Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
S1 2HH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 667
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 29, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Dr Sonia Sharp Director, Children and Young People's Directorate Sheffield City Council Town Hall Pinstone Street Sheffield South Yorkshire S1 2HH
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Children’s services in Sheffield City Council perform adequately.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The overall effectiveness of around half of inspected services, settings and institutions is good or better. Performance in school sixth forms is above that found in similar areas and nationally. Inspection shows that nursery, primary and secondary schools, and the sixth form college do not perform as well as these types of provision in similar areas and nationally, although there was an improving trend for primary and secondary schools inspected in 2008/2009. The overall effectiveness of childminders and childcare providers is below that found in similar areas and nationally. Judgements for staying safe and for enjoying and achieving in inspected services are good or better in the large majority of cases.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The local authority’s adoption and fostering services and children’s homes perform well and are above comparators but the private fostering arrangements are adequate and below comparators. There have been three serious case reviews; all were carried out well and judged to be good. The local authority has had a recent unannounced inspection of its contact, referral and assessment arrangements. This identified some strengths and improvements, but also noted one area for priority action; some inconsistencies in the quality of social care assessments and practice were reported as an area for development. Of the 10 special schools within the authority all are good or outstanding. The performance of pupil referral units is not as strong with two satisfactory and one good.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Performance against the very large majority of national indicators is at least in line with similar areas and national figures, although performance is not as strong for enjoying and achieving. This is particularly the case for achievement at age 11 when compared with national figures, and the achievement of children and young people from certain minority ethnic groups at age 11 and age 16.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion