Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 689
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Dave Hill Executive Director, Children, Young People and Learners London Borough of Croydon 7th Floor, Southside Taberner House Park Lane Croydon London CR9 3JS
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)
Children’s services in the London Borough of Croydon perform adequately.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)
Performance across services is mixed. Whilst most nurseries are good or better, day care across childminder and childcare settings is only satisfactory. The area has fewer good or better primary schools than seen on average in similar areas or nationally. The proportion of secondary schools that is good or better is particularly low in comparison, although none is inadequate. School sixth forms are considerably stronger by similar area and national comparison. Performance across services which support children and young people whose situation makes them vulnerable is also mixed. Most special schools are good, although the proportion which is good or better is below national and similar area averages. Four out of five pupil referral units are good which is above comparator averages. Children’s homes are good as is the local authority fostering agency; both the adoption agency and private fostering arrangements are satisfactory.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)
Performance against a large majority of national indicators, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is in line with similar areas and the position nationally. However, initial assessments of children and young people’s needs are carried out on comparatively few referrals to social care services, although a higher proportion than average in similar areas are completed in a timely fashion. Fewer than average looked after children reviews are completed within the required time scales. Children’s achievements at age 5 are better than seen in similar areas although are the same at ages 11 and 16. Rates of permanent exclusion from schools are high by national and similar area standards, and persistent absence in secondary schools is high in comparison with similar areas. A greater proportion of young offenders receive custodial sentences than is the case nationally. Participation of 17-year-olds in education and training is good and more young people than
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)
average in comparison to similar areas achieve level 2 or level 3 qualifications by age 19.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs Adequately (2)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion