Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Pietro Battista
- Postcode verified
SY2 6ND
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This has been acknowledged by the council and plans have been developed to address this. p.3
- However routine case audits by service managers have not been undertaken since April 2011, as a result of the service reorganisation. p.3
- This negatively impacts on managers’ ability to monitor the quality of service provision. p.3
- The council plans to re-introduce these audits in the near future. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Kim Ryley, Chief Executive, Shropshire Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 705
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 29, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr David Taylor Corporate Director - People Shropshire Council Shirehall Abbey Foregate Shrewsbury Shropshire SY2 6ND
p.1
arrangements within Shropshire Council Children’s Services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Shropshire Council which was conducted on 6 and 7 September 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Shropshire Council Children’s Services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Shropshire Council Children’s Services
The inspection identified an area of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Shropshire Council Children’s Services
The areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in May 2010 have been appropriately addressed. The areas for improvement in relation to safeguarding from the safeguarding and looked after children inspection in February 2011 have been appropriately addressed. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Shropshire Council Children’s Services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Highly effective measures have been taken to recruit and retain staff which have led to most posts being filled by permanent staff. This has resulted in significant improvements in the timeliness of assessments, the manageability of social work caseloads and staff morale.
p.2
following areas
Systems for receiving contacts and referrals within the initial assessment team are effective and contacts and referrals receive a prompt response.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for access to children’s services are clear and have been recently reviewed effectively, in partnership with other agencies.
p.2
following areas
No cases are unallocated at the time of this inspection. All cases are promptly allocated to suitably experienced and qualified social workers.
p.2
following areas
Child protection inquiries are promptly and appropriately undertaken, in partnership with other agencies.
p.2
following areas
Most assessments are of at least a satisfactory standard, and some are of a good standard.
p.2
following areas
The views of children and their carers are evident within assessments and taken into consideration in case planning.
p.2
following areas
The diverse needs of children and their families are appropriately considered in assessments.
p.2
following areas
Children are routinely seen during assessments and contacts are clearly recorded.
p.2
following areas
Cases are routinely reviewed by managers and their decisions and directions are satisfactorily recorded.
p.2
following areas
Staff receive regular supervision, which is appropriately recorded. Staff have ready access to managers, including senior managers, which is highly valued.
p.2
following areas
Relevant training and development opportunities are available to staff. Newly qualified social workers are effectively supported and enabled to develop their skills and experience.
p.2
following areas
Communication and links between the out of hours service and the contact, referral and assessment service are robust.
p.2
Areas for development
Referrals to the children with disability services, other than those for children at risk of significant harm, are assessed within the common assessment framework with insufficiently clear prioritisation, risk assessment and management oversight.
p.3
Areas for development
The service operates a combined electronic and hard copy case file system which is inefficient. This has been acknowledged by the council and plans have been developed to address this.
p.3
Areas for development
Robust systems for case audits have been developed by managers within the service and by the Local Safeguarding Children Board. However routine case audits by service managers have not been undertaken since April 2011, as a result of the service reorganisation. This negatively impacts on managers’ ability to monitor the quality of service provision. The council plans to re-introduce these audits in the near future.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Kim Ryley, Chief Executive, Shropshire Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion