Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Pathways Care Group Limited

Inspected 28 Feb 2018 · URN 1241897

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ricky D’Arcy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Pathways Care Group Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Feb 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ricky D’Arcy

  • Name on report verified

    1241897

  • URN verified

    1241897

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−25Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseindependentclear
Criticismlimitedgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings22w−33
  • What needs to improve447w−12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
466
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 50
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%What needs to improve 28%About the inspection 70%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: 1241897 1 Registered provider: Pathways Care Group Limited Interim inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home is one of five children’s homes run by a private organisation. The home provides accommodation for up to eight children who may have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

Enforcement action since last inspection: none

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At the interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

The home’s managers and the staff have worked to address the concerns that were identified at the last inspection. However, two requirements need further work. The following improvements were noted during this inspection:

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

 The home’s outdoor areas are free of hazards.  The children can access a computer to support their education and learning.  The children, staff and external professionals value the manager and the support that they receive from him.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

The home provides a training programme for the staff to support them to care for the children. However, training in important subject matters that could have an impact on the children’s lives are not covered in enough detail. This leaves a shortfall in staff Inspection report children’s home: 1241897 2 members’ knowledge of child sexual exploitation, children who go missing and children who present with self-injurious behaviours. This lack of training can leave staff without the necessary skills and knowledge to safeguard the children for whom they care and has the potential to place children at further risk. A requirement in respect of the internal monitoring of the home has not been fully addressed. Feedback from children’s families and relatives and external professionals is not routinely sought. Consequently, their views are not incorporated into the development of the service. The most recent internal monitoring report lacked rigour.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

The monitoring failed to review or assess recent missing-from-care episodes. As a result, there were no plans or actions generated to reduce the number of these incidents and keep children from harm. The admissions and discharges register has not been accurately completed. This means that important information is absent, such as the date on which a child was discharged from the home. Failure to record information accurately means that there is no clear audit trail should this information need to be accessed at a later date. The staff do not use physical interventions. They use positive and negative consequences to manage children’s behaviour consistently to reinforce positive behaviours and to help the children to understand why some behaviours are unacceptable. The staff agree these consequences with the children, which helps to create positive relationships between them. A clear missing-from-care protocol guides the staff, and the records clearly document

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

incidents of missing from care. However, it is not always clearly recorded whether a child is offered or receives a return-from-missing interview. This makes reviewing, monitoring and devising systems to reduce these incidents difficult. However, incidents of missing for the children who currently live at the home are low. The location risk assessment considers crime statistics and some local risk factors. However, it does not consider in sufficient detail specific information about the immediate locality. Consequently, some potential risks to children may not be adequately risk assessed. The staff encourage and facilitate contact between the children and their families in a variety of ways. Contact arrangements are reviewed regularly. This regular contact provides opportunities for the children to make progress and means that they can develop and sustain positive relationships with their families. There are good relationships between the staff and the children, who speak positively

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

about each other. One child said, ‘I like the staff here. We talk about stuff with them and we do activities with them as well. I feel safe here. If I had a problem, I would speak with any member of staff or [manager].’ The staff support the children in their education. One child, who was recently admitted to the home, is home tutored while an education provision is sought. A social worker manager said about this child, ‘Staff are on board with education. There had been nothing put in place for [child], but they pursued this matter appropriately but with determination on [child’s] behalf until they [staff] got a response.’ The other two children attend mainstream schools. Inspection report children’s home: 1241897 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Requirement Due date

The registered person must maintain in the home the records in Schedule 4. In particular, a record in the form of a register showing in respect of each child the date of the child’s admission to the children’s home, the date on which the child ceased to be accommodated in the home, the child’s address immediately before being accommodated in the home, the child’s address on leaving the home, the child’s placing authority and the statutory provision (if any) under which the child is accommodated. (Regulation 37(1) Schedule 4 (1)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)) 14/03/2018

p.3

Requirement Due date

When the independent person is carrying out a visit, the registered person must help the independent person, if they consent, to interview in private such of the children, their parents, and relatives, as the independent person requires. (Regulation 44(2)(a)) 14/03/2018

p.3

Recommendations

 When a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority must provide an opportunity for the child to have an independent return home interview. Homes should take account of information provided by such interviews when assessing risks and putting arrangements in place to protect each child. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 45, paragraph 9.30) In particular, make clear whether a return interview took place and, if so, where Inspection report children’s home: 1241897 4 it is recorded.  Evaluation of missing-from-care incidents should be undertaken to identify any gaps in training, skills or knowledge for staff or to record and retain evidence of what worked well. This evaluation should inform the review of the quality of care. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page

p.3

Recommendations

45, paragraph 9.31) In particular, this evaluation should inform the review of the quality of the care and influence the training provided for the staff.  Under regulation 46, the registered person should review the appropriateness and suitability of the location and premises of the home at least once a year. The review should include the identification of any risks and opportunities presented by the home’s location and strategies for managing these. Providers should refer to the non-statutory advice about the location assessment process: Children’s homes regulation amendments 2014: Advice for children’s homes providers on new duties under regulations that came in to effect in January and April 2014. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 64, paragraph 15.1)

p.4

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.4

Information about this inspection

This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 1241897 5

p.4

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Pathways Care Group Limited

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Minton Place, Victoria Street, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 1EG

p.5

Inspector

Ricky D’Arcy, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: 1241897 6 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion