Other · Ofsted report
London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
26 Jul 2007
- Inspectors AI-checked
Rosemary Dancer, Sean White
- Postcode verified
UB8 1UW
- Name on report verified
London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following the inspection three years ago there were six requirements (actions) made. p.4
- There were also 19 recommendations made; all of these have either been addressed or are no longer relevant to this service. p.4
- There are no standards mapped to this outcome area. p.4
- The agency has a written recruitment strategy in place. p.4
- There is a range of recruitment activity which is based on the needs of children coming through the system. p.4
- There are arrangements to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy; these need refinement. p.4
- The agency works closely with other authorities in the local consortium and has procedures for using the Adoption Register for England and Wales. p.4
- Most adopters are impressed with the agency response to their initial and subsequent contacts. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,871
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service Inspection report for la adoption agency
p.1
SC055697 Unique reference number 26 July 2007 Inspection date Rosemary Dancer / Sean White Inspector Key Type of Inspection
p.1
London Borough of Hillingdon Address Civic Centre High Street UXBRIDGE Middlesex UB8 1UW 01895 277 854 Telephone number
p.1
London Borough of Hillingdon Registered person Ann Holmes Registered manager Debbie Haith Responsible individual 30 November 2004 Date of last inspection .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
You can obtain copies of The Children Act 2004, Every Child Matters and The National Minimum Standards for Children's Services from: The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Cripins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop
p.2
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. This report details the main strengths and any areas for improvement identified during the inspection. The judgements included in the report are made in relation to the outcome for children set out in the Children Act 2004 and relevant National Minimum Standards for the establishment.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
this aspect of the provision is of exceptionally high quality Outstanding: this aspect of the provision is strong Good: this aspect of the provision is sound Satisfactory: this aspect of the provision is not good enough Inadequate: 3 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007
p.3
Brief description of the service
The adoption agency of the London Borough of Hillingdon undertakes all statutory work associated with adoption services. It operates from the Civic Centre in Uxbridge. The duties it undertakes are as follows: the recruitment; preparation assessment and approval of adopters; both domestic and inter-country; the matching; introduction and placement of children with adopters; the support of adoption placements; post-adoption support to those whose lives have been touched by adoption, including birth records counselling and intermediary work; support to birth parents of children placed for adoption, or who have been adopted.
p.4
Summary
The recruitment, preparation, assessment and approval processes are overall of a good quality. The support services to adoptive families and to birth family members are overall of a good quality, geared to individual needs and made available when required. The agency is well managed at all levels and is run effectively and efficiently. Staff are valued by managers and are well supported in providing a good adoption service to all affected by adoption. The London Borough of Hillingdon achieves safe, secure and stable adoptive placements for children. The overall quality rating is good. This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection.
p.4
Improvements since the last inspection
Following the inspection three years ago there were six requirements (actions) made. All of these were addressed. There were also 19 recommendations made; all of these have either been addressed or are no longer relevant to this service.
p.4
Helping children to be healthy
The provision is not judged. There are no standards mapped to this outcome area.
p.4
Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe
The provision is good. The agency has a written recruitment strategy in place. There is a range of recruitment activity which is based on the needs of children coming through the system. There are arrangements to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy; these need refinement. The agency works closely with other authorities in the local consortium and has procedures for using the Adoption Register for England and Wales. Most adopters are impressed with the agency response to their initial and subsequent contacts. Applicants are involved in a formal assessment, preparation and approval process. Adopters report that the preparation groups and assessment visits are informative. As a result adopters feel well prepared to parent a child from the care system. Most assessments of applicants suitability to adopt viewed were of a reasonable quality. There were some gaps in some of the assessments at the stage the case was presented to the adoption
p.4
Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe
panel. For example in one case there was some outstanding health information and in another case a couple were not interviewed separately. In addition not all adopters career histories include the months of their start and finish dates and the health and safety checklist does not include an assessment of the safe storage of dangerous weapons and a risk assessment in 4 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007 respect to hanging cords on window blinds. The Child Permanence Reports (CPRs) are of a variable quality but are overall adequate to inform the matching processes. The agency has a thorough approach to matching children with adopters who will be able to meet their needs. Children's social workers reported that there is a good choice of adopters for the children they are placing and adopters overall felt well informed about the matching process and more
p.4
Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe
importantly most felt well informed about the child's needs. There are written policies and procedures in respect to the panels handling and functioning. The panel monitoring role is underdeveloped. There is a system in place to ensure that each assessment is edited in respect to any factual inaccuracies or spelling mistakes. Adopters are invited to attend the panel at which their case is being heard. While the panel is properly constituted better representation of gender and ethnicity is to be addressed via the recruitment of new members. Panels are planned in advance and convened regularly. Panel members read the papers in advance and devise appropriate questions. The independent chair is suitably qualified and experienced in adoption matters and she chairs the panel in a competent manner. New panel members are provided with an opportunity to observe a panel. The agency arranges training for panel members
p.5
Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe
to ensure they keep up to date with adoption issues; this includes training in issues relating to inter-country adoption. The agency undertakes a thorough recruitment process for all panel members and the chair, including taking up Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks and requiring members to sign confidentiality agreements. The adoption manager who has responsibility for the assessments of the adopters is the adviser to panel; this poses some issues around conflict of interests. The overall administration of the panel is good and papers are sent out to panel members in a timely way. The panel minutes do not consistently evidence that issues required by legislation to be considered by panel have been considered. Where a sibling group is being considered separate minutes are not always being made. The decision-making process is efficient and well organised in terms of timescales; the relevant people are advised of the decision in a
p.5
Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe
timely way. The manager and social workers are suitably qualified and experienced in adoption work. The agency uses the London Child Protection Procedures.
p.5
Helping children achieve well and enjoy what they do
The provision is good. The agency provides good quality support services through a service level agreement with a registered adoption support agency, via the consortium and via its own resources. The planning of more individualised support commences in a timely way. Support plans are based on assessed needs and are reviewed over time. Independent Reviewing Officers are fully involved in reviewing and monitoring the support plans. Adopters are committed to ensuring the child or children placed with them understand their past history. The agency arranges and supports letterbox and direct contact between adopted children and their birth families. Birth records counselling and intermediary services are also provided. The agency has not developed clear written information about the assessment process and how this work is quality assured. Some sensitive work is carried out with people touched by adoption. In one case an unqualified worker had
p.5
Helping children achieve well and enjoy what they do
carried out some intermediary work. The agency has disruption procedures in place; disruptions are used as a learning process in this agency. The access to legal and medical advice is good. The medical adviser is especially highly thought of by social workers and adopters. The agency also works with the Multi Agency Support Team and the local Children and Adolescent Mental Health Team; there are plans to further improve the links with these two services.
p.5
Helping children make a positive contribution
The provision is good. 5 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007 There is a clear strategic approach taken to supporting birth families and good efforts are made to involve them in the planning for their child as far as is possible. The agency provides support services to birth parents and birth family members through a service level agreement with a registered adoption support agency and via its own resources. In one case commendable efforts had been made to trace a birth father. Where birth parents had expressed views about the plans for the child these were included on the CPRs; where parents did not wish to express their views this is not always recorded in these reports. Birth parents are fully supported in meeting contact arrangements. The completion of life-story work and later life letters is monitored by the reviewing officers. Social workers reported some difficulties in preparing life-story books
p.5
Helping children make a positive contribution
for children due to a lack of time and access to equipment such as scanners, printers and other resources required to do this work.
p.6
Achieving economic wellbeing
The provision is not judged. There are no standards mapped to this outcome area.
p.6
Organisation
The organisation is good. There is a Statement of Purpose in place which details the services provided. While the document is informative it does not fully meet regulations and it has not been formally approved. The agency has developed a useful guide for children about adoption; this is geared to the older and more able age range and would not be accessible to a younger or less able child. The agency has clear policies and procedures which provide a sound framework for the delivery of services. Staff have accesses to all policies and procedures. The standard of the information provided to adopters is good; some adopters confirmed that this information is informative. There is a system to prioritise prospective adopters who were most likely to meet the needs of children waiting. The nominated manager and her deputy have suitable professional and managerial qualifications and experience. The agency is well managed at all levels. There are clear lines of
p.6
Organisation
accountability throughout the agency and clear arrangements are in place for the management of the agency when the manager is absent. There are well established lines of communication across the adoption and area teams and across the management structure. All staff reported that they felt very well supported by their managers. The agency is run in accordance with the Statement of Purpose. There are systems in place for monitoring and controlling the work of the agency and a robust system in place to track children through the system to ensure their care plans are progressed in a timely way. The executive side of the council are not receiving a minimum of two written reports on the management and outcomes of the agency and the quality assurance system for assessments need to be strengthened. The agency has sufficient qualified skilled and experienced adoption social workers to meet the expectations of the
p.6
Organisation
Statement of Purpose. There are some ongoing difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff in the area teams but these are being effectively managed. The social workers take an enthusiastic and committed approach to their respective roles and it is clear that they take a child-centred approach to their work. The management of workloads are effective and staff reported a good level of support from the managers via supervision, team meetings and less formal means such as informal supervision. The training opportunities for staff are excellent and staff reported that both internal and external training can be accessed and that this is extended to temporary workers. Administrative support was described as being insufficient in some of the teams; this relates to numbers of staff rather than the calibre of staff working for the agency. The case 6 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007
p.6
Organisation
files for children and adopters were overall adequate. However, the dividers used to section each file do not relate to the documents used in adoption work, not all files have records of supervisors decision making filed on them, some key documents are not signed by the relevant people and the file audit system in place is not fully utilised in every case. In addition on some children's files sibling groups are not always provided with individual panel minutes and the files do not contain information such as copies of life-story books or photographs of the child and his family. There are clear arrangements in place in respect to access to records. Current records are appropriately stored. The arrangements for the storage of archived files are overall satisfactory. However, there is no assessment in place in respect to the risk of fire and there are no arrangements for back up of paper files. The premises the agency operates from are
p.7
Organisation
accessible and appropriate for the purpose. The electronic systems are secure and there is a disaster recovery plan in place.
p.7
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person meets the Care Standards Act 2000, The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider must comply with the given timescales.
p.7
Due date Action Standard
1 October 2007 ensure that panel do not make recommendations unless full information is available to it. Regulation 32 Adoption Agency Regulations 2005. 1 October 2007 amend the statement of purpose to include all information as required by regulation and ensure that it is formally approved. Regulation 2 Schedule 1 Local Authority Adoption Service Regulations 2003.
p.7
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the registered person should take account of the following recommendation(s): • establish an effective system to evaluate the effectiveness of the recruitment strategy • carry out individual interviews where a couple is being assessed, ensure that full employment dates of adopters are obtained, ensure that the health and safety checklist includes an assessment of risk of any dangerous weapons owned by adopters and a assessment of risk from hanging strings on window blinds • develop a robust system for quality assuring assessment reports • establish systems to ensure the monitoring role of the panel is effective • review the policy that the adoption manager must be the adviser to the panel • include the full panel discussion in the minutes and ensure that separate minutes are made for each child • ensure that only qualified social workers carry out the intermediary support work
p.7
Recommendations
7 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007 • establish clear processes for the assessment and monitoring of work in respect to members of the public who have been touched by adoption, such as adult adoptees • ensure that where birth parents do not wish to express a view about the planning for their child this is recorded • ensure that social workers have access to the tools they need to complete life story books • develop a guide to adoption for younger or less able children. • provide the executive side of the council with a minimum of two written reports a year • review the arrangements for providing adoption and fieldworkers with administrative support. • ensure that the contents of the case files for adopters and children are up to date, that all key documents are signed and dated and that the file audit system is fully utilised • carry out a risk assessment of the archive arrangements in respect to the risk from fire and
p.7
Recommendations
develop a back-up system for paper files 8 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007
p.8
The intended outcomes for these standards are:
• Ofsted considers the key standard to be inspected.
p.9
The intended outcomes for these standards are:
• the agency matches children with adopters (NMS 2) • the agency assesses and prepares adopters (NMS 4) • adopters are given information about matching (NMS 5) • the functions of the adoption panel are as specified (NMS 10) • the constitution and membership of adoption panels are as specified (NMS 11) • adoption panels are timely (NMS 12) • adoption agency decision is made without delay and appropriately (NMS 13) • the manager is suitable to carry on or manage an adoption agency (NMS 15) • staff are suitable to work with children (NMS 19) • the agency has a robust complaints procedure (NMS 24 voluntary adoption agency only) • the agency safeguards and promotes the welfare of its service users (NMS 32)
p.9
The intended outcomes for these standards are:
• the adoption agency provides support for adoptive parents (NMS 6) • the agency has access to specialist advisers as appropriate (NMS 18) • services are tailored to meet the needs of people affected by adoption (NMS 33) Ofsted considers 6 and 33 the key standards to be inspected.
p.9
The intended outcomes for these standards are:
• birth parents and birth families are involved in adoption plans (NMS 7) • birth parents and birth families are involved in maintaining the child’s heritage (NMS 8) • the adoption agency supports birth parents and families (NMS 9) • Service users receive good quality services based on their needs (NMS 34) Ofsted considers 7, 8, 9 and 34 the key standards to be inspected.
p.9
The intended outcomes for these standards are:
Ofsted considers none of the above to be key standards to be inspected.
p.9
The intended outcomes for these standards are:
• there is a clear written statement of the aims and objectives of the adoption agency and the adoption agency ensures that it meets those aims and objectives (NMS 1) 9 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007
p.9
Annex A
• the agency provides clear written information for prospective adopters (NMS 3) • the manager has skills to carry on or manage the adoption agency (NMS 14) • the adoption agency is managed effectively and efficiently (NMS 16) • the agency is monitored and controlled as specified (NMS 17) • the staff are organised and managed effectively (NMS 20) • the agency has sufficient staff with the right skills/experience (NMS 21) • the agency is a fair and competent employer (NMS 22) • the agency provides training for staff (NMS 23) • case records for children and prospective / approved adopters are comprehensive and accurate (NMS 25) • the agency provides access to records as appropriate (NMS 26) • the agency’s administrative records processes are appropriate (NMS 27) • the agency maintains personnel files for members of staff and members of adoption panels (NMS 28) • the premises used by the adoption agency are suitable for purpose (NMS 29)
p.10
Annex A
• the adoption agency is financially viable (NMS 30 voluntary adoption agency only) • the adoption agency has robust financial processes (NMS 31) Ofsted considers 1, 3, 16, 21, 25 and 27 the key standards to be inspected. 10 of 10 Inspection Report: London Borough of Hillingdon Adoption Service, 26 July 2007
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion