Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Martin Ayres
- Postcode verified
NE61 2EF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Similarly, case records do not provide enough information on the wishes and feelings of the children and young people who are regularly seen in the course of assessments. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Mr S Stewart, Chief Executive, Northumberland County Council Mrs A Walton, Chair of Northumberland Safeguarding Children Board Lesley Rickerby, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Northumberland County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 772
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 24, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr P Moffat Corporate Director for Children’s Services Northumberland County Council County Hall Morpeth NE61 2EF
p.1
arrangements within Northumberland Children’s Services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Northumberland County Council which was conducted on 29 and 30 June 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Northumberland Children’s Services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Northumberland Children’s Services
The inspection identified areas of strength and satisfactory practice, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Northumberland Children’s Services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
A comprehensive performance management framework is in place and is being effectively utilised by local managers to drive continuous improvement in safeguarding practice and processes.
p.1
Strengths
Multi-agency working is embedded in the county including across the national border between England and Scotland with strong evidence of good Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk information exchange, protocol sharing and agreed thresholds for intervention.
p.1
Strengths
County-wide consistency is being maintained in key elements of service including thresholds and procedural compliance in parallel with appropriate scope for local responses to the needs of children and young people.
p.2
Strengths
Managers of local contact, referral and assessment teams work well together to deliver reliable safeguarding services, they are open to learning from each other and provide an appropriate level of challenge in order to ensure a clear focus is maintained on the needs of children and young people.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Contact, referral and duty arrangements are effective. Joint accountabilities are clear and based on widespread awareness of safeguarding priorities.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
All work is suitably allocated according to skill and experience with prompt action to respond to the needs of vulnerable children and young people. Managers provide effective oversight and direction.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
The social care workforce in contact, referral and assessment teams, and emergency duty is stable, experienced and well supported by managers. Staff receive regular supervision and have good access to training and personal development opportunities.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Initial assessments are timely and produced to a consistent standard.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
The quality and timeliness of core assessments has markedly improved following concerted management action to raise the county-wide performance level.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Child protection investigations are timely, well considered and lead to effective planning for the safeguarding of children and young people.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Emergency duty arrangements are firmly in place and ensure that urgent action is taken outside normal working hours to safeguard children and young people. There is appropriate information sharing between emergency duty team members and staff in the contact, referral and assessment teams.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Social worker visiting frequency is regular and children and young people are routinely seen alone as part of assessments and subsequent planning.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Clear and well established processes are in place to ensure that learning from serious case reviews is widely disseminated and used to promote good safeguarding practice.
p.2
Satisfactory practice
Administrative support to duty functions is highly professional and ensures that case records are consistently well organised and maintained.
p.2
Areas for development
Case records do not sufficiently reflect work that is being undertaken by social workers to ensure that issues of diversity, equality and identity are fully addressed. Similarly, case records do not provide enough information on the wishes and feelings of the children and young people who are regularly seen in the course of assessments.
p.3
Areas for development
Working agreements with parents following social care interventions are not always written in a way that facilitates a partnership and not always adapted to ensure they can fully comprehend what is required of them as part of a plan.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Mr S Stewart, Chief Executive, Northumberland County Council Mrs A Walton, Chair of Northumberland Safeguarding Children Board Lesley Rickerby, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Northumberland County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion