Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Allcock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Peter Allcock

  • Postcode verified

    IG6 1NB

Page 1 of 23
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesaferobustcaringclearlyimprovedprecise
Criticismconcernslimitedconcernyet tonot yetnot happybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings2230w−15
  • Safeguarding1181w−25
  • What needs to improve515w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
23
Words of findings
3,818
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
26 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%Safeguarding 27%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

X10029.doc Version 1.40 Page 1 LOCAL COUNCIL PRIVATE FOSTERING ARRANGEMENTS

p.1

IG6 1NB

Lead Inspector Peter Allcock Announced Inspection 5th June 2006 10:00 London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 2 The Commission for Social Care Inspection aims to:

p.1

IG6 1NB

• Put the people who use social care first • Improve services and stamp out bad practice • Be an expert voice on social care • Practise what we preach in our own organisation

p.2

IG6 1NB

Reader Information Document Purpose Inspection Report Author CSCI Audience General Public Further copies from 0870 240 7535 (telephone order line) Copyright This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI Internet address www.csci.org.uk London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 3 This is a report of an inspection to assess local authority private fostering arrangements against the National Minimum Standards for Private Fostering. These standards can be found at www.dfes.gov.uk. The NMS specify a minimum standard for local authority practice in the fulfilment of their duties and functions in relation to private fostering under the Children Act 1989. Along with the new measures in section 44 of the Children Act 2004 and the 2005 regulations, they are intended to better focus local authorities’ attention

p.2

IG6 1NB

on private fostering, in part by requiring them to take a more proactive approach to identifying arrangements in their area.

p.3

IG6 1NB

Every Child Matters, outlined the government’s vision for children’s services and formed the basis of the Children Act 2004. It provides a framework for inspection so that children’s services should be judged on their contribution to the outcomes considered essential to wellbeing in childhood and later life. Those outcomes are: • Being healthy • Staying safe • Enjoying and achieving • Making a contribution; and • Achieving economic wellbeing.

p.3

IG6 1NB

In response, the Commission for Social Care Inspection has re-ordered the national minimum standards for children’s services under the five outcomes, for reporting purposes. A further section has been created under ‘Management’ to cover those issues that will potentially impact on all the outcomes above. The Private Fostering National Minimum Standards are mapped to just two of these outcomes, Staying Safe and Management.

p.3

IG6 1NB

Copies of Every Child Matters and The Children Act 2004 are available from The Stationery Office as above This report is a public document. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the prior permission of the Commission for Social Care Inspection. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 4

p.3

Name of Local Authority

London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA)

p.4

Name of Local Authority

Address Station Road Barkingside Ilford Essex IG6 1NB

p.4

address

London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 5

p.5

London Borough of Redbridge

This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection.

p.5

London Borough of Redbridge

Private Fostering Arrangements are not regulated services, they are private arrangements and Local Authorities have functions and duties with regard to Children that are privately fostered. CSCI have agreed with the Department for Education and Skills to inspect all Local Authorities against the new national minimum standards over the next three years. The purpose is to lever improvement, assess how well the new government measures are safeguarding children in private fostering arrangements and assess Local Authorities against the new national minimum standards and regulations.

p.5

London Borough of Redbridge

The Government's new measures on private fostering in section 44 of the Children Act 2004 and replacement regulations (the Children (Private Arrangements for Fostering) Regulations 2005) came into force on 1 July 2005.

p.5

London Borough of Redbridge

This inspection was organised and undertaken at short notice, and the inspector would like to thank the managers and staff of the London Borough of Redbridge for their assistance in the conduct of this inspection.

p.5

London Borough of Redbridge

There are currently ten private fostering arrangements known to the London Borough of Redbridge, all but one being asylum seeking young people. All the private foster carers except one live in the Ilford area of Redbridge.

p.5

London Borough of Redbridge

Prior to this inspection, the inspector met with a manager of the service to plan the inspection, and read the pre-inspection information sent by the London Borough of Redbridge. The fieldwork phase of the inspection took place between 5 th June 2006 and 5 th July 2006, and consisted of a day in the offices viewing records, interviews with three social work managers and two social workers from the fostering team. The inspector also contacted the chair of the Local Safeguarding Children Board and the Head of Children’s Services. Questionnaires were sent out to five carers and seven young people. Two carers and four young people returned completed Questionnaires. The inspector spoke to one carer at length on the telephone and visited another in her home. The inspector would like to thank the carers and young people who took the time to respond. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 6

p.5

What the local authority does well:

The local authority has raised awareness of private fostering amongst staff, and has systems in place to respond to both notifications and arrangements that come to their attention. Children and young people have their needs assessed and their welfare is monitored on a regular basis by appropriately trained and experienced social workers, which means they feel supported and listened to. The local authority discharges its responsibilities respect of safeguarding children and young people, and there are systems in place to monitor the way in which the local authority discharges its duties and functions in relation to private fostering.

p.6

What has improved since the last inspection?

This is the first inspection of Local Authority Private Fostering Arrangements under the Governments new measures on private fostering in section 44 of the Children Act 2004, and the Children (Private Arrangements for Fostering) Regulations 2005. These regulations came into force on 1 July 2005.

p.6

What they could do better:

There are eleven recommendations made following this inspection. The principle areas in which the local authority is aware that it must improve are to engage the awareness of the wider community with regard to private fostering, and to review the arrangements for the management oversight of the suitability of arrangements, and the ongoing monitoring and support of private fostering arrangements. Further recommendations are made as to written information provided to private foster carers, ensuring confidentiality when interpreters are used, the provision of services to people whose first language is not English, and the revision of the Statement of Purpose. It is also recommended that matters of interest to children and young people who are privately fostered are included on the proposed Looked After Children Website, and that children and young people are consulted as to whether a support or activity based group would be helpful to them.

p.6

What they could do better:

Please contact the provider for advice of actions taken in response to this inspection. The report of this inspection is available from enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk or by contacting your local CSCI office. The summary of this inspection report can be made available in other formats on request. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 7

p.6

CONTENTS

Management London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 8

p.7

Staying Safe

The intended outcome for these Standards are: (NMS 2) The local authority is notified about privately fostered children living in its area.

p.8

Staying Safe

(NMS 3 ) The welfare of privately fostered children is safeguarded and promoted

p.8

Staying Safe

(NMS 4) Private foster carers and parents of privately fostered children receive advice and support to assist them to meet the needs of privately fostered children; privately fostered children are able to access information and support when required so that their welfare is safeguarded and promoted .

p.8

Staying Safe

(NMS 5) The local authority provides advice and support to the parents of children who are privately fostered within their area as appears to the authority to be needed .

p.8

Staying Safe

(NMS 6) Children who are privately fostered are able to access information and support when required so that their welfare is safeguarded and promoted. Privately fostered children are enabled to participate in decisions about their lives.

p.8

2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Quality in this outcome area is adequate. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered both during and before the visit to this service.

p.8

2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Whilst the local authority has raised awareness of private fostering amongst staff, work with staff from other organisations and the wider community needs to be developed. There are appropriate systems in place to respond to notifications and to unnotified arrangements. There are robust arrangements to safeguard children and young people whose needs have been fully assessed. The support to private foster carers and the promotion of young people’s welfare would be enhanced by less fragmented management oversight of the suitability of arrangements or ongoing support. Young people placed under private fostering arrangements feel listened to and supported by the social workers that visit them. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 9

p.8

Promoting Awareness

Steps taken by the local authority to promote awareness that private fostering arrangements must be notified to the local authority have included the distribution of the Dfes Private Fostering Information leaflets to social care, health and education establishments and local libraries. The local authority ran an advertisement in the local press, and a further advertisement is to be placed in the next edition of the local authorities magazine, which is distributed to all homes in the London Borough of Redbridge. The inspector was also told that electronic information mailouts are used to raise awareness amongst health, education and social care staff.

p.9

Promoting Awareness

The local authority has begun to develop links with community and faith groups, though this work is in its early stages, and the authority is aware that this work requires further development. It is recommended that the local authority develop a programme of communication activities for the public, local authority staff and other agencies, and that the local authority develop appropriate publicity materials to support this programme.

p.9

Promoting Awareness

All but one of the private fostering arrangements currently known to the authority has come to the attention of the authority when young people sought asylum status or leave to remain in the United Kingdom from the Home Office. It is recommended that the local authority establish a protocol for working with the Home Office to ensure that all childcare arrangements that appear to be a private fostering arrangement are appropriately notified to the local authority.

p.9

Responding to Notifications

The authority has yet to receive any formal notifications of private fostering arrangements, or been required to disqualify any person from caring for a child or young person under a private fostering arrangement. The local authority has local systems in place to manage both notifications and disqualifications, and is aware that these require updating.

p.9

Responding to Notifications

Case records seen during this inspection demonstrate that the local authority have taken the appropriate action when they have not been satisfied that the welfare of a privately fostered child is being, or will be satisfactorily promoted. In one case, following concerns raised during the Initial Assessment, the local authority undertook a further assessment in accordance with the Framework London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 10 for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families (2000), and the outcome was that the child was accommodated.

p.9

Responding to Notifications

The local authority has not yet had to handle an appeal in respect of decisions it has made relating to private fostering arrangements. There are systems in place to do so.

p.10

Responding to Unnotified Arrangements

All the private fostering arrangements currently known to the local authority have been brought to their attention once the child or young person was living with their private foster carer. The local authority responds to these notifications by undertaking an initial assessment on the child/young person, and referring on to the fostering service for an assessment of the carer. The local authority has recently developed its systems so that initial assessments from the Adolescent Service Initial Assessment Team are included in the referral to the Fostering Service in order to speed up the response to the referral and avoid the duplication of work. Case records seen during this inspection demonstrated that initial assessments are undertaken within seven days as is required under the Children (Private Arrangements for Fostering) Regulations 2005.

p.10

NMS 3 – Safeguarding and Promotion of Welfare

The inspector read the case files of four young people and their carers during the inspection, and was satisfied that the local authority has taken sufficient steps to determine the suitability of the private fostering arrangements which become known to it, by establishing all of the matters set out in national minimum standards 3.2.1 to 3.2.11. Assessments held on file, included consideration of the child’s health, education, religious and cultural needs, their family relationships, emotional and behavioural development, social presentation and self-care.

p.10

NMS 3 – Safeguarding and Promotion of Welfare

There are clearly some difficulties for the local authority in establishing the matters above in relation to the role of birth parents, as they do not have the information available to them that would allow contact to be established with them.

p.10

NMS 3 – Safeguarding and Promotion of Welfare

The carer visited during this inspection confirmed that the social worker had asked her opinions and those of the child during the assessment. There was evidence that where appropriate the local authority has provided interpreting services to enable communication during the assessment process, and on an ongoing basis when required. One carer said that she had to ask for a new interpreter as the one allocated lived in her community and was telling people her business. Whilst this may be an isolated incident, it does raise a legitimate London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 11 concern, and it is recommended that the local authority review the provision of interpreting services with regard to client confidentiality.

p.10

NMS 3 – Safeguarding and Promotion of Welfare

Case files had evidence of appropriate management oversight, though current arrangements are somewhat disjointed, with the separate team managers signing off on the assessments of children and carers. It is recommended that the local authority review the systems in place for management decisions as to the overall suitability of private fostering arrangements.

p.11

NMS 4 – Advice and Support for Private Foster Carers

The current system of supporting private foster care arrangements involves visits by social workers from the children’s social work team, and the fostering development team. The reports of these visits are made to the social workers respective managers, but there is no formal system for managers of both teams to regularly meet and have an oversight of the overall quality of support to the private foster carers. This system opens up possibilities of confusion and is wasteful of scarce social work time. These difficulties are compounded by the fact that whilst fostering social workers are allocated to support private foster carers, social work visits from the children’s social work team are undertaken on a duty basis. As one carer told the inspector, “always a different social worker”. It recommended that the local authority review the provision of support to private foster carers, and that all private foster carers and young

p.11

NMS 4 – Advice and Support for Private Foster Carers

people have the details of an allocated social worker who they can contact. It is also recommended that the local authority review their contact arrangements for private foster carers who have limited English language skills, as this places a further barrier to their raising concerns about the welfare of the child, or in requesting a visit from a social worker. One foster carer told the inspector that the social worker sometimes only visited for a few minutes, and did not seem interested in anything other than a quick check that everything was alright.

p.11

NMS 4 – Advice and Support for Private Foster Carers

The local authority provides information to private foster carers on financial matters as part of the assessment process. Two carers who the inspector spoke to raised the issue of financial support for private foster care arrangements. One carer told the inspector that they had engaged a solicitor and were now receiving a regular payment to support their care of a child. The inspector noted that another carer was receiving no financial assistance, and said that she had been told forms were not available to claim benefits, and that the social worker had not been particularly helpful given that she was on income support and money was tight. The inspector understands the level of support offered to individual private foster carers is assessment based, but in order to empower private foster carers it is recommended that written information be given to them about financial support that may be available. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service

p.11

NMS 5 – Advice and Support for Parents of Privately Fostered Children

All but one of the current private fostering arrangements known to the local authority are unaccompanied asylum seekers whose parents live overseas, and whose precise whereabouts are unknown. In the event that the local authority believe a private fostering arrangement is unsuitable, attempts are made to contact the birth parents to advise them to make alternative arrangements.

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

Questionnaires were sent out to seven young people, and three young people returned completed Questionnaires. Their views are summarised in the table below.

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

Yes No 1 Have you met with a social worker to discuss where you are living ? 3 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

Once A few Times Regularly Don’t Know 2 If so, roughly how many times have you met with the social worker ? 0 1 2 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

Yes No Wouldn’t want to 3 Do you know how to contact the social worker if you need to ? 2 0 1

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

Yes No Don’t Know 4 Do you feel well cared for where you are living now ? 3 0 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

5 Do your carers listen to you and take notice of your opinions ? 3 0 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

6 Does your social worker listen to you and take notice of your opinions ? 3 0 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

7 Do you know who to speak to if you are not happy or have a personal problem ? 2 1 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

8 Do you know how to make a complaint ? 2 1 0 9 Are you being bullied ? 0 3 0

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

Young people surveyed feel well cared for and safe in their private foster placements, and are seen regularly by their social worker, who they felt listens to them and takes notice of their opinions. Young people are given a copy of the local authorities complaints leaflet, which is translated into community languages. A senior manager told the inspector that some young people have requested a decrease in the frequency of visits, or that they no longer required an interpreter as their English improved. The local authority has managed to meet these requests whilst still meeting its statutory obligations as to the London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 13 frequency of visits from social workers. The authority is aware from its own case file monitoring that not all discussions with young people during social work visits are made in private, and is aware that this aspect of practice must

p.12

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

improve. None of the young people who returned their questionnaires reported that they were being bullied.

p.13

NMS 6 – Information and Support for Privately Fostered Children

The local authority are currently in the process of setting up a website for looked after children. It is recommended that matters of interest to children and young people are included on this website. It is also recommended that the local authority consult with young people who are privately fostered as to whether a support or activity based group would be helpful to them. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 14

p.13

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• (NMS 1) Relevant staff are aware of local authority duties and functions in relation to private fostering .

p.14

The intended outcomes for these Standards are:

• (NMS 7) The local authority monitors the way in which it discharges its duties and functions inrelation to private fostering.

p.14

1, 7

Quality in this outcome area is good. This judgement has been made from evidence gathered both during and before the visit to this service.

p.14

1, 7

There are systems in place to raise the awareness of staff as to their duties and responsibilities, which would be enhanced by an appropriate programme of training. The local authority has systems in place to monitor the way in which it discharges its duties and functions in relation to private fostering.

p.14

NMS 1 – Staff Awareness of Duties and Functions

The local authority has a written statement setting out its duties and functions in relation to Private Fostering, entitled Private Fostering , this statement is part of the Children Looked After, volume 2, Children and Families Procedures, January 2001. The local authority is aware that this statement does not currently include all the matters as set out in national minimum standard 1.2, and requires updating to take into account section 44 of the Children Act 2004, the Children (Private Arrangements for Fostering) Regulations 2005 and the National Minimum Standards for Private Fostering. It is recommended that revision of this document take into account not only the above changes, but the desired outcomes for children and young people set out in the national minimum standards and every child matters.

p.14

NMS 1 – Staff Awareness of Duties and Functions

The local authority has publicised arrangements for private fostering to social services and health/education authority staff, and the authority is expecting London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 15 the formation of the children’s trust to further improve communication as these separate departments now operate as a unified body.

p.14

NMS 1 – Staff Awareness of Duties and Functions

The current private fostering arrangements are included in staff induction training, and this training is clearly overdue for revue. It is recommended that a training strategy be put in place to identify appropriate staff for training, not only from the Children’s Trust, but also from other relevant organisations operating within the local authority area. It is also recommended that the monitoring of the effectiveness of staff training is included in the annual report made to the Head of Children’s Services.

p.15

NMS 7 – Monitoring

The separate records for children and carers seen during this inspection were well organised and appropriately stored in lockable filing cabinets. These files contained the information required in national minimum standards 7.2 and 7.3. The files have been recently audited as part of the ongoing file auditing procedures operated by the local authority.

p.15

NMS 7 – Monitoring

The local authority maintains a record of privately fostered children and private foster carers living in their area, and information on new notifications is submitted to the Department for Education and Skills as require.

p.15

NMS 7 – Monitoring

The chair of the Local Safeguarding Children Board has confirmed in writing to the Commission for Social Care Inspection that there have been no child protection enquiries conducted by the London Borough of Redbridge in relation to a privately fostered child, a private foster carer or other child in the household of a private foster carer.

p.15

NMS 7 – Monitoring

The inspector saw reports prepared for the Head of Children’s Services and the Chair of the Local Safeguarding Children Board. These reports not only provide a statement of the welfare of privately fostered children in the local authorities area, but also provide an action plan to address shortfalls the authority has identified in regard to its compliance with the new regulations and national minimum standards. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 16 Optional

p.15

EVIDENCE:

London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 17

p.17

EVIDENCE:

London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.2 Page 18

p.18

EVIDENCE:

London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.1 Page 19

p.19

EVIDENCE:

London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.1 Page 20

p.20

SCORING OF OUTCOMES

This page summarises the assessment of the extent to which the National Minimum Standards for Private Fostering have been met and uses the following scale.

p.20

SCORING OF OUTCOMES

4 Standard Exceeded (Commendable) 3 Standard Met (No Shortfalls) 2 Standard Almost Met (Minor Shortfalls) 1 Standard Not Met (Major Shortfalls) “X” in the standard met box denotes standard not assessed on this occasion “N/A” in the standard met box denotes standard not applicable STAYING SAFE MANAGEMENT Standard No Score Standard No Score 2 2 1 3 3 2 7 3 4 2 5 3 6 3 London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.1 Page 21 Are there any outstanding recommendations from the last inspection? N/A

p.20

RECOMMENDATIONS

These recommendations relate to National Minimum Standards and are seen as good practice for the Local Authority to consider carrying out.

p.21

RECOMMENDATIONS

No. Refer to Standard Good Practice Recommendations

p.21

RECOMMENDATIONS

1 PF2 It is recommended that the local authority develop a programme of communication activities for the public, local authority staff and other agencies, and that the local authority develop appropriate publicity materials to support this programme. 2 PF2 It is recommended that the local authority establish a protocol for working with the Home Office to ensure that all childcare arrangements that appear to be a private fostering arrangement are appropriately notified to the local authority.

p.21

RECOMMENDATIONS

3 PF3 It is recommended that the local authority review the provision of interpreting services with regard to client confidentiality. 4 PF3 It is recommended that the local authority review the systems in place for management decisions as to the overall suitability of private fostering arrangements. 5 PF4 It is recommended that the local authority review the systems in place for management decisions as to the overall suitability of private fostering arrangements. 6 PF4 It is recommended that the local authority review their contact arrangements for private foster carers who have limited English language. 7 PF4 It is recommended that written information be given to private foster carers about financial support that may be available.

p.21

RECOMMENDATIONS

8 PF6 It is recommended that matters of interest to children and young people are included on the proposed Looked After Children Website. 9 PF6 It is recommended that the local authority consult with London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.1 Page 22 young people who are privately fostered as to whether a support or activity based group would be helpful to them. 10 PF1 It is recommended that revision of the Private Fostering Statement of Purpose take into account not only the changes in legislation but the desired outcomes for children and young people set out in the national minimum standards and every child matters. 11 PF1 It is recommended that a training strategy be put in place to identify appropriate staff for training, not only from the Children’s Trust, but also from other relevant organisations operating within the local authority area, and that the monitoring of the effectiveness of staff training is included

p.21

RECOMMENDATIONS

in the annual report made to the Head of Children’s Services. London Borough of Redbridge Fostering Service (PFA) Version 5.1 Page 23

p.22

Commission for Social Care Inspection

Ilford Area Office Ferguson House 113 Cranbrook Road Ilford IG1 4PU

p.23

Commission for Social Care Inspection

National Enquiry Line: Telephone: 0845 015 0120 or 0191 233 3323 Textphone: 0845 015 2255 or 0191 233 3588 National Enquiry Line: 0845 015 0120 Email: enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk Web: www.csci.org.uk © This report is copyright Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) and may only be used in its entirety. Extracts may not be used or reproduced without the express permission of CSCI

p.23

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion