Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    TW1 3QB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivetimelystrengthswell supportedclearindependent
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings528w+80
  • What needs to improve126w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
654
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 25, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 19%

Full report text

Mr Nick Whitfield Director of Education and Children’s Services London Borough of Richmond upon Thames 1st Floor Regal House London Road Twickenham TW1 3QB

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames which was conducted on 25 and 26 November. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

ƒ Arrangements for responding to contacts and referrals are effective and timely, with appropriate decision making by managers.

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

ƒ Child protection cases are identified well and responded to appropriately and in a timely way. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Children are seen alone and their views taken into account and appropriately recorded in assessments.

p.1

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

ƒ Families are appropriately involved in assessment and care planning with consideration in most cases given to their ethnic, religious and cultural needs.

p.2

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

ƒ Initial and core assessments are of mainly good quality and their timeliness is above the national average.

p.2

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

ƒ Arrangements for the provision of the out of hours social work service are clear and well integrated.

p.2

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

ƒ The Common Assessment Framework is being used effectively in work to improve outcomes for children in need, with appropriate targets for further development.

p.2

Richmond upon Thames Children’s Services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Social workers are well supported by their managers and effectively communicate, leading to good staff morale. Frequent and good quality supervision is provided to staff with effective managerial oversight of decisions on cases.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Effective partnership working across all agencies, including the police child abuse investigation team, results in timely and planned action to protect children and young people.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Arrangements for file audit and quality assurance are well established and used effectively to promote improvements in practice.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Management information is comprehensive and effectively used at all levels of the local authority, the Children’s Trust and Local Safeguarding Children Boards to monitor performance and drive forward service redesign and improvement.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good training and development opportunities are actively promoted for social workers and are well regarded.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Difficulties in recruiting permanent and suitably experienced front line managers and social workers result in additional work pressures and responsibilities for existing members of staff and a potential risk to the quality of the delivery of the service.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Some social workers in the initial response team have caseloads which are significantly higher than the target set by the local authority, reducing their capacity to close cases in a timely way.

p.3

Areas for development

Heather Brown Divisional Manager, Social Care Safeguarding

p.3

Areas for development

Copy: Gillian Norton, Chief Executive, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. Tony Eccleston, Independent Chair of Richmond upon Thames Safeguarding Children Board. Cllr Malcolm Eady, Lead Cabinet Member for Children’s Services and Education, London Borough of Richmond upon Thames. Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion