Schools & FE · Short school inspection
St Francis RC Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Mar 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Jason Hughes
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Postcode verified
SE15 1RQ
- Name on report verified
St Francis RC Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You have built a staff team that is highly skilled and addresses the needs of all pupils. p.1
- Teachers and leaders accurately assess pupils’ work, and systems for tracking progress are strong. p.2
- Attendance continues to be a strength of the school, and is consistently higher than the national average. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 995
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Rosalind Atkinson and Mrs Carol Molloy Co-headteachers St Francis RC Primary School Friary Road Peckham London SE15 1RQ
p.1
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 6 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in 2012.
p.1
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You have built a staff team that is highly skilled and addresses the needs of all pupils. The school’s strong ethos, based on Christian values, is shared across your close-knit community. Governors have a thorough understanding of the school, and of the academic and social issues facing pupils.
p.1
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
Pupils are happy at the school. They enjoy their learning and take pride in their work. Pupils are motivated to do their best by adults who know them well. Healthy competition is used to increase pupils’ academic stamina and resilience. Pupils were keen to tell me about their latest reading books, and how much they enjoy reading.
p.1
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
Using information on pupils to set them challenging targets is an area that you have addressed. This was identified for improvement at your last inspection. Your subject leaders work in collaboration with teachers, other schools and the local authority. They make sure that pupils’ work is moderated so that information is accurate. You know which pupils have not met your high expectations and you use this information to help them improve.
p.1
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
Progress in reading has not been as strong as in other core subjects. Your reaction to the drop in reading standards at key stage 2 in 2016 has been swift. You have rightly raised the profile of reading, to the extent that recently the school won the World Book Day Award. Reading is an improving area, but leaders must make strenuous efforts to ensure that progress in reading at key stage 2 matches that in writing and mathematics. The school has a robust school improvement plan. It includes strategies for improving progress and achievement in core subjects. The school’s self-evaluation reflects pupils’ attainment. To better inform all stakeholders, including governors, the school should also include progress measures in self-evaluation documents.
p.1
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
You and the leadership team have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose, and records are detailed and of high quality. The school works closely with outside agencies so that pupils and families receive the individualised support they need. Governors ensure that relevant policies are regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the needs of the school.
p.2
Short inspection of St Francis RC Primary School
Training of all staff, including the designated safeguarding leads, is timely and ensures that the school is continually assessing the safety of its pupils and staff. Leaders, through the school curriculum, make sure that pupils are well informed on how to stay safe. Pupils told me, ‘We feel safe in school’ and ‘We tell our teacher if we have a problem.’
p.2
Inspection findings
At our initial meeting we discussed the current priorities for the school, including the ones that you had identified. We agreed on a number of key lines of enquiry. The first line of enquiry was to examine pupils’ progress in reading at the end of key stage 2. The 2016 outcomes highlighted this, and it was an identified priority for the school. The school has introduced and invested in a new guided reading programme. Pupils study selected texts that engage all types of learners through imaginative, insightful and reflective activities. Pupils enjoy the autonomy which their reading and writing journals allow. Parents and carers have been encouraged to support pupils’ reading and writing. They are asked to read and write in their children’s journals, allowing families to share in pupils’ learning. Pupils are making progress with their reading. They read more at home, and their comprehension skills have improved. The programme is still relatively new,
p.2
Inspection findings
so evidence of sustained progress is yet to be seen. The second line of enquiry was based on underachievement in mathematics at key stage 1. This was chosen because recent mathematics outcomes in key stage 1 have been lower than in reading and writing. Middle leaders have been heavily involved in producing local authority shared curriculum plans for mathematics. They now have a working knowledge of the mathematics curriculum, which they use to support all staff in delivering good- quality mathematics lessons. Teachers and leaders accurately assess pupils’ work, and systems for tracking progress are strong. Termly reviews ensure that interventions and additional support are directed to those pupils who require it, and the extra help is having a positive impact. The regular analysis of pupils’ skills has led to positive changes to the school curriculum. For example, the school altered the mathematics
p.2
Inspection findings
curriculum when mental strategies were identified as being less developed than formal written methods. The final line of enquiry was to examine the school’s attendance and persistent absence rates. This was identified because persistent absence rates were higher than national averages. Attendance continues to be a strength of the school, and is consistently higher than the national average. Persistent absence rates are currently lower than national figures. Leaders track pupils’ absence and persistent absence. They use this information to direct appropriate rewards and sanctions, which are ensuring the high attendance.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
progress in reading improves so that it is consistent with that in writing and mathematics the school self-evaluation process addresses pupils’ progress as well as their attainment achievement in mathematics at key stage 1 improves so that a greater proportion of pupils meet the expected standard.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Archdiocese of Southwark, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Southwark. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
The following activities took place during the inspection: Meetings were held with senior leaders, the safeguarding team, a group of middle leaders, a representative from the local authority and a governor. Teaching was observed jointly across the school with senior leaders. Pupils from Years 3 and 6 were heard reading. A range of school documents were scrutinised, including policies and safeguarding records, the school’s website and governors’ minutes. A range of pupils’ workbooks were reviewed. Discussions were held with pupils. The 15 responses to the Ofsted online survey, Parent View, were considered. The inspector had conversations with parents and pupils on the playground.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion