Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Sutton-On-Trent Primary and Nursery School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Feb 2018
- Inspectors verified
Yvonne Watts
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
NG23 6PD
- Name on report verified
Sutton-on-Trent Primary and Nursery School
- URN verified
122678
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They access many similar activities at an appropriate level and are supported very well by an enthusiastic and knowledgeable practitioner. p.8
- They use their skills very well to provide an effective balance between challenge and support for the school team. p.1
- drive to secure consistently strong teaching. p.1
- As a result, the children thrive in the early years provision and are well prepared for their move to Year 1. p.7
- The executive headteacher and head of school have developed a positive and ambitious culture. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance31
“The capacity of the school leadership to continue to make further improvements is strong.” p.3Teaching & assessment21
“drive to secure consistently strong teaching.” p.1SEND & inclusion6
“The leadership of SEN and/or disabilities is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,896
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sutton-on-Trent Primary and Nursery School Church Street, Sutton-on-Trent, Newark, Nottinghamshire NG23 6PD
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The executive headteacher and head of school have developed a positive and ambitious culture. This has led to rapid improvement across the school since the previous inspection. School development planning is detailed and thorough. The impact of actions being taken is evaluated regularly. Governors have a clear and accurate knowledge of the school. They use their skills very well to provide an effective balance between challenge and support for the school team. The collaboration formed with another local school is proving to be very beneficial for the staff. It is enabling the team to build on the best practice found in both schools. The middle leadership team is shared across the two schools. They are knowledgeable and committed to making further improvements to teaching and learning. Leaders at all levels monitor teaching and learning closely. They use assessment information well and are relentless in their
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
drive to secure consistently strong teaching. The attainment and progress of pupils in 2017 showed considerable improvements on the previous year. Pupils in all key stages achieved higher outcomes than previously and when compared with schools nationally. Pupils now generally make good progress from their starting points, in all subjects. Pupils are very well behaved and take pride in their school and their achievements. They show respect for adults and each other. Attendance is above the national average. Parents and the wider community value the school and recognise the recent improvements. Staff in the early years provision ensure that children make a positive start to their school lives. The curriculum provides a wide range of learning opportunities, with the key skills being taught in a topic-based approach. When learning is most effective, teachers have the highest expectations of pupils. This is not
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
yet consistent in all classes. In 2017, fewer key stage 2 pupils than nationally achieved greater depth scores. This was particularly apparent in mathematics. Although showing improvements currently, pupils who are disadvantaged or who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities have not historically made as much progress as other pupils during their time at the school.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – all staff consistently demonstrate the highest expectations of what all pupils can achieve by providing them with tasks that are challenging and build appropriately on their starting points, especially in mathematics – teachers learn from the most effective practice seen in the school and across the collaboration – differences in progress and attainment between disadvantaged and non- disadvantaged pupils are further diminished. Improve outcomes by: – ensuring that more of the most able pupils across the school, including those who are disadvantaged, are working at greater depth in all subjects – increasing opportunities for pupils to embed their mathematical reasoning skills, by applying their knowledge to a wider variety of problem-solving activities.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The school has made rapid improvements since the previous inspection. The areas identified for development have been addressed effectively. School development planning is detailed and accurate, with regular evaluations helping to ensure that the identified priorities have continuing focus. The capacity of the school leadership to continue to make further improvements is strong. The executive headteacher and the head of school work very effectively together and have created an ambitious culture in the school. This has helped to raise the aspirations of staff and pupils. Parents speak very highly of the impact made by the changes of leadership since the previous inspection. One parent summed this up by saying, ‘the new leaders have given the school a breath of fresh air.’ The school has been strengthened by the formation of a collaboration with another local primary school. The leadership team is shared across the two schools and staff
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
take part in joint development and planning opportunities. This approach has enabled leaders at all levels to have greater objectivity, with moderation activities helping to raise expectations and standards. The collaboration is proving to be mutually beneficial for both schools. Senior leaders are ably supported by the middle leadership team members, both in the school and across the collaboration. The middle leaders show a good understanding of their respective roles. They prepare detailed and specific action plans, which enhance the school development plan. Leaders’ arrangements for managing the performance of staff are effective. Teachers and support staff are given clear targets to improve their practice. These targets are appropriate and linked closely to school development planning. Senior leaders are tenacious in their approach to addressing any inconsistencies in the quality of teaching
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
and learning. The leadership of SEN and/or disabilities is effective. These pupils are supported well and are making positive progress from their individual starting points. The school uses its relatively small allocation of pupil premium funding well. Leaders use many creative solutions to provide focused interventions, including regular and timely sessions being led by well-qualified support staff and volunteers from the local community. As a result, disadvantaged pupils currently are making at least as good progress as their peers. Staff are very positive about the school. They value the support they receive from senior leaders and the school’s commitment to ongoing professional development. The local authority provides regular, effective support to the school. This has involved monthly visits since the previous inspection, with close monitoring and detailed advice being given to help secure improvements.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Leaders are committed to ensuring that pupils are supported well to prepare for life in modern Britain. There are regular whole-school initiatives, where older pupils take responsibilities and help support their younger peers. These include weekly assemblies which focus on issues such as e-safety, empathy and anti-bullying. The school offers a broad and balanced curriculum. There are clear links between subjects and a focus on developing key skills across broad topics. Some inconsistencies remain in the quality of teaching and learning, particularly the levels of challenge provided, although leaders are fully aware of these. They are working purposefully to embed a culture with the highest expectations and offer systematic support and challenge to teachers. Leaders recognise the need for staff to learn from each other and show a commitment to ensuring that the best practice across the collaboration is emulated.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development needs are generally met well. There are many opportunities to learn about other faiths, cultures and traditions. Pupils are not always helped to develop their experiences and understanding of spirituality in assemblies and whole-school activities. The primary physical education (PE) and sport premium is being spent effectively. The funding is partly used to employ specialist sports coaches, extending available resources and supporting pupils in undertaking competitive sports with other schools. There is currently limited emphasis on measuring the impact of these initiatives.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors have played an energetic and significant part in ensuring that the improvements made since the previous inspection have been brisk. They show a detailed understanding of the strengths and areas for development. Governors undertake very regular visits to the school and carry out many monitoring activities, with the findings being systematically reported to the full governing body. Further actions are then generated from these reports. Members of the governing body have a wide variety of skills, including financial and education experience. These specialisms are used very well to provide expertise in the various committees. Governors receive detailed information from senior leaders about the additional funding received for pupil premium, SEN and/or disabilities and physical education. They have a secure knowledge of how this funding is helping to improve the provision for pupils. Governors appreciate the support and guidance offered by the local authority and have
p.4
Governance of the school
shown commitment to their changing roles since the formation of the collaboration.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The senior leaders share the designated lead responsibility, which they take very seriously. The robust and thorough safeguarding processes are well documented. Staff members understand their responsibilities with respect to safeguarding. They receive regular training and know the processes required to report any concern. Leaders ensure that safer recruitment procedures are followed when recruiting new staff. The school’s records meet requirements. The safeguarding governor takes her responsibilities very seriously. She meets regularly with senior leaders and supports them well in fulfilling their duties.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teaching, learning and assessment have improved since the previous inspection and are now good. Teachers plan a range of interesting and cohesive lessons. These engage pupils’ interests and help to ensure that they generally make good progress from their starting points. Success criteria are planned for each learning objective and are referred to during lessons to help structure the learning. Where learning is most effective, teachers use questioning effectively to both check pupils’ understanding and to make them think more deeply. This was demonstrated particularly well in a thought-provoking discussion during analysis of a classic poem in upper key stage 2. Pupils were encouraged to consider the rich language and to reflect on their empathy with the characters and setting. Other adults, in classes and in small intervention groups, make a positive contribution to pupils’ learning, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and those who have SEN
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
and/or disabilities. They work effectively to help pupils understand what they need to do and to encourage individuals to complete the work they have been set. The school has introduced an effective assessment system which is understood by all staff and governors. This is helping staff to closely track the progress of each pupil and to help ensure that they make expected or better progress. The work in pupils’ books shows a consistent approach to presentation, and to feedback, which is in line with the school’s policy. However, pupils do not always respond to the feedback given. Leaders and teachers have given appropriate focus to improving the quality of teaching and learning in mathematics. This has shown benefits in the quality of work completed and the progress made. However, there is still room to provide further opportunities for pupils to develop their reasoning skills across the mathematics curriculum.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teachers generally demonstrate high expectations of the pupils during lessons. Where this happens, the pupils show high levels of engagement and rise to the challenges set. However, this is not yet consistently apparent in all classes. Inconsistencies in the levels of challenge provided to pupils were seen in a minority of lessons. This means that sometimes pupils are repeating work that they can already do, so they do not always make as much progress as they are capable of. This is particularly evident for some of the most able pupils who are sometimes given tasks that are too easy.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils feel well cared for and relationships with adults and other pupils are warm and friendly. Pupils show a well-embedded respect for the views of each other and they listen carefully to adults and to other pupils. Pupils display very positive attitudes towards the school and their learning. They take pride in their school and in their work, which is displayed across the school. A favourite time of the week is the ‘Shining Time’ assembly when pupils enjoy celebrating their own and each other’s successes. Pupils know how to keep safe from a variety of risks to their safety, both in school and in the wider world. They show a good awareness of anti-bullying initiatives. Pupils recognise that any instances of bullying are extremely rare and they know what to do should there be an incident. Pupils are taught how to use the internet safely.
p.6
Personal development and welfare
Parents and carers who responded to the Ofsted questionnaire, Parent View, or who spoke to the inspector, are very positive about the support and care that their children receive. They are confident that their children are happy and safe at school. One parent described the ‘nurturing and fun learning environment’. Pupils say that staff listen to them and will consider their views. Pupils would like even more opportunities to voice their ideas in more formal and documented forums.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. They generally behave well in lessons and show self- discipline at social times such as in the lunch hall or on the playground. Pupils understand the school’s system for rewards and sanctions. As a result of the clear expectations of staff, pupils move around the school sensibly and the atmosphere in school is calm and friendly. Pupils wear their uniforms smartly and help to keep their school and classrooms clean and tidy. The attendance of pupils is higher than the average for schools nationally, which reflects pupils’ positive attitudes to school life. They are punctual for school and for lessons. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent has risen slightly in recent months, partly due to the illness of a small number of pupils. This trend has been identified by leaders, who are working proactively to reduce the proportion.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
Outcomes for pupils at Sutton-on-Trent are improving rapidly. There have been noticeable improvements in the achievement of children in early years, and pupils in key stage 1 and key stage 2 since the previous inspection. In general, pupils are now attaining better than pupils nationally in reading, writing and mathematics. Consequently, they are being prepared well for the next stage of their education. The attainment and progress of Year 6 pupils in 2017 showed considerable improvements on the outcomes in recent years. The majority of pupils made at least the progress expected of them in reading, writing and mathematics. Furthermore, the proportion of pupils who attained the expected level was at least in line with that for schools nationally. Key stage 1 pupils achieved higher levels than nationally in reading, writing and mathematics. The proportions of pupils who attained the higher standard were again
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
better than national averages. The results of the phonics screening check in Year 1 were well above those of pupils nationally. This reflects the quality of teaching of early reading experienced by pupils. The school tracks the progress of individual pupils carefully in all year groups across the school. The targets set for pupils are now aspirational and are reflected in the high proportions of pupils currently making expected or better progress in all year groups. The progress made by pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is now generally good from their starting points. The specific needs of each pupil are focused on well to help them move on quickly. The proportion of key stage 2 pupils who attained greater depth scores in 2017 was lower than the national average. This was particularly apparent in mathematics, where no pupils achieved the higher standard. This resulted in no pupils attaining the
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
combined reading, writing and mathematics measure at a greater depth. The attainment and progress made by disadvantaged pupils in key stage 2 were low in 2017 when compared with those of other pupils in the school and nationally. However, there were improvements apparent since the 2016 outcomes. A similar picture was seen with those pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities, although case studies show that these were the same pupils who had multiple vulnerabilities. The school is aware of the discrepancy and is now providing greater support and intervention to help diminish the differences for these pupils. Current analysis indicates that disadvantaged pupils are now progressing at least as well as their peers. Pupils do not always achieve the best possible outcomes during lessons, particularly in mathematics. This is because the highest levels of challenge are not always applied, which would help pupils to extend their understanding and reasoning skills across the
p.7
Early years provision Good
The leadership and management of early years are good. The leader has a thorough and accurate knowledge of the needs of each child individually. As a result, the children thrive in the early years provision and are well prepared for their move to Year 1. Children enter the school at levels similar to those typically found in children of the same age. They make good or better progress during their time in early years, and the proportion of children who achieve a good level of development is above the average for schools nationally. This proportion has risen noticeably in recent years. The small number of disadvantaged children receive targeted and individualised support. There are warm relationships apparent between the adults and children, with humour and reference to real life being introduced effectively during discussions. For instance, in one session, the children were being encouraged to think of their key skills when
p.7
Early years provision Good
using the class shop. The teacher skilfully included references to phonic knowledge through list-making and the importance of number knowledge when spending money. The school has introduced Nursery provision since the previous inspection. This initiative has helped fulfil an identified need in the local community and has been greatly appreciated by parents. The Nursery children are integrated well with the children in Reception Year. They access many similar activities at an appropriate level and are supported very well by an enthusiastic and knowledgeable practitioner. Staff take good care of the children and make sure that they are kept safe at all times. The children behave well and cooperate positively with adults and their peers. Partnerships with parents are strong. Close links between home and school help the children to settle in school and to quickly grow in confidence.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address head@sutton-on-trent.notts.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 3–4 February 2016
p.9
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average-sized primary school. Children are taught in four mixed-age classes, comprising Nursery and Reception Years, Years 1 and 2, Years 3 and 4, and Years 5 and 6. The vast majority of pupils are of White British heritage. A small minority of pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is similar to the national average. In 2017, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ progress and attainment in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.9
Information about this inspection
The inspection was undertaken by one inspector for two days. During the inspection, teaching and learning were observed in every class. This included carrying out joint observations with the executive headteacher and the head of school. The inspector listened to pupils reading and talked with them about their reading and about their school. The inspector looked at a wide range of work in pupils’ books, in and out of lessons. Meetings were held with members of the senior leadership team, middle and subject leaders, the special educational needs coordinator, the chair of the governing body and other governors. A telephone conversation was held with a representative from the local authority. The inspector took into account the 18 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and spoke with parents at the start of the school day. Analysis of the three responses to the staff survey was made.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The inspector reviewed a range of documentation including: the school’s self- evaluation summary; the school development plan; leaders’ monitoring and reports on the quality of teaching and learning; assessment information; minutes of governing body meetings; and records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.
p.10
Inspection team
Yvonne Watts, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion