Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service

Inspected 9 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Key Type

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jul 2007

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Key Type

  • Postcode verified

    OL12 0ED

  • Name on report verified

    Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelyclearrobustindependentclearlytimelywell-supported
Criticismnot alwayspoorconcerningdisruptioninconsistenciesnot clearnot robustnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings733w+77
  • What needs to improve1435w+6

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,118
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service Inspection report for la adoption agency

p.1

SC056804 Unique reference number 9 July 2007 Inspection date Jayne Ivory / Sean White Inspector Key Type of Inspection

p.1

Foxholes Resource Centre Address Foxholes House Foxholes Road ROCHDALE Lancashire OL12 0ED 01706 710750 Telephone number

p.1

Email

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Registered person Steve Garner Registered manager Steven Roger Murray Titcombe Responsible individual 12 July 2007 Date of last inspection .

p.1

Email

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Email

You can obtain copies of The Children Act 2004, Every Child Matters and The National Minimum Standards for Children's Services from: The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Cripins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop

p.2

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. This report details the main strengths and any areas for improvement identified during the inspection. The judgements included in the report are made in relation to the outcome for children set out in the Children Act 2004 and relevant National Minimum Standards for the establishment.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

this aspect of the provision is of exceptionally high quality Outstanding: this aspect of the provision is strong Good: this aspect of the provision is sound Satisfactory: this aspect of the provision is not good enough Inadequate: 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007

p.3

Brief description of the service

Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council offers a full range of adoption services as part of an integrated Children, Schools and Families Service. Rochdale employ an independent chairperson to chair the adoption panel. Rochdale provides the following adoption services for children and adults: To match and place children with adopters who can best meet their assessed needs throughout childhood and beyond once adoption has been identified as being in their best interests. To prepare children prior to introduction and placement with adopters in an age appropriate way whilst ensuring that the child’s own history is understood and preserved. To recruit, prepare, assess and approve adoptive applicants who can meet the needs of children needing adoption both locally, regionally and nationally. This includes the recruitment of adopters for older children, sibling groups, disabled children and children from diverse ethnic

p.4

Brief description of the service

backgrounds. To provide a range of adoption support services, either directly or through contractual arrangements with other agencies for adopted children and their families. This includes financial support where appropriate. To offer a range of services and information to birth parents in order to make effective plans for their children, where adoption has been identified as being in the best interests of their child. To work in partnership with other agencies as part of Adoption 22 to offer a service to adopters who wish to adopt a child from overseas.

p.4

Summary

There has been significant improvements in the ability of the service to comply with national minimum standards and regulations. Although there are a few recommendations from this inspection, the overall quality of the provision is good. The outcomes helping children to be healthy and achieving economic wellbeing were not assessed as part of this inspection. The overall quality rating is good. This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection.

p.4

Improvements since the last inspection

The majority of requirements and recommendations which came as a result of the first inspection have been addressed. The service has invested additional resources in the adoption team and adoption support service. All the previous issues concerning the adoption files have been resolved. Files are now stored in fire proof and water proof cabinets and all adoption files are backed up electronically, with the exception of current adoption files. Support services are available to all those touched by adoption and their partnership with a local voluntary adoption agency commissioned to provide adoption support services is managed well. The information from the commissioned service is of a good quality and provides evidence that birth parents are able to access services appropriate to their needs.

p.4

Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe

The provision is good. Rochdale has sound systems to ensure that the needs of children waiting for or likely to need an adoption placement inform recruitment activity. The service promotes good outcomes for children with a plan for adoption by ensuring that matching is a thorough and well-supported 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007 process. Much time and effort is invested in the matching process to ensure that Rochdale’s adoption service experiences consistently low disruption rates. There are very few children waiting for adoption placements. This is as a result of a clear focus upon family finding in the adoption team, and close collaborative working across the service. The quality of recruitment, preparation and training for adopters is of a good standard. Rochdale works in partnership with another adoption agency to provide regular preparation training. There are inconsistencies in

p.4

Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe

the range of evidence used to inform the assessments of prospective adopters. Some sources of information are missing from those outlined in the practice guidance for preparing and assessing adopters. Practice guidance timescales for completing prospective adopters reports are not always met. Rochdale has a broad recruitment strategy. It is a leading member of Adoption 22, a network of adoption agencies in the north west of England and places the majority of Rochdale's children with other adoption agencies in the network. Rochdale's adoption service benefits from effective performance management systems. The adoption panel ensures that adopter's and children's assessments are subject to close scrutiny. The quality of work submitted to the panel is of a good and improving standard. The adoption panel receives regular adoption service reports which detail the progress of children’s plans and approved adopter’s

p.5

Protecting children from harm or neglect and helping them stay safe

circumstances. Rochdale has sound recruitment and selection practices, which ensure that vulnerable children and adults are safeguarded. Children receive an adoption service that keeps them safe in Rochdale, however adoption panel members files have not been audited to ensure that they meet the regulations and the national minimum standards. Social workers and other members of staff in the service are not clear about the identification and management of cases of historical abuse in accordance with the additional adoption support national minimum standards.

p.5

Helping children achieve well and enjoy what they do

The provision is good. Rochdale provides a range of support services to children and their families, that acknowledge the life long implications of adoption. The service supports adopter's by financing their first year of membership to a national independent adoption support network. Rochdale facilitates a longstanding adoption support group. Families receive good initial assessments of their adoption support needs by social workers in the adoption team, including financial assessments and support. The need for information and support for young people about their own adoption is delivered very sensitively. Young people are able to express their feelings in an appropriate way and the integrated way of working with the families empowers adoptive parents to support their child and other children in the family. Although there is a system to review financial arrangements, there is no formal system for the review of other packages of adoption support.

p.5

Helping children make a positive contribution

The provision is satisfactory. Rochdale’s preparation training, assessment and matching process provided adopters, in most cases with information about a child’s history and its relevance in enabling a child to develop a positive self-image. It also enables adopters to understand and to develop strategies in assisting a child to address all forms of discrimination. The importance of keeping safe information provided by birth parents and families is clearly addressed through out the preparation and assessment process. The service recognises the life long implications of adoption. Placing social workers are encouraged to involve birth parents and families in the care planning processes for their child. The views of the birth parents about adoption and contact are clearly 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007 recorded in some files. The agency has a service level agreement with a voluntary adoption

p.5

Helping children make a positive contribution

agency to provide an independent counselling service to birth parents. Birth parents and families are given further opportunities to maintain and up-date their child’s heritage through direct or indirect contact via the services letterbox system. This is a well organised and an effectively managed system, which provides birth parents and their families a real opportunity to contribute to the maintenance of their child’s heritage. There is close liaison between the independent social work service and effective systems to ensure that birth parents are referred at the point of the panel recommendation and agency decision that a child should be placed for adoption. Staff are aware of the need to preserve and maintain a child’s heritage however, life work is not always completed within timescale. The service work together with the child and adolescent mental health service link workers to help prepare children for adoption if appropriate. The

p.6

Helping children make a positive contribution

multi-agency approach to counselling and preparing children for their adoptive placement supports good outcomes for adopted children and their families.

p.6

Organisation

The organisation is good. The statement of purpose clearly outlines the aspirations and operations of the agency and is written in an easy to read style. The policies and procedures of the agency, many of which had been recently reviewed and revised, support the statement of purpose. The statement of purpose did not include details of how service users can contact Ofsted. The range of children's guides that are available do not include details of how a child or their family can contact the Children's Rights Director. The information provided for prospective applicants is satisfactory. It gives a clear indication of all the implications and processes of adoption, including profiles of the kind of children requiring placements, and it also specifies the range of people that the agency wishes to recruit. Performance management is a real area of strength in the service, and underpins operational activity and strategic direction. All staff are well supervised and supported

p.6

Organisation

by their managers. All managers involved in the adoption service are qualified social workers and have considerable post-qualifying experience. However, there is no robust system of file auditing. The files for both children and adopters showed little or no evidence of any management oversight. The quality of some of the paperwork is poor, decisions made during supervision are not recorded on all files and signatures on documents are not always dated and supplemented by the manager’s or social workers full name. As a result, there is no effective quality assurance systems which evidences the supervision and management decision making process of children’s and adopters’ assessments.

p.6

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person meets the Care Standards Act 2000, The Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005 and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider must comply with the given timescales.

p.6

Due date Action Standard

6 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007

p.6

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the registered person should take account of the following recommendation(s): • develop systems to ensure that assessment practice is delivered in a timely and effective manner in all cases • ensure that there is greater consistency in the range of evidence used in the assessment of prospective adopters • ensure that the files of adoption panel members meet the regulations and the national minimum standards • reviewed and amended the safeguarding policy procedure to ensure that social workers and other members of staff in the service are clear about the identification and management of cases of historical abuse • ensure that a formal system for the review of packages of adoption support is developed to go alongside the existing system of the review of financial arrangements • develop a strategy to ensure that life work for children with a plan for adoption is delivered

p.7

Recommendations

in a timely way, in all cases. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007

p.7

The intended outcomes for these standards are:

• Ofsted considers the key standard to be inspected.

p.8

The intended outcomes for these standards are:

• the agency matches children with adopters (NMS 2) • the agency assesses and prepares adopters (NMS 4) • adopters are given information about matching (NMS 5) • the functions of the adoption panel are as specified (NMS 10) • the constitution and membership of adoption panels are as specified (NMS 11) • adoption panels are timely (NMS 12) • adoption agency decision is made without delay and appropriately (NMS 13) • the manager is suitable to carry on or manage an adoption agency (NMS 15) • staff are suitable to work with children (NMS 19) • the agency has a robust complaints procedure (NMS 24 voluntary adoption agency only) • the agency safeguards and promotes the welfare of its service users (NMS 32)

p.8

The intended outcomes for these standards are:

• the adoption agency provides support for adoptive parents (NMS 6) • the agency has access to specialist advisers as appropriate (NMS 18) • services are tailored to meet the needs of people affected by adoption (NMS 33) Ofsted considers 6 and 33 the key standards to be inspected.

p.8

The intended outcomes for these standards are:

• birth parents and birth families are involved in adoption plans (NMS 7) • birth parents and birth families are involved in maintaining the child’s heritage (NMS 8) • the adoption agency supports birth parents and families (NMS 9) • Service users receive good quality services based on their needs (NMS 34) Ofsted considers 7, 8, 9 and 34 the key standards to be inspected.

p.8

The intended outcomes for these standards are:

Ofsted considers none of the above to be key standards to be inspected.

p.8

The intended outcomes for these standards are:

• there is a clear written statement of the aims and objectives of the adoption agency and the adoption agency ensures that it meets those aims and objectives (NMS 1) 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007

p.8

Annex A

• the agency provides clear written information for prospective adopters (NMS 3) • the manager has skills to carry on or manage the adoption agency (NMS 14) • the adoption agency is managed effectively and efficiently (NMS 16) • the agency is monitored and controlled as specified (NMS 17) • the staff are organised and managed effectively (NMS 20) • the agency has sufficient staff with the right skills/experience (NMS 21) • the agency is a fair and competent employer (NMS 22) • the agency provides training for staff (NMS 23) • case records for children and prospective / approved adopters are comprehensive and accurate (NMS 25) • the agency provides access to records as appropriate (NMS 26) • the agency’s administrative records processes are appropriate (NMS 27) • the agency maintains personnel files for members of staff and members of adoption panels (NMS 28) • the premises used by the adoption agency are suitable for purpose (NMS 29)

p.9

Annex A

• the adoption agency is financially viable (NMS 30 voluntary adoption agency only) • the adoption agency has robust financial processes (NMS 31) Ofsted considers 1, 3, 16, 21, 25 and 27 the key standards to be inspected. 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Adoption Service, 9 July 2007

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion