Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Inspected 6 Mar 2018 · published 4 Apr 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    6 Mar 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Rai

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    KT3 3JU

  • Name on report verified

    Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 18% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrongpositivestronglyenjoyhappyimproved
Criticismpersistent absencedecliningbelownot yetabsencelownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings954w+45
  • What needs to improve92w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,036
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Marie Baxter Headteacher Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School Chestnut Grove New Malden Surrey KT3 3JU

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 6 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since your appointment as headteacher you have worked hard to develop the capacity of the leadership team and ensure that they are fully involved in monitoring standards across the school. You have secured positive working relationships and a clear direction of travel in terms of school improvement.

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Your commitment to creating an inclusive and welcoming learning environment, centred on the school’s core values, is strongly evident. Pupils understand and adhere to these values right from their starting point in Nursery.

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Leaders have led improvements to the curriculum and assessment processes. Professional development opportunities closely linked to these priorities have led to improvements in teachers’ subject knowledge. You have also initiated opportunities for sharing practice amongst staff. Leaders recognise that there is still more to do to fully benefit from this approach to training.

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Pupils respond well to the learning opportunities provided for them and enjoy sharing their ideas with their peers when working in groups. They react well to challenges to apply their learning to problem solving situations. For example, in a Year 4 class pupils were asked to work out areas of different shapes using a selected number of cut-out squares in order to help farmers calculate the area of their fields.

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

In Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and during informal discussions, parents and carers overwhelmingly agree that their children are happy at school.

p.1

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

Governors are actively involved in the school and make regular visits to review how well leaders are addressing school improvement priorities. Governors make effective use of external reports to validate leaders’ judgements.

p.2

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

The previous inspection report recommended that the school should provide the pupils with more opportunities to apply their knowledge of grammar, punctuation and spelling to written work in different subjects. Training provided for all staff has led to strong improvements in their subject knowledge of phonics. Pupils are provided with a good range of purposes for writing, from reports on the Great Fire of London in history to recording experiments in science lessons. Teachers remind pupils of grammar, punctuation and spelling rules in all subject areas when they are asked to write. Teachers use opportunities to develop language related to topics well.

p.2

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

In addition, the previous inspection report recommended that good practice is strengthened by increasing opportunities for teachers to show pupils how to review and improve their written work. The introduction of the new phonics programme has resulted in an increased focus on editing work in key stage 1. In key stage 2 this continues, with pupils marking their changes using ‘polish pens’. In some classes, pupils are given opportunities to share their work with their peers and exchange ideas about how their writing could be improved.

p.2

Short inspection of Corpus Christi Catholic Primary School

The importance of safeguarding pupils is well embedded into the culture of the school. The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Staff demonstrate a secure understanding of policy and their role in keeping every child safe. Staff are provided with regular updates. Pupils are informed about how to keep themselves safe and report that they seek guidance from staff if needed.

p.2

Inspection findings

 A key line of enquiry for the inspection was to review the procedures for monitoring pupils’ attendance as persistent absence increased in the academic year 2016/17.  Attendance is robustly monitored and staff work in partnership with the local authority to ensure that families of pupils with high absence are supported effectively to improve. As a result, the number of pupils with persistent absence is declining.  The second key line of enquiry was to review the steps taken to raise attainment in key stage 1, as outcomes in 2017 were below the national average for all subjects. In addition, I investigated how well those pupils who are now in key stage 2, who did not meet the expected standard at key stage 1, are being supported to catch up.  Teachers demonstrate effective subject knowledge and plan tasks that are creative and engage pupils well. As a result, pupils are well focused in lessons and work well together to share ideas and raise questions.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Where the best practice is seen, time in lessons is used productively and assessment, including questioning, is used effectively to assess pupils’ understanding and extend their learning. However, this is not yet consistent across the school.  The final key line of enquiry was to measure how successfully leaders support teachers to create opportunities for reading and writing in early years. In 2017, the percentage of children who achieved expected levels at the end of Reception was below the national average, with reading and writing outcomes particularly low.  Through creative planning based on children’s interests, early years staff ensure that pupils are well motivated by their learning experiences. The opportunities for early reading and writing are relevant and varied. For example, children enjoyed using the magnifying glasses to find clues about the ‘crime scene’ staged in Reception. They recorded their findings in a variety of ways and

p.3

Inspection findings

articulated their ideas with enthusiasm and clarity.  Early years staff support learning by engaging, with interest, in meaningful discussion with children. They question children well to extend their learning and initiate new ideas.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 staff make more effective use of assessment to reshape lessons and move learning on more swiftly  leaders continue to develop opportunities for staff to share practice in order to establish greater consistency in the quality of teaching.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Archdiocese of Southwark, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kingston upon Thames. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, the deputy head teacher, the special educational needs leader, the phonics leader, the English leader and the key stage 2 leader. I met with the office staff responsible for pre-employment checks and a member of the office team who monitors attendance. I met with two members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I visited classes from Nursery to Year 6 with you and the deputy headteacher to observe teaching, talk to pupils and review work.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I met with the pupils from the school council and reviewed a selection of pupils’ work.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I reviewed responses from parents and staff to the Ofsted online surveys. I analysed 113 responses from parents to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey. In addition, I spoke to six parents in the playground. Together with this I considered 18 responses from staff.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I evaluated a range of documentation related to safeguarding and the school’s website. School attendance and assessment information were also reviewed.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion