Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Feb 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Lea Hannam
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
HP13 7HT
- Name on report verified
Ash Hill Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The previous inspection report highlighted the school’s many strengths, including effective leadership, good progress and stimulating learning opportunities. p.1
- Teachers use assessment within lessons effectively to ensure that pupils make strong progress. p.2
- They had turned their classroom into an Italian restaurant and, following this experience, wrote strongly worded, high-quality letters of complaint. p.3
- You provide enthusiastic and knowledgeable leadership, ably supported by your assistant headteachers. p.1
- Parents and carers recognise the high expectations you have for pupils and staff. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,219
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Sarah Mitchell Headteacher Ash Hill Primary School Herbert Road High Wycombe Buckinghamshire HP13 7HT
p.1
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 27 February 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You provide enthusiastic and knowledgeable leadership, ably supported by your assistant headteachers. The school is a place where hard work and a ‘can-do’ attitude are valued and rewarded. Your ambition and clear goals for the school, captured in the motto, ‘Growing minds for learning, crafting skills for life’, are shared both by leaders and governors alike. Staff feel valued and enjoy working at Ash Hill. Parents and carers recognise the high expectations you have for pupils and staff. All parents who responded to the Ofsted online questionnaire said that they would recommend the school. Officers from your local authority use your knowledge and expertise to support other local schools to improve further.
p.1
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
Pupils enjoy coming to Ash Hill Primary School. They say their lessons are fun and that they have ‘lovely’ teachers. Pupils are enthusiastic about their learning. Behaviour throughout the school is consistently positive. The well-developed behaviour management system helps pupils take responsibility for their own behaviour. Pupils understand rewards and consequences well, and particularly enjoy the opportunity to spend their tokens at the Smart Cart. Pupils are enthusiastic about the many leadership roles they can apply for, including the role of Ash Hill Ambassador.
p.1
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
The previous inspection report highlighted the school’s many strengths, including effective leadership, good progress and stimulating learning opportunities. You have maintained these strengths. At the last inspection, leaders were asked to increase challenge for the most able pupils. You have taken effective action to improve this aspect of the school’s work. We agreed, however, that the level of challenge in reading could be increased further. The previous report also asked leaders to improve achievement in writing in key stage 1. High standards and strong progress in pupils’ writing are now evident throughout the school.
p.1
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
You understand the many strengths of the school but also know that there are still areas to work on. At the end of Year 2, in 2017, pupils’ attainment in mathematics was below the national average. You have responded by improving the teaching of mathematics across the school. However, we agreed that pupils’ mathematical reasoning skills need to be developed further.
p.2
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
School leaders and governors fulfil their statutory safeguarding duties well. Policies and procedures are fit for purpose and day-to-day routines are secure. Pre- employment checks to ensure the suitability of all adults who work or volunteer are fully in place. Leaders work successfully with outside agencies to support pupils and their families. Safeguarding training is regular and up to date. As a result, staff and governors understand their roles and responsibilities well. Staff have created a very nurturing environment. As one parent commented, ‘The children are all happy and well looked after.’
p.2
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
Attendance figures have been below the national average in recent years, and the proportion of pupils frequently absent has been high. Leaders now closely track the attendance of pupils whose levels of absence are a concern. They work effectively with these pupils and families to reduce absence and, as a result, current attendance is better. Leaders acknowledge that there is still work to do to ensure that all pupils attend school regularly.
p.2
Short inspection of Ash Hill Primary School
All pupils I spoke to feel safe in school and know who to talk to if they are worried. They told me there is no bullying in the school, ‘as we know it is not nice to bully’. Leaders have ensured that the curriculum includes many opportunities for pupils to learn how to stay safe in a wide range of situations. For example, pupils told me about their regular workshops focusing on the school’s values, emotional intelligence, and developing their spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding. These workshops have taught pupils effectively about the different types of bullying, and what to do if they see it happening. Pupils also have a strong knowledge of how to keep themselves safe online.
p.2
Inspection findings
In 2017, by the end of Year 6, the proportion of pupils who reached the higher standards in reading and mathematics was below that seen nationally. Leaders have responded swiftly to these results. During my visits to lessons, I saw the most able pupils challenged appropriately in their work in mathematics. Feedback to pupils is specific. Teachers use assessment within lessons effectively to ensure that pupils make strong progress. Leaders acknowledge that challenge in reading is less developed. Evidence in pupils’ books shows that they are not yet using a wide range of comprehension skills and, as a result, reading progress is slower. The progress pupils made in writing by the end of key stage 2, in 2017, was well above the national average. During the inspection, we examined whether these notable results were sustainable. My classroom visits, which included the scrutiny of pupils’ work, showed me that standards in writing are high. Pupils, including
p.2
Inspection findings
those who are disadvantaged, are making strong progress. They have many opportunities to write at length across the curriculum and present their work neatly. Their basic writing skills are secure. Pupils know how to improve their writing by using their well-developed editing and evaluation skills. They enjoy their writing lessons. For example, Year 6 pupils showed me their work from a recent ‘writing day’. They had turned their classroom into an Italian restaurant and, following this experience, wrote strongly worded, high-quality letters of complaint. In order to improve attainment and progress in mathematics, leaders have introduced new teaching strategies. There is an increased focus on problem solving which is having a positive impact on standards. Leaders have an accurate understanding of the quality of mathematics teaching across the school. The assistant headteachers check on this regularly by visiting lessons, talking to
p.3
Inspection findings
pupils, looking at books and evaluating assessment information. Feedback to staff is specific and expectations are clear, and linked closely to effective professional development. Leaders’ forensic analysis of the gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding ensures that pupils who are falling behind rapidly catch up. However, we agreed that the teaching of reasoning skills and the opportunities that pupils have to use their skills independently could be further developed.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
rates of attendance match or exceed national averages, with a sharp focus on those who are regularly absent teachers increase the challenge in reading lessons by giving pupils the opportunity to use and apply a wider range of comprehension skills, so more pupils reach the higher standard in reading teachers increase the opportunities for mathematical reasoning so more pupils reach the expected standard by the end of key stage 1, and a greater proportion of pupils reach the higher standard by the end of key stage 2.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Buckinghamshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I met with you and your two assistant headteachers to discuss the school’s effectiveness. We visited lessons to observe pupils learning, speak to them and look at their work. We looked at the quality of pupils’ work in books. I considered 25 responses from parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the free-text comments from some. Responses to Ofsted’s staff and pupil questionnaires were also considered. I spoke to parents at the beginning of the school day, and to a representative from the local authority on the telephone. I met with three governors, including the chair of the governing body, and spoke to a group of pupils about their school. I evaluated the school’s safeguarding arrangements. A wide range of documents were examined, including: your school’s self-evaluation and school improvement planning; pupils’ progress information; records of leaders’ checks on teaching; and attendance information and policies.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion