Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Training 2000 Limited

Inspected 23 Feb 2018 · URN 55045

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Shahram Safavi (lead), Bob Busby, Brenda Clayton, Ian Frear, Ken Fisher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    23 Feb 2018

  • Inspectors verified

    Bob Busby, Brenda Clayton, Ian Frear, Ken Fisher, Shahram Safavi

  • Name on report verified

    Training 2000 Limited

  • URN verified

    55045

Page 1 of 14
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−12Mixedmore positive than 19% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualityeffectivelystrongeffectivesuccessfulrapid progressaccuratesuccessfully
Criticismrequires improvementtoo manytoo fewweakdeclinedtoo lowerrorsconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings2001w−32
  • Leadership87w−11
  • Safeguarding142w+64
  • What needs to improve1957w+4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
4,063
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%Leadership 2%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 40%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

Training 2000 Limited Independent learning provider

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement 16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement Apprenticeships Good Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings

This is a provider that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Leaders and managers have not ensured that 16 to 19 study programmes fully meet the needs of learners; many learners do not stay to complete all aspects of their programmes.  Too few learners on study programmes achieve their qualifications; for example, on pre- employment and engineering courses.  A high proportion of study programme learners on pre-employment and administration courses do not progress to other courses, training or gain jobs.  Managers do not use data to improve study programme learners’ performance, for example to improve their regular attendance or to ensure that they complete their planned work experience.  Managers do not have effective measures to improve weak teaching, learning and assessment practices, especially for study programme learners.  Tutors do not match work to the needs and potential of individual study programme learners and do not have high enough expectations of what they can achieve.

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Apprentices and learners do not improve their skills in written English well enough, such as the ones who study engineering.  Too many apprentices do not achieve their full potential, because assessors do not review fully their skill development and set them clear and demanding learning targets.  Governors do not receive accurate information about the quality of lessons for study programme learners and their achievements; consequently, they are not able to challenge leaders to make improvements.  The quality of provision for study programme learners has declined.

p.1

Summary of key findings

The provider has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Apprentices receive good-quality training and assessment on the job and away from work; as a result, they develop good occupational skills, for example in engineering and dental nursing.  Apprentices and learners benefit significantly from using high-quality resources, such as the dental suit and advanced engineering centre.  Good partnership working with employers ensures that the apprenticeship curriculum reduces employers’ skills shortages, for example in cyber security.  Employers prioritise apprentices’ training well and support them very effectively.

p.1

Information about the provider

 Training 2000 is the largest Group Training Association in England. The company became a wholly owned subsidiary of the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) in July 2017 although it continues to operate as an independent registered charity. A non-executive board drawn from employers and senior staff of UCLan governs the company. Operating from its head office in Blackburn, the company has training centres in Carlisle, Burnley and Blackpool. A board of directors and a chief executive officer are responsible for the strategic and operational management of the company. The company employs 240 staff.  Approximately 80% of the company’s revenue is from the Education and Skills Funding Agency, of which around three quarters is for apprentice training. At the time of the inspection, there were only a few adult learners on courses; therefore, this provision is not reported on separately. Most of the apprentices and learners are recruited from

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Increase the pace of improvement so that achievement rates on 16 to 19 study programmes improve rapidly.  Collect accurate data and information about all aspects of study programme learners’ education and training and use it to ensure that: – the requirements of study programmes is met fully for all learners – increase the number of learners in all programmes who progress to further education, training or employment.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment for study programme learners by ensuring that tutors: – meet individual learners’ needs, particularly in subjects where they require more support, such as English and mathematics – reinforce the importance of regular attendance to learners in all lessons – provide work that challenges learners, especially the most able – provide feedback on learners’ work that is clear about what needs to be done to improve standards – further develop ways to integrate the development of learners’ written English and

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

mathematical skills in their lessons.  Ensure that assessors develop apprentices’ skills and knowledge to their full ability by using their starting points to set them clear, specific and demanding targets to improve, including for English and mathematics.  Improve the impact of quality improvement measures by ensuring that: – managers’ evaluation of the quality of all aspects of teaching, learning and assessment is accurate and the findings of the evaluations result in swift and sustained improvements – senior managers review, identify and implement improvement actions based on a more accurate self-assessment report.  Ensure that governors receive accurate data and information about all aspects of study programme learners’ progress and achievements, so that they can support and challenge leaders for swift improvements.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders and managers are very ambitious for apprentices’ prospects and the contributions they can make to their employers’ businesses. They have ensured that apprentices’ programmes are up to date, well-resourced and managed effectively. However, the quality of study programmes has declined since the last inspection. Learners on study programmes are not receiving the same quality of teaching, learning and assessment as apprentices. Too many of these learners do not achieve their qualifications and do not complete their planned work experience.  Managers do not have accurate data and information about learners’ completion of different aspects of their study programmes in order to improve the quality of the provision. When learners do not complete their work placements, managers do not consistently and accurately record that learners have not achieved this aspect of their programmes. Consequently, governors, leaders and managers have an overoptimistic

p.4

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

understanding of learners’ achievements and progress.  The self-assessment process involves all staff and reflects the views of apprentices, learners and employers, but has not resulted in an accurate evaluation of the provision. Leaders’ and managers’ evaluation of apprenticeship programmes is broadly accurate. However, they have not recognised the improvements required in how well staff monitor apprentices’ progress or develop their English and mathematics skills. Leaders are overoptimistic in their judgement about the quality of 16 to 19 study programmes and the effectiveness of leadership and management. They have not identified the key weaknesses in the use of reliable data to improve quality. Consequently, the improvement action plan is not reliable.  Managers do not use their findings from the evaluation of assessors’ and tutors’ practices to improve teaching, training and learning. When managers identify weak practices, they

p.4

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

do not ensure that tutors improve swiftly. For example, weak teaching practices that managers identified almost two years ago in their observation of lessons in study programmes remain. Leaders and managers have developed new measures to improve the skills of study programme learners in the use of English and mathematics. For example, tutors include useful activities in lessons to help learners practise using more extensive vocabulary. However, these measures have not been developed and implemented for apprentices.  Management of subcontractors is effective. The company has only a few apprentices who receive their theory lessons through a subcontractor; managers have detailed and accurate information about the quality of education that these apprentices receive.  High-quality partnership working with local, regional and national employers has increased the range of courses available for apprentices. Managers have developed

p.4

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

training for apprentices in employers’ identified skill gaps. For example, skills for network management and accessing engineering systems through the internet.  Leaders and managers have a strong ethos of inclusion and promote this well. They have ensured that staff have received effective training so that they can develop successfully apprentices’ and learners’ understanding of British values. They encourage apprentices and learners to enhance further their understanding of different faiths and beliefs through a range of activities and events. For example, dental nursing and business learners have written and performed plays to raise awareness of the impact of children living in war zones.

p.4

The governance of the provider

 Governors do not receive reliable information about the quality of teaching, learning and assessment for study programme learners. Consequently, they have not challenged leaders and senior managers about the decline in the quality of study programmes.  Governors are well qualified and experienced to support leaders and senior managers to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, as well as outcomes for all learners. The change in the ownership of the company has led to new governance arrangements; for example, two governors are UCLan appointees.

p.5

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Senior managers have developed and implemented robust and comprehensive policies and procedures to reduce safeguarding risks to apprentices and learners. These include extensive training of all staff and ensuring that appropriate checks are in place for recruiting staff. Managers respond appropriately to incidents, for example by contacting external organisations. They maintain detailed records of these incidents.  Led by managers, staff focus well on health and safety practices. They monitor health and safety incidents well. Managers have been very successful in developing policies and practices that have reduced the number of health and safety-related issues, for example by ensuring that workshop areas are tidy.  Staff have completed appropriate training on protecting apprentices and learners from the dangers of extremism and radicalisation. Assessors and tutors extend competently

p.5

Safeguarding

apprentices’ and learners’ awareness of these risks.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment for apprentices, who comprise the significant majority of learners, is good, and for study programme learners, requires improvement.  Assessors and tutors use a good range of learning activities to gain the interest of apprentices and study programme learners. They engage them very successfully through practical work in lessons and workshops. Assessors set group work very skilfully. As a result, apprentices become adept at working with their colleagues, and improve further their social and team-working skills.  Tutors assess well study programme learners at the start of their course to identify their English, mathematics and vocational knowledge, skills and understanding. Most tutors make good use of this information to determine learners’ starting points. However, too few tutors use this information well in their teaching. Although apprentices’ vocational

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

knowledge is assessed, their starting points in English and mathematics are not so clearly defined. Consequently, assessors do not have sufficient information to enhance further apprentices’ use of English and mathematics.  Apprentices apply their learning well as a result of effective on- and off-the-job training. Many employers plan and deliver apprentices’ on-the-job learning carefully to ensure that it makes a strong contribution to the development of their knowledge, skills and understanding. Assessors plan and deliver apprentices’ off-the-job learning competently, with the result that apprentices develop a sound knowledge base that relates closely to their work activities.  Assessors and tutors identify apprentices and study programme learners who have additional learning needs quickly. They take good action to ensure that the necessary support is provided as soon as possible to enable apprentices and study programme

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

learners to achieve. Learning support officers provide good pastoral support, which apprentices and study programme learners value highly. When required, apprentices and study programme learners are referred to external agencies who can provide specialist support, for example regarding finance, housing and sexual health.  Staff have a ‘zero tolerance’ approach to bullying, harassment, discrimination and unfair treatment. Apprentices and study programme learners have good levels of respect between themselves and for their assessors and tutors. Many assessors and tutors competently promote equality, inclusion and diversity through teaching, learning and assessment as a result of their continuing professional development.  Apprentices and study programme learners have access to high-quality, state-of-the-art resources that make a substantial contribution to helping them develop good vocational skills. For example, the dental suite is a particularly good learning resource for dental

p.6

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

nurses. Apprentices and study programme learners also have good access to engineering and motor vehicle workshops, an advanced manufacturing and automation centre and the scaffolding centre. These enable them to develop and practise skills in realistic working environments.  Assessors monitor apprentices’ progress towards completing their qualifications regularly and when they fall behind, they take suitable measures to enable apprentices to catch up. As a result, only a small number of apprentices make slow progress. Tutors’ expectations of study programme learners are often not high enough. These learners, especially the most able, are not challenged sufficiently to make the progress of which they are capable.  Feedback to apprentices about the accuracy and quality of their written work is generally good and useful. If criteria are not satisfied, assessors return assignments to them with a request to complete the assignments before they can be signed off. However, tutors

p.6

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

return marked work to study programme learners that contains many uncorrected errors. They tell learners, incorrectly, that their work is acceptable.  In too many instances, assessors’ and tutors’ target setting requires improvement. Targets lack detail, focus and precision. For example, targets set during apprentices’ progress reviews are insufficiently focused and clear. Consequently, apprentices do not know what they have to do to improve the quality of their work and to make rapid progress.  Assessors and tutors give insufficient attention to developing apprentices’ and study programme learners’ English and mathematical competencies throughout their training programmes. They do not ensure that their skills are continuously improved.  Too many apprentices are not challenged sufficiently to complete as much work as they can in the time available and to the highest possible standard. Tutors do not check study

p.6

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

programme learners’ depth of understanding fully. They are often too ready to accept superficial answers rather than continuing their questioning for answers that are more detailed.  Tutors on lessons for English for speakers of other languages for adult learners do not use learners’ starting points to ensure a good pace of learning English. Consequently, they do not make sufficient progress.

p.7

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

 Apprentices and study programme learners take pride in their work and what they accomplish. They become more self-confident and self-assured and, in many cases, realise that they have the potential to succeed in their training and in their careers.  Most apprentices and study programme learners who attend regularly enjoy their learning and are motivated by the knowledge and the skills they acquire. Those study programme learners who have a work experience placement enjoy putting what they have learned in the classroom into practice in the workplace.  Employers value the contributions that apprentices and study programme learners make to their businesses. Most of them are supportive and help apprentices and study programme learners to develop their knowledge, skills and understanding further through carefully planned on-the-job training and experience.  Most apprentices produce work that is of a high standard. They realise that employers

p.7

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

require high standards and know they have to aspire to and maintain those standards to ensure that businesses remain competitive and profitable. Too many study programme learners do not produce written work of a high enough standard.  Apprentices and study programme learners feel safe. They recognise the importance of healthy and safe working practices. For example, apprentices on the scaffolding programme are very aware of what can happen if safe working practices are not maintained at all times. They give good attention to their own safety by wearing protective hats, harnesses, boots and gloves and to the safety of the scaffolding they are erecting.  Most apprentices and study programme learners have a good awareness of safeguarding. They have a clear knowledge of the behaviours and signs that may indicate a safeguarding or safeguarding-related problem. They know that if they have any concerns about themselves or others, they must report them immediately. They know also that

p.7

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

their concerns will be taken seriously and acted upon speedily.  Apprentices and study programme learners have a good knowledge of the many additional activities that they can participate in and from which they can learn. These include a wide range of fund-raising activities and local, regional and national competitions. Apprentices are very successful in World Skills competitions and National Apprentice Awards.  Most apprentices and study programme learners have a good awareness of British values and their importance in modern Britain. They also have a good understanding of the dangers associated with radicalisation and extremism, and the hazards that arise when the internet and social media are misused.  Most apprentices think carefully about the type of occupation they wish to enter. Prior to enrolment, good information, advice and guidance are available to help them make the correct choice. Many apprentices also get good advice from their employers about job

p.7

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

prospects and career opportunities. Although the number of study programme learners who leave their programme early is declining, it is still too high.  Leaders and managers know that employers want punctual employees and full attendance. As a result, they have set an attendance target of 100% for all apprentices and study programme learners. Almost all apprentices and study programme learners are punctual. Attendance rates differ across vocational areas and require improvement.

p.8

Outcomes for learners Good

 The large majority of apprentices develop good technical skills and make the progress that is expected of them. They use their new skills very competently in their job roles, for example, taking on challenging and innovative engineering projects.  In 2016/17, the proportion of apprentices who achieved and did so on time was not good enough. These low rates were mainly due to a high number of apprentices on plumbing, heating and ventilation, refrigeration and air conditioning programmes who were transferred to other providers.  Overall, achievements of apprentices and most adult learners are good. Outcomes for learners on 16 to 19 study programmes require improvement.  In 2016/17, the proportion of dental nursing apprentices who completed and were successful within the planned time was good. However, these rates had declined from the high rates in 2015/16. The large majority of adult learners achieved their qualifications.

p.8

Outcomes for learners Good

 In 2016/17, too few study programme learners achieved their vocational qualifications. In many cases, this was because they left early to enter employment or start other courses. The proportion who achieved qualifications in business administration was high, but too few were successful in gaining qualifications in preparation for life and work and engineering.  In 2016/17, the proportion of study programme learners achieving qualifications in English and mathematics, including GCSEs at grades A* to C, or 9 to 4, or functional skills, was very low. In 2017/18, the proportion of learners achieving these qualifications is improving, but remains too low.  In 2016/17, taking into account the number of apprentices who were transferred, there is no significant difference in achievement between different groups of apprentices, such as their age or gender. There are no significant discernible differences between the

p.8

Outcomes for learners Good

achievements of different groups of learners.  Most apprentices take on additional responsibilities in their workplace and contribute well to their employers’ businesses. The progression of study programme learners to further education, apprenticeships and employment varies too much between different courses, ranging from high rates for learners on dental nursing to poor levels for business administration learners.

p.8

16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement

 At present, 114 learners aged 16 to 19 are following a range of vocational study programmes at foundation and intermediate levels. They are on dental nursing, engineering, pre-employment and business administration courses. The largest number of learners study on pre-employment courses and engineering.  Too many study programme learners on business administration and pre-employment courses do not complete their planned work experience. The proportion of study programme learners on these courses who progress to further education, apprenticeships or employment, with or without training, is too low.  Although managers plan learners’ study programmes to comply fully with the principles of the Department for Education’s requirements, they do not monitor closely enough learners’ participation in all non-qualification activities, such as work experience and talks from visiting speakers. Consequently, managers do not ensure that learners on all

p.9

16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement

programmes complete fully all the planned activities within their study programme.  Tutors’ expectations of learners are frequently not high enough. In too many instances, tutors expect all learners to complete the same tasks and do not take sufficient account of their different abilities. They do not challenge learners, and especially the most able, to make the progress of which they are capable. Target setting requires improvement.  Tutors’ assessment of the standard of learners’ work is inaccurate in many cases. Too often, tutors accept written work that contains too many spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors. They advise learners incorrectly that their work is of a high standard.  In too many instances, tutors’ feedback to learners is not helpful enough in supporting them to improve their written work. Consequently, learners continue to repeat errors. In the few instances where tutors’ feedback is more helpful, learners do not act on it and

p.9

16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement

tutors continue to accept work that includes the same errors.  Learners’ attendance in lessons is too low. Learners’ attendance requires improvement as quickly as possible.  Learners who attend regularly develop good personal, social and work-related skills. As a result, they become more confident, better able to organise their daily lives effectively and they improve their chances of gaining employment. For example, learners calculate their personal or family budgets so that they can live within their means and avoid getting into debt.  In lessons and workshops, learners’ behaviour is good. They work together cooperatively and show respect for each other and for people’s individual differences. Learners on courses that prepare them to be dental nurses speak confidently and respectfully about ways in which people may be stereotyped because of their ethnicity or sexuality.  The large majority of tutors use learning activities that learners find interesting. As a

p.9

16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement

result, most learners participate enthusiastically in lessons. For example, learners preparing for employment in the Armed Forces push themselves physically and mentally to meet the fitness levels required for selection.  Many tutors develop learners’ mathematical skills effectively in lessons. This enables learners to develop the specific mathematical skills they need to achieve their vocational qualification. For example, learners on engineering courses measure dimensions and calculate ratios accurately so that they can produce a 3D drawing of an anchor bracket.  Learners have good access to information, advice and guidance. Before they begin their courses they receive good advice about the suitability of different vocational areas so they are in a strong position to select the most appropriate course. During their training, they can obtain good impartial careers information, advice and guidance that help them to

p.9

16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement

decide on their most appropriate next steps.  The large majority of learners who complete courses that prepare them for jobs in the Armed Forces, engineering and dental nursing benefit from meaningful work experience. A high proportion of learners on these courses progress to further education, apprenticeships or employment, with or without training.

p.10

Apprenticeships Good

 The company has 153 intermediate apprentices, 735 advanced apprentices and 65 higher apprentices. Approximately 70% of apprentices are completing framework apprenticeships and 30% are working on the new standards. There are no differences in the quality of provision between these two types of apprenticeships. Apprenticeships are offered in dental nursing, engineering, scaffolding, automotive and business administration; the largest numbers are in engineering and business administration. The company delivers almost all aspects of the apprenticeship programmes directly; a few apprentices receive their theory training at a local college.  Apprentices develop the high-quality skills that they require within their industry because the planning and management of apprenticeship provision are good. Managers’ plan programmes carefully with employers to ensure that they meet the needs of employers and apprentices and industrial standards.

p.10

Apprenticeships Good

 Employers’ involvement in the training of apprentices in the workplace is of a consistently good standard. This ensures that almost all apprentices make sustained progress in developing the knowledge, skills and understanding that they need to work efficiently and carry out their duties effectively in the workplace.  Assessors provide good support for their apprentices. They make good use of their up-to- date vocational knowledge and skills when they train and assess apprentices.  Apprentices take full advantage of the additional training opportunities that are available to them. Apprentices’ additional training and qualifications enable almost all of them to make a strong contribution to their employers’ businesses. For example, in engineering, most apprentices gain an Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) qualification that ensures they are fully conversant with, and able to contribute to, the

p.10

Apprenticeships Good

hazard and risk management practices in their workplace.  Apprentices have a good range of progression pathways available to them in their chosen vocation. They receive appropriate advice and guidance on how to realise their ambitions, such as moving on to higher national certificate and degree-level programmes in business administration, engineering and accounting.  The quality of on-the-job training is good. All apprentices are allocated a supervisor at work and they guide and support apprentices’ development very effectively. The quality of apprentices’ off-the-job training is good. Assessors use industry-standard, and in some instances state-of-the-art, facilities to demonstrate how practice and theory link together. For example, dental apprentices apply their knowledge gained in theory lessons to their practice in a modern dental suite.  Most apprentices progress successfully into sustained employment, often with additional

p.10

Apprenticeships Good

training, on completion of their apprenticeship.  Most apprentices receive additional training and good support to achieve the relevant qualifications in English and mathematics. However, apprentices’ use of English and mathematics in the workplace and in their written work is not developed sufficiently throughout their programmes.  Target setting requires improvement. Assessors do not set precise targets during progress reviews. Consequently, not all apprentices know what they need to do to make rapid progress and to develop and improve the quality of their work.  Assessors do not plan for and deliver training to develop apprentices’ individual learning needs well enough. They too often do not set apprentices tasks that are sufficiently demanding. Many apprentices, especially the most able, do not build on their knowledge and skills swiftly to achieve their potential.

p.11

Provider details

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.12

Provider details

Approximate number of all learners over the previous full contract year 1,500

p.12

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Main course or learning programme level Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 or above Total number of learners (excluding apprenticeships) 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+

p.12

Provider information at the time of the inspection

68 44 44 22 - 3 - - Number of apprentices by apprenticeship level and age Intermediate Advanced Higher

p.12

Provider information at the time of the inspection

16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 106 47 475 260 3 62 Number of traineeships 16–19 19+ Total - - - Number of learners aged 14 to -

p.12

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Number of learners for which the provider receives high- needs funding -

p.12

Provider information at the time of the inspection

At the time of inspection, the provider contracts with the following main subcontractors: Trafford College

p.12

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the director of business and educational standards, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider.

p.13

Inspection team

Shahram Safavi, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.13

Inspection team

Bob Busby Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Inspection team

Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Inspection team

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Inspection team

excellence in the nursing of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social nursing, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.14

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.14

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.14

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.14

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion