Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Toad Hall Nursery Langley
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Careroom Limited
- Group reference verified
RP910483
- Inspection date verified
14 Mar 2018
- Inspectors verified
Jane Franks
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SL3 8BB
- Name on report verified
Toad Hall Nursery Langley
- URN verified
EY231585
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The management team does not consistently identify staff’s strengths and areas where their practice, such as the quality of teaching and confidence in all aspects of safeguarding procedures, needs improving. p.1
- Staff do not complete all progress checks for children aged between two and three years in line with the legal requirements. p.1
- The quality of teaching is not consistently of a good standard. p.1
- Some staff do not make the most of information from assessment and learning opportunities to challenge and extend children’s learning. p.1
- This has an impact on the progress children make. p.1
- Some staff do not plan activities and routines effectively to support the individual needs of all children and enable their participation. p.1
- At times, children have to wait too long to eat or to participate in activities, and they get frustrated. p.1
- The management team has not made effective use of self-evaluation to identify all p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes8
“weaknesses in practice to help raise outcomes for children.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 863
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Toad Hall Nursery Langley Parlaunt House, Parlaunt Road, Langley, Slough, Berkshire, SL3 8BB
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 14 March 2018 11 August 2015
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The management team does not consistently identify staff’s strengths and areas where their practice, such as the quality of teaching and confidence in all aspects of safeguarding procedures, needs improving. Staff do not complete all progress checks for children aged between two and three years in line with the legal requirements. The quality of teaching is not consistently of a good standard. Some staff do not make the most of information from assessment and learning opportunities to challenge and extend children’s learning. This has an impact on the progress children make. Some staff do not plan activities and routines effectively to support the individual needs of all children and enable their participation. At times, children have to wait too long to eat or to participate in activities, and they get frustrated. The management team has not made effective use of self-evaluation to identify all
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
weaknesses in practice to help raise outcomes for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are confident in their environment and show kindness to others. Staff organise effective settling-in visits and offer plenty of reassurance. Children settle well and form secure relationships with all staff. Children have daily opportunities for fresh air. For example, younger children enjoy catching bubbles in the garden. They dig in the soil and investigate what they find.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
implement effective systems to monitor staff's knowledge and support their professional development 28/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure staff complete all the information as required in the progress check for children at age two years 28/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching and ensure it is consistently of a good standard and that staff make the most of learning opportunities and information from assessment to challenge and extend children's learning. 28/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
make better use of routines to help ensure children are not keep waiting or become frustrated, particularly during mealtimes review the planning of activities to enable all children to take part so that they equally benefit from the learning opportunities provided ensure self-evaluation is used effectively to identify all areas for improvement and to raise outcomes for children.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector took into account the views of parents spoken to on the day. The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact on children's learning. The inspector conducted a joint observation with the manager. The inspector held discussions with the manager, children and staff at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector looked at various documents, including policies and procedures, risk assessments, staff training records, records for children and evidence of the suitability of staff.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The management team does not consistently identify where all staff require additional support to improve their knowledge and practice. Staff have an appropriate understanding of the signs that may indicate a child is at risk from harm and are clear about how to report any child protection concerns. Some were less confident about whom to contact outside of the setting should they have a concern about another member of staff. However, the relevant contact numbers are on display at the setting and a delay in making a referral would be minimal. Safeguarding is effective. Staff have not completed all progress checks on children's development when they are aged between two and three years in line with legal requirements. This means that staff cannot be sure that parents have all the required information they need to share with other professionals, where there may be a concern that a child has gaps in their development. The management team uses
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
rigorous recruitment procedures and holds regular meetings and training for staff. However, systems to evaluate the provision, such as the quality of staff teaching and practice, are not rigorous enough at identifying all areas to improve.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff make regular observations of children's achievements, and management monitors children's progress. However, some staff do not plan activities that provide all children with opportunities to learn. On occasion, children are eager to take part in activities and show frustration when they are not able to do so. For example, they ask to join in a mark- making activity but there are not the resources, such as paper, to support this. The quality of teaching is variable. For example, some staff do not use information from assessment to challenge children, and they do not interact sufficiently well to extend on children's learning. However, some teaching is good. For example, children under the age of two enjoy craft activities and staff encourage them to explore different textures.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Parents speak highly of staff and are happy with the care their children receive. They comment that staff work closely settling in children. Children learn to keep themselves safe. For example, toddlers balance on stepping stones and make their way over apparatus. Children benefit from a healthy range of home-cooked meals, and mealtimes are generally social occasions. Staff in the pre-school room move from child to child with the serving bowl and encourage them to serve themselves. However, this takes time and children were observed to become frustrated waiting to receive and eat their food.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Most children are developing within typical ranges for their age. However, due to the weaknesses in teaching and staff practice, not all children are making the best possible progress. Young children make marks using different resources. Older children learn to write their name. Children participate in songs and action rhymes and enjoy reading stories. These skills help prepare children for their future learning, such as school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY231585 Local authority Slough Inspection number 1128546 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 5 Total number of places 101 Number of children on roll 150 Name of registered person Careroom Limited
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 11 August 2015 Telephone number 07889001664
p.4
reference number
Toad Hall Nursery Langley registered in 2002. It is located in Langley, near Slough, in Berkshire. It opens Monday to Friday between 7.30am and 6pm, 51 weeks a year. The nursery is in receipt of funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The nursery employs 26 members of staff to work with children. Of these, 21 hold relevant childcare qualifications at level 2, level 3 and level 5.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion