daycare offers childcare for up to 40 children from birth to the age of five. Leaders provide a welcoming and stimulating environment in a well-resourced facility where children enjoy learning. Children are well cared for and make good progress from very low starting points in their development of skills, knowledge and understanding. Resources are well organised to allow children to follow their own interests while promoting their basic skills. The outdoor area allows children to be active and to explore the good range of play equipment that is set out imaginatively. Each child’s progress is recorded carefully and used to plan future activities to build on what each child has achieved. This information is made available each day to parents and carers. They are encouraged to share in their children’s play and they are kept informed about events through regular newsletters. Their views are sought

p.10

childcare provision

effectively through questionnaires, a suggestion box and an open-door policy.

p.10

childcare provision

Children’s welfare is promoted well and there is good hygiene provision. Safeguarding requirements are effective and systems to ensure that children are safe and secure are robust. The staff work effectively as a team and provide good support for children, including disabled children and those who have special educational needs. Partnership work with the school and effective transition arrangements ensure that children moving to the Nursery class are well prepared.

p.10

childcare provision

These are the grades for the Early Years Foundation Stage of the registered childcare provision, inspected under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006

p.10

childcare provision

Overall effectiveness of the Early Years Foundation Stage Taking into account: Outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage The quality of provision in the Early Years Foundation Stage The effectiveness of leadership and management of the Early Years Foundation Stage for the registered provision

p.10

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding These features are highly effective. An outstanding school provides exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. Grade 2 Good These are very positive features of a school. A school that is good is serving its pupils well. Grade 3 Satisfactory These features are of reasonable quality. A satisfactory school is providing adequately for its pupils. Grade 4 Inadequate These features are not of an acceptable standard. An inadequate school needs to make significant improvement in order to meet the needs of its pupils. Ofsted inspectors will make further visits until it improves.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Nursery schools 54 42 2 2 Primary schools 14 49 32 6 Secondary schools 20 39 34 7 Special schools 33 45 20 3 Pupil referral units 9 55 28 8 All schools 16 47 31 6

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

New school inspection arrangements have been introduced from 1 January 2012. This means that inspectors make judgements that were not made previously. The data in the table above are for the period 1 September to 31 December 2011 and represent judgements that were made under the school inspection arrangements that were introduced on 1 September 2009. These data are consistent with the latest published official statistics about maintained school inspection outcomes (see www.ofsted.gov.uk ). The sample of schools inspected during 2010/11 was not representative of all schools nationally, as weaker schools are inspected more frequently than good or outstanding schools. Primary schools include primary academy converters. Secondary schools include secondary academy converters, sponsor-led academies and city technology colleges. Special schools include special academy converters and non-maintained special schools.

p.11

Type of school Outstanding Good Satisfactory Inadequate

Percentages are rounded and do not always add exactly to 100.

p.11

Common terminology used by inspectors

Achievement: the progress and success of a pupil in their learning and development taking account of their attainment.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attainment: the standard of the pupils’ work shown by test and examination results and in lessons.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Attendance: the regular attendance of pupils at school and in lessons, taking into account the school’s efforts to encourage good attendance.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Behaviour: how well pupils behave in lessons, with emphasis on their attitude to learning. Pupils’ punctuality to lessons and their conduct around the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Capacity to improve: the proven ability of the school to continue improving based on its self-evaluation and what the school has accomplished so far and on the quality of its systems to maintain improvement.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Floor standards: the national minimum expectation of attainment and progression measures.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Leadership and management: the contribution of all the staff with responsibilities, not just the governors and headteacher, to identifying priorities, directing and motivating staff and running the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Learning: how well pupils acquire knowledge, develop their understanding, learn and practise skills and are developing their competence as learners.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Overall effectiveness: inspectors form a judgement on a school’s overall effectiveness based on the findings from their inspection of the school.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Progress: the rate at which pupils are learning in lessons and over longer periods of time. It is often measured by comparing the pupils’ attainment at the end of a key stage with their attainment when they started.

p.12

Common terminology used by inspectors

Safety: how safe pupils are in school, including in lessons; and their understanding of risks. Pupils’ freedom from bullying and harassment. How well the school promotes safety, for example e-learning.

p.12

carers to share with their children. It describes Ofsted’s

main findings from the inspection of their school.

p.13

Inspection of Priory Primary School, Dudley, DY1 4AQ

Thank you for welcoming inspectors to your school. We enjoyed talking with you, sharing your lessons and reading your questionnaires. We found that Priory Primary School is not giving you a good enough education because there are a number of things that need to be improved. We have decided that your school needs extra help and we call this ‘special measures’. Other inspectors will visit you regularly to check on the progress that the school is making.

p.13

Inspection of Priory Primary School, Dudley, DY1 4AQ

Although children in Nursery and Reception make satisfactory progress, we want you all to be able to reach higher standards in English and mathematics. We have asked the teachers to make sure that your lessons are interesting and that their marking tells you how to improve your work. We want those of you who find work difficult to have better support so that you make faster progress.

p.13

Inspection of Priory Primary School, Dudley, DY1 4AQ

We agree with you that behaviour is not as good as it should be. We have asked the governors, headteacher and staff to take action to deal effectively with those who misbehave. We also want you to be given equipment to play with at breaks and lunchtimes. The governors and headteacher need to check more carefully how the school is doing and how you are all progressing in your work. We have also asked them to take action quickly where they find that the school is not improving quickly enough.

p.13

Inspection of Priory Primary School, Dudley, DY1 4AQ

All of you can play a part in helping the school to improve. You can do this by attending regularly, arriving on time, behaving well, working as hard as you can, and talking with teachers about your work, especially if it is too hard or too easy.

p.13

Inspection of Priory Primary School, Dudley, DY1 4AQ

Helen Morrison Lead inspector procedures set out in the guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion